News Corp to extend CEO's contract through June 2030, company says
June 22 (Reuters) - News Corp (NWSA.O), opens new tab said it is extending the contract of Chief Executive Robert Thomson, which will see him continue as CEO through June 2030, the company said in a statement on Sunday.
Thomson was appointed as CEO of News Corp, which owns the Wall Street Journal and book publisher HarperCollins, in 2013, and his contract was extended in 2023 until 2027.
Thomson has been at the helm of the company through several major deals, such as the sale of its Australian cable-TV unit Foxtel to British-owned sports network DAZN for A$3.4 billion ($2.19 billion) in 2024.
"Robert has been instrumental in News Corp's growth and transformation, and his vision and leadership are extremely important as the company continues to navigate this era of rapid change," Chair Lachlan Murdoch said in a statement.
($1 = 1.5547 Australian dollars)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bunnings is slammed for 'dehumanising' move: 'You are treated like a number'
Bunnings has come under fire as it becomes one of several large Australian retailers to use artificial intelligence in its recruitment process. The application process involves a chat and video interview powered by Sapia AI, a tool designed to screen candidates. According to Sapia's website, the technology was 'built on the foundation of making hiring inclusive, efficient and effective'. Bunnings describes the AI interview as comparable to a traditional phone interview with a recruiter, but highlights several benefits. 'You can take all the time you need and edit your answers until you're happy with them,' the company explains in its FAQ for job applicants. 'There are usually five questions, and most people finish in about 30 minutes.' For those who don't have access to the required technology, Bunnings reassures candidates they 'can arrange an alternative format for you to complete the same interview questions'. The retailer emphasises that the AI interview is designed to be fair and impartial, focusing solely on responses to a standardised set of questions. Sapia is used by a number of businesses across Australia, including Woolworths, Qantas, David Jones, Suncorp and Starbucks. It was founded by Barb Hyman, a former HR executive who is based in Melbourne. Sapia claims that companies using its software are saving up to 20 hours a week in recruitment time, while also cutting the time-to-hire in half. They report a 90 per cent satisfaction rate among job applicants. Recruiter Tammie Ballis, who owns Realistic Careers, expressed scepticism about the approach, calling it 'dehumanising'. 'It's a cost-cutting feature, it's also a screening tool,' she told Daily Mail Australia. 'You are treated like a number now more than ever, especially if you are applying to jobs for the big retailers.' She did acknowledge that businesses were trying to save money, saying the HR process is often 'expensive'. A screenshot of a job advertisement promoting the use of Sapia AI was shared to Reddit where social media users were divided 'My suggestion to you as a recruiter is don't touch the big retailers, you are more likely to get a personal and human experience when applying to a small or medium sized business,' Ms Ballis said. A screenshot of a job advertisement promoting the use of Sapia AI was shared to Reddit, where social media users slammed the change. 'Pro-tip: If they were actually interested in hiring you, they'd speak to you in person. Don't put up with this dehumanising c***,' one wrote. 'We're cooked,' another wrote. 'It won't be long before people are selling optimal answers for AI interviews, it'll be like SEO for Google,' a third added. 'As long as someone knows the key words/phrases they'll nail the interview.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Iran tensions make thermal coal a winner against pricier LNG
LAUNCESTON, Australia, June 23 (Reuters) - Thermal coal may end up as a major beneficiary of escalating hostilities in the Middle East, as the fuel used to generate electricity becomes cheaper than one of its main competitors liquefied natural gas (LNG). Much of the focus of the potential fallout from the conflict between Israel, and now the United States, and Iran is the threat to crude oil and refined fuels shipped through the Strait of Hormuz. But all of Qatar's LNG also goes through the narrow waterway separating the gulfs of Persia and Oman, and this amounts to almost 20% of the global seaborne supply of the super-chilled fuel. While there has yet to be any disruption of Qatar's LNG, the mere threat that Iran may attempt to block the strait or attack shipping has seen spot LNG prices rise in Asia, the biggest market. LNG for delivery to North Asia rose to $14 per million British thermal units (mmBtu) in the week to June 20, a four-month high and up from $12.6 the prior week. The weekly price assessment also came before the United States joined Israel's bombing campaign against Iran, with President Donald Trump claiming on June 21 that the strikes had "completely and totally obliterated" three nuclear facilities. The involvement of the United States makes it more likely that LNG prices will continue to rise to reflect the increased risk premium. But even at the current level, LNG is no longer competitive against thermal coal in the two major markets where fuel-switching can occur, Japan and South Korea. The price of Australian thermal coal with an energy