CJP's political outreach sparks questions
The country's top judge played host to some unusual guests at his residence last week, first meeting with executive officials and later conferring with the key opposition party to seek their input on the judicial reform agenda, among other matters -- sparking debate over the judiciary's role in political affairs and the implications of such engagements.
In the curious turn of events, Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Yahya Afridi not only waded into politically charged waters but also reportedly counselled the opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) to stay within the system and shun boycotts – advice that comes as PTI and other opposition parties gear up for an anti-government push.
Political experts have described the development as unprecedented, noting that previous chief justices have also attempted to "fix the system" despite it being beyond their constitutional mandate. They argue that engaging with a select group of political representatives was an unwise move and question whether the chief justice will now extend the same opportunity to other political parties.
In the first meeting, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had requested CJP for expeditious disposal of tax-related cases on merit as, as of January 2025, as many as 33,522 cases worth Rs4.7 trillion are currently pending nationwide in various courts and tribunals.
Though the executive's meeting with the top judge went smoothly, PTI somewhat grilled CJP by telling him it doesn't recognize the 26th Amendmentthe very amendment that paved the way for CJP's appointment and urged him to decide petitions regarding the 26th Amendment first, refrain from 'court packing', put his house in order, and do not become an accomplice against PTI.
Referring to recent letters and petitions of Supreme Court and Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges pertaining to the 26th Amendment and seniority of high court's judges, respectively, as well as the alleged role of spy agencies, the PTI delegation had gone on to say that it was CJP's responsibility to fix things in his own backyard.
PTI had also briefed CJP in detail about how PTI founder Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, were being treated unfairly and urged him to ensure the rule of law and the Constitution in the country instead of allowing the judiciary to become an accomplice against PTI.
"Many past CJPs remained under the illusion that they had a much greater role to fix the national problems beyond the role assigned to them by the Constitution," the Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT), Ahmed Bilal Mehboob, said.
The PILDAT chief argued that previous CJPs had also attempted to take on broader responsibilities but it didn't lead to anything meaningful. "CJPs tried to assume the role but judges are neither cut out for that role nor our constitution defines such a role for judges or CJP," Mehboob said.
To the questions about how things have played up in SC and IHC in the past few weeks, Mehboob said that "it was not a very wise move for CJP to meet PM and PTI delegation led by Leader of the Opposition," saying "it was unnecessary, against the past practices and potentially counterproductive."
In addition, he said, "CJP unnecessarily exposed himself to the political narrative of PTI." He further added that it will be difficult for CJP now if other political parties also ask to be heard.
Professor Tahir Naeem Malik of NUML University opined that CJP's newly-assumed role of meeting political parties was unprecedented as none invited and met political parties to discuss political, judicial and other issues in the past few decades.
"CJP stepping out of his institutional role and trying to resolve political crisis can be interpreted in different ways but simple truth makes sense: it's not his job to meet a select few political parties, assure them to resolve their grievances and then later on decide their cases," Professor Malik said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
SHC orders opening of Governor House for acting governor
The Constitutional Bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC), comprising Justice K.K. Agha and Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, heard Acting Governor Owais Qadir Shah's petition challenging the locking of Governor House offices. The court ordered the immediate reopening of these offices and directed the principal secretary to submit a compliance report by June 23. During the urgent hearing, the bench granted acting governor immediate access to the Sindh Governor's official residence. The court specifically ordered the unlocking of all offices (excluding private residential quarters) and restrained the principal secretary from obstructing the acting governor's access. The court also directed that a copy of the judicial order be transmitted to the President of Pakistan and the Principal Secretary of the Governor's House, Sindh. In the petition, it was averred that since assuming charge, the Acting Governor, Owais Qadir Shah, has been denied entry to the Governor's House for official duties which is a violation of Article 104 of the Constitution. Governor Kamran Tessori has been abroad since June 2. Acting Governor of Sindh, Owais Qadir Shah, informed the court that a meeting on law and order in the was scheduled for today, specifically to discuss matters related to Muharram. The home minister, secretary, IG Sindh, and other officials reached for the meeting. However, the principal secretary stated that the governor had taken the office keys with him. Owais Qadir Shah stated that this was an act of considering the Governor's House as their personal lounge. He cited the Constitution, which clearly states that in the absence of the governor, the acting governor can perform duties. Owais Qadir Shah said, he would write to the chief minister, highlighting that this was a mockery of the Constitution.
