logo
Dust in the system — How Saharan storms threaten Europe's solar power future

Dust in the system — How Saharan storms threaten Europe's solar power future

Business Mayor06-05-2025

As Europe increases its reliance on solar energy to meet climate and energy security targets, a growing atmospheric phenomenon is complicating the path forward: Saharan dust. New research presented at the European Geosciences Union General Assembly (EGU25) shows that mineral dust carried on the wind from North Africa is not only reducing photovoltaic (PV) electricity generation across Europe but also making it harder to predict. In their presentation at EGU25, The shadow of the wind: photovoltaic power generation under Europe's dusty skies, Dr. György Varga and collaborators from Hungarian and European institutions reveal how dust-laden skies disrupt PV performance and challenge existing forecasting models. Their work, grounded in field data from more than 46 Saharan dust events between 2019 and 2023, spans both Central Europe (Hungary) and Southern Europe (Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, and Greece).
The Sahara releases billions of tonnes of fine dust into the atmosphere every year, and tens of millions of tonnes reach European skies. These particles scatter and absorb sunlight, reduce irradiance at the surface, and can even promote cloud formation — all of which degrade PV output. The researchers found that conventional forecasting tools, which use static aerosol climatologies, frequently miss the mark during these events. Instead, the team recommends integrating near-real-time dust load data and aerosol-cloud coupling into forecasting models. This would allow for more reliable scheduling of solar energy and better preparedness for the variability introduced by atmospheric dust.
'There's a growing need for dynamic forecasting methods that account for both meteorological and mineralogical factors,' says Varga.
'Without them, the risk of underperformance and grid instability will only grow as solar becomes a larger part of our energy mix.'
Beyond atmospheric effects, the team also points out to the long-term impacts of dust on the physical infrastructure of solar panels, including contamination and erosion — factors that can further reduce efficiency and increase maintenance costs. This research contributes to ongoing efforts in Hungary and the EU to improve climate resilience and renewable energy management. It is supported by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (FK138692), the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and the EU-funded National Multidisciplinary Laboratory for Climate Change.
READ SOURCE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Let's celebrate: Today is the summer solstice, the longest day of the year
Let's celebrate: Today is the summer solstice, the longest day of the year

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Let's celebrate: Today is the summer solstice, the longest day of the year

Editor's note: This story was first published on June 21, 2013 Welcome to the best day of the year. Today is the summer solstice, the longest day. In North Jersey, we'll get more than 15 hours of daylight. Go ahead and gloat — that's nearly an hour and a half more daylight than Key West, Florida, will get today. For those who like daylight — pretty much everyone save Dracula — today is a day to celebrate. In past eras, they actually did. "The summer solstice was a carnivalesque feast day," said Pamela H. Smith, a European history expert at Columbia University. "In England, there were bonfires, lots of beer drinking, cannons being fired off, masqueraders — people dressed up as devils and demons. "Days like the solstice were important for ancient peoples in terms of trying to find patterns in nature that were important for their livelihood, like knowing when to plant crops. All cultures had megaliths like Stonehenge," Smith said. The Earth's orbit around the sun is slightly elliptical, but not enough to cause the seasons, said Carlton Pryor, an astronomer at Rutgers University. In fact, at the summer solstice, the North Jersey region is 94.4 million miles from the sun. At the winter solstice, it's only 91.4 million miles away. The seasons are caused by the Earth's axis being tilted at a 23.5 degree angle. When the Northern Hemisphere is tilted toward the sun, the hemisphere receives sunlight more directly, for longer periods, increasing temperatures. More: Make one of these 10 books that are set in New Jersey your next beach read for summer 2025 In winter, the Northern Hemisphere is tilted away — even though it is closer to the sun in miles — so the light is less direct, more angled. The sun is lower in the sky and appears for fewer hours, causing cooler temperatures. On the summer solstice, the Earth's northern axis is tilted at its most extreme angle toward the sun. Today in North Jersey, the sun at its zenith will be at an angle of nearly 73 degrees above the horizon. On Dec. 21, it will be only 26 degrees above the horizon. The Earth's axis tilt also affects where the sun rises on the horizon. Conventional wisdom that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west is true only twice a year — at the spring and fall equinoxes. During the summer solstice, the sun rises at its northernmost point on the horizon. This morning in Hackensack, if you had faced due east, the sun would have risen about 32 degrees to the north (or to your left). At the winter solstice, it will rise 32 degrees to the south of due east (or to your right). Though the summer solstice once triggered celebrations, that's rarely the case anymore. After the Protestant Reformation in Europe, religious leaders started to call for an end to the celebrations. "A lot of Protestant pastors criticized midsummer night's eve, saying people were drinking too much, fighting," Smith said. Another reason we don't celebrate the solstice is the shift from an agrarian lifestyle. "We live in a more urban society, and we have colonized the night," said Sara Schechner, an expert on science history at Harvard University. "So we are not as bound to the cycles of nature in how we go about our lives." This article originally appeared on Summer solstice 2025 is here

