A Google search, a broken taillight, a disputed confession. Here are some of the pivotal issues in the Karen Read trial.
Advertisement
Read's
Did Read say 'I hit him' at the scene?
Prosecutors say Read returned to the Fairview Road home with two other women just after 6 a.m. and found O'Keefe's snow-covered body on the lawn, and that she repeatedly said 'I hit him' in the presence of emergency responders.
The defense maintains that Read wondered aloud, 'did I hit him?' or 'could I have hit him?' and that witnesses who testified to hearing her dramatic confession have changed their stories over time or been unduly influenced by investigators.
Advertisement
One such witness is
McCabe testified that she heard a frantic Read tell an emergency responder, 'I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,' at the scene.
''I hit him, I hit him, I hit him' is just as fresh today as it was three years ago,' McCabe said on the stand Wednesday.
She told Read attorney Alan Jackson during a tense cross-examination that a Canton police report saying she had indicated soon after O'Keefe's death that Read said something like 'I hope I didn't hit him' was inaccurate.
'I told [the officer] that she said 'I hit him,'' McCabe said.
Jackson also handed her a 227-page transcript of her previous grand jury testimony, and rhetorically asked her to point out where in the stack of papers she told the panel that Read said 'I hit him.'
'Did you tell that to the grand jurors?' Jackson said.
'I'm not sure,' McCabe said.
'Because you didn't, did you?' Jackson asked.
'Again, I'm not sure,' McCabe said.
Jennifer McCabe of Canton speaks on the witness stand as Judge Beverly Cannone listens in the background during the Karen Read murder trial in Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Wednesday, April 30, 2025. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)
Greg Derr/Associated Press
When did McCabe Google 'hos [sic] long to die in cold'?
As with so much in this case, it depends who you ask.
Read's lawyers have noted repeatedly that the contested Google search was timestamped on McCabe's phone at 2:27 a.m. on Jan. 29, 2022.
If they can convince jurors of the timestamp's accuracy, it's extremely damaging to the government's case: prosecutors maintain that O'Keefe didn't move from the flagpole area of the lawn from around 12:30 a.m. until just after 6 a.m., when Read, McCabe, and a third woman found his body.
Advertisement
But prosecutors recently
digital forensic analyst with the company Cellebrite, who told jurors he believes the search and a second, similar inquiry were conducted on McCabe's phone shortly after 6:20 a.m.
That tracks with McCabe's testimony that Read asked her to Google the information after finding O'Keefe's body in the snow.
Whiffin told jurors the 2:27 a.m. timestamp marked when McCabe first opened the tab on her phone to look up a youth sports score, and that the timestamp didn't change when she used the same tab for the hypothermia searches. He conducted a live demonstration for jurors on an iPhone showing how that could transpire. In addition, Whiffin said he doesn't believe McCabe could have intentionally deleted the search, based on the forensic trail.
While cross-examining Whiffin, Read attorney Robert Alessi asked if Magnet Forensics, a competitor to Cellebrite, 'still shows' a 2:27 a.m. timestamp for the Google search. Whiffin said that was correct.
'And Magnet Forensics is a reliable forensic company, correct?' Alessi asked.
'As reliable as they come,' Whiffin said.
Ian Whiffin, a digital intelligence expert with Celebrite, testifies under cross-examination by the defense during Karen Read's murder retrial at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., on Tuesday, April 29, 2025. (Libby O'Neill/The Boston Herald via AP, Pool)
Libby O'Neill/Associated Press
Did the scratches on O'Keefe's right arm come from a dog?
As they did in the first trial, Read's lawyers at the retrial plan to call
Dr. Marie Russell testifies during Karen Read trial at Norfolk Superior Court on Tuesday, June 18, 2024 in Dedham, Mass. Read is accused of backing her SUV into her Boston Police officer boyfriend, John O'Keefe, and leaving him to die in a blizzard in Canton, in 2022. (Stuart Cahil/The Boston Herald via AP, Pool)
Stuart Cahill/Associated Press
The defense alleges that Chloe, a German Shepherd who lived in the Fairview home at the time, may have attacked O'Keefe during some kind of drunken fracas inside the residence.
