Need we bow to Trump and massively ramp up defence spending?
Not only is an arms race a financial bonanza for the grotesquely rich, but it is paid for by society's poor. The pretext is the war in Ukraine and fear of Russia.
Anyone who has paid attention to this three-year-old war could not help notice the abysmal military performance of Russia. Supposedly the world's second most powerful military power, Russia has reportedly sustained casualty figures of one million troops killed or wounded in Ukraine and has worked through most of its ground military hardware, all to little effect on the battlefield.
The war has revealed huge inadequacies in the Russian military who have resorted to the use of foreign troops and prisoners led from the rear by leaders tainted by corruption and incompetence.
It is understandable that ex-Soviet satellite states are rearming, but the combined strength of Western states far outweighs Russia in weapons and population.
Are we to obey President Trump and hugely increase arms spending or make a reasoned assessment of the risks we face and act accordingly? Should we consider the effect on Russian people of the threat of NATO, especially if introduced into Ukraine? Would a change of stance on the part of the west calm fears in Russia?
For years UK has spent a greater proportion of GDP on defence than other European countries but whether it has spent wisely is another question. Two giant aircraft carriers, costing many billions, raise the questions, 'what for? and 'could the money be spent more effectively?'
We need to dispense with Cold War thinking, make rational decisions about the level of threat and make defence provision accordingly. Generals and military experts are not always our best advisors.
John Inglis, Arran.
Neil Mackay ('The BBC is helping Reform – and has become a danger to demcoracy', June 12) should look at the actual output of the BBC for evidence of bias towards Reform UK rather than second-guessing BBC policy papers.
There's virtually nothing to support BBC approval of Reform UK, rather the contrary. His article is a projection of his dislike of Reform rather than an acknowledgement of reality.
Mackay says the BBC gives too much time to Reform UK. You'd think that he did not notice the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, where Labour, the SNP and Reform were in a tight group miles ahead of the other parties. Mackay mentions the LibDems. Should the BBC puff up 2% parties, for that's what they got in Hamilton?
Elsewhere Mackay has evidently missed the Reform UK win in Runcorn and their decisive victories in English
council and other elections.
Does he really think that Scotland will be completely different? As for all the opinion polls UK-wide which show a clear Reform lead, the BBC should ignore them in the Mackay universe.
Having ignored Reform, next year he and 'his' BBC will be completely confused about where the 2026 Reform MSPs came from. Perhaps from decent and thoughtful Scottish voters predictably and ignorantly labelled by Mackay as 'hard right'.
John Burton, Gatelawbridge, Thornhill.
Education needs radical change
I read what some might find controversial views on Scottish education by Eric Melvin in which he extols the virtues of the Japanese system of teamwork in schools (Letters, June 13).
What Mr Melvin does not seem to elaborate on the comparatively very disciplined approach employed in Japanese schools.
Additionally, I suggest that it cannot be wholly unrelated to the fact that last year 2024, was the worst on record for pupil suicides in Japan. The number who killed themselves while a pupil at Elementary, Junior High and Senior High was 529.
However I do agree with Mr Melvin that things must change, perhaps radically, if Scottish education is to improve. It may be that like the NHS we should now take a more national view. The system of local authorities having responsibility for education may seem a democratic solution but it has one obvious issue.
If you agree that parenting skills are the key to providing young people with the best start in their education then attempting to enforce parental responsibilities becomes influenced by the fact that the enforcers only got their authority by the votes of the public, including said parents.
I see any attempt to take politicians out of the equation must be a good thing.
Bill Brown, Milngavie, Glasgow.
Unionist parties can't be trusted
Am I missing something? Voters put Labour into power at the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election.
Labour is the party that stood by and did nothing while Grangemouth oil refinery went under, with the initial loss of 400 jobs. Labour is the party that moved the marine boundaries in the Scottish North Sea, so that they could secure key Scottish oil fields and put them in English waters, instead of Scottish waters. Labour is the party obsessed with fantasy net zero, which will cost the taxpayer billions of pounds.
Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Tories, stated that if Scotland became independent, it would be poorer for it because it would lose the Union Dividend.
