India, Pakistan exchange tit-for-tat attacks, sparking fears of escalation
- India and Pakistan are teetering on the edge of open conflict, after the Indian military struck deep within Pakistan in the early hours of May 7 in retaliation for a terrorist attack that killed 26 civilians in India-administered Kashmir last month.
In the most expansive action ever taken on its neighbour , India rained air strikes on what military officials sa id were 'terror camps' in territory as far away as 30 km from the de facto border.
Pakistan called this 'an act of war' saying that the 26 people who died included civilians; and vowed to respond 'at a time, place and manner' of its choosing.
Meanwhile, cross border shelling along the Line of Control, the defacto border, on May 7 killed around 15 in India, said media reports here.
With the nuclear-armed neighbours now engaged in a tit-for-tat spiral, officials and analysts on both sides are also in a race to shape the narrative for what comes next.
Those in India say that the ball is now in Pakistan's court and that whether the clash escalates is up to Islamabad; those in Pakistan say that New Delhi's actions leave Pakistan with little choice but to strike back with full force.
'I do see a limited conflict looming because India has hit Pakistan in multiple places,' said Dr Qamar Cheema, executive director of Sanober Institute , an Islamabad-based think tank.
'India has attacked Pakistan's m ainland. Pakistan would strike back with full force.'
Professor Harsh V. Pant, vice-president for studies and foreign policy at the New Delhi-based think tank Observer Research Foundation, said meanwhile that India does not wish the situation to escalate further.
'Ultimately this is a question for Pakistan – whether they want to climb the escalation ladder,' he said.
India's operation comes two weeks after gunmen killed 26 people – 25 Indians and one Nepali – in Pahalgam, a tourist hub in Kashmir. New Delhi pointed the finger at Islamabad, which it accuses of harbouring terrorists .
India's foreign secretary, Mr Vikram Misri, said that its counter-actions in striking terror camps in Pakistan including those of Pakistan-based terror groups Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba 'were measured, non-escalatory, proportionate, and responsible'.
The Indian government has called its missile attack Operation Sindoor, referring to the red vermillion powder married Hindu women wear in their hair parting.
It brought symbolism to a mission meant to avenge the trauma of 25 women who watched their husbands shot by militants in Pahalgam.
At the press briefing on the operation on May 7, Mr Misri was flanked by two women officers, which was greeted with approval by the public . Many Indian celebrities and social media users called the sight of two women officers inspiring, with political analyst Saba Naqvi saying it was 'good optics'.
But Pakistan, which denies being involved in the April 22 attack and has called for a neutral investigation, struck back at India's assertion that no civilians were hurt in its May 7 strikes.
It said that 26 civilians including a three-year-old girl died, and released disturbing photos of civilians allegedly killed and injured. The estimates of civilian deaths across Pakistan's media have ranged from 10 to 26.
Pakistan's military spokesman Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry said that the girl was killed in a mosque in Punjab province. The image of a child in white clothes being treated by gloved doctors in a hospital has been shared widely.
Pakistan said as well that it shot down five India jets on May 7. There was no response from India on the downing of the jets.
The clash has evoked nationalist fervour in both countries, with many closing ranks with their respective governments.
In India, where many had sought strong action against Pakistan, schools in many parts of the country were shut early as the home ministry asked states to conduct mock civil drills to test evacuation plans.
The mood was also grim in Pakistan , with many expressing anger and outrage for the death of civilians in the air strikes, as well as alarm over India's threat to halt the water supply that flows from the Indus River into Pakistan.
The two countries fought two wars over Kashmir – claimed in its entirety by both – in 1947-1948 and 1965, and a limited conflict in 1999.
There have also been more recent cross-border strikes.
In 2016, Indian Army commandos crossed into Pakistani territory and struck terrorist launch pads in the wake of an attack that had killed 17 Indian soldiers in an army outpost near the Line of Control.
And in 2019, India launched air strikes against what it said was a terror training camp in Balakot in Pakistan in retaliation for a suicide bombing in which 40 Indian soldiers were killed in Kashmir.
