Sen. Mike Lee deletes social media posts about the Minnesota shooting after facing criticism

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, removed posts on his personal X account about Saturday's fatal attack on a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband after facing fierce backlash from Democrats about the postings.
Minnesota Sen. Tina Smith, a Democrat who was friends with the slain lawmaker, told reporters on Monday that she confronted Lee about his tweet. 'I needed him to hear from me directly what impact I think his cruel statement had on me, his colleague,' she said.
Lee had written in one post about the Saturday assassination of Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, that 'this is what happens When Marxists don't get their way.' In another, he posted a photo of the suspect in the case and captioned it, "Nightmare on Waltz Street," an apparent reference to the state's Democratic governor, Tim Walz.
Several Democrats had called on Lee to take down the posts, which he'd posted on Saturday and Sunday. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said at a press conference Tuesday he asked Lee to remove them and "he wouldn't listen to me."
Some of Lee's posts about the shooting were still visible as of Tuesday afternoon, including one from Saturday night that said, 'Marxism kills.'
On Lee's official Senate X account, his posts struck a different tone. "These hateful attacks have no place in Utah, Minnesota, or anywhere in America. Please join me in condemning this senseless violence, and praying for the victims and their families," he wrote.
Prosecutors said the suspect, Vance Boelter, is also responsible for the non-fatal shooting of state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said Boelter's car had notebooks with the names of more than 45 state and federal elected officials, and the federal criminal complaint against him says officials named in the notebooks were 'mostly or all Democrats.'
Lee did not answer questions about the posts from NBC News on Monday, and his office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about why they were taken down on Tuesday.
Smith spoke to Lee on Monday and later told reporters she'd felt compelled to confront him about the posts.
'I wanted him to know how much pain that caused me and the other people in my state and I think around the country, who think that this was a brutal attack,' Smith told reporters in the Capitol on Monday.
Smith's deputy chief of staff, Ed Shelleby, also lambasted the posts in an email to Lee's office shared with NBC News.
'Is this how your team measures success? Using the office of US Senator to post not just one but a series of jokes about an assassination—is that a successful day of work on Team Lee?," Shelleby wrote.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Reuters

37 minutes ago

• Reuters

Senate parliamentarian faults Republicans' plan to limit judges' power

June 23 (Reuters) - A U.S. Senate official has concluded that a Republican-drafted provision in President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that would restrict the ability of judges to block government policies violates budgetary rules. The Senate's parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, advised over the weekend that the provision ran afoul of a Senate rule governing what can be included in budget reconciliation legislation that can be passed with a simple-majority vote and would instead need to be subject to a 60-vote threshold if it remained in the bill. Republicans, who control the Senate 53-47, intend to use complex budget rules to pass the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" with a simple majority vote. The parliamentarian is a nonpartisan referee. Her decision could spell doom for the provision's inclusion in the ultimate legislation Congress passes because it would allow Democrats to challenge the vote on the floor and require Republicans to muster 60 votes to pass it. Congressional leaders hope to enact the overall bill in the coming days so Trump can sign it into law before July 4. The courts-related provision in the Senate version of the bill would limit the ability of judges to issue preliminary injunctions blocking federal policies unless the party suing posts a bond to cover the government's costs if the ruling is later overturned. The bond requirement differs from one tucked into the version of the bill the Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed in May that would curb courts' power by curtailing the ability of judges to hold officials in contempt if they violate injunctions. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Sunday hailed the parliamentarian's assessment, saying Republicans had tried to "write Donald Trump's contempt for the courts into law — gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution, and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy." The provision was drafted by Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is led by Senator Chuck Grassley. He had argued the provision would ensure judges enforce an existing requirement that parties seeking a preliminary injunction provide a security bond to cover costs incurred by a defendant if a judge's ruling is later overturned. Judges rarely require such bonds when a lawsuit is not pitting two private parties against each other but instead challenging an alleged unlawful or unconstitutional government action. Several judges have denied the Trump administration's requests for bonds or issued nominal ones. Grassley in a statement on Sunday said Republicans are committed to using all available avenues to "ensure courts operate according to lawful and constitutional standards." Congressional Republicans have called for banning or curtailing nationwide injunctions blocking government policies after key parts of Trump's agenda have been stymied by such court rulings. The House in April voted 219-213 largely along party lines in favor of the No Rogue Rulings Act to do so, but the Senate has not yet taken up the measure. A White House memo in March directed heads of government agencies to request that plaintiffs post bonds if they are seeking an injunction against an agency policy. Such bonds can make obtaining an injunction a cost-prohibitive option in cases concerning multi-billion-dollar agenda items. Read more: US Senate Republicans seek to limit judges' power via Trump's tax-cut bill

