I love the Kishi V3 Pro, but the Razer Tax is real
Razer Kishi V3 Pro
The Razer Kishi V3 Pro is the best purely telescopic mobile controller you can get right now. It has swappable TMR sticks and a ton of extra buttons, all of which are customizable. The build quality is terrific, it's comfortable to use, and the companion Razer Nexus app offers a ton of great features with no subscription needed. At an MSRP of $149, you need to be living the luxury life to buy it, but if you can justify the cost you'll love the Kishi V3 Pro.
Whenever I review a Razer product, I always end up saying the same thing: 'It's amazing, but I wouldn't pay [exorbitant price Razer is asking] for it.' I would love to tell you that I won't be using that line in this review, but let's be real: you already know from the headline that I'm going to dust it off to tell you about the new Razer Kishi V3 Pro and its two siblings.
In a word, these controllers are great. The Pro models easily surpass the Razer Kishi Ultra from last year, and the vanilla Kishi V3 is an interesting new option that makes the family a bit more accessible. But I can appreciate them as they are because Razer was kind enough to send them to me for free for testing — I'm not sure most people will want to pay the asking price for them.
But I'm getting ahead of myself. First, let me tell you why there are three controllers launching this year and what makes them different.
Razer Kishi V3 series: Baby, mommy, and big daddy
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
As a refresher, the $149 Kishi Ultra from 2024 is a telescopic mobile controller that only works when connected to something. In other words, there is no battery or Bluetooth on board, and it only functions when a smartphone is slotted into it or it is connected with a USB-C cable to another system, such as a laptop. The Kishi Ultra had RGB lights, a standard set of analog sticks, two customizable 'claw-grip' buttons near the triggers, and the ability to act as a virtual controller for mobile games that don't support physical controller input, such as Genshin Impact.
The Kishi V3 family is an evolution of the Ultra. At the bottom end, the standard Kishi V3 ($99.99 at Amazon) removes many of the premium features to bring the price down to $99. This is still pretty pricey for a mobile controller, but it does match its premium competition, and does have a few perks that make that price almost worth it. I'll touch on this in a bit.
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
Meanwhile, the Razer Kishi V3 Pro ($149.99 at Amazon) is the follow-up to the Kishi Ultra in everything but name. Although it lacks the Chroma RGB lighting (all three V3 controllers lack it for some reason), it does literally everything else the Ultra does, including working with small 8-inch tablets. It also throws in some new premium features, including the long-awaited upgrade to a higher tier of analog stick technology. Like the Kishi Ultra, the Kishi V3 Pro will cost you $149.
Razer
Finally, the Kishi V3 Pro XL ($199.99 at Amazon) is exactly the same as the Kishi V3 Pro, just bigger. It's specifically designed for tablets that are 10 inches or larger. It does not work at all with smartphones. Because it's larger, it comes in at a whopping $199. Unfortunately, Razer didn't send me this one to check out, but I can already tell that a $200 controller that only works on large tablets is the very definition of an excessively niche product.
That's the basic gist on each model. Now I can dive in a bit deeper, starting with the standard version.
Razer Kishi V3 review: Nice, but a little too lean
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
Compared to the Ultra, Razer took a lot away from the Kishi V3 to make it less expensive. First, it shrunk it down a bit. The grips are smaller than the full-sized ones you'll find on the Ultra and the other two V3 models. This makes it a little less comfortable to hold. I think it's still really comfortable, though, especially when compared to most telescopic controllers out there, which tend to feel cramped. The overall footprint of the controller is also smaller, and it weighs a lot less, too — I measured just 175g for the Kishi V3 against the 267g of the V3 Pro. Depending on your travel needs with this controller, that could be a good thing.
Razer took a lot away from the Kishi V3 to make it $99.
However, one of the ways Razer slashed down the weight of the Kishi V3 is by removing all haptic motors. High-quality rumble effects are a necessity with any controller I own, so the fact that the Kishi V3 doesn't even have bad haptics is a deal-breaker for me, though if you've used previous generation Kishi controllers like the original or the Kishi V2, you might not be as concerned.
The Kishi V3 also doesn't have the customizable claw-grip buttons near the triggers and swaps the eight-way D-Pad for a standard four-way model. The mecha-tactile ABXY face buttons are also gone, with pretty standard buttons in their place. Again, this is all like previous vanilla Kishi models, but it's quite a step down from the Ultra/Pro versions.
The Kishi V3 is also less compatible with gaming devices as it's locked to phones only. Unless you have a really small tablet, it's not going to fit into the Kishi V3. If you have a big phone, though, it will work fine — even if it's in a thick case.
While it sounds like Razer didn't do anything but remove features from the Ultra and carry over the Kishi V2 to make the Kishi V3, there are two new things added. The first, and most important, is the introduction of TMR sticks. TMR stands for 'tunnel magnetoresistance.' It's a technology that increases precision and decreases the potential for stick drift. In many ways, TMR sticks are even better than Hall effect designs. Seeing them on this $99 controller is really nice. In fact, seeing them on any mobile controller is nice, as TMR is rare to see outside of the most high-end units.
