Republicans ignore their own age issues in pursuit of Biden's frailty

One political party nominated a 78-year-old candidate for president last summer with a history of obscuring his health.
The same party kept in place an octogenarian congressional leader until earlier this year, despite health battles. And that party just elevated a 91-year-old to a constitutional leadership position third in the line of presidential succession.
Must be Democrats, right?
No, that lineup comes from Republicans: President Donald Trump, who turns 79 this weekend; Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), 83, who stepped down as GOP leader in January; and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the Senate's president pro tempore who chairs the Judiciary Committee.
While Democrats are undergoing a bruising internal debate about generational change, Republicans have shown little appetite for a similar discussion. They don't want to talk about elderly politicians, just Biden's cognitive state.
'This isn't an age issue,' Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Missouri) said Thursday.
'I don't think this is so much about age as it's about cognitive ability,' Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) also said Thursday.
Schmitt, 49, and Cornyn, 73, are co-chairing an 'unfit to serve' hearing Wednesday before the Judiciary Committee examining how much Biden's senior aides concealed his condition.
In less partisan times, senators might have used this moment to launch a sober discussion about creating transparent health and cognitive tests to ensure future presidents do not face similar allegations.
'I think for the country moving forward, it's important to understand how this could happen, or how this would have happened, and make sure it never happens again,' Schmitt said in a brief interview.
But such a bipartisan effort is not likely when Republicans will not acknowledge any potential health risks for Trump, who is slated to turn 82 during his final year in office.
'This is really about Joe Biden, a man who was clearly incompetent,' Schmitt said.
'Some people like President Trump operate on all cylinders at 79, where Biden obviously was incapacitated,' Cornyn said.
The former president, who was diagnosed last month with cancer, has denied that he was unfit to serve or that senior aides were running the government. But post-presidency books have revealed that Biden's mental state had clearly gotten worse over the four-year term, alleging that only a few senior aides and family members were fully aware of his condition.
Democrats have responded to Biden's withdrawal from the race last July and Trump's subsequent victory in November with a furious debate about the standing of their party's elder statesmen.
House Democrats pushed aside three committee leaders who were all over 75 years old in favor of younger lawmakers. And next week they will elect a new ranking member for the Oversight Committee, with a pair of second-term Democrats challenging two 70-somethings for the post.
Sen. Dick Durbin (Illinois), the No. 2 Democratic leader for 20 years, announced he would retire at the end of next year. The leading candidate to replace the 80-year-old is Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), who is 52.
Outside liberal activists have pledged to force older Democrats into primaries next year against next-generation challengers.
Any similar look in the mirror by Republicans is not in the offing.
Yes, after 18 years as leader, McConnell stepped aside in January after a bad fall in 2023 caused several other health incidents. The new majority leader, 64-year-old Sen. John Thune (R-South Dakota), is middle-aged by Senate standards.
But of the five senators who are at least 80 years old, three are Republican: Grassley, McConnell and James E. Risch (Idaho).
McConnell, who is retiring the end of next year, now chairs the subcommittee in charge of almost $1 trillion in defense spending. Risch, 82, chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and announced in early April that he is running again for a term that will end when he is 89.
Grassley has remained resilient despite being 91 and is an active committee chair. But by electing him as pro tem — a mostly honorific position — Republicans placed him in line to succeed Trump, creating the possibility of a nonagenarian president at a moment of national crisis if the vice president and House speaker are not able to serve.
