Do you need to watch 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later before 28 Years Later? Here's what you should know

With 28 Years Later officially on the way and director Danny Boyle returning to the franchise that helped redefine modern horror, anticipation is running high. But with two decades separating this new chapter from the original film, one question has everyone intrigued: Do you really need to watch the previous movies to get into 28 Years Later?
Let's unpack what we know and why watching the earlier films might give you more than just context—it might give you chills in all the right places.
28 Years Later: Is it connected to the first two?
If you're the type who likes to dive into a movie fresh, you'll probably be fine. Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland have a reputation for storytelling that's self-contained, so 28 Years Later is likely to stand on its own. That said, if you want to understand the emotional weight of the franchise, the evolution of the virus, and the deep sense of loss that defines this universe, the first two films are worth your time.
28 Days Later introduced more than just a virus
Released in 2002, 28 Days Later is where it all began. This was the film that gave us the rage virus—not quite zombies, but infected humans driven by uncontrollable aggression. It also gave us Cillian Murphy's breakout performance as Jim, a man who wakes up from a coma to find London completely abandoned.
28 Days Later. Credit: IMDb
But this wasn't just a post-apocalyptic survival story. It was raw, emotional, and eerily quiet, shot in a way that made everything feel uncomfortably real. You got glimpses of the virus's origin, the speed of its spread, and how fragile civilisation truly is. Even now, it holds up as a masterclass in minimalist horror. Watching this one gives you a strong foundation in what kind of nightmare world 28 Years Later is building on.
What 28 Weeks Later added to the series
Five years later came 28 Weeks Later, a sequel that explored the aftermath of the initial outbreak. Directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, this installment zoomed out to show how military forces tried to reintroduce civilians into a quarantined zone. Predictably, the virus wasn't finished yet, and what follows is a harrowing collapse of a false sense of safety.
28 Weeks Later. Credit: IMDb
While it's more action-heavy than Days, the sequel still captures the same emotional bleakness. It introduces ideas about how the virus might return, mutate, or survive in hosts that don't show symptoms. It also raises moral questions about sacrifice, trust, and institutional failure—ideas that could easily carry into 28 Years Later.
What we know about 28 Years Later
Very little plot information has been officially confirmed, but we do know 28 Years Later will be the first in a new trilogy. Cillian Murphy is back, this time as an executive producer, though there are strong rumours that he might appear on screen. The involvement of both Boyle and Garland is a major signal that this won't be just a nostalgia-fuelled reboot but a return to the gritty, thoughtful horror of the original.
Whether the story continues any specific character arcs or not, the time jump of nearly three decades suggests we'll see either the long-term aftermath of societal collapse or the dangers of trying to rebuild.
28 Years Later is set to release in theatres on June 20, 2025 , and brings a fresh but familiar cast into the apocalyptic world. Jodie Comer stars as Isla, a mother navigating the chaos, alongside Aaron Taylor-Johnson as Jamie, her partner. Ralph Fiennes joins the cast as Dr. Ian Kelson, a mysterious figure tied to the infected, while Jack O'Connell plays a cult-like leader named Sir Jimmy Crystal. Young newcomer Alfie Williams plays Spike, a 12-year-old centre character of the story.
You can totally skip the first two films!
While watching the first two films will give you a deeper feel for the 28 world, you don't have to binge them to keep up with the new one. But if you do, every scream in an empty street, every split-second decision, and every flicker of hope will hit a little harder.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Pink Villa

an hour ago

• Pink Villa

28 Years Later Box Office: Danny Boyle's zombie film surpasses Final Destination Bloodlines and Sinners, grossing USD 5.8 million in previews

Danny Boyle's latest release 28 Years Later is making waves among the cinegoers. The post-apocalyptic horror movie is receiving polarising word-of-mouth from the audience, though, it began its box office journey on an impressive note. 28 Years Later clocks USD 5.8 million from preview shows, targets USD 50 million weekend Starring Jodi Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Jack O'Connell, Alfie Williams and Ralph Fiennes, the movie rakes in over USD 5.8 million from preview shows at the domestic box office. Mounted on a production budget of USD 75 million, the third installment of the much-loved 28 Days franchise is targeting a strong debut. Going by the current trends and buzz, the zombie movie is aiming for USD 45 million to USD 50 million in its opening weekend itself. Though the movie has received a thumbs up from the critics, it has the audience in different thoughts. The mixed-bag reactions might be a major concern for its box office potential. 28 Years Later surpasses Sinners, A Quiet Place 2, and Final Destination Bloodlines The post-apocalyptic horror movie performed better than recent Hollywood horror releases- Sinners, A Quiet Place and Final Destination Bloodlines. While Sinners had collected around USD 4.7 million in its previews, A Quiet Place 2 raked over USD 4.8 million, the 6th installment of the Final Destination franchise clocked over USD 5.5 million from the previews at the domestic box office. All eyes are now on the weekend growth of 28 Years Later. It will be interesting to see whether it can perform on the expected lines or not. 28 Years Later film series and sequels Set three decades after the events of the first film, 28 Years Later marked the reunion of Danny Boyle and acclaimed writer Alex Garland after 23 years since the film series' first release- 28 Days Later (2002). It was followed by 28 Weeks Later (2007), which was helmed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. The latest release is planned as a trilogy. Its second installment is already in the works under the direction of Nia DaCosta. Slated to release in 2026, the sequel is officially titled 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple. It stars Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Jack O'Connell, and Cillian Murphy in key roles. Stay tuned to Pinkvilla for more.