On both occasions, the two sides stepped back from the brink of conflict.
Professor C. Raja Mohan, a visiting research professor at the NUS Institute of South Asian Studies, said any further escalation in current hostilities will also depend on international pressure.
Calls for restraint have come in from different parts of the world. The United Nations Security Council urged India and Pakistan to avoid military conflict and ease tensions. China also called on both countries to show restraint, on May 7. A Chinese spokesperson said both countries needed to prioritise peace and stability.
US President Donald Trump said the rising tensions were a 'shame' and sought a quick resolution, as Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke to the national security advisors in both countries.
'The Indian foreign secretary said if Pakistan escalates, India will respond even more vigorously. Now this is where what the rest of the world does comes in. Do they step in and stop Pakistan from retaliating or do they step in after Pakistan has retaliated?' asked Prof Raja Mohan.
'Trump has said that he hopes this will come to an end quickly. If it is a moderate response (from Pakistan), attempts will be made to stop it here.'
Nirmala Ganapathy is India bureau chief at The Straits Times. She is based in New Delhi and writes about India's foreign policy and politics.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
35 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Satellite images undermine Trump's claim that Iran's atomic sites were destroyed
Satellite image distributed by Maxar Technologies showing destroyed buildings at Isfahan Nuclear Technology Centre, before (left) after it was hit by US airstrikes. PHOTOS: REUTERS WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's decision to order US forces to attack three key Iranian nuclear installations may have sabotaged the Islamic Republic's known atomic capabilities, but it's also created a monumental new challenge to work out what's left and where. Mr Trump said heavily fortified sites were 'totally obliterated' late on June 21, but independent analysis has yet to verify that claim. Rather than yielding a quick win, the strikes have complicated the task of tracking uranium and ensuring Iran doesn't build a weapon, according to three people who follow the country's nuclear programme. International Atomic Energy Agency monitors remain in Iran and were inspecting more than one site a day before Israel started the bombing campaign on June 13. They are still trying to assess the extent of damage, and while military action might be able to destroy Iran's declared facilities, it also provides an incentive for Iran to take its program underground. Mr Trump dispatched B-2 stealth jets laden with Massive Ordnance Penetrators, known as GBU-57 bombs, to attempt to destroy Iran's underground uranium-enrichment sites in Natanz and Fordow. Satellite images taken on June 22 of Fordow and distributed by Maxar Technologies show new craters, possible collapsed tunnel entrances and holes on top of a mountain ridge. They also show that a large support building on the Fordow site, which operators may use to control ventilation for the underground enrichment halls, remained undamaged. There were no radiation releases from the site, the IAEA reported. New pictures of Natanz show a new crater about 5.5 metres in diametre. Maxar said in a statement that the new hole was visible in the dirt directly over a part of the underground enrichment facility. The image doesn't offer conclusive evidence that the attack breached the underground site, buried 40 metres under ground and reinforced with an 8-metre think concrete and steel shell. US Air Force General Dan Caine told a news conference earlier on June 22 that an assessment of 'final battle damage will take some time.' IAEA inspectors, meanwhile, haven't been able to verify the location of the Persian Gulf country's stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium for more than a week. Iranian officials acknowledged breaking IAEA seals and moving it to an undisclosed location. Indeed, there's just a slim possibility that the US entering the war will convince Iran to increase IAEA cooperation, said Ms Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based think tank. 'The more likely scenario is that they convince Iran that cooperation and transparency don't work and that building deeper facilities and ones not declared openly is more sensible to avoid similar targeting in future,' she said. The IAEA called on a cessation of hostilities in order to address the situation. Its 35-nation board will convene on June 23 in Vienna, Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi said. Before the US intervention, images showed Israeli forces alone had met with limited success four days after the bombing began. Damage to the central facility in Natanz, located 300km south of Tehran, was primarily limited to electricity switch yards and transformers. The US also joined in attacking the Isfahan Nuclear Technology and Research Centre, located 450km south of Tehran. That was after the IAEA re-assessed the level of damage Israel had dealt to facility. Based on satellite images and communications with Iranian counterparts Isfahan appeared 'extensively damaged,' the agency wrote late on June 21. The IAEA's central mission is to account for gram-levels of uranium around the world and to ensure it isn't used for nuclear weapons. The latest bombing now complicates tracking Iranian uranium even further, said Dr Tariq Rauf, the former head of the IAEA's nuclear-verification policy. 