Poundland shutting another three branches with 200 more at risk – see full list of stores closing in days

POUNDLAND is set to close three more stores over the coming weeks with up to 200 stores at risk.
The bargain retailer will close a number of branches weeks ahead.
1
This includes three branches across Filton, London and Cowes, which are due to begin closing as soon as this Saturday.
The South Gloucestershire store is due to shut on May 31 giving shoppers just shy of a week to say their goodbyes.
News of the closure came as a shock to locals who described the move as a "shame".
Others said they were "gutted" for the staff that work there.
A spokesperson for the brand confirmed the closure to The Sun and also said shoppers are welcome to visit nearby sites in Emersons Green Retail Park store or other locations across Bristol.
Meanwhile, a branch in Surrey Quays, in London will close on June 11.
Finally, a branch in Cowes in the Isle of Wight will close come July.
The branch opened back in 2021, so it brings an end to a near four year stint in the area.
It comes after it was reported that up to 200 stores could close as part of Poundland's rescue deal.
Bidding for the business started last week.
A source told The Sunday Times that Poundland would be priced at "effectively a pound."
Gordon Brothers, the ex-owner of Laura Ashley and Homebase owner Hilco are reported to be in a two way race to win the chain.
Poundland to be sold for JUST £1 as frontrunner for shock takeover is revealed after wave of store closures
A decision on who the preferred bidder is could be announced in the coming days.
Polish retail giant Pepco said it expects the sale of Poundland to complete by September.
These closures come on top of seven more stores which have been flagged for closure this month.
Bosses at Poundland have already called time in a branch in Clapham Junction Station and Copdock Mill Interchange Ipswich.
A popular branch in Belle Vale Shopping Centre, Liverpool also closed on May 6.
This comes on top of a closure in Brackla Wales which is due to take place on May 24.
A few months back, Poundland was forced to close a branch in Belfast after the Connswater Shopping Centre was put into receivership.
A branch in Bermondsey, London also closed on May 14.
You can see the full list of closures below:
Maidenhead – closed October 2024
Sutton Coldfield – closed early October 2024
Macclesfield – closed August 2024
Cowes, Isle of Wight – July 2025 (exact date tbc)
Surrey Quays – closing June 11 2025
Filton Abbeywood – closing May 31 2025
Chiswick High Road – closing May 28 2025
Copdock Mill Interchange, Ipswich – closed May 2025
Southwark Park Road – closed May 14 2025
Belle Vale Shopping Centre, Liverpool – closed May 6 2025
Clapham Junction Station, London – closed May 2 2025
Brackla, Wales – closed May 24 2024
St George's Centre, Gravesend – closed last week
Connswater Shopping Centre, Belfast – closed end of March
WHAT IS GOING ON AT POUNDLAND
Last month, its parent company Pepco is said to have hired advisory firm Teneo to oversee the sale of the UK business.
It comes after Pepco said it was looking at"all strategic options" to separate Poundland from its brand.
The Polish group said it might turn its focus to its more profitable businesses in Europe.
Pepco previously warned that upcoming hikes to employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and national minimum wage would significantly add to its costs.
Late last year, it was revealed that profits at Poundland also tumbled by £641million in the year to September, with bosses again blaming slow sales amid a poor outlook thanks to measures set out by Reeves.
A spokesperson also said the huge loss was "due to a non-cash impairment at Poundland that relates to the acquisition of the UK chain in 2016".
RETAIL PAIN IN 2025
The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs will cost the retail sector £2.3billion.
Research by the British Chambers of Commerce shows that more than half of companies plan to raise prices by early April.
A survey of more than 4,800 firms found that 55% expect prices to increase in the next three months, up from 39% in a similar poll conducted in the latter half of 2024.
Three-quarters of companies cited the cost of employing people as their primary financial pressure.
The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.
It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year.
Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025."
Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector.
"By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

38 minutes ago

• Telegraph

An unprecedented eight fires in 10 weeks. Who or what is targeting Britain's electricity network?

