Dispersal order issued amid anti-social behaviour in Broadstairs

A dispersal order has been put in place to deter anti-social behaviour in a town in Kent.Police said it had issued the order in Broadstairs due to ongoing concerns relating to issues caused by a small minority of young people in some public areas.The dispersal order, which grants officers additional powers to instruct people to leave specific areas, started at 16:30 BST on Friday and will remain in place until 16:30 on Saturday.Areas covered by the order include Dumpton Bay - onto Seacroft Road up to the junction with South Cliff Parade - Detling Avenue onto Dumpton Park Drive, Boundary Road onto Margate Road and other nearby streets.
The coast, foreshores and beaches back to Dumpton Bay also fall within the scope of the order, police said.While in place, officers have additional powers to stop and search individuals without reasonable grounds.Police said issues in the town included under-age street drinking, fighting and reports of aggressive behaviour towards staff at shops.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

2 hours ago

• Telegraph

The grooming gang scandal isn't just about race, it's also about class

Public outrage over the grooming gang scandal has so far revolved almost entirely around its racial dimension. There can be absolutely no doubt that the suppression of crucial facts because they might have incited prejudice against an ethnic minority was unforgivable, and that the ramifications of what we now know must be ruthlessly examined. There are serious questions about the possibility (or impossibility) of successful multiculturalism that can no longer be avoided. All this is clear and it will be discussed, with its huge implications, exhaustively – because race and the coexistence of different ethnicities within a democratic country are the great topics of the day. What is receiving far less attention – perhaps because it is so much a part of the fabric of British social attitudes as to be nearly invisible – is the question of how the victims of this systematic abuse could have been treated by official authorities with such callous indifference. Let's put it plainly: the fact that huge numbers of white working-class girls could be trafficked, tortured and horrifically abused with the conscious complicity of agencies of the state is not entirely due to sensitivities about the ethnicity of the perpetrators. There is another factor here that is much older and more deeply embedded in British attitudes than the fashionable concern with racial politics. Most of these girls, now being described as 'vulnerable', are of a class and a social type that this country was accustomed to treating with contempt long before Pakistani men were said to have regarded them as whores because they appeared 'uncovered' in public. This supposed explanation, which is presented as a kind of apologia – it was all just a form of cultural misunderstanding – is ridiculous of course. The men knew perfectly well that what they were doing was criminal and relied on local networks of corruption to protect them. But what about the other matter? What about the police and the local authorities and the social care agencies who just preferred to ignore what was happening – or even, in some outrageous instances, to join in the persecution of the victims? Was that entirely due to the fear of raising racial tensions? Or could it be that Britain still has some pretty ugly class prejudices which permit those in charge to dismiss the complaints and protests of the kind of people who are considered beneath contempt? There is something about the hardhearted dismissiveness with which the girls' pleas for help were treated that is almost Dickensian. Many of those who heard them and saw what was happening were presumably quite normal and respectable, perhaps with families (maybe daughters) of their own. What made it possible for them to discount a category of helpless young girls as – what? Not fit for sympathy? Incapable of leading decent lives, anyway? In effect, less than human? Yes, there had to be more to this than the fear of arousing racial tensions or alienating a minority ethnic group. You cannot write off a whole tranche of victims whose safety is your legal (and moral) responsibility unless you believe that they are, somehow, not worth protecting. Did they tell themselves that the girls had 'asked for it', joined in with the drug taking, made themselves available, become the 'whores' that the men assumed them to be? That is the sort of thing that has been said for generations about poor girls who found themselves left to the streets, whom the Victorian reformers and the Evangelical Christian Church once set out to save in the face of traditional smug complacency. This is such a well documented phenomenon in English social history that it is scarcely credible that it could survive intact into the 21st century. But here it is, in a new incarnation. It is not preposterous to suggest that the race issue was just another pretext for the old snobbery that has always condemned girls of this kind to be social outcasts. Ironically, they were being disowned by people who probably regarded themselves as Left-wing. There is something peculiarly resilient about class attitudes in Britain. It remains the undercurrent for most social transactions (and almost all comedy), political behaviour and professional advancement. Of course every sophisticated society has some kind of hierarchical social order and codes of behaviour that are dictated by it. In many of the old European countries – even ones that have dispensed with their aristocracies – it is based on inherited family position. Sometimes (as in Italy) it is connected to regions. In the United States, race took the place of class as the great social barrier but within the white population it was primarily wealth that provided status, not breeding and, until very recently, the wealth that was most admirable was self-made. The Calvinist ideal of success by one's individual effort was the admired model, not the noblesse oblige of an inherited fortune. For the longest time, Americans did not openly acknowledge the existence of what we would call a 'class system'. There were just the 'poor' who needed to work harder so that they could fulfil the American dream, and those who had fulfilled the dream and become richer. It was a ruthless, puritanical assumption that largely ignored the variations in advantages that are (supposedly) taken into account by an older, more established hierarchy. Many would argue that the resilience of class divides in British life should not be blamed entirely on middle-class prejudice: that it is as much a function of working-class solidarity. The reassurance of community ties and common values may make the abandonment of your old roots a frightening and painful thing. There can be little doubt that the existential anxiety that permeates American life with its relentless pressure for social mobility is not enviable. So yes, there is something to be said for loyalty to family, roots and neighbourhood – a refusal to budge from the attitudes in which you were raised. That can seem like a justifiable moral stand and a safe harbour for life. But where does it end? With a road to nowhere and such incurable hopelessness that huge numbers of working-class girls (and boys) can be discarded without a qualm.