Advertisement
The dog has since been rehomed to Vermont, according to prior testimony, and remains a frequent topic of discussion on Read-related social media.
Prosecutors at the retrial
'Seventy pounder,' Jackson said of the dog's imposing frame while questioning McCabe on Wednesday.
He also asked if McCabe was aware Chloe wasn't good with strangers.
McCabe said she knew Chloe wasn't good with other dogs, 'so I could never bring my dog over there.'
When, and how, did Read's taillight crack?
Another key piece of evidence in the case is the damaged right taillight on Read's SUV, which prosecutors say was cracked when she rammed into O'Keefe.
McCabe and
Read's lawyers maintain her taillight was initially damaged when her SUV grazed O'Keefe's vehicle as she backed out of his driveway in an effort to find him around 5 a.m., before she met up with the other women and returned to his residence with them.
The apparent impact with O'Keefe's vehicle was
Read's attorneys allege that law enforcement officials later tampered with the taillight when her vehicle was brought back to a Canton police garage for processing on the evening of Jan. 29, 2022.
Advertisement
Jackson told jurors in his opening statement that investigators found no taillight pieces at the crime scene before investigator Michael Proctor gained access to Read's vehicle at the garage. Authorities have said collecting evidence at the scene was difficult in the blizzard-like conditions at the time.
Proctor was later
after he was forced during the first trial to read a number of crude and misogynistic texts he had sent about Read to friends and co-workers in the early stages of the probe, which the defense seized on to argue that investigators were biased against her from the start.
Prosecutors also
The 'corrected' video shows that Proctor was 'standing feet away' from Read's vehicle and 'never touched' the right taillight, prosecutors
Were O'Keefe's injuries consistent with being hit by a car?
A crash reconstruction firm initially hired by the Justice Department says no.
The DOJ
(
Advertisement
The ARCCA analysts
Analyst Andrew Rentschler testified that if O'Keefe were hit by the SUV as it
as well as bruising and fractures beyond the superficial abrasions documented on O'Keefe's right arm.
Rentschler also said the head injury O'Keefe sustained, in the absence of other trauma, 'is not' consistent with being struck by a vehicle. O'Keefe had suffered a skull fracture and also had severe swelling around his eyes.
'If there's enough force to cause a skull fracture then there's going to certainly be enough force' to cause injuries elsewhere, including on the cervical spine, Rentschler said. Having just the skull fracture, he said, 'is inconsistent' with being struck by a taillight, as prosecutors have maintained.
The defense plans to call the ARCCA witnesses again. But prosecutors maintain the experts, rather than being the neutral fact finders the defense portrayed them as, actually
Weeks after the mistrial, records show, ARCCA billed the defense for roughly $23,000, although Read's lawyers claim they had no prior knowledge of the bill, which Robert Alessi said came 'out of the blue.'
Read's lawyers have since formally retained ARCCA, which conducted additional testing for the retrial. Prosecutors want Judge Beverly J. Cannone to restrict the analysts to testifying only about their findings contained in a February 2024 report that they submitted to the federal government and that was distributed to the prosecution and defense in Read's case.
Cannone has yet to rule.
Material from prior Globe stories was used in this report.