It started late on the evening of March 20 when a bang broke the reassuring hum at the North Hyde electricity substation near Heathrow Airport. One of the plant's two 'supergrid' transformers – giant pieces of equipment that step down high voltage power so it can be used by nearby homes and businesses – had exploded and set itself on fire. The blaze spread swiftly through the compound, taking out a neighbouring unit that was still in operation. Within moments, a third back-up transformer also tripped off-line. In less than an hour, the conflagration caused cascading outages across the local network, severing power to 66,000 homes in the west London area – one of the UK's biggest non-weather related power cuts of the past decade. Vital cogs in the network, electrical substations shuttle electricity from power stations to the point of consumption. They vary in size, and are generally unmanned. Yet despite being just one of three supplying Heathrow, North Hyde also cut off vital power to parts of the airport, leaving it unable to guarantee the safety of its flying operations. Europe's busiest aviation hub was closed for more than a day, disrupting over 1,300 flights and almost 300,000 passengers, as well as costing the airlines an estimated £50-100 million in lost revenue. It was an eloquent demonstration of how a single point of failure could bring chaos to a crucial piece of the British economy. And, worse, it wasn't the first serious electricity substation fire in March; it was the third. Recent months have seen an epidemic of puzzling fires and failures across Britain's electricity network, as unexplained outbreaks have erupted from Exeter in the West Country to Glasgow in Scotland. In the James Bond films, 007's arch enemy Auric Goldfinger had a simple rule of thumb when it came to how many times seemingly innocent mishaps could recur before he perceived a more sinister pattern. 'Once is happenstance; twice coincidence; three times is enemy action,' he said. Britain's recent experience would certainly satisfy those criteria. There have been five more blazes since the Heathrow fire, making a total of eight in about 10 weeks between the beginning of March and mid-May. 'Normally you'd expect to see one or two fires every few years, not a whole bunch compressed into a couple of months,' says an electricity expert. Their frequency has even led some to speculate that the Bond baddie's aphorism might be right and someone is indeed out to get us. While being careful to point out there is no hard evidence to support it, Philip Ingram, a former colonel in British military intelligence, has suggested the attacks look like something 'straight out of the Russian military intelligence playbook'. Yet there's also an alternative domestic hypothesis that is no less disturbing. This argues that what we are witnessing is not the product of hostile outside action, but rather decades of shirked capital expenditure and reliance on increasingly antiquated equipment by bonus-hungry executives and financially-driven owners. In this version the enemy isn't some foreign baddie undermining our system, it may be the stewards of the network themselves. Growing number of fires The epidemic of blazes started on March 3 when a small substation in West Sussex caught fire, disrupting supplies to about 400 households in the Lancing area. According to the owner, UK Power Networks, a generator installed during repairs might have been tampered with. The fire was extinguished, the police were stumped. No one thought too much more about it. Then, 11 days later on March 15 a second substation blew up in Huddersfield, west Yorkshire, leaving a worker in hospital with serious burns, and cutting off 300 customers. The owner, Northern Powergrid, promised a health and safety investigation, which is still ongoing. Five days after that came North Hyde. Subsequent weeks saw no let up in the accidents. On March 23, fire erupted at a substation near Nottingham, cutting off power to 200 properties, and leaving the puzzled owner, National Grid, blaming 'third party damage'. On April 29, it was the turn of the Aberdeen Place substation in Maida Vale, west London, to erupt in a pillar of smoke and flame when a transformer exploded. While the blaze didn't cut off power supplies, it ignited some nearby flats, burning out four, and causing some 80 residents to be evacuated. Next came Glasgow where, on April 30, a substation caught fire in Taransay Street just behind the BAE warship yard in Govan, where the firm is building Type 26 frigates for the Royal Navy. Around 500 properties were cut off, including the yard itself. On this occasion two unnamed teenagers were arrested, who are due to appear in court this month on a charge Police Scotland said was connected to 'a wilful fire'. On May 11, witnesses reported a 'huge ball of flames' rising above a street close to Exeter city centre as another substation blew up, leaving 281 homes without power and requiring 25 people to be evacuated. And finally, the Aberdeen Place substation in Maida Vale caught fire again, this time in the high voltage section run by National Grid. The blaze caused what the owners described as a 'power blip', disrupting supplies to several underground lines. The worst affected – the Bakerloo Line – was out of operation for six hours. At Crocker's Folly, a Lebanese bar in Maida Vale, they are still grumbling about the fires at the substation; a blank brick building that faces the restaurant across the quiet leafy street, whose purpose is only signalled by the yellow 'Danger of Death' notices on its walls. In an adjoining compound, you can still see the fire-blackened equipment, and men in high-vis jackets buzz around, seemingly engaged in making repairs. 'It was a real pain for us because they closed the road off for days after the first one so we couldn't open for customers,' says one of the staff, who thinks the station's owners still owe residents a proper explanation after two blazes in as many weeks. Was there foul play or was the equipment faulty? There's been talk of something being set on fire and thrown into the compound on April 29. But UK Power Networks hasn't been drawn: it simply says that an investigation is ongoing. 