NBC News

43 minutes ago

• NBC News

How Trump decided to strike Iran

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump in recent weeks directed the Pentagon to give him military options for destroying Iran's nuclear enrichment program as the president, frustrated with pace of negotiations, leaned into taking action. Trump has said his foreign policy is about ending wars, not starting new ones, and he had believed he could cut a deal with Tehran — replacing the nuclear deal agreed to in 2015 under former President Barack Obama, which Trump ended in 2018 — that would end Iran's path to creating a nuclear weapon. But by last month, Trump had begun to decide that talks were not progressing in a way that gave the Iranians credibility, Vice President JD Vance told NBC News' 'Meet the Press' on Sunday. 'I think that he decided probably by mid-May that this process was not going anywhere, and so he decided to issue some private ultimatums to the Iranians,' Vance said. 'And then eventually, of course, we decided to destroy the Fordo nuclear facility, and some of these other facilities, ourselves.' Last week, Trump had all but decided to go forward on the military plans presented to him. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, had briefed him on a range of options for Iran earlier this month at Camp David, the secluded presidential retreat in Maryland. One option was not to get involved at all. But at some point after that briefing Trump started leaning toward taking military action. It was only in the final days leading up to the strike that those plans grew more refined. Trump ultimately chose an option to use B2 Spirit stealth bombers, the only platform capable of carrying the largest bunker buster bombs in the U.S. arsenal, the 30,000-pound GBU-57 known as a Massive Ordnance Penetrator, and drop them on nuclear sites in central Iran. That bomb had never before been used in combat, but it was key to the operation, and to at least part of the rationale for the U.S. taking action. One of Iran's most important nuclear sites, at Fordo, is built inside a mountain and has been believed to be protected from any bomb with the sole exception of the GBU-57. And though Israel does possess smaller bunker busters provided by the U.S., it is not believed to have either the GBU-57 or any plane capable of delivering it. Few people inside the administration knew that Trump was moving forward with the plan, administration officials said publicly after the strikes, especially after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced on Thursday that the president had decided he would give Iran up to two weeks to agree to a nuclear deal. The president has developed a reputation for changing his mind on military operations or other policy moves, even at the last minute. By telegraphing to Iran, the world and even the American public that he was content with giving Iran two more weeks, he gave himself some measure of political protection in case he wanted to change his mind just before the operation began. According to a senior White House official, at the time Leavitt released the statement, Trump had not yet made a final decision, but "his instincts were to move forward." Even as the Pentagon was preparing for the strikes, the president was continuing to pursue diplomacy, mainly through his special envoy for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff. As he weighed how to move forward, Trump was briefed daily on Israeli operations and the U.S.'s own military options. On Friday, the day after Leavitt released the statement from him about giving Iran two weeks, Trump ordered the military plans to move forward, though he did not yet give the final go order. The operation was given a name, Midnight Hammer, and the Pentagon began to put the pieces into place. Covert movements Some B2s were flown towards the Pacific as part of a diversionary tactic and a submarine that would also play a role, firing Tomahawk cruise missiles at one of the nuclear sites, was pre-positioned. U.S. Navy ships were prepared to continue with the kind of defensive operations they have been conducting since Israel began its campaign against Iran earlier this month. 'This was a highly classified mission, with very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature of this plan,' Caine said during a briefing at the Pentagon Sunday morning. Also on Sunday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth acknowledged that the bulk of U.S. military forces deployed to the region were also not informed of the impending mission. Defense officials said forces in the region are now on high alert. On Monday, Iran said it had launched a missile strike against a U.S. base in Qatar. As the operation approached, advisers checked and double checked whether Trump still planned to move ahead with the strikes. On Saturday morning, Hegseth called Trump, who was at his golf course in Bedminster New Jersey, to confirm that the operation was still a go, and Trump informed the secretary that the Pentagon should move forward. Later Saturday, as Trump was flying on Marine One to an airport in New Jersey for his trip back to Washington, D.C., to meet with his national security team, Hegseth called again to get the president's final approval, a White House official told NBC News, confirming a detail first reported in The Wall Street Journal, which cited people familiar with the matter. Trump told him the strikes were a go, the official said. When Trump arrived back in Washington, he immediately went to the Situation Room to monitor the mission with his top advisers, including Vance, Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio, Caine, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Hegseth. Soon after, the first bombs began to drop, at about 6:40 pm Washington time, or 2:10 am Iranian time. The lead B2 dropped two GBU-57s at Fordo, the primary target of the mission, according to Pentagon officials. The bombers behind it then dropped their bombs, ultimately unleashing a total of 14 GBU-57s bombs on two of the nuclear sites, Fordo and Natanz. The submarine then launched Tomahawk cruise missiles at the third site, known as Isfahan. The operation was by most accounts a smoothly executed one in which no American was killed or injured and the known targets were all hit. The Pentagon used more than 125 aircraft in total, launching about 75 total weapons. Trump and Hegseth were quick to declare the mission a success. Trump posted on Truth Social that it was a 'very successful attack.' Hegseth on Sunday said that Trump had delivered 'the final blow' to Iran's nuclear program.

NBC News

an hour ago

• NBC News

Why Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar is Iran's retaliatory target

The Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar is occupied by thousands of Americans and serves as the headquarters of military air operations in the Middle East. NBC News' Courtney Kube reports on why Iran would focus its first retaliatory attacks against the U.S. on the base outside of Doha.