Cornyn, who is around the same age as Biden was at the end of his vice presidency in January 2017, is running for another term that, if reelected, would end when he is just shy of 81.
The average Senate Democrat, at the start of this new Congress, was 66, compared to 64.5 for a Republican, according to a Pew Research study.
In the House, there's no partisan difference: The average Democrat is 57.6 years old, 57.5 for Republicans, according to Pew.
By later this year, after three younger Democrats are sworn in to replace three lawmakers who died in their 70s recently, their caucus will likely be a little younger than the House GOP.
That's a remarkable shift considering, until two-and-a-half years ago, the image of the Democratic caucus was three 80-somethings in the top leadership posts.
Until last summer, when she entered a senior living home and missed most of her final months in office, Kay Granger (R-Texas) chaired the House Appropriations Committee and oversaw its $1.7 trillion pot for federal agencies.
When Rep. Virginia Foxx (North Carolina) reached the end of her term atop the education committee, House GOP leaders installed her as chair of the critical House Rules Committee. She turns 82 in two weeks.
Some younger Republicans are not surprised by the head-down approach from senior Republicans in Washington.
'That's because most people are older, they don't want to talk about it,' said Rep. Wesley Hunt (R), a 43-year-old who is considering entering the race for Cornyn's seat.
GOP primary voters are also itching to find new blood, Hunt said. 'There is a national conversation, I think, that's being held for younger candidates, period. And I think that's happening on both sides of the aisle.'
But in a party where fealty to Trump is so critical — and securing his endorsement is considered crucial for winning a primary — Hunt talks about the president as if Trump is half his actual age.
Hunt said his own travels with Trump showed that the president is 'an anomaly' who faces no health risks.
'His mental acuity and his ability to operate is unlike anything I've ever seen before,' Hunt said.
Schmitt used similar bravado. 'I was just with President Trump. I played golf with President Trump. President Trump has more energy than most 21-year-olds,' he said.
In his first term as president, Trump revealed less about his health than past presidents. A book by a senior aide revealed that Trump tested positive for covid days before his late September 2020 debate with Biden, but did not disclose it after getting conflicting test results.
His fight with the virus in early October 2020 was much more serious than aides ever revealed.
In a rare rebuke among presidential physicians, Barack Obama's White House doctor criticized Biden's doctor for not administering a cognitive test on the then-president.
But Jeffrey Kuhlman, Obama's White House physician, went a step further in a book last year by specifically calling for neurocognitive tests for all national leaders over the age of 70.
In a health report released this spring, Trump's doctors did perform a neurological exam.
Durbin, who has said that upon reflection Biden should not have tried to run for reelection, accused the genial Cornyn of using Wednesday's hearing as a bid to appeal to conservative voters rather than a serious debate about presidential health.
'I think this has more to do with John Cornyn's primary challenge than anything else,' Durbin said. 'He has to show a fiery demeanor, so he's decided to pick on Joe Biden.'
Cornyn rejected that accusation. 'Well, he must be clairvoyant if he knows what information we're going to gather beforehand,' he said.
He grew angry after a question about whether the hearing would include issues related to Trump, accusing The Washington Post and the press of a broad conspiracy to benefit Biden.
'As far as I'm concerned, you're part of the conspiracy,' Cornyn said.
Durbin said the real conspiracy is age, something that comes for everyone eventually, but in uneven ways.
'I think we all have to face the reality that age is unrelenting,' he said. 'It treats some people more kindly than others.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Washington Post