'It's a bit worrying if it's just going to keep catching fire,' the waitress says. In fairness, the electricity companies have been no more forthcoming in other cases. For instance, after the Exeter explosion, which took place just round the corner from the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, National Grid spoke vaguely of 'third party damage' and promised an investigation, while after the Nottingham blaze, the company apologised for a 'small electrical fire', while thanking customers for 'bearing with us as our teams work to restore supplies as quickly and safely as possible'. Granted, there's an understandable reason for their reticence: Britain has around 57,000 large (33 kilovolt or over) substations spread across the transmission and distribution networks – out of a total of more than 500,000. These are all unmanned, defended only by CCTV and sensors, and hence vulnerable to vandalism or other malign interference. But at a time of tension between Russia and the UK, the resulting informational void has invited speculation about Kremlin-backed sabotage. Oleksandr Danylyuk is one who sees the hand of Moscow behind recent events. 'It has the feel of a well-organised conspiracy – checking out resilience and vulnerabilities and whether they elicit diplomatic protests,' he says. An associate fellow of Britain's Royal United Services Institute, and an expert on Russian 'multi-dimensional warfare' against the West, Danylyuk is not alone in worrying about Kremlin-sponsored aggression. Last November, MI6 chief Richard Moore said Russia was conducting a 'staggeringly reckless' sabotage campaign in Europe, while the head of MI5, Ken McCallum, accused the Kremlin of seeking to create 'sustained mayhem' on British streets. In a report published in March this year, a US think tank, the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, noted that the number of Russian attacks in Europe almost tripled last year to 34 known incidents, of which around a fifth were against critical infrastructure targets, such as electricity grids, undersea cables and energy pipelines. This doesn't mean the streets need to be swarming with Russian saboteurs, Danylyuk points out. The GRU, Russia's military intelligence unit, often recruits locals or non-Russians for the purposes of deniability. Late last year, two young British nationals, Dylan Earl, 20, and Jake Reeves, 23, pleaded guilty to setting a fire at a warehouse in east London on behalf of the Wagner Group, a Russian state-funded private military company that is seen as an arm of the Kremlin. Danylyuk also sees the official veil of silence as entirely consistent with a Russian hybrid campaign. (After the North Hyde blaze, the former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev even goaded the Government, saying he was 'looking forward to Russia being blamed for the Heathrow fire', and adding: 'What are you waiting for, Starmer?') Hybrid attacks on critical infrastructure fall uncomfortably close to the line of outright war, and politicians are consequently wary about reacting in case they inflame an already tense situation. 'There is no appetite in Western European governments to tell people about things such as sabotage when you are not really ready to do anything,' Danylyuk says. The main problem with the sabotage theory is a lack of hard evidence. While suspicions of vandalism hang over several of the fires, only in Glasgow has anyone been arrested. Elsewhere, the police have played down talk of organised sabotage. For instance, in the interim report into the still unexplained Heathrow incident by the National Energy System Operator (Neso), the state-run authority that controls the entire grid, the Met's counter terrorism unit was quoted as saying it 'found no evidence that the incident was suspicious in nature'. The final report is due by the end of June. There is also no sign of cyber attacks on substation control systems; the best way to shut down the entire facility and thus maximise the chaos from a single attack. Despite his earlier conjecture about foul play, Col Ingram is now wary of pointing the finger at Moscow, although he doesn't exclude its involvement. 'Experts I have spoken to with access to very sensitive areas say they have no evidence of anything untoward going down,' he says. Instead, he has come to believe the fires may be more a case of cock-up rather than foreign conspiracy. 'My primary view is that old infrastructure and poor maintenance – or the lack of maintenance – may be responsible for a lot of what we are seeing,' he observes. A perverse incentive Perhaps the most striking fact buried in Neso's interim report into the North Hyde fire was the sheer age of the equipment involved. The 275 kilovolt (kV) transformer blamed for the blaze was one of two installed when the substation was itself built in 1968, and manufactured by Hackbridge and Hewittic, a British brand name that disappeared in the early 1970s. Such venerable lifespans aren't out of the ordinary in British substations. Other vital devices such as circuit breakers (that cut off the power in the case of a fault) and switches (which route the current through the substation) also last for many decades. But transformers are a vital cog, enabling power to be stepped up to 400 kV so it can be transported over long distances without undue loss and then stepped back down to the 230 volts we use in our homes. Without them, the network simply couldn't function at all. A large part of the currently installed base was commissioned from the 1950s to the early 1970s – the last time Britain invested heavily in the network as it completed its electrification. Manufactured with a design life of around 40 years, these old transformers proved much more long-lived than expected. 'Basically, they were fantastically robust and once you had got them bedded in through the 1980s, the grid people really knew how to keep them running,' says one electrical engineer who formerly worked for National Grid. Then, in 1990, came a further incentive to eke out old equipment. The new privatised transmission and distribution ventures spun out of the Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) and the boards found themselves in a world where regulators not only set prices; they determined how much companies could spend on replacing worn out electrical gear. Margaret Thatcher's administration had decreed the system should reward companies for being efficient, so if they could do it for less than the watchdog's capital expenditure (capex) 'allowance', they got to keep the difference. This new privatised system sliced up the network between transmission companies – responsible for running the 400 kV and 275 kV supergrids – and distribution companies (DNOs) that run wires to people's homes. Initially, most were listed on the stock market, but over the years, like much of British infrastructure, they were snapped up by