This is coded language for saying that England would go bust when it lost Scottish oil revenues. The message is plain – do not trust the Unionist Parties. Or are some Scots just turkeys voting for an early Christmas?
William C McLaughlin, Thankerton, Biggar.
Aggressive interviewers
It is good to know that Walter Paul (letters, June 12) and so many friends rise early on a Sunday morning and also read the Herald. That's certainly good for democracy.
It seems strange that they failed to notice numerous interviewers who frequently interrupt politicians of all shades of opinion, giving them no chance to answer their questions. I have already expressed this view in your columns.
The idea that Anas Sarwar, as suggested by Mr Paul, is at all 'arrogant' in private or in public, apart from those who are prejudiced, is for the birds.
Sir Tom Clarke, former MP for Coatbridge.
Scotland and the Brexit vote
Martin Redfern makes a valiant effort (letters, June 12) to defend Scotland's expulsion from the EU in 2016 by stressing that Brussels had made the consequences clear before the vote.
The simple fact that neither Mr Redfern nor Brussels can dispute is that our Scottish nation voted emphatically to remain in the EU and the results show that even if every vote cast in Scotland to Leave had instead been cast to Remain, the outcome for Scotland would have been unchanged.
If Mr Redfern is content to entrust Scotland's destiny perpetually to the wishes of our English neighbours, whom I have no wish to denigrate in any way, that is his undeniable right. But I prefer to trust and respect my fellow Scots and will never be content to accept the colonial status we have had to endure since being annexed by England in 1907.
Willie Maclean, Milngavie.
No football gods and precious few heroes
The Herald Sport seems to consider the fate of the Scotland football manager as the most important issue to come out of the SFA AGM. It is not.
It is the ludicrous situation where the manager of the Scotland team has so few Scottish players to choose from. Unless the SFA can force or coax clubs in Scotland to adopt a quota system where Scotland-eligible players eventually form the on-field majority of teams, we may as well just pack in international football as being too embarrassing for us Scots to watch.
No football gods and precious few heroes: that's us, the country which likes to think we invented the game. There should be zero public funding for professional football in Scotland, and clubs should be charged for every cost the public incurs (policing, transport disruption et al) until things change.
GR Weir, Ochiltree.
Seeing the real, paid-entry Fringe
I read with interest Brian Ferguson's account of the street shows at the Fringe having to be cancelled or cut back due to the ubiquitous 'funding crisis' ('Edinburgh Festival Fringe street theatre shows under threat', June 11).
When I was the Director of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe Society in the 1980s it cost next to nothing to organise these shows, which were plentiful even then, so I shudder to think why the EFFS needs £250,000 to put on these street events now.
I could point out that the performers, especially the professional UK and European-based street entertainers, 'pass the hat' and therefore could pay something towards the cost, but I get annoyed when the street events get spoken of as the real Fringe.
The Fringe is made up of hundreds of performances, usually indoors somewhere and this is what your readers need to support given the horrific state of Edinburgh's accommodation costs.
I get sad when people tell me they have 'been to the Fringe' when all they saw were crowds in the closed-off High Street and some guy juggling knives before they had a drink or a meal. Spare a thought for the many other performers that I would prefer the public paid to see. They actually make up the Fringe.
Michael Dale, Glasgow.
An alliterative alternative
I share David Miller's admiration for Jody Harrison's humdinger Herald headline of 'Summer solstice sees searches spike for Scottish standing stones' (June 12).
In my musings this morning, the intrusive 'for' has been eliminated and words realigned to produce 'Summer solstice sees Scottish standing stones searches spike'. And all fuelled by bran flakes, as opposed to David's cornflakes.......
Colin C MacKean, Kilmacolm.
The King's sense of humour
I am not a great fan of the Royal Family, but I believe that credit should be extended to it when due. I refer to the picture which accompanied your story ('King's starry celebration', June 13).
In the picture the King is shown in conversation with Meryl Streep and Kate Winslet, as you do. Both of the ladies are smiling, as is the King. He clearly has a sense of humour and likes to share it with others when their paths cross. This is not a rare occurrence, because often, when out and about, he seems to be smiling and encourages others to see the humorous side of life.
