Here's Donald Trump's endgame in Iran

Social Sharing
The United States now appears at the cusp of a development scarcely conceivable just days ago: direct involvement in bombing Iran.
President Donald Trump has begun by dropping something else: hint, after unsubtle hint, that the U.S. might assist Israel in attacking unspecified targets in its conflict with Iran.
He's told people to flee the Iranian capital; posted an all-caps demand on social media for, "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER"; and said he knows where the supreme leader is hiding but won't kill him — for now.
The implied threat is obvious — that the U.S. could send its bombers and bunker-busters to burrow Iran's most secretive nuclear site, the mountain facility at Fordow, into oblivion.
There's also a longer-term threat that this conflict could keep escalating until it risks the survival, both literal and figurative, of the Iranian regime.
So what is Trump doing?
One clue came in an unusually long tweet from his vice-president. JD Vance specifically mentioned uranium enrichment: Iran can end it the easy way, he said, or the hard way, and, if it ends up being the latter, the U.S. military might help.
The prevailing consensus among experts interviewed by CBC News is that the current preferred option in Washington is non-participation.
That remains Plan A, in the view of a 34-year CIA veteran who spent a decade as the national intelligence manager for Iran at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
"It's clear the Trump administration would prefer to see a situation where Israel's attacks compel Iran to return to negotiations with serious concessions — driven by a desire to save the Islamic Republic," said Norman Roule, now a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think-tank in Washington.
"However, it's not yet clear if Iran's leaders believe their situation is so dire they must do so."
WATCH | Trump says he knows location of Iran's supreme leader:
Trump calls for Iran's 'unconditional surrender,' says U.S. knows location of Iranian leader
3 hours ago
Duration 5:34
U.S. President Donald Trump called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and said the U.S. knows the location of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a social media post on Tuesday as the Israel-Iran conflict raged for a fifth day.
Plan B: More escalation
And that's why the U.S. government is actively seeking to instil a sense of desperation in Tehran, ramping up the pressure on Tuesday, said another analyst.
Kamran Bokhari predicted that Israel will hit increasingly vital infrastructure like communications, oil and water supplies.
It is also targeting hardline factions of Iran's security establishment — the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Basij — shifting the balance of power to the less-ideological, pre-revolutionary military.
"It moves up the escalatory ladder," said Bokhari, a Georgetown University professor and senior director for Eurasian security and prosperity at a Washington think-tank, the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy.
Washington's preferred plan, he said, is that Iran end uranium enrichment and fully open the Fordow site to international monitoring. If that doesn't happen, Bokhari said, the U.S. may destroy Fordow, as the Israelis continue targeting the Iranian leadership.
"A last resort — that's what it is," he said of using U.S. B-2 planes to drop massive ordnance penetrator bombs on the heavily fortified underground facility.
Regime change risks
The current message to Iran, he said, is: "We're not trying to bring your regime down. We don't want anarchy in your country." But if this continues, anything is possible.
That's the plan, at least.
The problem with plans foisted by foreigners in the Middle East is they have a track record of occasionally exploding into uncontrollable chaos.
Ali Vaez said the Iranian leadership might see its severely degraded nuclear program and race to build the bomb with whatever assets it has left.
WATCH | Iran's new military chief of staff killed, Israel says:
Israel says it has killed Iran's new military chief of staff
9 hours ago
Duration 6:59
The project director for Iran at the International Crisis Group said he can't imagine the Iranians making major concessions while they're being bombed. It sets a brutal precedent, inviting additional bombing, for additional objectives, whether regime change or ending Iran's missile program.
"A regime in Tehran that sees the choice before it as surrender or fight may opt for the latter, expanding the conflict by targeting U.S. interests, assets and allies," Vaez said.
Even if the Islamic regime collapses, he said, there's no guarantee which path Iran will take: a swift transition like Syria in 2024, or a deadly, destabilizing power struggle in the heart of a volatile region, à la Libya post-2011 or Iraq post-2003.
"It would not be the first time that impressive gains by the U.S. and its allies have eventually ended in grief," Vaez said.
How the U.S. got here
He blames Trump for what he calls the original sin: withdrawing from the Obama-era Iran deal. That pact allowed some enrichment, but not enough to build a bomb.
It's unclear whether Iran was days, or months, or years away from a bomb. It depends who you ask. The Israelis insisted it was potentially imminent; U.S. intelligence less so.
One possible source of confusion is the improvement in centrifuges. Newer generations like the IR-7, IR-8 and IR-9, reportedly being tested by Iran, are dozens of times more efficient at enriching uranium than versions being used a few years ago.
Meanwhile, in a little-noticed assessment, U.S. intelligence officials recently estimated that within a decade, Iran might have 60 intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of striking the continental United States.
Needless to say, U.S.-Iranian relations have been perilous for decades. Just last year, the U.S. Department of Justice charged someone with plotting to kill Trump on behalf of Iranian officials. The charges were laid during the Biden administration.
Three Iran analysts interviewed for this story agreed that Trump legitimately wanted to negotiate a new nuclear deal in recent months. They agreed that talks had languished. One said it was a stretch to even call them a negotiation — more like meetings to set ground rules for negotiations. Trump grew frustrated.
They also agreed that Trump had a shift in posture. For months, he actively pushed back against Israel's desire to strike Iran, then stopped.
Where analysts differ is whether Trump explicitly encouraged it.
After all, just last week he'd said he didn't want Israel attacking, as he still hoped diplomacy might work. Now he's cheering on the Israelis.
Analysts differ on Trump's approach
Vaez of the International Crisis Group said he suspects there was an element of miscommunication. The president had told his Israeli counterpart, in April and May, that he was ardently opposed. Then in June, he expressed frustration at the pace of talks. "Netanyahu took that as a green light," he said, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Bokhari doesn't share that view. He believes the U.S. president was more explicit, and more hawkish, than that.
He said Trump concluded the Iranians were dragging things out, stringing him along, in the belief he was bluffing about real consequences in the absence of a deal.
Trump wanted to reassert leverage, Bokhari said, without being directly involved in any attack, as he'd promised his MAGA base to avoid foreign wars.
"But you have Israel ready to do it," he said. "[Trump] said, 'OK, and let's see what you can do.' And the idea was, 'Well, if you [Iran] weren't willing to talk, if you weren't willing to compromise, then now are you ready to talk after being hit?' ... That strategy is playing itself out."
Trump certainly set some conditions. For example, U.S. officials are telling reporters that the U.S. president nixed an Israel plan to kill Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
WATCH | Tehran residents try to flee capital amid Israeli warnings:
People try to flee Tehran as airstrikes continue
21 hours ago
Duration 2:26
Panicked residents of Tehran tried to flee the city after warnings from Israel of more airstrikes and some Iranian missiles managed to get through Israel's defence systems.
"[Trump would have said to Israel], 'Let's agree on what you're going to hit.' 'This is not open-ended.' 'How much time do you need?'" Bokhari said.
"You know, all the logistical stuff that needs to be figured out. Target sets and no-go areas and so on and so forth."
Now Trump is warning: This could still get worse.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CTV News