‘The biggest betrayal': A year on, staff grieve Ontario Science Centre's snap closure
‘The biggest betrayal': A year on, staff grieve Ontario Science Centre's snap closure

Hamilton Spectator

time18 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

‘The biggest betrayal': A year on, staff grieve Ontario Science Centre's snap closure

TORONTO - In the year since the abrupt closure of the Ontario Science Centre, the cost of a new site at Ontario Place has escalated, its opening date has been pushed back, there is no sign of a temporary location – and the old building's roof that was said to be at risk of collapse appears to be intact. Workers say they've dealt with a rodent and raccoon infestation at a building where science centre materials are stored, and the department that builds exhibits is at a virtual standstill. It's been a year of demoralizing changes, they say. Government officials announced midday on June 21, 2024, that the science centre at its original, east Toronto location would permanently close at the end of the day, citing an engineering report on the state of the building's roof. Critics have blasted the decision, noting that the report presented several options other than full closure, and have suggested the whole plan to move the science centre to a revamped Ontario Place was designed to lessen the heat a more controversial tenant — a waterpark and spa by European company Therme — has generated. Infrastructure Minister Kinga Surma has said she did not want to jeopardize anyone's safety with the science centre's roof panels at risk of collapse. The workers do not buy it. Toronto set a weather record in 2024 with 1,145 millimetres of precipitation, which included two 'once-in-a-century' storms that flooded thousands of homes last summer and the city's snowiest winter in years. 'And the science centre is still standing,' said Raluca Ellis, the president of Local 549 of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union. 'It just seems like it was a manufactured crisis and that's the biggest betrayal.' NDP infrastructure critic Jennifer French also takes issue with stated reason for the closure. 'The roof managed to get through winter snow loads and a lot of rain this spring, and the only thing falling apart is the government's plan for a new science centre,' she said. The opening of the science centre at Ontario Place has already been pushed back from 2028 to 2029. A report from the auditor general late last year found that the cost estimate for building and maintaining the new science centre has increased by nearly $400 million from the government's spring 2023 business case for relocating it. Meanwhile, the government has said it will look for a space to house a temporary science centre until the new one opens. A request for proposals seeking a temporary location was released just days after the abrupt closure. It said the government was working 'expeditiously' to find an interim site and wanted it to open no later than Jan. 1, 2026. No such location has yet been announced, nearly one year later. Jason Ash, of the group Save Ontario's Science Centre, said it is a shame children are missing out. 'The bottom line, one year out from the closure of the science centre on Don Mills Road, is that a generation of Ontario kids and youth are without a world-class institution to learn about STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) education,' he said. 'Regardless of any of the other aspects that enter into the story ... it's a real failure of the government's educational policy to have let down so many children.' The science centre is currently operating two pop-up exhibits at Harbourfront Centre and the CF Sherway Gardens mall in Toronto, and has had staff and small exhibits at various events around the city. The Ministry of Infrastructure said in a statement that it is working with the science centre to 'consider options' for a temporary location. As for the old building, the ministry said Infrastructure Ontario is managing it. 'IO has undertaken preventative measures to maintain integrity of the structure and roof since the facility was closed last year,' the ministry wrote. 'This includes managing snow load in the winter and rainwater and, mechanical repairs and system maintenance to ensure minimal heating and cooling levels.' As workers moved everything out of the old building last fall, one of the new storage locations presented a number of problems. All of the science centre's education materials were moved to a building by Highway 401 in Etobicoke. The building on Resources Road, which has become the science centre's official mailing address, is used as a warehouse of sorts where workers can gather experiments and small exhibits and other goodies for their visits to classrooms. That building had been vacant for more than a decade. Problems began immediately, said four employees with knowledge of what's been happening there. They asked not to be named for fear of repercussion. They said workers discovered mouse, and possibly rat, excrement throughout the basement and on the second floor of the building. And there were also signs of a raccoon infestation, they said. The workers found droppings and little hand prints that suggested a raccoon, or a family of raccoons, was living in the building. The building's manager laid out 'a ton' of rodent traps and one large raccoon trap after workers complained to science centre management, the sources said. There was no running water for a time, with very few power outlets and reams of extension cord snaking throughout the area, they added. Workers also discovered asbestos in the building. 'The entire ordeal moving to Resources Road has been very frustrating,' said one worker. 'The topper was the mouse and raccoon s—t.' The infestation was eventually fixed, the sources said, though it took months. The science centre declined requests for interviews with management, saying no one was available. It referred questions about the problems with the building to Infrastructure Ontario. The Ministry of Infrastructure statement said all pest control and maintenance issues were addressed promptly. 'Given the urgent requirement to find storage suitable for the Science Centre exhibits, artifacts and items in an extremely tight timeline, 101 Resources Road was identified as an available government-owned storage,' the ministry wrote. 'OSC continues to optimize operations, ensuring working conditions consistently meet all health and safety requirements.' The local union declined to discuss problems at the building. Ontario Science Centre CEO Paul Kortenaar pointed to ongoing pop-ups, special events and satellite locations for children to enjoy. 'Planning is underway for our new home at Ontario Place, with a competitive design process for our new flagship location on Toronto's waterfront,' Kortenaar said in a statement. Management is working on a 10-year master plan for the new science centre, he wrote. 'This work reflects our broader vision: we are reimagining what a science centre can be — not only a building, but a dynamic, provincewide platform for learning, discovery and connection.' The connection between management and workers has frayed since the closure. Working from home is not in the employees' DNA, said Ellis, the Local 549 president. 'We are not working in ideal conditions and many ask why we put up with this and the answer is because we love the science centre, but ever since we were shut down, we've lost that essence of what the science centre is,' she said. More than 20 union members have taken buyout packages over the past year, Ellis said, most due to the sudden change in job conditions. And the hope that workers could reunite in person at a new interim location was recently dashed. 'They told me the timeline for the interim location has been changed, that the process has paused and we don't know what the new timeline is,' Ellis said. For union steward Martin Fischer, who works in the education department, the loss of the original building has been 'heartbreaking.' 'It's been extremely difficult,' said Fischer, who describes himself and many colleagues as neurodivergent. 'I'm somebody who needs a physical workplace, I thrived in the environment at the science centre, being with classes a few hours a day, it could be kindergarten, it could be a high school class, it'd be adult and then I'd maybe go talk to the shops to help design and build stuff for the school program, but that's all gone now,' he said. He still goes to schools for presentations, but he also spends a lot of time at home in front of his computer. 'It's just not the same,' he said. Melis Tokgoz, vice president of the local union and an exhibit designer at the science centre, said she too has struggled since the closure. With the fabrication shop shuttered, there are far fewer designs to make, limited largely to the pop-up spots, she said. The science centre is looking at a few spots to restart designing and making exhibits for other science centres, but that work has largely stopped, Tokgoz said. 'We keep getting these reassurances that one day we'll be back in the business of designing exhibits, but again, it is really hard to build that trust when you have no evidence otherwise,' she said. That joie de vivre among employees is missing, she said. 'There's this sense of grief amongst many employees, missing what their jobs once were, missing the fulfilment, and I'm no different.' 'The energy has been sad and melancholic and a bit depressing the whole time.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 20, 2025.

