A nasty and dangerous phase
Listen to article
The fragile ceasefire between Pakistan and India may remain intact, but tension is far from over. The two nuclear-armed neighbours, with a long history of wars and military standoffs, are now entering a new, far more perilous phase in their relationship.
Consider the post-Pulwama episode of February 2019. Despite India's airstrikes on Balakot and Pakistan's swift military response, tensions were de-escalated relatively quickly. Diplomatic ties, though briefly strained, were soon normalised. Borders remained open, and even the Indus Waters Treaty — often cited as a pressure point — was not weaponised. In fact, weeks after the military standoff, then-Prime Minister Imran Khan went so far as to express a preference for Modi's re-election, believing a hardliner like him might finally resolve the deadlock. That assumption, however, was wrong.
Today, the landscape is starkly different. After the Pahalgam attack, India took a series of unprecedented steps. It suspended the IWT for the first time since 1960, closed the Wagah-Attari border, expelled military advisers, reduced diplomatic staff, and ordered all Pakistani nationals to leave the country. Pakistan responded in kind.
Then came the events of May 6th and 7th. In a dramatic escalation, India launched missile and drone strikes deep into Pakistani territory. For the first time, the world witnessed an exchange of missiles and drones between two nuclear powers. What made matters worse was the disinformation campaign run by Indian media.
On the eve of Pakistan's counter-strike to India's so-called Operation Sindoor, Indian news outlets spread false reports — claims of Karachi Port being bombed, Indian forces entering Lahore, and even the Indian flag flying over Islamabad. These fabrications were quickly debunked by international media, which confirmed that India's attempts to set a new normal had failed. Notably, the downing of advanced Rafael jets by Pakistan remains a hot topic in global defence circles — one India refuses to acknowledge, citing vaguely that "losses are part of combat."
The broader implications of this latest flare-up are deeply troubling. Pakistan and India appear poised for their most dangerous confrontation yet. Frustrated by setbacks and international apathy, Prime Minister Modi is doubling down on aggressive diplomacy. India has dispatched bipartisan delegations worldwide to present its narrative, while simultaneously pushing for Pakistan's diplomatic and economic isolation.
One telling move came just days after the conflict: Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's visit to the Netherlands. This was no routine stopover. The Dutch have played a key role in strengthening Pakistan's maritime security, including supplying mine-hunters and offshore patrol vessels. India's goal was clear: pressure the Dutch to halt such cooperation. Similar efforts are underway with Pakistan's other economic and defence partners.
India is also believed to be leaning heavily on regional allies to discourage any financial or strategic collaboration with Islamabad. There are signs that India is lobbying behind closed doors, using economic leverage and diplomatic influence to corner Pakistan multilaterally.
Pakistan on the other hand is actively pursuing its own game plan. Together with its close allies and international partners, Islamabad is making efforts to nullify New Delhi's campaign. Despite limited resources and other challenges, Pakistan has demonstrated it could take on India both on the battlefield and diplomatic front.
While India is struggling to find answers to its miscalculation, Pakistan is looking to take advantage of the opportunity its eastern neighbour has thrown at it. The decision-makers in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, however, must not be complacent. India will not take this defeat lightly. It would resort to both covert and overt actions to undermine Pakistan. The coming months could well see the region descend into a new and even more volatile chapter — one that might push South Asia closer to a conflict of unprecedented scale.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
OIC calls for 'strict adherence' to IWT
The Punjab government is likely to ask the federal government to raise at all possible forums India's alleged violations of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960 in building dams and hydropower plants on Pakistani rivers. Listen to article The Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC-CFM) on Sunday condemned Israeli aggression against Iran and expressed solidarity with Pakistan in the wake of "unjustified strikes" carried out by India last month. The 'Istanbul Declaration' issued at the end of the two-day meeting in the Turkish city, emphasised that the ceasefire between Pakistan and India announced on May 10, 2025, must be "faithfully adhered to", in the interest of regional peace and stability. The foreign ministers from the Muslim states met in Istanbul for the 51st session of the CFM and adopted the 'Istanbul Declaration'. The two-day session on Saturday and Sunday was held under the theme of 'The OIC in a Transforming World'. The CFM called for strict adherence to bilateral agreements between Pakistan and India, including the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT); and stressed the importance of a broad-based dialogue for peaceful settlement of all outstanding disputes. "Express our deep concern over the recent military escalation in the South Asia region, including the unjustified strikes carried out on multiple locations in Pakistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, and stress the need to exercise maximum restraint and avoid actions that would destabilise the region," it said. The CFM expressed full support for the inalienable right to self-determination of the Kashmiri people in accordance with the UN Security Council and OIC resolutions, and the wishes of the Kashmiri people; and condemned massive human rights violations in the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Israeli aggression The Istanbul Declaration condemned the Israel aggression against Iran and stressed "the urgent need to stop Israeli attacks". It expressed great concern over this dangerous escalation and a threatening human, economic and environmental situation in the region. The CFM condemned the ongoing Israeli campaign of genocide against the Gaza Strip as well as the systematic campaigns of destruction and killing in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, aimed at eliminating the Palestinian cause, including the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. It reaffirmed the importance of achieving a permanent and sustainable ceasefire and of implementing the UNSC resolution aimed at ending the Israeli aggression, rebuilding of the Gaza Strip, and ensuring the provision of political and financial support to the Palestinian government. The