8 minutes ago

• CTV News

As Musk's ‘robotaxi' rollout approaches, Democratic lawmakers in Texas try to throw up a roadblock

Elon Musk listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) NEW YORK — A group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas is asking Elon Musk to delay the planned rollout of driverless 'robotaxis' in the state this weekend to assure that the vehicles are safe. In a letter, seven state legislators asked Tesla to wait until September when a new law takes effect that will require several checks before autonomous vehicles can be deployed without a human in the driver's seat. Tesla is slated to begin testing a dozen of what it calls robotaxis for paying customers on Sunday in a limited area of Austin, Texas. 'We are formally requesting that Tesla delay autonomous robotaxi operations until the new law takes effect on September 1, 2025,' the letter from Wednesday, June 18, reads. 'We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations.' It's not clear if the letter will have much impact. Republicans have been a dominant majority in the Texas Legislature for more than 20 years. State lawmakers and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott have generally embraced Musk and the jobs and investment he has brought to Texas, from his SpaceX rocket program on the coast, to his Tesla factory in Austin. The company, which is headquartered in Austin, did not responded immediately to a request for comment from The Associated Press. The law will require companies to secure approval from the state motor vehicles department to operate autonomous cars with passengers. That approval, in turn, would depend on sufficient proof that the cars won't pose a high risk to others if the self-driving system breaks down, among other reassurances. Companies would also have to file detailed plans for how first responders should handle the cars if there is a problem, such as an accident. The letter asked Tesla to assure the legislators it has met all the requirements of the law even if it decides to go ahead with the test run this weekend. The letter was earlier reported by Reuters. Musk has made the robotaxi program a priority at Tesla and a failure would likely be highly damaging to the company's stock, which has already tumbled 20% this year. Musk's political views and his affiliation with the Trump administration have drastically reduced sales of Tesla, particularly in Europe, where Musk's endorsement of Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany party in February's election drew broad condemnation. Tesla shares bottomed out in March and have rebounded somewhat in recent months. Much of the rise reflects optimism that robotaxis will not only be deployed without a hitch, but that the service will quickly expand to other cities and eventually dominate the self-driving cab business. Rival Waymo is already picking up passengers in Austin and several other cities, and recently boasted of surpassing 10 million paid rides. In afternoon trading Friday, Tesla shares were largely unchanged at US$320. --- Bernard Condon, The Associated Press AP reporter Jim Vertuno contributed from Austin.

