Parties' selection of candidates for Presidential election becoming a late late show
By the end of May 1990, Mary Robinson had already been endorsed as the formal Labour and Workers' Party candidate for the presidential election in November of that year.
By contrast, coming into the last week of May 2025, just two independent candidates have declared they will seek to contest this year's November election: the Donegal businessman Peter Casey and the MMA fighter Conor McGregor.
While many names have been bandied around, political parties are only entering the foothills of their preparations. There has been a lot of shadowboxing and speculation, but little real movement so farto begin the process of choosing preferred candidates.
The pattern of when presidential candidates are announced is not consistent. In 1997, the identities of all six candidates were not revealed until late September. When Robinson stood in 1990, the Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael candidates, Brian Lenihan and Austin Currie, were not put forward until mid-September.
READ MORE
In 2011, the last presidential election where an incumbent wasn't a candidate, most of the runners declared early. David Norris, the early favourite, announced his candidacy that January. The eventual winner, Michael D Higgins, was officially endorsed by Labour in June; Fine Gael's Gay Mitchell in July. By then, two Independent candidates, Mary Davis and Seán Gallagher, had also declared.
Bertie Ahern and former minister Mary Hanafin have been mentioned, but colleagues are concerned about their association with the era of economic collapse
What is evident this year is that the bigger parties are holding back. It looks very much like it could be late summer or September when they, and a combination of parties on the left, finalise their candidates.
Part of the waiting game is strategic. 'If we are running a candidate, we should not aim to have everything ready to go until early September,' says a senior Fianna Fáil source.
The other reason for tarrying is intrinsic to what the Fianna Fáiler has just said. The question the party has to put to itself is whether or not it runs a candidate at all. The last time there was an official Fianna Fáil candidate was 28 years ago in 1997, when Mary McAleese was its candidate.
Sinn Féin faces the same quandary for different reasons. It had a dismal presidential election campaign in 2018, with its candidate Liadh Ní Riada receiving only 6.4 per cent of the vote, well below her party's support levels.
Richard Moore is a political communications adviser with direct experience of two presidential campaigns, those of Gay Mitchell in 2011 and Gavin Duffy in 2018. He says the first crucial decision for all the parties is whether they will even go to the starting line.
'Will the party be willing to run a candidate and burn €500,000 on a campaign? There's a risk there unless they are satisfied that their candidate will outperform the party's support (levels),' he says.
At this moment, only one party, Fine Gael, is certain to run its own candidate. Its executive council said this week that it will 'decide in the coming weeks the timeline and process for the selection of a Fine Gael candidate for the forthcoming presidential election'.
The names of two prominent party members – Mairéad McGuinness and Seán Kelly – are frequently mentioned. Party grandee Heather Humphreys this week announced she will not put her name forward. The probable candidate is the former EU Commissioner McGuinness, who also sought a nomination in 2011.
And what of Fianna Fáil? When you speak to its TDs, there are mixed views. Some point to the lack of an obvious candidate. 'I don't think there is any benefit in us contesting the election,' says one Minister of State bluntly.
Theirs is a minority view, however. Another TD argued that Fianna Fáil, as the largest party, should run a candidate, but that finding one will be difficult.
There are many nuances. The electorate can switch very quickly to another candidate if you say something that is controversial or make a mistake
Former taoiseach Bertie Ahern and former minister Mary Hanafin have been mentioned, but colleagues are concerned about their association with the era of economic collapse, which caused huge reputational damage to the party. Either could face uncomfortable questioning during a campaign that is often fractious and quite personalised.
Former ceann comhairle Seán Ó Fearghaíl, who is respected across party lines, has been mentioned but he quickly dismissed the prospect. 'Not in a million years, not under any circumstances,' he said. 'It's for not me. It's not where I want to be.'
So where should Fianna Fáil go? Ó Fearghaíl expresses a view that is shared by many of his colleagues: 'I do think the party should run a candidate, but it may need to look outside the fold to find somebody.'
That somebody would not be the Fine Gael candidate, whoever emerges. 'We can't ask our supporters to vote for Fine Gael,' said a Dublin Fianna Fáil TD. 'I just don't see many of them voting that way in the first instance.'
But as yet, no high-profile person has yet been identified or targeted by the party.
An outside candidate is the route down which Sinn Féin might ultimately go. It has been seeking internal feedback this month, with a letter sent to the membership asking them to become involved in a process that would 'help inform the leadership on the proposed route forward in relation to the upcoming Presidential Election'.
Earlier this year, the party's MP for North Belfast, John Finucane, was mentioned as a possibility, but the party seems to have cooled on that idea.
Sinn Féin has been involved in talks with the Social Democrats, Labour, People Before Profit and the Green Party on exploring a possible consensus left-wing candidate. Several names have been mentioned: Senator Frances Black, SDLP leader Claire Hanna and Independent TD Catherine Connolly.
In mid-May, Dr Mike Ryan, former deputy director of the World Health Organisation, became the latest well-known figure to be targeted by political parties for a potential presidential run. It is understood he has not been approached and has not considered the question as he is taking some time off.