specialist investors. For instance, UK Power Networks, the DNO that owns the Maida Vale substation, is owned by funds connected to Li Ka-shing, the Chinese billionaire, while Northern Powergrid belongs to Berkshire Hathaway, the investment vehicle of Warren Buffett. As one might expect, these financially-driven owners responded to the regulatory incentives. Over the past decade, they have generally underspent their allowances for replacing equipment, banking the extra income and helping to make electricity transmission and distribution business one of the highest margin sectors in the country. Between 2014 and 2021, for instance, transmission companies undershot their replacement capex allowance by 28 per cent, according to Ofgem data, while for DNOs between 2016 and 2023, the figure was 12 per cent. Recent analysis by Common Wealth, a Left-of-centre think tank, estimates they collectively spent just £1.5 billion annually last year on replacing equipment against an approved budget of £2 billion. Some see this system – which splits the resulting 'gains' between the companies and their customers – as a perverse incentive to skimp on capex. By setting broad rules which require companies to deliver outcomes such as network performance targets while letting them decide how (and if) to spend the allowance, Ofgem may think it is empowering companies to be more efficient. But insiders point to a culture of 'asset-sweating' that has left most substations with primitive analogue control systems, ancient concrete gantries, and a lack of modern monitoring gear designed to forestall outages. 'It's a systemic issue: the companies won't spend money on things that bring them no extra revenue, even if having those things would be good for the network as a whole,' says one, who thinks the lack of monitoring equipment contributed to the massive North Hyde outage. The result is an increasingly aged network. Of the roughly £70 billion (in 2023-24 prices) of assets on transmission company balance sheets, around £30 billion, or 40 per cent, dates from before 1975. This creates a creeping fragility. 'This old gear can't last forever,' says Mathew Lawrence of Common Wealth, adding that when companies are challenged about skimping on capex, they say: ''Ah, but we will catch up when it's really needed'. It's like a football manager who loses his first five games saying he'll win the next seven.' One nagging vulnerability lies in the oil that transformers use for insulation. A former CEGB engineer warns that any ingress of water can reduce the insulation properties and increase the risk of electricity arcing and fires. Such contamination inevitably becomes more likely with age. Another is that old plants often lack modern safety features, for instance the North Hyde plant had no concrete blast walls separating the transformers – something that has been required since the 1970s, but substation owners aren't required to retrofit. So when plants go bang, the damage will be worse. 'Dirty power' To many electricity insiders, it seems no less bizarre talking about the recent fires as an existential threat as it does about foreign sabotage. Not only does the system continue to function, there are no obvious signs of deterioration. In Neso's latest annual transmission review, for instance, so-called loss of supply incidents actually fell in number over the past five years, although the aggregate amount of electricity lost was greater. Typical is the view of Simon Gallagher of UK Networks Services, a consultant: 'The networks are performing better than they ever have.' But for all the upbeat talk, there is also a sense of foreboding. Until now, the network's assets have aged against a backdrop of declining usage, easing the pressure on hard-pressed substations. Britons consumed just 318 terawatt hours of electricity last year; 23 per cent less than the peak year of 2005. Now, as Keir Starmer's administration presses on towards net zero, usage should start shooting up again as sectors like motor transport and domestic heating shift from fossil fuels to electricity. Other power-hungry applications such as AI are coming too. By 2030, Neso anticipates demand will have grown by almost a third to 411 terawatt hours. The increment to supply that will be needed will come from renewables, such as wind and solar. These create other concerns, such as 'dirty power' – a phenomenon linked to intermittent renewable generation sources where, instead of operating at a stable 50 hertz, the power supply's frequency jumps around and becomes irregular. 'There is no escaping the fact that dirty power imposes a far greater burden on network equipment like transformers,' says one electricity expert. There are also concerns about demand spikes from electric vehicle charging putting old transformers, switchgear and cables under heavy strain. But the biggest worry is that an avalanche of equipment failures will expose the near impossibility of replacing old and broken kit. Years of thin orders have long killed off firms like Hackbridge and Hewittic, which built the transformers that burnt in the North Hyde fire. Now, despite a chronic shortage of such equipment, the few survivors have been slow to ramp up production, and Britain is years away from developing solid state transformers that are necessary, in the opinion of Martin Kuball, professor of physics at Bristol university, to create a grid that is safer and more resilient. The UK has just one plant making old style units – GE Vernova – based in Stafford. The average delivery time for a step-up transformer is currently around 200 weeks in the US. And that's before you get to the structural problem of finding the time slots and engineers to install the new equipment you might need. Given the need to keep power always running, access to the transmission and distribution networks is tightly controlled. So restricted are 'system access slots', during which the grid operator permits owners to take substations offline for maintenance and upgrades, and so sparse the ranks of highly skilled engineers to oversee them, that observers wonder how the network could ever deal with a bulge in maintenance – given all the upgrades that net zero will require. Could the recent transformer fires be an advance warning of a wider wave of failure? No one knows. 'It's hard to tell when equipment like this is going to start failing,' says Tim Stone, an infrastructure and energy expert. 'What I fear is that it could resemble Ernest Hemingway's description of going bankrupt in the way it happens – first slowly then suddenly.'