Globe and Mail

11 minutes ago

• Globe and Mail

Trump calls for special prosecutor to probe false 2020 election claims

U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden, repeating his baseless claim that the contest was marred by widespread fraud. 'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD!' Trump said in a social media post in which he also sought to favourably contrast his immigration enforcement approach with that of the former president. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!' Trump's post, made as his Republican White House is consumed by a hugely substantial foreign policy decision on whether to get directly involved in the Israel-Iran war, is part of an amped-up effort by him to undermine the legitimacy of Biden's presidency. Earlier this month, Trump directed his administration to investigate Biden's actions as president, alleging aides masked his predecessor's 'cognitive decline.' Biden has dismissed the investigation as 'a mere distraction.' Trump orders investigation into Biden's actions as president and use of autopen The post also revives a long-running grievance by Trump that the election was stolen even though courts around the country and a Trump attorney-general from his first term found no evidence of fraud that could have affected the outcome. The Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity arm pronounced the election 'the most secure in American history.' It was unclear what Trump had in mind when he called for a special prosecutor, but in the event Attorney-General Pam Bondi heeds his call, she may face pressure to appoint someone who has already been confirmed by the Senate. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment Friday. The Justice Department in recent years has appointed a succession of special counsels – sometimes, though not always, plucked from outside the agency – to lead investigations into politically sensitive matters, including into conduct by Biden and by Trump. Last year, Trump's personal lawyers launched an aggressive, and successful, challenge to the appointment of Jack Smith, the special counsel assigned to investigate his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election and his retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. A Trump-appointed judge agreed, ruling that then-Attorney General Merrick Garland had exceeded his bounds by appointing a prosecutor without Senate approval and confirmation, and dismissed the case. That legal team included Todd Blanche, who is now deputy attorney-general, as well as Emil Bove, who is Blanche's top deputy but was recently nominated to serve as a judge on a federal appeals court.

Winnipeg Free Press

16 minutes ago

• Winnipeg Free Press

Senate parliamentarian deals blow to GOP plan to gut consumer bureau in tax bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans have suffered a sizable setback on one key aspect of President Donald Trump's big bill after their plans to gut the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau and other provisions from the Senate Banking Committee ran into procedural violations with the Senate parliamentarian. Republicans in the Senate proposed zeroing-out funding for the CFPB, the landmark agency set up in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, to save $6.4 billion. The bureau had been designed as a way to better protect Americans from financial fraud, but has been opposed by many GOP lawmakers since its inception. The Trump administration has targeted the CFPB as an example of government over-regulation and overreach. The findings by the Senate parliamentarian's office, which is working overtime scrubbing Trump's overall bill to ensure it aligns with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule' processes, signal a tough road ahead. The most daunting questions are still to come, as GOP leadership rushes to muscle Trump's signature package to floor for votes by his Fourth of July deadline. Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., the chairman of the Banking Committee that drafted the provisions in question, said in a statement, 'My colleagues and I remain committed to cutting wasteful spending at the CFPB and will continue working with the Senate parliamentarian on the Committee's provisions.' For Democrats, who have been fighting Trump's 1,000-page package at every step, the parliamentarian's advisory amounted to a significant win. 'Democrats fought back, and we will keep fighting back against this ugly bill,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the Banking Committee, who engineered the creation of the CFPB before she was elected to Congress. Warren said that GOP proposals 'are a reckless, dangerous attack on consumers and would lead to more Americans being tricked and trapped by giant financial institutions and put the stability of our entire financial system at risk–all to hand out tax breaks to billionaires.' The parliamentarian's rulings, while advisory, are rarely, if ever ignored. With the majority in Congress, Republicans have been drafting a sweeping package that extends some $4.5 trillion tax cuts Trump approved during his first term, in 2017, that otherwise expire at the end of the year. It adds $350 billion to national security, including billions for Trump's mass deportation agenda. And it slashes some $1 trillion from Medicaid, food stamps and other government programs. All told, the package is estimated to add at least $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade, and leave 10.9 million more people without health care coverage, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's review of the House-passed package, which is now undergoing revisions in the Senate. The parliamentarian's office is responsible for determining if the package adheres to the Byrd Rule, named after the late Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, who was considered one of the masters of Senate procedure. The rule essentially bars policy matters from being addressed in the budget reconciliation process. Senate GOP leaders are using the budget reconciliation process, which is increasingly how big bills move through the Congress, because it allows passage on a simple majority vote, rather than face a filibuster with the higher 60-vote threshold. But if any of the bill's provisions violate the Byrd Rule, that means they can be challenged at the tougher 60-vote threshold, which is a tall order in the 53-47 Senate. Leaders are often forced to strip those proposals from the package, even though doing so risks losing support from lawmakers who championed those provisions. One of the biggest questions ahead for the parliamentarian will be over the Senate GOP's proposal to use 'current policy' as opposed to 'current law' to determine the baseline budget and whether the overall package adds significantly to deficits. Already the Senate parliamentarian's office has waded through several titles of Trump's big bill, including those from the Senate Armed Services Committee and Senate Energy & Public Works Committee. The Banking panel offered a modest bill, just eight pages, and much of it was deemed out of compliance. The parliamentarian found that in addition to gutting the CFPB, other provisions aimed at rolling back entities put in place after the 2008 financial crisis would violate the Byrd Rule. Those include a GOP provision to limit the Financial Research Fund, which was set up to conduct analysis, saving nearly $300 million; and another to shift the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which conducts oversight of accounting firms, to the Securities and Exchange Commission and terminate positions, saving $773 million. The GOP plan to change the pay schedule for employees at the Federal Reserve, saving $1.4 billion, was also determined to be in violation of the Byrd Rule. The parliamentarian's office also raised Byrd Rule violations over GOP proposals to repeal certain aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act, including on emission standards for some model year 2027 light-duty and medium-duty vehicles. __ Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.