BBC News

2 hours ago

• BBC News

Man arrested after car hits building in Oxford

A man has been arrested on suspicion of drink-driving and criminal damage after a car hit a building in the centre of Oxford. Part of St Aldate's had to be cordoned off in the aftermath of the crash, in which a blue Mazda 2 TS hit the wall at the junction with Thames Street at about 03:50 driver, a 21-year-old man, was hurt and taken to hospital. He has since been discharged and taken in to police Valley Police said there had been "significant damage" to the building. Part of the wall and a road sign were damaged, with bricks and rubble covering the pavement force said partial road closures had been put in place while the scene was made safe and repairs were made but these had been lifted by the appealed for witnesses or anyone with relevant dashcam footage to come forward. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

Daily Mail​

2 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

'Superhero' security guard who fought off racist thug who trashed Tesco store was fired and charged with assault after a witness complained

A security guard hailed as a 'superhero' for fending off a racist thug who trashed a Tesco Express was later sacked on the spot and charged with assault - after a bystander complained about his use of force. Wayne Price, 40, was cleared in just 30 minutes after CCTV showed he acted in self-defence - but Worcester BID, who had employed him to tackle crime in the city centre, refused to give him his job back. He now works at a crazy golf course to support his family. CCTV and bodycam footage confirmed Price had acted lawfully as he shoved career criminal Peter Swinbourne - who had previously hurled racist abuse at staff and thrown wet floor signs inside the shop. The incident unfolded in September last year, when staff at the Tesco Express on Foregate Street radioed for help dealing with a drunk man trying to barge his way into the shop. Mr Price arrived to find Swinbourne - known locally as 'Barney' - squaring up to staff at the door. He positioned himself in the entrance to block him and tried to de-escalate the situation. Bodycam footage obtained by MailOnline shows him repeatedly warning Swinbourne to step back before finally pushing him away with an open hand, causing him to stumble backwards and fall over. Despite the clear warnings and Swinbourne's behaviour, a member of the public later complained - and Mr Price says he was told by his employer that he should have let the man back into the store. He was suspended, sacked, and then charged with assault by beating. His SIA licence - which allowed him to work in security - was also suspended, leaving him unable to return to the industry. After pleading not guilty in January, Mr Price spent six months on bail before going on trial earlier this month - where magistrates took just half an hour to find him not guilty. The court heard that Swinbourne had 35 previous convictions for violence and 30 public order offences stretching back nearly three decades. He did not attend the hearing because he was in prison. Mr Price, who has two children, said the experience shattered his confidence and left him wondering whether stepping in had been worth it. Even though I was cleared it's like I've been punished anyway,' he said. 'I never thought it would get to the stage it did - I was put through all this just for doing my job. 'I was banned from working in any security role so I've had to find a job at a crazy golf course and the work is a lot less fulfilling but I have to do it to provide for my family. 'I loved my old job and I was good at it and I had a good relationship with businesses in the city. When I came to court I had so many letters of support from them. 'Being accused of these crimes makes you question yourself but I know I am the sort of person who will step into harm's way to help other people.' Mr Price - whose father was a police detective and whose 21-year-old son is now a serving officer - said being forced out of the industry left him feeling worthless. 'Being accused of these crimes makes you question yourself but I know I am the sort of person who will step into harm's way to help other people.' He has now launched a GoFundMe in a bid to raise £4,000 to start his own security company and return to patrolling Worcester's streets. Since Mr Price was removed, traders say uniformed patrols have disappeared - and shoplifting and antisocial behaviour have spiralled as a result. Rachael Evans, who runs the New England Country Store, said: 'Wayne was very important in helping to prevent crime in Worcester. 'You would often see him patrolling and he would pop in and see if everything was OK. He was helpful and friendly - not at all aggressive. Charging him was ridiculous. Somebody has to stand up to people who are in the wrong.' Gabrielle Bullock, owner of nearby Bygones antiques, added: 'Wayne was a real asset to the city and I'm sad he's no longer doing the job.' Leena Batchelor, who runs Script Haven bookshop, said: 'I think it was a kneejerk reaction to sack him before any verdict had been given. He was always very pleasant - and he should still have his job.' Nigel Mee, who owns the Rohan outdoor clothing franchise in the city, said: 'Wayne has been treated appallingly. BID used his stats to justify the system businesses pay into - he was one of the biggest reasons they got re-elected. 'Now he's gone, I don't see anyone. Shoplifting is getting worse and the man he pushed is a known shoplifter and fighter. He came at Wayne - why the law took his side, I can't understand.' One shop worker, who asked not to be named, said: 'If you can't stop a shoplifter without losing your job, we're in a right pickle. 'That Barney is a horrible bit of work. He and his mates sit on the bench swearing at kids and starting fights. For BID to say Wayne should have let him back into the shop is absurd. What are we even paying for?' Mr Price said one of the hardest moments was having to explain what had happened to his 10-year-old daughter Eva. 'We told her I had a new job at first because sometimes security work can be dangerous,' he said. 'But when the court case started and the local paper ran a piece, her mum said: 'You need to tell her the truth.'' 'She tells people I'm a superhero - and I don't ever want her to stop seeing me that way.' Describing the incident that led to his firing, he said: 'I was called to Tesco Express as he had been inside throwing wet floor signs and racially abusing a staff member 'When I got there he had walked out so I stood at the door and stopped him coming back in. 'All I did was stood my ground and told him repeatedly if he didn't get away from me I would have to push him. When he came at me with a raised fist I pushed him and he stumbled back and hit his head.' At Worcester Magistrates' Court earlier this month, lead Magistrate Harris Markou, said they believed Mr Price was acting in the execution of his duty and had used reasonable and necessary force. 'Mr Swinbourne acted aggressively. The defendant thought he would be physically attacked, he said. Mr Price, of College Street, Worcester, broke down in tears as the not guilty verdict was delivered and hugged partner Jemma Bailey. Worcester CID has been approached for comment.