Travis Andersen can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Man whose parents were kidnapped after $245M Bitcoin theft pleads guilty to charges
A Connecticut man whose parents were kidnapped after he took part in a $245 million Bitcoin theft has pleaded guilty to fraud and money laundering conspiracy charges and has agreed to testify against his co-defendants, according to court documents that were unsealed this week. Veer Chetal, 19, from Danbury, Connecticut, was one of three men charged with stealing 4,100 Bitcoins from a victim in Washington, D.C., in an elaborate online scam last August. The trio lived large after the heist, spending millions of dollars on cars, jewelry, rental mansions and nightclub parties, prosecutors say. A week after the theft, Chetal's parents were assaulted and kidnapped briefly in Danbury in a failed ransom plot aimed at Chetal, who the attackers believed had a large amount of cryptocurrency, authorities said. Chetal's criminal case was unsealed on Monday in federal court in Washington, revealing his guilty pleas in November and his agreement to cooperate with federal authorities investigating the Bitcoin theft. It also revealed new allegations that he was involved in about 50 similar thefts that raked in another $3 million between November 2023 and September 2024. Another man charged in the Bitcoin theft, Malone Lam, was also among 13 people indicted by a federal grand jury in May in an alleged online racketeering conspiracy involving cryptocurrency thefts across the U.S. and overseas that netted more than $260 million, including the $245 million Bitcoin theft. Chetal is facing 19 to 24 years in prison, a fine between $50,000 and $500,000 and restitution to the victim that has yet to be determined, according federal sentencing guidelines and his plea agreement. His lawyer, David Weinstein, declined to comment, saying Chetal's case is still pending. In September, federal agents with a search warrant raided Chetal's apartment in Brunswick, New Jersey, and his parents' home in Danbury in connection with the $245 million Bitcoin heist. Authorities said they found more than $500,000 in cash, expensive jewelry and watches and high-end clothing. Federal agents also said Chetal had $39 million worth of cryptocurrency that he turned over to investigators. Authorities alleged Chetal, Lam and Jeandiel Serrano were involved in online 'social engineering' attacks against cryptocurrency holders. Lam would send victims alerts about unauthorized attempts to access their crypto accounts, while the others would call the victims posing as representatives from well-known companies like Google and Yahoo and gain access to their accounts, authorities said. Messages seeking comment were left with lawyers for Lam and Serrano on Friday. A week after the theft, six Florida men were accused of kidnapping Chetal's parents in broad daylight in Danbury. One of them crashed a car into the parents' Lamborghini, while others pulled up in a van, police said. The attackers forced the couple out of their vehicle, beat them, put them in the van and tied them up, police said. The plot was foiled, and the attackers were arrested quickly because there were eyewitnesses who immediately called police, and an off-duty FBI agent happened to be driving by at the time of the kidnapping, authorities said. Federal agents said a seventh man who was later arrested in connection with the kidnapping had previously gotten into a dispute with Chetal that turned physical at a Miami nightclub. The attack on the couple is part of an increasing trend worldwide in robbers using violence to steal cryptocurrency. Chetal, who was attending Rutgers University in New Jersey at the time of the $245 million theft and later withdrew, was born in India and came to the U.S. with his family when he was 4 years old in 2010, according to court documents. His father was granted a foreign worker's visa, and his wife and children obtained related dependent visas. Federal authorities said Chetal could face deportation as a result of the criminal case. Authorities say Chetal's father lost his job at Morgan Stanley because of the kidnapping and his son's connection to it. Chetal was initially released from federal custody on his own recognizance. But a judge ordered him detained until trial earlier this year after federal prosecutors said they discovered Chetal was involved in another crypto theft worth $2 million in October that he didn't tell them about, after he had begun cooperating with federal authorities.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man whose parents were kidnapped after $245M Bitcoin theft has pleaded guilty to federal charges
A Connecticut man whose parents were kidnapped after he took part in a $245 million Bitcoin theft has pleaded guilty to fraud and money laundering conspiracy charges and has agreed to testify against his co-defendants, according to court documents that were unsealed this week. Veer Chetal, 19, from Danbury, Connecticut, was one of three men charged with stealing 4,100 Bitcoins from a victim in Washington, D.C., in an elaborate online scam last August. The trio lived large after the heist, spending millions of dollars on cars, jewelry, rental mansions and nightclub parties, prosecutors say. A week after the theft, Chetal's parents were assaulted and kidnapped briefly in Danbury in a failed ransom plot aimed at Chetal, who the attackers believed had a large amount of cryptocurrency, authorities said. Chetal's criminal case was unsealed on Monday in federal court in Washington, revealing his guilty pleas in November and his agreement to cooperate with federal authorities investigating the Bitcoin theft. It also revealed new allegations that he was involved in about 50 similar thefts that raked in another $3 million between November 2023 and September 