India.com

3 hours ago

• India.com

Made for Rs 30 lakh, this Amitabh Bachchan film became a huge hit, earned Rs..., won 9 awards, has 8.1 IMDb rating, movie is...

Amitabh Bachchan is one of those actors who have been enthralling audiences for decades. For the last 55 years, the actor has carved a remarkable place for himself, which he continues to hold even at the age of 82. From Zanjeer, Deewar, Trishul, Silsila to Coolie, Baghban, Sarkar, Piku, and more, the Big B of Bollywood has delivered several hits. Today, we will talk about one of those films of Big B that became a huge hit, earned him 9 awards, and also has an IMDb rating of 8.1. This movie featured the late actor Rajesh Khanna and was released 54 years ago, becoming a massive success. The film we are talking about is Anand. Released in 1971, this film won the Filmfare Award for Best Film in 1972. Rajesh Khanna won the Best Actor Award. On the other hand, Amitabh Bachchan won the Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actor. This film also received the Filmfare Award for Best Story. Gulzar received the Filmfare Award for Best Dialogue for the film. Hrishikesh Mukherjee was honored with the Filmfare Award for Best Editor and also received the National Award for this film. What stood out in the film was the powerful climax of Anand. Apart from that, the songs from the film also left audiences emotional and are still cherished to this day. The film was so loved by the audience that it received an 8.1 IMDb rating. If you are planning to watch the film, you can find it on Amazon Prime Video. Apart from Rajesh Khanna and Amitabh Bachchan, the movie also features Sumita Sanyal, the late actor Ramesh Deo, Seema Deo, and more.

The Hindu

5 hours ago

• The Hindu

‘28 Years Later' movie review: Celebrating the terrible beauty of the apocalypse

Taylor Holmes's 1915 rendition of Rudyard Kipling's 1903 poem, 'Boots', with its repeated words pounding in one's brain sets the tone for the film's delirious beauty. That Kipling wrote it imagining the thoughts of an infantry soldier during the second Boer war and it has been used since for its psychological effects through the World Wars, in Russia, in videogames and now more than 100 years later in a post-apocalyptic horror movie, signifies how things change and remain the same. 28 Years Later (English) Director: Danny Boyle Starring: Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Jack O'Connell, Alfie Williams, Ralph Fiennes Storyline: A boy travels to the ravaged mainland with his mother in search of a doctor to cure her who might cure her Runtime: 115 minutes The third installment in the series, which started with Danny Boyle's 28 Days Later (2002), followed by 28 Weeks Later (2007), 28 Years Later, written by Alex Garland, is the first of a new trilogy. The movie opens with a young boy, Jimmy, whose family is overwhelmed by the rage virus, running to his father who is praying in church. His father welcomes the ravening hordes as a form of rapture while Jimmy escapes. After 28 years, the rest of the world has conquered the virus and moved on while the United Kingdom is in quarantine. An island, Lindisfarne, connected to the mainland by a heavily guarded causeway, has a group of survivors living a kind of normal life. Spike (Alfie Williams) is 12 years old and his father, Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), feels the time has come for him to go to the mainland for his first kill — a rite of passage among the islanders. Isla (Jodie Comer), Jamie's wife and Spike's mum, suffers from a mysterious illness with crippling headaches and memory loss. Spike is amazed at the vastness of the mainland, he learns of the different kind of infected from the bloated crawlers eating worms off the forest floors to the cunning, sentient, ripped Alphas who do a neat line in ripping off heads, spinal cord and all. While Spike is celebrated as a hero on his return, he feels let down. When he learns of a mysterious doctor on the mainland, who might or might not be insane, he decides to take Isla to find the doctor in the hope of curing her. Boyle is credited with revitalising the post apocalyptic zombie genre, whose influence is still felt today, what with the nasty cordyceps laying waste to civilisation on a screen near you. Similar to other apocalyptic tales, 28 Years Later features intense bloody, brutal action — Samson (Chi Lewis-Parry), the powerful alpha, is the stuff of nightmares. It also features stretches of unimaginable beauty. The ruined countryside looks magnificent, truly a bejewelled isle reinforced by the bird's-eye view. Ralph Fiennes as the mysterious Doctor Kelson, though echoing Colonel Kurtz, sees a beauty in the horror of it. His ritualistic citadel of bones is a temple to insanity or cold reason depending on your perspective. He brings memories of that other great renaissance navel gazer/deep thinker, when he holds up a skull to say 'Alas, poor Erik.' Fiennes brings in the gravitas, while Williams embodies the raw power and frailty of youth, and Edvin Ryding as Erik, the hapless Swedish NATO soldier, provides the unintentional humour. With a sequel featuring more of cult leader, Jimmy (Jack O'Connell), and Cillian Murphy from 28 Days Later, this is one psychedelic nightmare train, with Boyle and Garland at the wheel, that you will want to ride all the way to the end of the world. 28 Years Later is currently running in theatres