Another potential big-beast candidate, Independent Senator Michael McDowell, has ruled himself out. The former minister for justice told The Irish Times: 'I'm not going to run.'
He said he has come to the conclusion that the Upper House is the place where he could most usefully serve.
For Moore, the election is never about parties, or policies, or issues, it's about the qualities that mark out the best candidate.
'The tribal loyalty towards parties is well and truly shot,' he says. 'My own view is that it ended with Brian Lenihan in 1990 (when the Fianna Fáil candidate was caught out in a lie that put paid to his campaign, over his attempt to persuade president Patrick Hillery not to dissolve the Dáil back in 1982).
'The Irish electorate is sophisticated and understands politics. They want somebody as President who will be presentable and not let the country down.
'The candidate has to be authentic and genuine and be able to show their qualities in the heat of the battle and under fierce media scrutiny.'
Will the party be willing to run a candidate and burn €500,000 on a campaign? There's a risk there unless they are satisfied that their candidate will outperform the party's support
There are a litany of candidates who started off as favourites and became also-rans during the course of bruising and intrusive campaigns: Brian Lenihan, Adi Roche, Mary Davis, David Norris and Seán Gallagher.
'On the face of it, it looks like a simple election,' adds Moore. 'There are many nuances. The electorate can switch very quickly to another candidate if you say something that is controversial or make a mistake.
'It's a much more difficult election than a general election in my view.'
There is no hard and fast rule on the optimum time to declare. Several interviewees remarked that the name of the next President has not even entered the public domain yet. For observers like Moore, however, that should take place sooner rather than later.
'In September, you run the risk of leaving it too late unless you have a superstar. Sure, the campaign will be short and sharp for all candidates, but you need to have a profile established before that,' he says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Palestine GAA club's planned tour of Ireland ‘under serious threat' due to visa delays
A West Bank GAA club's planned trip to Ireland 'is now under serious threat due to visa delays', representatives have said. At least 33 young Palestinian players are to arrive in Ireland in July to play a series of competitive matches against GAA clubs around the country and to take part in a cultural exchange. GAA Palestine, the organisation behind the tour, said it faced 'new requirements introduced during the [application] process', such as English-language birth certificates for Palestinian players and for coaches born in the West Bank. It further said the Irish embassy in Tel Aviv had closed its public office since Iranian missiles hit the Israeli capital and it was 'not prioritising visa applications ... halting all progress'. READ MORE A total of 46 people, including players, coaches, officials and one doctor, were due to arrive in Dublin on July 18th as part of planned trip by Ramallah-based Moataz Sarsour GAA club. GAA Palestine chairman Stephen Redmond said the new requirements in the visa application process had increased the expected processing time from four weeks to eight after, he said, it was given a 10 week pre-departure time frame to submit all necessary paperwork. It had officially submitted the visa applications on May 19th. Co-founder of GAA Palestine Claire Liddy said 'the embassy responded three weeks later, on Monday, June 9th, with a list of additional required documents'. She said the Irish Representative Office in Ramallah 'refused to accept the original documents' on June 13th. She said as local team members were Palestinian, they were 'banned from travelling to Tel Aviv', so club officials outside the region 'had to scan and send the original documents digitally on Monday, June 16th'. A spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs said: 'The department cannot comment on individual visa applications, but all visa applications are processed in line with established procedures for consideration by the Department of Justice.' The spokesperson said the Irish embassy's public office in Tel Aviv and representative office in Ramallah 'are presently closed due to the security situation and staff are working remotely. The public offices will reopen when circumstances permit'. Mr Redmond criticised what he labelled 'bureaucratic nonsense' and he called 'for common sense to prevail so these young people can step on to a GAA pitch'. He said the group had requested an expedited processing of their application, but that this had not taken place. 'With co-operation from the Department of Foreign Affairs, there is still a chance to issue these visas in time,' he said.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ireland needs to ditch empty promises and economic fairy tales and start confronting reality
The next six weeks or so are going to go a long way to defining the Government's term in office. The printers are going to be busy. We are due an updated housing plan, a new strategy on competitiveness and productivity, the Summer Economic Statement and a new medium-term budget strategy along with a revised National Development Plan outlining state investment plans. Then, in the middle of all this, there is the deadline for the US/EU tariff talks on July 9th. The Government needs to use this crucial period to set some kind of coherent economic narrative for its term. So far it has been firing blanks. For example, bits of its housing plan are drip-feeding out in an often-disorganised fashion. Perhaps this is meant to give the impression of busyness, but all it does is confuse people. READ MORE At the heart of all this is credibility. A believable strategy must have some hope of delivery. And here the State – in the widest sense of the Government and the public service – is struggling. It is not just that things are happening late – like the National Children's Hospital. Or that there are signs of waste and carelessness with public money – step forward the Leinster House bike shed. It is that a lot of vital stuff is simply not happening at all. It is a stretch to believe that the Metro will ever get built. Or the giant project to bring water from Shannon across the State. Or the offshore wind infrastructure that is meant to be at the heart of our energy transition , where the Draghi report on EU competitiveness showed Ireland has one of the most long-drawn out consent mechanisms in Europe. In this context, government