This behaviour may help to reduce the apprehension felt by many about meeting up with the King. Good to know that he encourages humour and is happy to share it.
I think, incidentally, we all know why David Beckham, also in the photograph, is smiling now .
Ian W Thomson, Lenzie.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
30 minutes ago
- NBC News
Israel-Iran live updates: Conflict enters 9th day as diplomacy falters
CONFLICT ENTERS 9TH DAY: Iran sent a missile barrage into Israel early this morning, sending millions into bomb shelters but with no reported casualties. Israel continued to strike military sites in Iran. NO BREAKTHROUGHS ON INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMACY: A summit in Geneva yesterday with Iran's foreign minister and European leaders yielded no signs of a breakthrough. At the United Nations Security Council, Iran and Israel traded insults in a heated but ultimately inconclusive meeting. U.S. POSITION: Trump dismissed the European effort, suggesting that a diplomatic solution would require U.S. involvement. On Thursday, he opened a two-week window for negotiations with Iran, delaying a decision on a U.S. military strike on Iranian nuclear sites. IRAN AND ISRAEL: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told NBC News that Iran was not sure it could trust the U.S., and that they would not negotiate 'as long as the aggression continues.' The Israeli military chief said yesterday that the country is ready for 'a prolonged campaign' against Iran. NUCLEAR SITE RISKS: The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear power sites have caused some radiological leaks. There is no danger to the public for now, he said,'but there is a danger this could still happen.' HUNDREDS KILLED: Israeli strikes have so far killed at least 630 people in Iran, The Associated Press reported, citing a Washington-based human rights group. The Iranian health ministry says more than 2,500 people have been wounded. The death toll in Israel from Iran's retaliatory strikes remains at 24.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Billy Porter says Trump would be in jail if he was a black man
Broadway and Pose star Billy Porter has said that if Donald Trump was a black man he would have been in jail by now. Speaking to Matt Chorley for BBC Newsnight, Porter discussed the re-election of Donald Trump and the challenges faced by Democrats and activism in the United States. Porter said, 'We need to be focused on the fact he's not in jail… If he was a black man, he would be in jail.' He also speculated that the re-election of President Trump was a "backlash" to the election of President Obama because 'America is a racist country."
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Iran and Israel exchange strikes after Iran rules out nuclear talks while under attack
Update: Date: 08:22 BST Title: Trump says his director of national intelligence is 'wrong' on Iran Content: This video can not be played Watch: Trump says Tulsi Gabbard is 'wrong' on Iran More now from US President Donald Trump, who spoke to reporters yesterday on the tarmac next to Air Force One. He was asked what intelligence he has that suggests Iran is building a nuclear weapon, when his intelligence community has previously said they have no evidence. "Well, then my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?" Trump asked. The reporter replied that it was Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. "She's wrong," Trump quickly replied. In March, Gabbard told Congress that US intelligence agencies determined Iran had not resumed its suspended 2003 nuclear weapons programme, even as the nation's stockpile of enriched uranium - a component of such weapons - was at an all-time high. Update: Date: 08:19 BST Title: Trump won't let Iran develop a nuclear weapon Content: Jake KwonNorth America correspondent In March Tulsi Gabbard told a Senate Committee Iran was not building nuclear weapons. After Mr Trump said she was wrong, Ms Gabbard blamed the media for distorting her words and now says that she believes Iran could build nuclear weapons within weeks. President Trump insisted that Iran had gathered a 'tremendous amount of material' and could have a weapon within weeks - or if not weeks then months – and the US couldn't let that happen. On Thursday, Mr Trump said he would decide within the next fortnight whether the US should join the strikes on Iran. He now says two weeks is the 'maximum' time Iran has to reach a deal with the US – hinting that he could make a decision before the 14 days are up. The IAEA earlier this month expressed concern that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short, technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. Update: Date: 08:02 BST Title: Iran only ready for diplomatic talks once aggression stops - a recap Content: Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi On Friday, top diplomats from the UK, EU, Germany and France held hours-long talks with their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva. The