ITR-2 updates: Who benefits and who needs to be careful

The Income Tax Department announced the revised ITR 2 form for AY 2025 26 this week, reflecting a push for more detailed disclosures and tighter compliance. Here, through insights from tax experts, we explain what ordinary taxpayers need to know and how to navigate the changes.
Date based capital gains reporting
'The new form separates capital gains before and after July 23, 2024,' explains Dr. Simarjeet Singh, assistant professor of Finance at Great Lakes Institute of Management.She added "post date sales can opt for a flat 12.5 per cent tax rate without indexation, versus the earlier 20 per cent with indexation."
• Two sets of calculations are now required.
• Precise record keeping of sale dates is crucial to avoid filing errors.
Claiming share buyback losses
'Retail investors finally have clarity on buyback losses,' says Amit Bansal, partner at Singhania & Co. He added "from October 1, 2024, capital losses on share buybacks can be claimed only if corresponding dividend income is reported under Schedule OS."
• Cross reference losses and dividends carefully.
• Omission can lead to disallowed claims and notices.
Higher asset disclosure threshold
The reporting bar under Schedule AL has jumped from ~50 lakh to ~1 crore.
'This is a relief for upper middle income taxpayers,' notes Dr. Kirti Sharma, associate professor at Great Lakes. "Filers earning up to ~1 crore need not list every asset and liability in detail, freeing them from cumbersome schedules."
Detailed deductions and TDS codes
· TDS section reporting: Taxpayers must now state the exact section code (e.g., 192 for salary, 194I for rent) rather than just the deductor name and amount.
· Chapter VI 'A breakdown: Deductions under sections like 80C must specify sub categories (PF, LIC, tuition fees), while 80G donations require the ARN.
'These moves signal a shift to verification readiness,' warns SR Patnaik, head of taxation at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. 'The department's data 'matching will flag inconsistencies.'
Expanded foreign and digital asset reporting
· Schedule FA/FSI: Overseas investments now need more granular details, including Legal Entity Identifiers for high value transactions.
· Virtual digital assets: Trades remain taxed at 30 per cent under section 115BBH, with no set??'off for losses—making exact reporting non 'negotiable.
Tips for smooth self filing Here are detailed, step-by-step tips by Dr. Kirti Sharma.
1. Start Well Ahead: Spread the process over days to reduce fatigue??'induced mistakes.
2. Gather your documents: Form 16/16A, AIS/Form 26AS, bank statements, capital gains statements and donation ARNs.
3. Use pre??'fill utilities: The income??'tax portal's JSON uploader now accommodates most new disclosures.
4. Compare tax regimes: Run numbers under both old and new regimes before choosing to opt out of Section 115BAC. SR Patnaik supported the broader idea of being well-prepared and vigilant during self-filing.
In sum, the revamped ITR '2 strikes a balance. It lightens the load for many salaried and retired taxpayers by raising thresholds, yet demands greater diligence from those with capital gains, foreign holdings or digital assets. 'For straightforward incomes, it remains navigable,' Singh concludes, 'but complexity now truly warrants professional advice for anyone with multiple income streams.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

an hour ago

• Mint

India's gross direct tax collections rise 4.86% to ₹5.45 lakh crore in FY26 so far, net collections dip – Here's why

The gross direct tax collections in India for the financial year 2025-26 rose by 4.86 per cent to nearly ₹ 5.45 lakh crore as of June 19, from ₹ 5.19 lakh crore reported during the same period the previous year, according to data released by the Income Tax Department. There was a marginal dip of 1.39 per cent in the net tax collections, which stood at ₹ 4.59 crore, due to a 58 per cent increase in refunds issued, PTI reported. As of June 19, advance tax collections for the financial year 2025-26 were ₹ 1.56 lakh crore, a 3.87 per cent growth. The surge in advance tax collections was primarily due to a 5.86 per cent increase in corporate advance tax payments, while collections from non-corporate taxpayers decreased by 2.68 per cent. Even though corporate tax collections rose, the Securities Transaction Tax (STT) experienced a decrease, and the overall growth in collections was moderated by high refund outflows. The Income Tax Department recently launched the 'e-Pay Tax' feature, which is an online portal to make payments through the net banking facility of the authorised banks. The July 2024 Budget included a proposal for an extensive evaluation of the Income Tax Act of 1961. The aim was to streamline the Act for clarity, ultimately minimising disputes and litigation. On March 25, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman mentioned that the new Income Tax Bill will be discussed during the Parliament's monsoon session. The Finance Minister has previously indicated in his budget speech that under the updated tax structure, individuals with earnings up to ₹ 12 lakhs will incur no tax liability thanks to the raised rebate of ₹ 60,000. On March 18, the government urged stakeholders to provide their suggestions on the newly introduced Income Tax Bill 2025, which is currently being reviewed by the Select Committee for detailed consideration.

