Ecosystem building is coalition building

Current federal policy shifts, which are forcing significant funding cuts and other changes to innovation programs, are creating challenges for local ecosystem builders.
But ecosystem building is about bringing together diverse groups to support entrepreneurship, technology and economic development.
So despite national political turmoil, many local organizers remain focused on practical solutions and community-driven economic growth. Shared goals like job creation can bridge political divides.
One definition of justice is ensuring everyone has a fair shot at thriving.
That's what lights me up about entrepreneurship, technology and career training. It's also why I care about information resources (read: journalism) and the rule of law.
I'll talk to practically anyone who is serious about this work, even if I disagree with them on plenty else. This is the heart of ecosystem building, which I think of as the art of encouraging the big and the small, the weird and the square, the fast and the slow to inhabit the same environment. Not all species need to interact, and when they do some may even be at odds. My pursuit: Find the most important work that stitches together the most good-faith actors.
Ecosystem building is coalition building, then — and boy could we use coalition building right now.
This week, I recorded the next in Technically's ecosystem-building podcast with investor Brian Brackeen, the founding partner of Lightship Capital, and small business advocate Victor Hwang, the founder/CEO of Right to Start. What unites us is a passion for how local organizing and entrepreneurship define the American project. Our intention is to focus on that local work, which we've all found is better at uniting than dividing.
'When you start talking about entrepreneurship and the power to create jobs, to lift communities, to create wealth, to raise incomes, to fight poverty, fight inequality, it's pretty universal how [popular] that is,' Hwang said. 'But it's also one of those issues that doesn't get talked about much, which means it's still pretty fresh.'
Trouble is, I feel unable to ignore how a bombastic start to the Trump administration has impacted local organizing around the country. In addition to firing an estimated 200,000 federal workers and cutting federal funding less out of budgetary consequence than political motivation, the bipartisan Tech Hubs program has been under fire, as Technical.ly has reported, alongside data gathering and AI research.
And so, with a pledge to work to focus more on local, Hwang, Brackeen and I took some time to gather our advice for each other, and peers, that are in ecosystem building work around the country.
Local bright spots in entrepreneurship
Plenty of local organizing continues.
Brackeen praised Endeavor, a global network that supports entrepreneurs outside traditional venture capital strongholds like Silicon Valley and New York.
'[Endeavor is] doubling down on ecosystems and investing in positive entrepreneurs who create a multiplier effect in their communities,' Brackeen said.
Hwang, reflecting on a road trip he took last fall, emphasized the unlikely places where entrepreneurial energy is thriving.
'In Portland, Oregon, there's an effort to build a shoe innovation district in Old Town,' Hwang said. 'In Akron, Ohio, they turned an old Goodyear tire plant into Bounce Innovation Hub, a massive coworking and innovation space.'
The federal policy landscape: A challenge for local builders
Entrepreneurship-led economic development may be on the rise. But strategies developed under the climate and racial justice–focused industrial policy of the Biden administration are being scrutinized, if not abandoned altogether.
A report released last fall by Senate Republicans as an analysis of National Science Foundation grants titled ' DEI: Division. Extremism. Ideology. ' was recirculated this month by organizations attempting to redact politicized terms from their websites and applications.
Of the major innovation role research universities play in many regions, Brackeen said: 'If you're Columbus and your ecosystem is driven by Ohio State spin-offs, you could be affected more than, say, Tulsa, which relies on philanthropic private capital.'
'The news makes it seem like we're at war with each other, but when you actually visit communities, people are just focused on doing the work.'
Victor Hwang, Right to Start
Technical.ly's national Map of Innovation Ecosystems includes an index that relies heavily on the influence of major R&D investments. How much those investments change over time will shake up where technology is commercialized. Federally-funded Tech Hubs organizers are nervous.
Yet Hwang says on the ground, local organizers and entrepreneur supporters can only focus on what they can control — and many are doing just that.
'It's almost like we live in two different universes,' he said. 'The news makes it seem like we're at war with each other, but when you actually visit communities, people are just focused on doing the work.'
Coalition building as a path forward
As ecosystem builders look for ways to sustain momentum, the conversation turned to coalition building as a strategy for navigating political uncertainty. Hwang's Right to Start organization is actively working across political divides, launching in-state coalitions in places like Arkansas and Indiana, with plans for expansion into California, Michigan, Missouri, New York and North Carolina.
'We had over a dozen Right to Start Act bills introduced across states with vastly different political leadership,' he said. 'Creating an office of entrepreneurship, tracking entrepreneurs, shifting economic development priorities — all of these are ideas with broad appeal.'
Brackeen added that economic development strategies differ by region but ultimately share the same goal. 'Ohio's model is very different from New York's, but at the end of the day, they both want the same thing — thriving businesses,' he said. 'If you strip away the political middleman, it's clear that entrepreneurship is a common ground.'
Can local ecosystem builders continue to thrive in an era of political division? Hwang and Brackeen remain optimistic but realistic.
'This is still a bottom-up democracy,' Hwang said. 'Both parties haven't quite figured out how to tap into the energy of entrepreneurship, but the leader who does will have a major political advantage in the coming years.'
Policing language is easier than forging connections
My favorite social video of the week is from TikTok user @nopebrigade0 who identifies as a sociology PhD candidate and argues two of my favorite points: If you call everything fascism, the word loses meaning, and policing language is often classist virtue signaling.
After I published an op-ed critiquing Elon Musk for arrogantly overriding democratic ideals, plenty of readers criticized me for not being critical enough. Following my last Technical.ly column in which I argued that a Trump-championed witch hunt for DEI programs was no less an attack on free speech than mandating DEI language, one friend belittled my writing as daring to equate his political views with those of his political opponent. I find this unproductive.
As the social activist Bernice Johnson Reagon, who sadly died last year, put it: 'If you're in a coalition and you're comfortable, you know it's not a broad enough coalition.'
It is so much easier to police the language of someone you mostly agree with, than it is to build bridges to someone you mostly disagree with. Better to build a coalition around important issues we can agree on.
'What we need is a narrative of who we are together, who we are as a nation,' as that TikTok user eloquently puts it. 'It can be a big, expansive, wonderful one.'
National politics and federal priorities do shape state and local strategies. They did under the Biden administration, and they will under Trump. Activism is necessary, so do call your elected officials and attend town halls. For most of us though,the best path forward remains at the community level.
'People ascribe evilness to the 'other side' without actually knowing them,' Brackeen said. 'But when you focus on real entrepreneurs, real businesses, and real job creation, you can find common ground in any political environment.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Technical.ly