Business Recorder
16 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan budget for 2025-26 to consolidate economic gains, NA told
ISLAMABAD: Amid criticism from opposition lawmakers, Minister of State for Finance Bilal Azhar Kayani on Friday said that the budget is aimed at further consolidating economic gains, providing relief to the people, and continuing the reform process. He said the reforms would also extend to tax fraud investigations, with new safeguards to prevent arbitrary arrests. Under the new policy, arrests during investigations would only occur in cases of sales tax fraud exceeding Rs50 million, and only after approval from a three-member Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) panel. The opposition lawmakers; however, sharply criticised the budget, saying it lacked vision and heavily favoured the handful elite. They decried the increase in allocations to the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP), which rose from Rs592 billion to Rs716 billion, arguing it came at the expense of education, whose allocation remains comparatively low. PTI says 'federal budget favours elite, ignores masses' The opposition also slammed what they termed a symbolic 10 percent salary raise for government employees and a seven percent hike in pensions for retired government employees. They noted the budget failed to increase the minimum wage, allegedly due to pressure from industrialists. The Finance Ministry did announce some tax relief for salaried individuals, a promise previously made by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. But opposition members ridiculed the tax relief for those earning above Rs1.2 million annually, calling it a 'cruel joke.' At the outset of the session, Federal Minister for Finance Muhammad Aurangzeb laid four Statutory Regulatory Orders (SROs) before the House, issued under the Customs Act and Income Tax Ordinance. He confirmed to the speaker that he would conclude the budget debate on Monday. Several lawmakers belonging to both opposition and treasury participated in the ongoing debate on the Finance Bill for 2025-26, voicing a wide range of concerns and suggestions. Pakistan People's Party (PPP) MNA Nafeesa Shah called for greater support to the agriculture sector. Saba Talpur echoed this sentiment, urging the government to cut prices of seeds, fertilisers, and pesticides to support farmers. Junaid Akbar Khan of PTI said the budget had nothing for the people and called attention to sacrifices made by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in the war on terror. Agha Rafiullah of PPP demanded that the government review proposed family pension reforms and remove limitations affecting spouses and disabled children. Sahibzada Hamid Raza of SIC criticised the apparent neglect of health and education sectors in the budget. Minister for Religious Affairs Muhammad Yousaf described the budget as balanced and praised the government's handling of Hajj arrangements, noting that over 115,000 Pakistani pilgrims participated this year. Saudi Arabia awarded Pakistan for its management, and planning for next year's pilgrimage has already begun, he added. Qaiser Ahmed Sheikh, Minister for the Board of Investment, said macroeconomic indicators were improving, with inflation falling and remittances rising. He urged all political parties to agree on a Charter of Economy to attract investors. Minister for Public Affairs Rana Mubashir Iqbal said Rs250 billion had been allocated for Balochistan, including Rs100 billion for road infrastructure and further allocations for dams, agriculture, energy, education, and health. Minister of State for Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony Kesoo Mal Kheal Das stressed that no new taxes had been imposed on agriculture and reaffirmed the government's commitment to completing the Sukkur-Karachi motorway. Murtaza Mahmud lauded the government's steps toward economic stability, while Pullain Baloch called for tax relief for the public. Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar reiterated Pakistan's stance against Israeli aggression – whether in Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, or elsewhere – stating that the country will continue to oppose and condemn such actions. Other lawmakers who took part in the debate included Fayyaz Hussain, Azimuddin Zahid, Shaharyar Khan Mahar, Osama Sarwar, Noor Alam, Farah Naz and Zulfiqar Ali, Zahra Wadood. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
KSA envoy calls on CJP
ISLAMABAD: Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Nawaf bin Saeed Ahmad Al-Malkiy on Friday called on the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Yahya Afridi, at the Supreme Court, Islamabad. The chief justice warmly welcomed the ambassador and expressed appreciation for the longstanding, historic, and fraternal ties between Pakistan and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, rooted in shared faith and mutual respect. During the meeting, both dignitaries discussed avenues for strengthening bilateral cooperation in the field of justice. Emphasis was laid on expanding judicial collaboration under the framework of Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030, which includes modernisation and reform of the Kingdom's judicial system. It was noted that Pakistan holds Saudi Arabia in high esteem and values the opportunity to learn from each other's judicial systems and experiences. Both sides agreed that meaningful collaboration through exchange programmes and partnerships between judicial academies can significantly enhance capacity building and promote shared learning. Joint training initiatives were also discussed to equip judicial officers and legal professionals with modern tools and comparative legal perspectives. The discussion further covered areas such as the modernisation of judicial processes, establishment of specialised commercial and labour courts, collaborative research in Islamic jurisprudence, and comparative legal studies focusing on interfaith dialogue. The possibility of jurisprudential dialogue on thematic legal areas, regional judicial engagement, and hosting a Regional Judicial Conference also featured prominently. The chief justice reaffirmed Pakistan's commitment to fostering closer institutional linkages with the Saudi judiciary and underscored the importance of shared legal values in promoting regional stability, justice, and the rule of law. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