The Sun

39 minutes ago

• The Sun

Best UFC betting sites in the UK – Top UFC bookies ranked (2025)

THE UFC has exploded in popularity across the UK in recent years, quickly becoming one of the most-watched combat sports alongside boxing. Major UFC events now attract millions of UK viewers via platforms like TNT Sports (formerly BT Sport), while live shows at The O2 Arena often sell out within hours. With British champions like Leon Edwards making waves on the global stage, interest in MMA and MMA betting has never been higher. If you're itching to get in on the action, this article highlights some of the best UFC betting sites in the UK for 2025. Our top 10 sites for UFC betting 🔎 How we ranked our best UFC betting sites As with all of our reviews, the core system we base our evaluation on is our editorial framework, the " Sun Factor." And while we mostly looked for bookies with good odds and a good variety of UFC markets, there are other factors in play too, such as ease of use and the quality of the customer support. Here's a breakdown of everything we assessed: 🥊 Number of UFC betting markets When choosing the best UFC betting sites, one major factor is the range of UFC betting markets available. The top sportsbooks don't just stick to picking the winner: they offer a wide selection of betting options: method of victory (KO, submission, decision), round betting, to-go-the-distance markets, and more. A greater number of markets gives bettors more ways to bet, opening new ways to capitalise on each fight night. 🤑 Promotions & bonuses One reason many UK customers prefer certain betting sites for UFC is the availability of fight-specific promotions. The best UFC betting sites run bonuses tied to major events, like boosted odds, free bets, or parlay insurance. These offers often pop up ahead of pay-per-view bouts, making them a smart way to maximise your stakes. And although UFC-specific promos are rare, many sportsbooks offer welcome bonuses and VIP promotions that can be used across all sports, including on UFC fights. 💰 Best odds for UFC matches To get the most value from your bets, it's vital to compare odds across different UFC betting sites. The best betting sites consistently offer competitive lines, whether you're backing a favourite or hunting value on an underdog. Even marginally better odds can mean much bigger winnings, especially when placing large stakes or building a fight night parlay across several matches. 🗓️ Betting experience A great UFC betting experience starts with an easy-to-use site or app. The top online betting platforms have well-designed sites and intuitive apps that work across a variety of devices, making it easy to find the UFC betting markets you're after. After all, being able to quickly place a wager, especially during in-play betting, can make all the difference in quick-paced events like UFC fights. 💳 Payment methods The best betting sites support a wide range of options for deposits and withdrawals, including PayPal, debit cards, Skrill, and Neteller. They also provide hassle-free payment methods and process withdrawals quickly and securely, ensuring you don't have to wait long for your winnings. 📞 Customer support Whether it's a payment issue or a question about a bet, quick and effective customer service is key to a good online betting experience. Good betting sites provide24/7 support through live chat, email, or even phone, and detailed FAQ sections answering all typical customer questions. The best ones go a step further and offer their customer insights into upcoming matches and tips for events and promotions to look out for. An in-depth look at our favourite UFC betting sites 1. bet365 bet365 is one of the biggest names in the British betting world over the past two decades, and rightly so. From the quality and quantity of its game streaming and in-play betting options to generous promotions for both new and existing players, there's a lot to like here. As boxing lovers can attest, bet365 has a fantastic selection of markets for fighting fans. bet365 covers both major MMA events like UFC and UFC Fight Night, and smaller ones like Oktagon and ARES FC. Markets depend on the event, but you can expect everything from Fight Lines (winner) and Method of Victory to Strikes Landed and even combo bets like Method and Round. 2. Betfred Betfred is a truly legendary bookie in the UK, having started modestly as a single betting shop in Ordsall, Salford, in 1967. Although it has mostly made its name on excellent odds and acca deals for football fans, it has long since expanded into other betting markets, including boxing and MMA. All major events like UFC Fight Night and typical markets such as Round Betting are available, and you can even combine several matches into acca bets or keep up with the latest news and get custom tips and predictions on a dedicated UFC Betting Tips page on Betfred's Betfred Insights blog. 3. Coral Coral is a well-known site among UK punters, and its sportsbook offers solid coverage of UFC events. You can bet on all the key markets like Fight Betting (moneyline) and Method of Victory, or try to guess the total number of rounds. A standout feature is #YourCall, which lets you create your own custom UFC bets by tweeting @Coral. If accepted, you'll get informed about your odds and possibly be featured on the site's #YourCall page. While Coral doesn't go as deep into MMA markets as some competitors, it makes up for it with highly user-friendly betting tools, reliable odds, and creative bet-building features that can net you some unique, fun, and highly profitable bets. 4. BetMGM Since its UK launch in 2023, BetMGM has carved a niche in MMA by blending aggressive promotions with user-friendly innovation, managing to stand out even in a rather crowded sportsbook scene. The site offers an extensive selection of UFC and MMA betting markets, including standard options like To Win Fight, Round Betting, and Method of Victory, plus specials tied to major events. Features like Lion's Boosts enhance odds for select fights, and Edit My Bet lets punters tweak their wagers mid-event – a rare find in the MMA market. The platform also includes extensive in-play betting options and tips on upcoming fights. 