an hour ago

• Technical.ly

Will there be more software developers working next year?

For the first time, the number of software jobs in the US has stagnated. This coincides with the broader trend of lower labor force participation across sectors. Previously, recent college grads always had a lower unemployment rate than the general workforce. That has flipped — now recent grads have a notably higher unemployment rate. Societal shifts because of new technology tend to be more noticeable over a decade than over a single year. Is AI different? Brian Brackeen says there will be fewer software developers working in the United States a year from now. I call bullshit. We're making a bet of it: Loser has to wait in line to buy the other a cheesesteak from South Philadelphia's beloved Angelo's — since we'll both be in that city for a tech-inspired celebration of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence around the next Builders Conference (Here's coverage of our most recent one). Contrary to what I say to my friend's face, Brackeen is no fool. The proven entrepreneur–turned–provocateur venture capitalist has a point. Two big changes are hitting software development at the same time, making it difficult to distinguish between them: Higher interest rates have chilled speculative tech building, and new artificial intelligence tools are creating new efficiencies. Further complicating the trend, pandemic habits boosted international tech hiring, and the decades-old digital transformation appears to be aging. Expensive software developers seem an ideal role for executives to replace. In 2024, the American economy added new software developer jobs at the slowest year-over-year rate on record. All this comes in a strange macroeconomic moment. Take the first quarter of 2025: Tech hiring didn't just stall — it retreated. Software developer job postings were still falling even long after the pandemic-fueled bonanza had faded, a Wall Street Journal analysis found. Tech unemployment climbed above the national average, peaking at 5.7% in February. Other than robotics, most current AI excitement is concentrated in knowledge work, something college graduates specialize in. (The plumber I once worked for used to say that getting a college degree was a way to buy a chance to work in air-conditioning). So as economists research whether AI is affecting job prospects, they're focusing on degree holders. A real change is underway. For decades, the unemployment rate for recent college graduates was almost always lower than the overall unemployment rate. Following the Great Recession, unemployment peaked in June 2010 at 9.5%; It was bad for recent college graduates too, but that rate never got above 7.8%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank. The same thing happened in the recessions of 1990 and 2001. But those figures have flipped in recent years — and the gap is widening. The first quarter of 2025 ended with an unemployment rate for recent college graduates that was almost one-and-a-half times higher (5.8% versus 4% for all workers). Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees this week that over the next few years, the online commerce giant 'will reduce [its] total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' Any move toward the end of knowledge work bodes poorly for software development, an especially well-paid (and occasionally rote) trade. Fewer people are working — but not (yet) because of AI This coincides with a broader trend: Labor force participation remains down from pre-pandemic levels. A recent explainer from the Federal Reserve underlined the stakes: Either we grow our economy by improving productivity or by adding more workers. With aging demographics and early retirements, we've been trending in the opposite direction. That drop isn't theoretical. There are 1.7 million fewer Americans in the workforce now than in February 2020, per the US Chamber of Commerce. That means many jobs, including tech roles, are going unfilled. So software developers are harder to come by. But I'm still betting we'll have more of them by next year. Why? For one, the trends don't line up with AI breakthroughs. The unemployment rate for recent college grads crested above the overall rate way back in 2018 – though the gulf has gotten larger. Something else is happening. Next, pricing pressure can create surprising outcomes. Often called the Jevons Paradox, falling costs in something (like the price of building software) can boost demand for it (resulting in more need). The time required for any given software development can shrink, even as the need for people to do adjacent work can grow. Job titles can change — witness the decline of ' computer programmer ' — and job descriptions too. But software skills will remain in-demand for the foreseeable future. The third reason I took the bet is the maxim credited to Bill Gates: We tend to overestimate what we can achieve in a year and underestimate what we can in a decade. (Note: I was less sure about taking Brian up on a bet over 5 years, but jumped at the bet for a year out — check the video here.) Early this year, University of Oxford researchers published a paper documenting the impact automation has had on language translators. It's changing the job and shifting the skills needed, but certain tasks remain stubbornly human. Will AI be different from other tech advancements? No question getting a job, especially a first job, in tech is harder than it has been. The leader of one coding bootcamp told me there's been 'a collapse,' and they're feverishly adapting their model. At present, that is more to do with higher-interest rates and general macroeconomic trends, with AI as window dressing. Focused on the medium term, boosters remain bullish that the growth in tech apprenticeship will continue. Brackeen's side of the bet is that AI is different from past technologies, and that the speed will sneak up on us. AI legend Geoffrey Hinton recently argued the same. My side of the bet is that even if this is right, it will happen slower than we think, and that titles like software developer will adapt, and therefore grow, for at least a while longer. We'll settle it over cheesesteaks. See you in Philadelphia next May.