Europeans had hoped to make progress on a diplomatic breakthrough at what UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy called a "perilous moment". But the talks didn't yield the outcome they wanted. Araghchi told reporters afterwards Iran was only "ready to consider diplomacy once the aggression is stopped" and Israel is held accountable "for the heinous crimes committed". He added that Iran's nuclear programme was peaceful, and that Iran would continue to "exercise its legitimate right of self-defence". "I make it crystal clear that Iran's defence capabilities are non-negotiable." Update: Date: 07:49 BST Title: Israel says senior Iranian commander killed in strike - reports Content: Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Saturday the IDF had killed a senior Iranian commander in a strike on an apartment in the city of Qom, local media and Reuters news agency reported. Saeed Izadi was responsible for financing and arming Hamas ahead of its October 7 attacks on Israel, Katz said. "This is a major achievement for Israeli intelligence and the Air Force," Katz said in a statement. "Justice for the murdered and the hostages. Israel's long arm will reach all its enemies." Izadi was a member of Iran's powerful Quds Force, a branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) responsible for overseas activities, including supporting Iran's proxies in the region. The IRGC is yet to confirm Izadi's death. Update: Date: 07:36 BST Title: European discussions yield no breakthrough, but Iran ready to keep talking Content: Lyse DoucetChief international correspondent, reporting from Geneva Yesterday, European foreign ministers met with their Iranian counterpart in Geneva. Here are the key takeaways from the discussions: More than three hours of discussions in Geneva yielded no breakthrough. But European ministers emerged convinced that Iran was ready to keep talking, and more willing to put issues on the table which hadn't been there before. They all emphasised that Iran has to resume its talks with the United States. In his statement, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he was ready to meet with the Europeans again, but would only consider diplomacy with the US once Israeli attacks stopped and, in his words, the aggressor was held accountable. Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who flew straight to Geneva after meetings in Washington with US officials, came with tough messages – that the threat of U.S. military action was real, but a window for diplomacy was still open. No one can say for sure for how long. Lammy warned it was 'a perilous moment'. The message from Europe's top diplomats was that only a negotiated agreement - not more military action - could provide a lasting solution to Iran's nuclear programme, and to regional stability. Update: Date: 07:18 BST Title: Israeli military intercept Iranian strikes overnight, IDF says Content: Israel says it has intercepted multiple Iranian drones that entered its airspace overnight and this morning. Two were intercepted by the Israeli air force in Israeli-occupied Syrian territory roughly an hour apart, just just before 07:00 (5:00 BST) and 08:00 (06:00 BST) local time, according to the IDF. It says a third was intercepted less than an hour later just north of the West Bank. Update: Date: 07:04 BST Title: Israel strikes Isfahan nuclear facility - Iranian state media Content: Israel has continued its military operation against Iran's nuclear infrastructure overnight. Iranian state media reports an Israeli attack on a nuclear facility in Isfahan in the early hours of this morning. Iranian air defences reportedly responded to the attack, causing loud explosions. The attack did not cause the leakage of any hazardous material, Fars News Agency reports, although there has been no update yet from the UN's atomic agency, the IAEA, on the facility's status. Overnight, the Israeli military said it launched a "series of strikes" against missile storage and infrastructure sites in central Iran. Update: Date: 07:02 BST Title: Iran and Israel exchange strikes, as Iran refuses nuclear talks while attacks continue Content: Missiles fired from Iran in retaliation for Israeli attacks are seen in the sky over the Hebron, West Bank Good morning and welcome to our live coverage as Israel and Iran continue to exchange strikes on the ninth day of the ongoing conflict. Israel targets nuclear infrastructure in fresh strikes as Iranian media report an attack on a nuclear site in Ifsahan, in the centre of the country. Israeli Defense Forces say they struck down several drone and missile attacks from Iran overnight. It comes after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi ruled out nuclear talks while under attack. Speaking to reporters yesterday, Aragchi said Iran is "ready to consider diplomacy once again once the aggression is stopped" and "the aggressor is held accountable for the heinous crimes committed". We'll continue to bring you the latest developments and analysis throughout the day, stay with us.