meeting called for and early convening of the United Nations High-Level Conference on the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution and relevant United Nations resolutions, under the co-chairmanship of the Saudi Arabia and France. "Condemn the actions of Israel, the occupying Power, in using starvation as a method of genocide by obstructing the entry of humanitarian assistance and preventing United Nations humanitarian agencies from carrying out their mandates, with the aim of forcibly displacing the Palestinian population," it said. "In this regard, we call for the rejection of all forms of forced displacement of the Palestinian people, the urgent opening of crossings and borders, the unimpeded and adequate delivery of humanitarian aid, and the provision of protection for the Palestinian civilian population," read the Istanbul Declaration. The CFM called on the international community to take deterrent measures to stop Israel's destabilisation policies and its recent attacks on Iran, Syria, and Lebanon and make Israel accountable for its crimes. Islamophobia, terrorism The CFM urged the international community to take effective measures to combat extremism, hate speech, defamation of religions, negative stereotyping and the stigmatisation of people on the basis of religion, belief or ethnicity at the national and global level, The declaration underlines that terrorism and extremism could not be associated with any religion, race, ethnicity or nationality and should be unequivocally condemned regardless of its forms and manifestations that continue threatening the global peace and security The meeting welcomed the progress in the normalisation ties between Azerbaijan and Armenia and the efforts of the Syrian interim government for the integration of Syria into the regional and international system. it supported the aspirations of the Muslim Turkish Cypriots to secure their inherent rights. The OIC foreign ministers appreciated the commendable efforts by Algeria, Somalia and Pakistan to promote Islamic causes in the context of their non-permanent membership in the UN Security Council, the declaration stated.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump cuts India down to size
This is apropos a letter to the Editor titled 'India's water belligerence' carried by the newspaper yesterday. In my view the writer is spot on as it is increasingly evident that India's has been trying to overcome the shock that it has received in the four-day conflict at the hands of Pakistan last month. No doubt, the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Pakistan's Field Marshal and army chief Asim Munir has spooked the Indian government so much so that its ministers are now making more irresponsible statements against Pakistan than before. It is important to note that now Pakistan has announced its formal decision to recommend US President Donald Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, praising his 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' during the recent four-day war between Pakistan and India. In a statement posted on X, the government highlighted Trump's pivotal role in helping to de-escalate tensions between the two nuclear-armed nations. The post carried the headline: 'Government of Pakistan Recommends President Donald J Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize.' How ironic it is from India's perspective that prime minister Narendra Modi's so-called 'close friend' President Trump is now being assailed by Godi media for inflicting a blow on India's nefarious designs of becoming the regional hegemon. Be that as it may, Trump deserves praise for cutting India down to size in an effective and meaningful manner. Sana Adeel (Karachi) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Kashmir: a major escalation hotspot
EDITORIAL: The 2025 Global Peace Index designates Kashmir as one of the world's foremost escalation hotspots where tensions between India and Pakistan remain 'perilously high' — a sobering assessment shared by independent political and defence analysts. The Index put out by Sydney-based Institute for Economics and Peace explains that the situation in Kashmir exemplifies the fragility of ceasefire agreements in volatile geographic settings and underscores the dangers posed by non-state actors capable of triggering international crises. Such a danger, however, can also arise from suspected false flag operations, like the 2019 Pulwama attack on a convoy of Indian security personnel in the illegally Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJ&K), and last April's Pahalgam terrorist attack. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government used both incidents to launch military misadventures inside Pakistan only to face a punishing retaliation. The four-day May 7-10 conflict between the two countries was their deadliest in decades, brought to a halt by a ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump. The Kashmir dispute, rooted in the unfinished agenda of Partition, has sparked three wars between Pakistan and India as well as limited skirmishes over the Line of Control in the disputed region. The Modi government's decision in August of 2019 to revoke Article 370 of the Indian constitution, — which granted limited autonomy to IIOJ&K — led to bifurcation of the disputed region into two entities, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh — over much of which China has territorial claims — and made Union territories. PM Modi's critics at home, including the main opposition Congress Party leader Rahul Gandhi, have been accusing his government of creating a common interest for Pakistan and China in wresting back Kashmir from India. In any case, the risk of escalation between the two nuclear-armed nations carries grave implications. Even a conventional conflict, as seen last May, holds the potential of rapidly spiralling into a serious crisis. Discomfited by the outcome, Modi refuses to even acknowledge that the US played any role in defusing tensions in the latest stand-off with Pakistan. This hardline stance resonates with his far-right Hindu nationalist support base, but leaves little room for constructive diplomacy. It is more than obvious that PM Modi feels let down by President Trump's persistent assertions that he had helped bring about ceasefire between the two countries at India's request. At the risk of annoying him, New Delhi has denied having made any such request. Modi also passed on President Trump's invitation to stopover in Washington on way back from the G7 Summit in Canada, on the pretext of some pressing business at home. Yet as the Global Peace Index indicates, without some sort of diplomatic engagement the chance of miscalculation or inadvertent escalation will only grow. Reinstating dialogue mechanisms, whether backchannel or bilateral, is essential for establishing durable peace and stability in South Asia. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