Technical.ly

10-06-2025

• Technical.ly

Meet the ESHIP Alliance: New name for the national ecosystem building movement

Andy Stoll has one t-shirt, loads of post-it notes and a new job that's a lot like his old job. Stoll is the founding executive director of what is now called the ESHIP Alliance, a nonprofit startup that announced its new name last week in Indianapolis at the Global Entrepreneurship Congress (GEC). The GEC is a global conference organized by the Global Entrepreneurship Network (or GEN, which is lovingly pronounced like the name Jen by its many admirers). Stoll made his announcement alongside GEN founder and CEO Jonathan Ortmans, and right before Right to Start's Victor Hwang, another entrepreneurship booster with his own big announcement. They're just three of a constellation of groups that have spun off from the Kauffman Foundation 's decades-long investment in entrepreneurship. Last year, Kauffman announced plans to narrow its focus to economic opportunity in its hometown of Kansas City, winding down its national programming funding. Stoll joked that his ESHIP Alliance could be the younger sister to GEC, which makes the Kauffman Foundation mom and dad, and Hwang a kind of attentive uncle — with plenty of cousins and lots of folksy Midwestern charm to go around. Catching the ecosystem-building bug Stoll was a local organizer in Iowa first, working on startups and gatherings in the early 2000s and 2010s. Hwang, once an influential Kauffman executive, gave Stoll the language to describe what he and thousands of others were doing. 'Victor told me: What you're doing is the future of place-based economic development,' Stoll said. 'And I said: I'm doing the what of what?' In 2012, Hwang published ' The Rainforest,' a widely cited book on local economic development, and in 2017 hired Stoll. Together they produced Kauffman's Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Building Playbook, which put institutional heft behind rag-tag community efforts flourishing around the country. From 2017-2019, Stoll was emcee and organizer of annual Kauffman-backed ESHIP Summits. Hundreds came from around the country to discuss rebuilding their local economies from the ground up: some were there as part of their jobs, many others were not. But most talk fondly and passionately about being part of something that seemed overlooked then and is now taken more seriously. Stoll and his team would stock up on colorful post-it notes, markers and engagement activities. As a 2023 report on the origins of inclusive entrepreneurship tracked, many grassroots efforts to reshape local economies took hold after the Great Recession and steadily grew during the 2010s. One of the most enduring is the 'entrepreneurial ecosystem building' that is sometimes called ' place-based economic development ' among industry insiders. Their shared and primary push: state and local policymakers and civic leaders should put entrepreneurship at the center of their strategies for economic growth, opportunity and development. Like scripture passages, these believers cite studies showing that new businesses create effectively all net new jobs, and that each 1% increase in entrepreneurship correlates with 2% declines in poverty. The ecosystem metaphor teaches that big institutions are vital, but must prioritize the many differently sized, aged and types of organizations that overlap to make an economy. NRPs: National ecosystem resource providers Stoll is friendly, chatty, and millennial nerd chic enough to be among the movement's leaders, backed by the influence and checkbook of the Kauffman Foundation. Over a decade-plus, from an early Startup Champions summit to SXSW activations and beyond, I've seen Stoll at his most comfortable in a t-shirt, effusing folksy modesty while cracking self-effacing jokes and serving as a community historian of the work, preferably leading an exercise on collaboration with post-it notes. Pushed out of the comfortable confines of the Kauffman Foundation, Stoll is now stitching together a coalition so this on-the-ground change can last. Among his partners is Black-entrepreneurship focused Forward Cities, which also got its start with Kauffman funding and has been long led by Stoll's years-long collaborator Fay Horwitt. Together this week, they introduced the ESHIP Alliance's renewed focus to a network of so-called national ecosystem resource providers (NRPs) — organizations that address needs common to many ecosystems or state and local entrepreneurial communities. 