Economic Times

9 hours ago

• Economic Times

UAE rule, wary I-T to deter dodgy crypto deals

Mumbai: In the lane to launder money, the skill to move cryptos to control companies and properties in Dubai has been honed over the past few years. But treading that alley would soon become tougher. Dual, albeit unrelated, developments in India and the UAE would force money movers to devise new tricks. First, Income tax (I-T) officials, hunting for illicit homes of Indians over the past six months, now strongly suspect that some property purchases were made with cryptocurrencies; second, a new regulatory regime in the Middle East country, would soon end payment in cryptos, other than stable coins, to freely buy goods and services. "When Indian residents use crypto to purchase real estate, they bypass Indian banking channels and FEMA scrutiny. But, under the new UAE regulations (expected from August), merchants would no longer accept crypto directly. Only entities licensed by the UAE Central Bank would be allowed to convert stablecoins to AED after collecting full KYC. While this framework ensures the buyer's identity is recorded, it remains unclear whether such data would be shared under the India-UAE tax treaty," said Purushottam Anand, founder of the law firm Crypto raiding a leading UAE developer having roots in Mumbai and clients across India, a northern office of the I-T department found that more than 460 buyers in the 650-odd property deals have no record of having remitted money through banks to acquire the properties. According to findings which were shared with other I-T centres two months ago, the arm of the UAE realtor which brokered the deals was aided by a network of 86 sub-brokers who later shared details with the tax office. According to tax circles, some of the clients had paid in cryptos, probably under the belief it would go untraced. Earlier this year, the department had found that hundreds of mule accounts were opened by a few persons in Kerala to deposit cash, use the money to buy cryptos -either on local platforms or through peer-to-peer transactions-and then move the coins to other wallets before encashing the them in UAE, or buying assets like properties, or transferring them to third parties. "When digital assets move from exchanges to P2P platforms or private wallets, monitoring becomes difficult, creating opportunities for illegal activities such as ransomware attacks, laundering, tax evasion, and potentially terrorist financing. Although the exchanges are required to report 'suspicious transactions', including withdrawals, with the Financial Intelligence Unit-India, such risks can be further addressed through stricter enforcement of TDS provisions, i.e. Sections 194S or 195, ensuring tax compliance for all crypto transactions, whether conducted on or off exchanges. Additionally, specifying the reporting entities and the format for disclosures under Section 285BAA will improve traceability," said Ashish Karundia, founder of the CA firm Ashish Karundia & Co. 'PAYMENT TOKEN REGULATIONS' The new 'Payment Token Services Regulation' lays down the rules and conditions established by the UAE Central Bank for granting a licence or registration for payment token services-which include payment token issuance, token conversion, and token custody and transfer. Under the rules no merchant or anyone in the UAE selling goods or services can accept a virtual asset unless it's a dirham payment token issued by a licensed issuer. Also, a bank cannot act as a payment token issuer. UAE is working on Dirham-linked stable coin (like USDT or Tether which is pegged to the dollar)."This would have implications for India which has close economic and financial ties with the UAE. By bringing digital assets such as payment tokens under a structured licensing and anti-money laundering framework, the regulation adds a layer of safety and transparency to cross-border digital financial flows. For Indian individuals and businesses engaging in the UAE's digital economy, on one hand this means greater clarity, reduced risk of fraud, and alignment with global best practices; on the other hand, the clear prohibition on anonymous crypto instruments like privacy tokens reinforces the global trend toward traceable and regulated digital transactions. This is something India is also actively pursuing through its own financial intelligence mechanisms. This would deter transactions in property, high value luxury products bought by Indians in UAE using crypto tokens," said Siddharth Banwat, partner at CA firm Banwat & Associates dealers said the UAE rules are not entirely fool-proof as coins can be routed through platforms in multiple jurisdictions whose cooperation would be vital to spot the trail. But the very presence of licensed intermediaries collecting and storing information would deter money movers.

Time of India

10 hours ago

• Time of India

I-T's benami unit attaches 170 acre of land in MP linked to private firm

Bhopal: In a major crackdown on alleged benami transactions , the Benami Prohibition Unit of the Income Tax department has provisionally attached 170 acres of land in Rewa district, Madhya Pradesh, under Section 24(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions (PBPT) Act, 1988. The attached land is part of a larger block of approximately 700 acres across 112 khasras, originally purchased in 2011 for Rs 10.35 crore. The transactions were made in the names of Kardam Mishra and Ajay Kumar — both salaried employees of a wholly-owned subsidiary firm of a major private company. According to the department's findings, Mishra and Kumar were employees with nominal salaries, and their financial profiles did not support such a substantial investment in immovable property. During investigation, Mishra admitted under oath that the properties were purchased by senior officials of the private company in their names. A forensic financial analysis revealed that payments to the original landowners were made directly from the company's bank accounts. Subsequently, these properties were registered in the name of Prosperous Energy Pvt. Ltd. Meanwhile, the "consideration amount" was shown as routed through the bank accounts of Mishra and Kumar, only to be transferred back to the company in multiple tranches, indicating a classic case of layered benami transactions. The Income Tax department has determined that the real ownership and beneficial use of these properties rested with the private company and its subsidiary. This arrangement falls squarely under the definition of a "benami transaction" as per Section 2(9)(A) of the PBPT Act. A show-cause notice under Section 24(1) has been served to both the benamidars and the beneficial owners. Adding another layer to the case, it was discovered that the company had secured a short-term loan of Rs 925 crore from IDBI Bank by mortgaging these properties, along with others belonging to private firm. Due to default in repayment, IDBI Bank auctioned several of these properties. However, 46 khasras, covering approximately 170 acres, remained unsold and have now been provisionally attached to prevent any further alienation. Further proceedings under the PBPT Act are underway.