5. 888 Sport 888 Sport is one of the biggest names in online sports betting these days. The operator has a smooth, responsive site and a well-designed app that both support numerous pre-match and in-play betting options. Although the site's excellent Bet Builder is only available for football, NBA, and NFL matches, you can still make acca bets on UFC fights. There's also a section for Popular Bets so new players can get ideas and an occasional Odds Boost for major events such as headline UFC fights. There's a ton of betting markets for UFC too, from classics like predicting the match winner to method of victory & round combos. 6. Betano Betano has a simple recipe for success: make betting easy and give punters highly competitive odds. It has one of the best-designed apps we've tried, with features such as a sliding menu that can be pulled up mid-stream to make your bet. UFC lovers can bet on a variety of markets, from moneyline to guessing whether the fight will go the distance. There are also regular Bet Boosts on popular markets in big fights, and you can even get massive odds on randomised compound selections through Lucky Dip bets, such as guessing not only the winner and round, but also the exact minute the fight will end. 7. SBK SBK is a lesser-known operator well worth checking. In addition to excellent sports promotions for both new and existing players, it tries hard to stay competitive with the big industry names by offering the most competitive odds on a variety of popular sports markets, including all fighting sports. Best Price lets you see how the current odds for events stack up against major names like Unibet and Coral, while Price+ lets you get margin-free odds on select events to guarantee the most profitable bets. All major events such as UFC and UFC Fight Night are covered in detail, and you can bet on anything from outright winner to bout ranges. 8. Tote If you're a fan of pool betting, Tote is the best place to be. With a history spanning almost 100 years, Tote is a legendary bookie with some of the industry's best offers for this style of betting, including Tote Multiples that offer players the larger of starting price vs Tote dividend. If you don't feel like risking with accas, the Tote Guarantee ensures the final win price on select bets won't be lower than the starting price. MMA fans can bet on all popular UFC events and markets like moneyline and Over/Under bets and handy navigation tools let you pick between UFC fights only or everything that's currently available. 9. CopyBet CopyBet is our favourite pick for new punters and a great place to check out for some expert tipster advice. With the simple act of subscribing to your favourite pro tipsters on the site, you can get easy access to their bet slips, which can be instantly copied into your own selections. This benefits both inexperienced punters and grizzled veterans, the latter getting paid a percentage of winnings, while the former can copy multiple selections from several industry veterans, greatly raising their chances of making winning bets. UFC fans can look forward to over 15 markets, including submission or (T)KO combos, all neatly organised per event. 10. Kwiff Kwiff may not be a household name in the UK yet, but it's definitely a rising star. New players can look forward to sport-agnostic free bet offers not limited to certain payment methods (a rarity in the UK these days!) and great ongoing promos like surprise free bets, 3+ fold acca boosted odds, and more. Our favourite feature is Supercharged Bets, random bet selections across all sports (including UFC) that get boosted odds. The site's well-organised interface lets you see in-play bets, fights within 24 hours, popular competitions, or a calendar of all upcoming fights. There are over 10 betting markets, including all popular ones like Fight Winner and Total Rounds. 🥊 Popular UFC betting markets Betting on UFC and MMA fights is quite similar to boxing bets, so if you're familiar with those, you'll be right at home here. Here's a short list of the most common markets you'll see. Outright winner The most straightforward betting option: just pick which fighter will win the bout. For example, if you wager on an underdog at 3/1 and they score a knockout, your payout is based on those boosted odds, and you'll get triple your wager. This market is available on nearly all UFC betting sites and is a great entry point for new and inexperienced bettors. Over/under number of rounds Here, you predict whether the fight will end before or after a set number of rounds. For example, if two technical fighters with strong defensive styles are matched up, betting on the fight lasting over 5 rounds is usually a good idea. This market is often featured in UFC promotions and specials on major sportsbooks. Method of victory This UFC betting market lets you bet on how the fight will end: by KO, TKO, submission, or decision. For example, backing a grappler to win by submission against a striking-focused opponent is a solid plan, but don't expect the odds to favour you too much, as the bookie knows what to expect, too. Many betting sites boost the odds on these methods around championship fights. Fight