12 minutes ago

• Washington Post

Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election, reviving longstanding grievance

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Friday called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden, repeating his baseless claim that the contest was marred by widespread fraud. 'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD!' Trump said in a social media post in which he also sought to favorably contrast his immigration enforcement approach with that of the former president. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!'

Newsweek

13 minutes ago

• Newsweek

Is Donald Trump Considering Tactical Nukes Against Iran? What We Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration has not taken anything "off the table," including the use of tactical nuclear weapons, if it decides to take military action against the underground Iranian nuclear facility at Fordow, Fox News reported, citing a White House official. It followed a report in The Guardian that the president "is not considering using a tactical nuclear weapon on Fordow." The Pentagon declined comment to Newsweek, instead referring to a statement by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who said on June 16 that he had directed "the deployment of additional capabilities" to the Middle East. "Protecting U.S. forces is our top priority and these developments are intended to enhance our defensive posture in the region," Hegseth said. President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House on June 18, 2025 (left) and a retired U.S. B61 thermonuclear gravity bomb, a type of tactical nuclear weapon still... President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House on June 18, 2025 (left) and a retired U.S. B61 thermonuclear gravity bomb, a type of tactical nuclear weapon still in service, shown in 2021. More BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Jon G. Fuller/GETTY/AP Why It Matters No nuclear weapon has been deployed in war since the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan in 1945, and any use of such weapons against an Iranian facility would be extremely controversial in the U.S. and worldwide. On Thursday, the White House said Trump would decide "within the next two weeks" whether the U.S. will join Israeli military action that began on June 13 against Iranian nuclear sites. Israel claims that Iran is working toward building a nuclear weapon, while Tehran insists its nuclear program is entirely peaceful. What To Know One of Iran's most important nuclear sites is the Fordow nuclear enrichment facility, which is believed to be buried about 80 meters deep into the side of a mountain. Experts have suggested Israel doesn't have any conventional bombs capable of destroying the site, though on Thursday Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that "we have the capability" to "hit all of their nuclear facilities." Unlike Israel, the U.S. possesses 30,000-pound GBU-57s "bunker buster" bombs that are specifically designed to reach targets buried deep beneath the surface and can be deployed by B-2 Spirit heavy bombers. On Wednesday, citing people "familiar with the deliberations," The Guardian reported that Trump "does not appear to be fully convinced" that GBU-57s bombs can reach the Fordow facility. It said the effectiveness of GBU-57s against the Fordow facility was "a topic of deep contention" within the Pentagon, citing two defense officials, with some reportedly believing that only a tactical nuclear weapon could destroy the site. It added that Trump was "not considering" the option and said it hadn't been presented by Hegseth or Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Dan Caine. Tactical nuclear weapons are smaller than strategic nuclear weapons and are designed to be deployed for limited strikes or on the battlefield, rather than against whole cities. The U.S. maintains a large arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons, though none have ever been used in combat. Fox News senior White House correspondent Jacqui Heinrich said she was told by a White House official that The Guardian report was "false." According to Heinrich, the official "has no doubt about the efficacy of bunker busters in eliminating the site at Fordow" adding they also denied "that any options [including tactical nukes] have been taken off the table." Israel has been attacking Iranian military and nuclear sites since June 13. On Thursday, the Washington-based group Human Rights Activists said that at least 639 people had been killed in the attacks, though the figures have not been independently verified. In response, Iran has fired ballistic missiles at Israel, killing 24 civilians, according to Israeli authorities. On Friday the British, French and German foreign ministers were slated to meet their Iranian counterpart in Geneva, Switzerland, in a bid to resolve the conflict. U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said that "a window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution." What People Are Saying Fox News senior White House correspondent Jacqui Heinrich: "There have been a lot of headlines this afternoon including one from The Guardian that claims that the U.S. military has doubts about whether the 'bunker-buster' bombs could get the job done, further claiming only a tactical nuke maybe could finish it and it further stated that the president is not considering a tactical nuke, that it was not one of the options presented to him. "I was just told by a top official here that none of that report is true, that none of the options are off the table and the U.S. military is very confident 'bunker busters' could get the job done at Fordow." Fox News host Jesse Watters, on Thursday: "The Guardian reported Trump was getting cold feet worried about the effectiveness of 'bunker busters' and not willing to use tactical nukes. But the White House tells Fox that's not true, everything's on the table, even tactical nukes." Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, on Friday, referring to possible U.S. tactical nuke deployment, according to Russia's TASS news agency: "This would be a catastrophic there are so many speculations that, in fact, it's impossible to comment on them." What Happens Next It is not yet known whether the U.S. will launch strikes against Iran and, if so, what weaponry it will use. Deploying a tactical nuclear bomb, the first use of a nuclear weapon since World War II, would be a controversial move.