Notably, Razer brought two customizable back buttons to the Kishi V3 along with TMR sticks — a rarity in this product category.
Elsewhere, Razer added two new mouse-click-style buttons on the back of the Kishi V3. These are customizable using the subscription-free Razer Nexus app for Android and iOS. The Razer Nexus app is also where you set up virtual controls for Genshin Impact and other games. It's a terrific piece of software, and it's great that Razer is keeping it free, unlike some other companies I know of (cough Backbone cough).
While I would never use the Kishi V3 as my go-to controller due to its lack of haptics, a $99 price for a controller with TMR sticks is at least approaching competitive, which is nice to see from Razer.
Razer Kishi V3
Perfect for large tablets • Swappable TMR sticks • Lots of extra buttons
MSRP: $99.99
More customizable than ever.
The Razer Kishi V3 improves on the V2 base model with swappable TMR sticks and extra buttons. See price at Amazon
Positives Perfect for large tablets
Perfect for large tablets Swappable TMR sticks
Swappable TMR sticks Lots of extra buttons
Cons No haptics
Razer Kishi V3 Pro review: Beats the Ultra, but the price still stings
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
As mentioned earlier, the Kishi V3 Pro is the true follow-up to the Kishi Ultra. Aside from the RGB lighting, the Kishi V3 Pro has every single feature of the Kishi Ultra and even finds room to add in three upgrades.
The first Kishi V3 Pro upgrade is the introduction of TMR sticks, just like the vanilla V3. However, it ups the ante by making those sticks swappable, which is the second upgrade. In the box, you'll find two alternate sticks: one with a cushy domed top and another with the same ridged top as the standard sticks but with an extended stem. You can put these two extra sticks on either the right or left sticks of the controller, depending on your preferences. Changing the sticks is easy: just pull up on the stick to remove the current one, line up the arrows on the new stick, and push down.
The third upgrade is the introduction of the two customizable buttons on the back, the same ones we see on the standard V3. Since the Kishi V3 Pro still has the claw-grip buttons near the triggers, that gives you a total of four buttons that you can customize as you wish without needing to sacrifice any of the standard controller buttons.
So really, the Kishi V3 Pro is the Ultra without RGB lighting and with swappable TMR sticks and two extra buttons. Although the loss of RGB stings a bit, those three upgrades make this a much better controller than the Ultra. Of course, Razer is still asking $149 for the Kishi V3 Pro, which is a big ask.
Razer Kishi V3 Pro
Swappable TMR sticks • Four extra customizable buttons • Powerful free companion software
MSRP: $149.99
Razer's Kishi series gets even better.
Swappable TMR sticks and lots of extra customizable buttons make this a powerful telescopic mobile controller. See price at Amazon
Positives Swappable TMR sticks
Swappable TMR sticks Four extra customizable buttons
Four extra customizable buttons Powerful free companion software
Powerful free companion software Virtual controller support
Virtual controller support Great build quality
Cons Really expensive
Really expensive No Chroma RGB
No Chroma RGB Won't travel well
Razer Kishi V3 series verdict: Don't pay full price for the Pro
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
I really don't want you to come away from this review thinking that I don't love these controllers — I really do. The Razer Kishi V3 is pretty terrific considering I couldn't even find a competitor device with TMR sticks for $99 — the basic Backbone One ($99.99 at Amazon) matches it for price and is great, but those sticks are a world apart. If you game on an iPhone, it's an especially great deal because iOS doesn't support haptics anyway, so you won't be missing anything. But $99 for an Android gamer like me who expects their controller to shake when they're shot in-game? That's just too much money to not get rumble.
Likewise, the Kishi V3 Pro is practically perfect. It has pretty much everything anyone could want from a telescopic mobile controller. With a $149 price, though, it had better be everything you could want, because that is the price of two Xbox or Sony DualSense controllers.
OK, so here's the line: The Razer Kishi V3 Pro is amazing, but I wouldn't pay $149 for it. The Backbone Pro ($169.99 at Manufacturer site) is the obvious alternative here, even though it doesn't have haptics or upgraded sticks, but it does offer Bluetooth connectivity for use as a gamepad without a docked device. However, there are competitors out there that offer nearly everything the Kishi V3 Pro does for a lot less.
Although you wouldn't get TMR, you could buy two models of comparable GameSir controllers for what Razer is asking for just one.
Take, for example, the GameSir G8 Plus ($79.99 at Amazon), which is easily found for half the price of the Kishi V3 Pro. It has Hall effect sticks, which is a slight step down from TMR, but then it has literally everything else. It also supports Bluetooth connectivity. Meanwhile, the G8 Galileo ($79.99 at Amazon) is even more similar to the Kishi series because it relies on a USB-C connection instead of Bluetooth. You could add both of these GameSir models to your cart for the price you'd pay for one Kishi V3 Pro.
Even the 2024 Razer Kishi Ultra is a good deal in comparison. On Amazon, you can get a refurbished Kishi Ultra for just $90, which is not bad considering how close to the V3 Pro it is. Also, now that the V3 Pro exists, Razer will likely discontinue the Ultra, bringing the new models down in price eventually, too.