2024. Another man charged in the Bitcoin theft, Malone Lam, was also among 13 people indicted by a federal grand jury in May in an alleged online racketeering conspiracy involving cryptocurrency thefts across the U.S. and overseas that netted more than $260 million, including the $245 million Bitcoin theft. Chetal is facing 19 to 24 years in prison, a fine between $50,000 and $500,000 and restitution to the victim that has yet to be determined, according federal sentencing guidelines and his plea agreement. His lawyer, David Weinstein, declined to comment, saying Chetal's case is still pending. In September, federal agents with a search warrant raided Chetal's apartment in Brunswick, New Jersey, and his parents' home in Danbury in connection with the $245 million Bitcoin heist. Authorities said they found more than $500,000 in cash, expensive jewelry and watches and high-end clothing. Federal agents also said Chetal had $39 million worth of cryptocurrency that he turned over to investigators. Authorities alleged Chetal, Lam and Jeandiel Serrano were involved in online 'social engineering' attacks against cryptocurrency holders. Lam would send victims alerts about unauthorized attempts to access their crypto accounts, while the others would call the victims posing as representatives from well-known companies like Google and Yahoo and gain access to their accounts, authorities said. Messages seeking comment were left with lawyers for Lam and Serrano on Friday. A week after the theft, six Florida men were accused of kidnapping Chetal's parents in broad daylight in Danbury. One of them crashed a car into the parents' Lamborghini, while others pulled up in a van, police said. The attackers forced the couple out of their vehicle, beat them, put them in the van and tied them up, police said. The plot was foiled, and the attackers were arrested quickly because there were eyewitnesses who immediately called police, and an off-duty FBI agent happened to be driving by at the time of the kidnapping, authorities said. Federal agents said a seventh man who was later arrested in connection with the kidnapping had previously gotten into a dispute with Chetal that turned physical at a Miami nightclub. The attack on the couple is part of an increasing trend worldwide in robbers using violence to steal cryptocurrency. Chetal, who was attending Rutgers University in New Jersey at the time of the $245 million theft and later withdrew, was born in India and came to the U.S. with his family when he was 4 years old in 2010, according to court documents. His father was granted a foreign worker's visa, and his wife and children obtained related dependent visas. Federal authorities said Chetal could face deportation as a result of the criminal case. Authorities say Chetal's father lost his job at Morgan Stanley because of the kidnapping and his son's connection to it. Chetal was initially released from federal custody on his own recognizance. But a judge ordered him detained until trial earlier this year after federal prosecutors said they discovered Chetal was involved in another crypto theft worth $2 million in October that he didn't tell them about, after he had begun cooperating with federal authorities. Dave Collins, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Former mayor from Haiti gets prison time for lying to get into the US
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A former mayor from Haiti convicted of lying about his violent past on his visa application was sentenced Friday to nine years in prison and three years of supervision, after which he will be subject to deportation proceedings. Jean Morose Viliena, of Malden, Massachusetts, was the mayor of Les Irois, Haiti, from December 2006 until February 2010. He was convicted of three counts of visa fraud in March and sentenced Friday in federal court in Boston. 'For more than a decade, he lived freely and comfortable in this country while the victims of his brutality lived in fear, exile and pain,' U.S. Attorney Leah Foley said in statement. 'Today's sentence brings a measure of justice for the lives he shattered and sends a clear message: the United States will not be a safe have for human rights abusers.' According to prosecutors, Viliena committed 'violent atrocities' against his political foes in an isolated, rural community of about 22,000 residents on Haiti's western tip. In 2007, he was accused of leading a group of his allies to the home of a political opponent, where he and his associates shot and killed the opponent's younger brother, then smashed his skull with a rock. In 2008, Viliena and his allies went armed with guns, machetes, picks and sledgehammers to shut down a community radio station that he opposed, prosecutors said. Authorities said he pistol-whipped and punched a man and ordered an associate to shoot and kill the man and another person. Both survived, but one of the men lost a leg and the other was blinded in one eye. When he applied for a visa to enter the U.S., however, Viliena denied having 'ordered, carried out or materially assisted in extrajudicial and political killings and other acts of violence against the Haitian people.' He later received a permanent resident card and has raised a child who is a U.S. citizen by birth, prosecutors said. Defense attorneys argued in court that it was members of a rival political party — including some who they say are government witnesses — who committed the violence. They described the former mayor as the son of a farmer who became a teacher and eventually ran for mayor to improve conditions in town. In 2023, Viliena was found liable by an American jury in a civil trial in connection with the killing and the two attempted killings and assessed $15.5 million in compensatory and punitive damages. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