Fox News

14 minutes ago

• Fox News

Foreign policy experts rip Tim Walz's claim that China has 'moral authority' in Middle East conflict

Former vice presidential nominee Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., is facing criticism after claiming China could be the voice of "moral authority" in the Israel-Iran conflict. During a "What's Next: Conversations on the Path Forward" event hosted by the Center for American Progress (CAP) last week, Walz responded to a question from former Biden White House advisor, Neera Tanden, about the "escalatory" nature of the strikes between the two countries. "Now, who is the voice in the world that can negotiate some type of agreement in this? Who holds the moral authority? Who holds the ability to do that? Because we are not seen as a neutral actor, and we maybe never were," Walz said of the United States' role in deescalating tensions in the Middle East. As the United States weighs striking Iran and war in the Middle East rages on, Danielle Pletka, a distinguished senior fellow in Foreign and Defense Policy Studies at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute (AEI), told Fox News Digital that Walz's comments are "ignorance on display." According to Walz, the United States once attempted "to be somewhat of the arbitrator" in the Middle East, but Americans must face the reality that the "neutral actor" with the "moral authority" to lead negotiations in the Middle East "might be the Chinese." Walz didn't elaborate on why China would be that world leader. "It's so staggering to me that Tim Walz was within a heartbeat of the presidency," Pletka said, before adding, "We don't need a neutral player here," and urging him to "stick to local politics." Andy Keiser, senior fellow at the conservative National Security Institute and former senior advisor on the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News Digital that someone should "remind Governor Walz that China is far from a moral authority on much of anything," and said China is committing "cultural genocide." "The Chinese government has reportedly arbitrarily detained more than a million Muslims in reeducation camps since 2017," according to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). "Most of the people who have been detained are Uyghur, a predominantly Turkic-speaking ethnic group primarily in China's northwestern region of Xinjiang." In addition to the detentions, "Uyghurs in the region have been subjected to intense surveillance, forced labor, and involuntary sterilizations, among other rights abuses," according to the CFR. According to Human Rights Watch, President Xi Jinping has "detained human rights defenders, tightened control over civil society, media, and the internet, and deployed invasive mass surveillance technology" in Xinjiang and Tibet, which the human rights watchdog likened to "crimes against humanity." "I would strongly beg to differ that China has a moral authority on much in the world," Keiser said, and added, "I would not see them as a neutral arbiter here." "Obviously, we are not going to be a neutral broker between a terrorist and a democratic state," Pletka said. "That's just not how it works. You threatened to kill the President of the United States, but we're then meant to think of you in a balanced way with the state of Israel, our most important ally in the Middle East?" Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Fox News' Bret Baier on Monday that President Donald Trump remains a target of the Iranians. "They want to kill him. He's enemy No. 1." "I don't know how anybody could have said what [Walz] said about the role that China plays. The idea that there is some neutral interlocutor in this world, that anybody is an 'honest burger' is nothing other than grad school silliness," Pletka said. Pletka added that "Of course, China can't play that role. China is an authoritarian communist [state] that is supporting Russia in its war on Ukraine, that is threatening Taiwan, that has broken its word over Hong Kong." And she said, "This is not a playground in which you need somebody who can talk to both Bobby and Billy about why it is you don't smack your friends." "The idea that it should be reduced to something where you have an arbiter who sees the arguments on both sides, no. This is a situation where there's a right and a wrong, and there's a winner and a loser. That's how it should be, by the way, because Iran has fashioned itself as an enemy, not just to the state of Israel, but to the United States." Nikki Haley – former U.S. Ambassador to Israel and a 2024 GOP presidential candidate, who sounded off on China's threat to the United States on the campaign trail – was quick to criticize Walz's viral comments last week. "This is absolute insanity. Democrats think that we need the Chinese to be the negotiators between Iran's nuclear production and Israel…God bless Tim Walz. Totally tone deaf," Haley posted on X.