to go the distance A variation on the over/under bet, this one simply predicts that the fight will last its full scheduled length, and thereby have the winner decided by a judges' decision. Excellent for those 'boring' matches where both fighters are cautious, but not that uncommon in UFC, considering that matches typically last either three or five rounds, depending on the format, finishing far quicker than your typical boxing match. Most of the UFC markets listed above are often available as in-play bets on most major sportsbooks. This means you can place bets while the fight is happening, adjusting to the action in real time. However, UFC fights are typically much shorter and more fast-paced than boxing, but they can end just as suddenly, especially in lower weight classes or striker-heavy matchups. As a result, in-play betting windows can be narrow, and odds may shift rapidly. Quick decision-making and access to a site with a good live betting interface are essential to making the most of in-play bets for UFC fights. Ones to watch in the UFC From living legends like Jon Jones, who is at 37 still the reigning heavyweight champion with a record-breaking 12 title defences through his career, to up-and-coming fighters like the undefeated Khamzat Chimaev and Ilia Topuria, or female UFC flyweight Erin Blanchfield, there are plenty of interesting talents to watch these days. Although most category champions are expectedly dogged veterans like Dricus Du Plessis, Islam Makhachev or Valentina Shevchenko, some slightly younger fighters like Australia's Jack Della Maddalena have managed to snatch titles, too. While all of the UK waits with baited breath for the supposed heavyweight title clash between the reigning and interim champs Jon Jones and our very own Tom Aspinall, there are plenty of exciting upcoming matches in 2025, including Topuria's June 29th clash with veteran Charles Oliveira, and the much-anticipated Du Plessis vs. Chimaev duel on August 16th. 🤝 How to bet on the UFC Here's a quick step-by-step guide on how to make bets on UFC matches. Choose a licensed UFC betting site – Pick a bookmaker regulated by the UK Gambling Commission with strong MMA betting coverage. Any of the options in our article are a great starting point. Create an account – Register your account on the site and confirm it by providing some form of national ID, such as your passport or driving license. Make an initial deposit – Before doing anything else, put some money into your account. This is also the step where you'd confirm your welcome promotion if you opted in for one. Find the UFC section – Navigate to the UFC or mixed martial arts page under the list of sports available on the site. Select a fight – Choose an upcoming fight night or championship card to proceed. Pick a market – Common UFC betting markets include choosing the outright winner, method of victory, and over/under rounds. Add your bet to the slip – Click on the odds next to your selection, enter your stake, and confirm (this process may vary a little between sites but the basics are always the same). Claim your winnings – Providing you guessed correctly, all that's left is to see how much you've won and cash out your winnings. 📺 How to follow all things UFC and MMA For UK MMA and UFC fans, staying up to date with the latest fights, odds, and events is easy with the right sources. TNT Sports (formerly BT Sport) holds the official UFC broadcasting rights in the UK, airing every major card, including fight nights and championship bouts. For news, previews, and betting tips, talkSPORT is a must: check out their dedicated MMA section for expert insights. Other top resources include MMA Junkie, Sherdog, and the UFC's own channels on YouTube and Instagram. Podcasts like The MMA Hour with Ariel Helwani and Morning Kombat also offer weekly coverage and fighter interviews. 🙋Q&A about the best UFC betting sites 1. Which stats and news stories should I pay attention to when looking to place UFC bets? Focus on each fighter's record, recent wins/losses, method of victory (e.g. knockout, submission), and fighting style. Also, pay close attention to injury news, weight cut issues, and short-notice opponent changes. Stats on takedown accuracy, striking defence, and cardio can also play a role, and the more research you do, the better your predictions will be. 2. How do bookies determine odds for UFC fights? Bookmakers calculate odds using fighter records, previous matchups, public betting trends, and expert analysis. They consider styles, fight history, current form, and even promotion hype. If a fighter is a fan favourite, odds may shorten due to heavy betting (regardless of true probability), making value bets possible for savvy bettors. 3. When is the best time to place UFC bets so that I can get the best possible odds? Early odds often offer more value, especially before public opinion shifts. Lines may tighten closer to fight night as bets roll in. Watching for line movement and placing wagers before weigh-ins or major media coverage can help you lock in the best possible returns on your stake. 4. Which types of UFC bets tend to offer the best potential returns? Markets like method of victory, round betting, and underdog outright wins typically provide the highest odds and payout potential. For example, backing a fighter to win via submission in Round 2 carries more risk but much bigger winnings than a simple moneyline bet. Parlays or accas also boost potential returns, but are much more difficult to pull off. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who: For help with a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 or go to to be excluded from all UK-regulated gambling websites.