targets take on an air of fantasy. Less than six months into the Coalition's term, Minister for Housing James Browne told us this week that the target of building 41,000 homes this year is not going to happen. So why should we believe the target for 2026 or the 300,000 plus homes promised during the Coalition's term? The Departments of Finance and of Public Expenditure will publish a budget strategy over the summer, based, we must assume, on tighter control of day-to-day spending. But key spending targets have ended up being roundly ignored in recent years. Central Bank researchers estimated this week that permanent Government spending has risen by 37 per cent since 2021. Had the annual spending limits of 5 per cent set by the previous administration been adhered to, the increase would have been 16 per cent. That is a €16 billion difference. Official documents and targets seem to exist in some kind of parallel universe where no one really expects them to happen. They are more fairy stories than strategy. And the risk with the plans coming in the weeks ahead is that these are more endless checklists of stuff that is happening already and stuff that might or might not happen at all. Some central themes and directions are urgently needed. And some convincing messages of actual action to get things done. Investment is built on certainty, yet in key areas such as climate change and housing this is simply missing. The current drift has a cost. The stalling of investment across the economy is in part due to threats of tariffs from Donald Trump . There isn't much the Government can do about that. But it can start to get its own story straight. Lack of clarity about housing policy is causing parts of the construction industry to sit on its hands. With talk of more incentives and tax breaks on the way, and uncertainty on state commitment in areas of social housing, builders wait to see what emerges. House building volumes slipped by 4.3 per cent in the first quarter of this year, compared to the previous three months. Meanwhile, big foreign investors – and their international headquarters – are starting to realise that promises to deliver better energy and water infrastructure are simply not being met. Investment plans, on hold to see how the US/EU talks work out, will restart at some stage. Ireland is at risk of not being in the frame. The first real alarm bell for this was when Intel ditched Oranmore in Co Galway as a possible site for a big new plant in 2021 because the State could not guarantee how long planning would take on vital supporting infrastructure. This followed the seemingly endless planning saga for the Apple data centre in Athenry , also Co Galway. A convincing economic narrative needs a few central points that everyone has signed up to. Read the Central Bank research out this week for a convincing case on how state investment remains low here, despite tripling over the past decade. This is because the economy and population have grown so fast and the economy was already hobbled by years of underinvestment after the financial crash. To allow space for investment to continue to grow – and provide a buffer if the public finances tighten – other parts of the budget need to be under control. This means keeping the budget in surplus and continuing to put away excess corporate taxes in the funds for the future. This needs to be a central part of a coherent strategy. To be credible, the whole Government – including Micheál Martin and Simon Harris – need to explicitly sign up to this. If it is just a creature of the budget departments, then it will be there to be negotiated away during the budget process. It goes without saying that the second leg of any strategy needs to focus on prioritisation and delivery. Many thousands of words have been written about this. And the challenges are significant. But Ireland, for now anyway, is in a uniquely privileged position with a flush Exchequer and room for manoeuvre. The resources are there. Spending them well is the challenge. Ireland can consider how to respond as the Trump story plays out. The odds are that it will continue to do so long after the July 9th talks deadline. But the Government needs a convincing narrative of how it is going to manage what is under its control and use what may prove to be transitory budgetary riches. There are dangers ahead. But we are starting from a good position, with full employment and flush coffers that are the envy of many other countries. The Government needs to start telling a better story – not just to the public and investors, but also to itself.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Fingal council not only party to blame for farce of Dublin Airport passenger cap
Under a planning restriction imposed by Fingal County Council dating from 2007, Dublin Airport's passenger numbers are supposed to be capped at 32 million a year. But, as we all know, this restriction is pure fiction. More than 33 million passengers went through the doors of the airport last year and 36 million-plus are expected to use it this year as a result of court rulings that have put a stay on the cap while we await a ruling from Europe . It's an Irish solution to an Irish problem. To add to the confusion and mess, the council this week issued an enforcement notice to DAA on foot of complaints by local residents. Nobody comes out of this shambles well. Government should have moved long ago to sort out the cap and remove planning regulation of Dublin Airport from the remit of the council. Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien promised a solution on taking office in January, but none has emerged to date. READ MORE DAA described Fingal's enforcement notice as a 'sorry indictment of the mess that is the Irish planning system, particularly when it comes to the most vital piece of transport infrastructure on this island'. That might be so, but it is also an indictment of DAA's dithering over 16 years before submitting an infrastructure application in December 2023 that would allow it to increase traffic through Dublin Airport. And it is not a good look for a state-owned company to breach legally binding planning rules. [ `Zombie' Dublin Airport passenger cap could be removed by legislation Opens in new window ] Willie Walsh, the former Aer Lingus and IAG chief who is now head of Geneva-based airlines trade body IATA, has said we are a laughing stock internationally, with people scratching their heads as to why a small island nation on the edge of western Europe that relies heavily on foreign direct investment would be tying itself up in knots with a cap on growth at its biggest international airport. He's not wrong.