'At its core, this alliance is about strengthening the profession of ecosystem building across the United States,' Stoll said in a GEC session. 'We need entrepreneurship, we need ecosystems, but we need to center equity so anyone, anywhere who wants to be an entrepreneur has the opportunity to participate.' The alliance will gather these resource providers and help advance and formalize 'ecosystem building' as a discipline for state and local governments to embrace. Events, training material and policy positions will help. As part of that work the ESHIP Alliance launched the ESHIP Commons, a social network intended to help ecosystem builders connect, share ideas and find resources. What's next for the ESHIP Alliance Turns out Technically itself is an NRP, so I was at one of Stoll's tables at GEC — years since the last time I saw him in action. On stage, he guided about a hundred NRP leaders through a series of exercises to identify the next set of challenges and potential solutions for ecosystem building. Much to attendee amusement, Stoll's presentation included a photo of him from years ago wearing the same 'Mass Collaboration' t-shirt he wore this week, signaling that while much has changed, many faces haven't. Horrowit was up next with an exercise that cleverly required attendees to never reference funding as a problem. As she said, 'That's a problem for everyone, give us something new.' That let us focus on more specific obstacles to advance the work of centering entrepreneurship in local policymaking and economic development. Good for an exercise, but what's next? Stoll, like this conversation, has graduated from the Kauffman nest (the group was initially called the Ecosystem Builders Leadership Network, so the rebrand gives it a fresh start). Entrepreneurship rates have surged post pandemic, led by women and people of color. That's caught the attention of serious state and local leaders. Stoll, Hwang and so many others have for years advocated for a bigger stage, and now they have it. Stoll donned a dress shirt to get on the GEC main stage and announce his organization's new name. He seemed more at home the next day in his t-shirt, pushing all of us who support local entrepreneurship and innovation efforts across the country. Said Stoll: 'We have who we need in the room.'

Libya Observer

09-06-2025

• Libya Observer

US travel ban on Libyans and citizens of 11 other countries takes effect

The executive order signed by US President Donald Trump officially came into effect on Monday morning, barring nationals from 12 countries—including Libya—from entering the United States. Last Wednesday, the White House announced in a statement that President Trump had signed an executive order restricting the entry of nationals from the following 12 countries: Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The White House justified the decision by saying the U.S. administration had conducted a thorough risk assessment of these countries, particularly regarding terrorism and national security. The statement explained that the listed countries fail to meet the necessary security requirements and pose a significant threat to the United States. In Libya's case specifically, the White House said the complete suspension of travel by Libyan nationals was due to the absence of a central, competent, and cooperative authority responsible for issuing passports and civil documents. It added: 'A history of terrorist activity within Libyan territory increases the risk of admitting its nationals into the US.' Despite the ban, the statement noted exceptions for individuals holding valid permanent residency or visas, specific visa categories, and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. As for implementation, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed a diplomatic cable providing instructions to American diplomatic missions on how consular officers should handle visa applications from nationals of the banned countries. Tags: USA Travel Ban US President Donald Trump