'It will now be very difficult for the IAEA to establish a material balance for the nearly 9,000 kilograms of enriched uranium, especially the nearly 410 kilograms of 60 per cent enriched uranium,' he said. Last week, inspectors had already acknowledged they'd lost track of the location of Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile because Israel's ongoing military assaults are preventing its inspectors from doing their work. That uranium inventory – enough to make 10 nuclear warheads at a clandestine location – was seen at Isfahan by IAEA inspectors. But the material, which could fit in as few as 16 small containers, may have already been spirited off site. 'Questions remain as to where Iran may be storing its already enriched stocks,' Ms Dolzikova said. 'These will have almost certainly been moved to hardened and undisclosed locations, out of the way of potential Israeli or US strikes.' Far from being just static points on a map, Iran's ambitions to make the fuel needed for nuclear power plants and weapons are embedded in a heavily fortified infrastructure nationwide. Thousands of scientists and engineers work at dozens of sites. Even as military analysts await new satellite images before determining the success of Mr Trump's mission, nuclear safeguards analysts have reached the conclusion that their work is about to become significantly harder. By bombing Iran's sites, Israel and the US haven't just disrupted the IAEA's accountancy of Iran's nuclear stockpile, they've also degraded the tools that monitors will be able to use, said Mr Robert Kelley, who led inspections of Iraq and Libya as an IAEA director. That includes the forensic method used to detect the potential diversion of uranium. 'Now that sites have been bombed and all classes of materials have been scattered everywhere the IAEA will never again be able to use environmental sampling,' he said. 'Particles of every isotopic description have infinite half-lives for forensic purposes and it will be impossible to sort out their origin.' BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran used drug traffickers to stoke trouble in France, says minister
FILE PHOTO: French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau speaks during an end-of-campaign rally for the presidency of the Les Republicains (LR) party in Boulogne-Billancourt near Paris, France, May 11, 2025. REUTERS/Stephanie Lecocq/File Photo Iran used drug traffickers to stoke trouble in France, says minister PARIS - France has evidence that Iran has used intermediaries in the past to hire drug traffickers to carry out activities in France on its behalf and could do so again, Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said on Sunday. France is on heightened alert following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities overnight. "Iran uses proxies that are often linked to drug traffickers. They get a contract and don't even know that the contract is linked to the Iranian regime," Retailleau told LCI television. "But that's the modality used by Iran on (our)national territory." Retailleau did not say what activities had been carried out in France and gave no specific evidence. Iran's embassy was not immediately available for comment. "It's very simple. These are contracts through intermediaries that don't link back to the regime," Retailleau said. Highlighting the heightened security threat, Retailleau also referred to a foiled plot in July 2018 to blow up an opposition rally near Paris where several Iranians were arrested after a joint Franco-German-Belgian operation. The plot was led by Vienna-based Iranian diplomat Assadolah Assadi and three others, according to court documents. Assadi, who French officials said was running an Iranian state intelligence network and was acting on orders from Tehran, was sentenced in Belgium to a 20-year prison term in 2021. He was exchanged in May 2023 for four Europeans held in Iran. Iran has repeatedly denied carrying out destabilising activities in Europe. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
US strikes on Iran nuclear sites are real-life test of hard power's limits