content of 6,000 kilocalories per kilogram at Newcastle Port rose to a four-month high of $109.41 a metric ton in the week to June 20, according to data from globalCOAL. This is the grade of thermal coal most used by Japan and South Korea, as well as Taiwan. Using LSEG data to convert the price of coal into million British thermal units shows that Australia's Newcastle benchmark is currently around $12.18 per mmBtu, or a 13% discount to the spot LNG price. The most recent low for spot LNG was in early May when the price dipped to $11 per mmBtu, at which point it was cheaper than Newcastle coal, which was $11.47. But spot LNG prices have rallied harder than those for coal in recent weeks, a trend that is likely to continue for as long as tensions remain high in the Middle East. Since it has only been 10 days since Israel started its bombing campaign against Iran it's still too early to see a sustained trend in the volumes of coal being purchased by Japan and South Korea. However, there are some signs that coal imports are starting to increase, with commodity analysts Kpler tracking Japan's arrivals at 6.57 million tons in June, up from 6.39 million in May. More interestingly, Kpler is already estimating that Japan's thermal coal imports will jump to 7.23 million tons, which would be the most since March. It's likely that the July number will be revised higher as more cargoes are assessed. There is also an element of seasonality to Japan's thermal coal imports, which tend to rise in both the winter and summer peak demand periods. This means it will be important to look at the year-on-year changes to see if Asia's third-biggest coal buyer is indeed buying more of the fuel. Japan imported 10.05 million tons of thermal coal in July last year, and given that the volume already assessed for this coming July is more than 70% of that total, it's likely that imports next month will show an increase from July 2024. It's also worth noting that Asia's two biggest coal importers, China and India, don't have much ability to swap LNG for coal given their limited use of natural gas for power generation. But on a longer-term note, both countries are likely to view the current unrest in the Middle East as another compelling reason to reduce dependency on imported crude oil and LNG as rapidly as possible. If that means using their vast domestic reserves of coal, supplemented by imports, to electrify transportation at a faster pace, it's likely that this is a path they will pursue irrespective of climate change concerns. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie slams infuriating act at gym: 'This is a charade'
A woman has ripped into a major gym franchise and accused staff of giving her the 'run-around' after she asked about membership prices. Sydney woman Tazzy said she had just moved to a new area and was doing research on which local gym would be the 'right fit' for her. She then called Anytime Fitness to ask about the price of membership before she was dragged into a '20-minute conversation' about her goals and motivation. The frustrated lawyer claimed she was roped into a tour of the premises, where she was asked to fill out a form and answer more personal questions like how many hours a night she slept and how much water she drank. 'Anyone that wasn't as clued up as me would have been fully into it, but at this point I see where this is going,' Tazzy said in a TikTok video on Thursday. 'This is a charade to distract me from some information you're about to give me that's going to make me definitely not want to join this gym.' Tazzy claimed she spent over an hour speaking to the staff member and still had no clue what the membership price was. The employee finally revealed new members were subject to a $149 enrolment fee and $99.95 access fee. Sydney woman Tazzy (pictured) said she had just moved to a new area and was doing research on new gyms in the area and which one would be the 'right fit' for her Tazzy claimed the gym offered her two types of memberships: $32-a-week for a 12-month commitment or $30 for 18 months. She explained she was interested in a monthly membership and as a rule she doesn't commit to 12-month contracts in case of unforeseen circumstances. 'I'm not signing anything that requires me to pay for an amount of time as long as 12 months,' Tazzy said. 'S*** happens, I could move out of the area, my financial situation could change.' The lawyer was told Anytime Fitness doesn't offer monthly memberships. Tazzy branded the gym 'ridiculous' as she explained she declined to join due to their pricey enrolment fees and refusal to offer monthly memberships. Social media users were divided, with many agreeing it was annoying the staff member was not upfront about the prices at the start of the conversation. 'Normalise putting membership pricing on the website,' one wrote. 'I don't want to talk to anyone ever.' 'They got me with the $80 fee for the access card, then told me immediately after I signed the contract I could just download the app and tap my phone,' another wrote. 'No physical card needed.' Others defended the gym, saying they did not share the same experience as Tazzy. 'I've never had an issue,' one commented. 'The anytime fitness near me was so transparent with pricing that was my first question and they showed me all the different options, holy heck I'm sorry about that experience girl.' 'Mine was $0 joining fee, no access fee and $15 a week. No idea why it was expensive for you,' another agreed.