EMA Recommends Rezdiffra for MASH Liver Fibrosis
EMA Recommends Rezdiffra for MASH Liver Fibrosis

Medscape

timea day ago

  • Medscape

EMA Recommends Rezdiffra for MASH Liver Fibrosis

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended conditional marketing authorization for Rezdiffra (resmetirom) for adults with noncirrhotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) with moderate-to-advanced liver fibrosis. MASH was formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH). There are currently no authorized treatments for MASH in the EU, making Rezdiffra a potential first. MASH is a serious liver disease that occurs when fat accumulates in the liver, causing inflammation. Left untreated, it can lead to cirrhosis and cancer. Symptoms may only present in more advanced stages of the condition, at which point they may include discomfort or pain in the upper right abdomen, muscle weakness or loss, and swelling in the abdomen or legs. Estimates suggest that up to 5% of people in Europe have MASH and that around 25% have metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), the condition that precedes MASH. MASLD was previously known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The active substance of Rezdiffra is resmetirom, which is a partial agonist of the thyroid hormone receptor-beta. It works by promoting lipophagy and hepatic fatty acid beta-oxidation to reduce liver fat, inflammation, and liver fibrosis. The EMA's decision comes after interim results from a pivotal, ongoing phase 3 trial including 966 adults with biopsy-confirmed MASH with varying stages of fibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned treatment on a 1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily resmetirom at 80 mg or 100 mg, or a placebo. The primary endpoints were MASH resolution at week 52 with no worsening of fibrosis, and a reduction in fibrosis by at least one stage alongside no worsening of NAFLD activity score. MASH resolution included a reduction in the NAFLD activity score by ≥ 2 points. Scores range from 0 to 8; higher scores indicate more severe disease. After 12 months, 30% of patients in the 100 mg resmetirom group and 26% of those in the 80 mg group achieved MASH resolution with no worsening fibrosis compared with 10% in the placebo group. Meanwhile, 26% of patients in the 100 mg resmetirom group and 24% of patients in the 80 mg group experienced fibrosis improvement by at least one stage with no worsening of NAFLD activity score compared with 14% in the placebo group. The most frequent side effects were diarrhea, nausea, itching, and pruritus. Diarrhea and nausea were more frequent among those taking resmetirom than those taking the placebo. The rate of serious adverse events was similar across all groups and ranged from 10.9% to 12.7%. Rezdiffra will be available as 60 mg, 80 mg, and 100 mg film-coated tablets. It should be taken alongside diet and exercise. The opinion adopted by the EMA will now go to the European Commission to await a decision on EU-wide marketing authorization. In the meantime, the EMA has required Rezdiffra's applicant to complete both the pivotal and another ongoing trial to provide further data regarding the drug's efficacy. This conditional approval comes as the EMA perceives that the benefits to patients from immediate availability outweigh the risk inherent in incomplete data. Detailed recommendations for using Rezdiffra will be described in the summary of product characteristics, which will be published on the EMA website in all official European Union languages.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store