The Independent

41 minutes ago

• The Independent

Up 15% in one day: London Stock Exchange set for another £3.8bn loss as Spectris accepts huge bid

Yet another firm looks set to end its London Stock Exchange listing, with specialist equipment business Spectris recommending to shareholders to accept a £3.8bn takeover bid. A cash offer from a private equity firm, Advent International, is for £37.63 per share. Spectris' share price at the close of Friday's session was around £33.48, sparking an immediate jump of 15 per cent when markets reopened on Monday morning - by far the FTSE All-Share's biggest riser on the day. Even so, the price could yet move even higher. While Advent's bid has been accepted, another American investment firm KKR has signalled an intent to potentially make another offer, while the actual change in share price is even bigger when widening the timeline. Spectris makes and tests technologies and instruments for use across many industrial sectors. But falling sales and profits meant the share price fell from above £41 in 2021, to around £25 for most of the second half of 2024. Add in trade tariff uncertainty and shares could be bought below £20 as recently as late May, but the first takeover approaches being made public quickly put a rocket under the price, which has now soared 89 per cent since then. Andrew Heath, CEO of Spectris, said the offer recognised 'our strong growth prospect'. Should the deal go through it would be another 2025 departure for the LSE to chalk up. Alphawave is set for a £1.8bn takeover from Qualcomm, Oxford Ionics has agreed to a £0.8bn takeover by US rival IonQ and financial services firm Wise are intent on shifting their listing from UK to US - that latter being a £10bn departure. They are unlikely to be the last moves made in the sphere either, with valuations continually lower on the LSE than the same firms might expect to see in the if taken private, as AJ Bell's investment director Russ Mould pointed out. 'The fact we've got two bid battles in Spectris and Assura just goes to show how the UK stock market continues to be on sale. If investors don't recognise the good value opportunities on offer, trade buyers or private equity firms will keep swooping on targets and pick them off one by one,' he said.