A combination picture shows satellite images over Fordow, before and after the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran, June 2, 2025 (L) and June 22, 2025. Planet Labs PBC via REUTERS VIENNA/PARIS - U.S. military strikes overnight in which President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites were "obliterated" will put to the test the widely held view that such attacks can delay a nuclear programme but not kill a determined push for atom bombs. As Iran's nuclear programme has expanded and become more sophisticated over the past two decades, many officials and nuclear experts have warned: You can destroy or disable a nuclear programme's physical infrastructure but it is very hard or impossible to eliminate the knowledge a country has acquired. Western powers including the United States have publicly suggested as much, complaining of the "irreversible knowledge gain" Iran has made by carrying out activities they object to. "Military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's extensive nuclear knowledge," the Washington-based Arms Control Association said in a statement after the U.S. strikes with massive bunker-busting bombs on sites including Iran's two main underground enrichment plants at Natanz and Fordow. "The strikes will set Iran's programme back, but at the cost of strengthening Tehran's resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities, possibly prompting it to consider withdrawing from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and possibly proceeding to weaponisation." Israel has also said it has killed Iranian nuclear scientists but, while little is known about the personnel side of Iran's nuclear programme, officials have said they are sceptical about that having a serious impact on Iran's nuclear knowledge, even if it might slow progress in the near term. The West says there is no civilian justification for Iran's enrichment of uranium to near weapons-grade fissile purity. Iran says its nuclear objectives are solely peaceful and it has the right to enrich as much as it wants. Iran's nuclear programme has made rapid advances since Trump pulled the United States out of a 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers that placed strict limits on its atomic activities in exchange for sanctions relief. After the U.S. withdrawal in 2018 and the re-imposition of U.S. sanctions, Iran pushed past and then far beyond the limits imposed by the deal on items like the purity to which it can enrich uranium and how much it can stockpile. URANIUM STOCK At least until Israel's first strikes against its enrichment installations on June 13, Iran was refining uranium to up to 60% purity, a short step from the roughly 90% that is bomb-grade, and far higher than the 3.67% cap imposed by the 2015 deal, which Iran respected until the year after Trump pulled out. The last report on May 31 by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog that inspects Iran's nuclear facilities, showed Iran had enough uranium enriched to up to 60%, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. It has more at lower levels like 20% and 5%. The exact impact of Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and materials has yet to be determined. In addition to the enrichment sites, the U.S. struck Isfahan, where officials have said much of Iran's most highly enriched uranium stock was stored underground. One important open question is how much highly enriched uranium Iran still has and whether it is all accounted for. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow, the site producing the bulk of Iran's uranium refined to up to 60%, had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack there. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi told state TV last weekend Iran would take measures to protect nuclear materials and equipment that would not be reported to the IAEA, and it would no longer cooperate with the IAEA as before. NORTH KOREA LOOMS LARGE The IAEA has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran since the first Israeli strikes nine days ago, but has said it is in contact with the Iranian authorities. What Iran will do next in terms of its nuclear programme is also unclear. Its threat to pull out of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty hints at a race for nuclear weapons, but Iran has maintained it has no intention of doing so. The only other country to announce its withdrawal from the NPT is North Korea in 2003. It expelled IAEA inspectors and went on to test nuclear weapons. "Our biggest concern is that we end up with a North Korea scenario whereby these strikes convince the Iranians that the only way to save the regime is to go for the bomb. Nobody is bombing North Korea now, are they?" a European official said. Even if inspections continue, because of Trump's withdrawal in 2018 Iran had already scrapped extra IAEA oversight provided for by the 2015 deal. That means the agency no longer knows how many centrifuges Iran has at undeclared locations. The IAEA says that while it cannot guarantee Iran's aims are entirely peaceful, it also has no credible indication of a coordinated nuclear weapons programme. The Israeli and now U.S. strikes have already raised fears among diplomats and other officials, however, that Iran will use those centrifuges to set up a secret enrichment site, since one could be built inside a relatively small and inconspicuous building like a warehouse. "It is quite possible that there are enrichment sites that we don't know about. Iran is a big country," a Western official said, while adding that Iran could also choose to bide its time. "In two years, if Iran were to start from scratch, they would only need a few months to reconstitute a new programme and to get back to where they were yesterday." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