Still, there's no denying that the Kishi V3 Pro is a beast. If money is no object to you, it goes on a good sale, or you simply want the best, most feature-rich telescopic controller you can get, this is the one. I just hope your wallet is ready for the Razer Tax.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UK's GCA to probe Amazon for alleged delays in supplier payments
UK's GCA launches probe into Amazon alleged delays in supplier payments The UK's Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) has initiated a probe into Amazon after concerns about alleged potential violations of regulations governing the timely payment to suppliers. The inquiry stems from suspicions that Amazon may have violated paragraph 5 of the code (no delay in payments) between 1 March 2022 and 20 June 2025. It will particularly scrutinise practices since 1 January 2024 to gain a comprehensive understanding of Amazon's current procedures. The investigation will assess the extent of any breaches, their impact on suppliers and the underlying causes. The GCA will examine Amazon's practices related to receiving goods, payment processes, handling supplier concerns about payment deductions and the use of settlements od deductions in its commercial negotiations. The GCA's decision to investigate follows previous interactions with Amazon. Mark White, the adjudicator, informed Amazon in 2024 that it must take decisive action to adhere to the code. White stated: 'Delays in payment can significantly harm suppliers. The alleged delays could expose Amazon suppliers to excessive risk and unexpected costs, potentially affecting their ability to invest and innovate. 'I decided to launch this targeted investigation based on the range of evidence I have seen from multiple sources. It will allow me to determine whether Amazon has breached paragraph 5 of the Groceries Code and the root cause of any breach.' The GCA states that despite Amazon's subsequent efforts, further detailed evidence from suppliers requires targeted investigation into payment practices. Reports have been received of other Groceries Code issues at Amazon. The GCA continues to work with Amazon to resolve these matters and remains prepared to initiate further investigations if required. White has called upon direct suppliers and stakeholders to contribute evidence and share their experiences of supplying to Amazon, as part of the GCA's evidence-gathering process for the ongoing investigation, stating: 'All responses will be completely confidential.' In June 2025, Amazon announced plans to downsize its corporate staff as it integrates generative AI technology into its business processes. "UK's GCA to probe Amazon for alleged delays in supplier payments" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Amazon's Driverless Cab Company Zoox Revs Up ‘Toaster Taxis'
Amazon hopes ride-hailers love direct eye contact because its carriage-style robotaxis feature four seats facing each other. After cutting the ribbon on a new factory in California, Amazon is ramping up production of its bidirectional, self-driving cabs ahead of a planned launch in Las Vegas later this year. The Bay Area facility currently churns out one robotaxi a day, but Zoox hopes to boost that rate to three an hour by next year. After buying Zoox five years ago for $1.3 billion, Amazon is prepping a big push onto the roads of major cities (first, Las Vegas and later, San Francisco, Austin and Miami). But rivals are already there. READ ALSO: Cybersecurity Giant Palo Alto Networks Caught Between Opportunity and Maturity and 'Uncertain' 2025, M&A Deadlock Freeze $1 Trillion in PE Assets Alphabet's Waymo said it provides 250,000 rides a week in its self-driving cabs, up from 10,000 two years ago. Riders can hail a driverless Jaguar from Waymo's app in Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix and San Francisco. Waymo also recently applied for a permit to operate in New York City, where state law will require a driver, though the company is pushing to change that provision. So far, Waymo is the only fully operational self-driving taxi service in the US, but Tesla is trying to join it ASAP: CEO Elon Musk promised in 2021 that Tesla would have a million robotaxis on the road by now, which … didn't happen. Tesla did, however, put a small group of robotaxis on the road in Austin, Texas, last weekend, which Musk described in a virtual victory lap as 'the culmination of a decade of hard work.' Regulators are investigating Tesla's self-driving tech in connection with fatal accidents as critics raise red flags about its robotaxi's lack of lidar and radar, which Waymo and Zoox use. Waymo and Zoox have been investigated after incidents including erratic driving. Yellow Light. Zoox is trying to join a race that Waymo's already a few laps into, but Waymo may have made the road a little smoother. Waymo eased riders into the concept of driverless taxis with its fleet of Jaguars, which look like regular cars with some extra gadgets whirring around. Zoox's autonomous taxis don't even have a steering wheel, so Zoox has planned a marketing push to persuade riders to hop into its toaster taxis. What'll probably be more important for swaying would-be riders is how safe upcoming robotaxi rollouts are. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
GenAI Won't Replace Doctors, But It Could Make Them Miserable
No matter how powerful generative AI becomes, physicians will still have jobs. But will those jobs ... More be fulfilling or soul-crushing? Will AI replace doctors? A year ago, most physicians would've confidently answered 'no.' Medicine, they'd argue, is too complex, too personal, too human to be handled by machines, no matter how advanced. Now, that confidence is starting to waver. Physicians, like other highly educated workers, are watching what's happening in another once-secure, intellectually demanding profession: computer programming. Not long ago, coding was considered one of the most prestigious and future-proof careers in the modern economy. The brightest students pursued software engineering, drawn by high salaries, strong demand and the appeal of solving complex problems. Programmers were irreplaceable. Until they weren't. From Amazon to Meta to Salesforce, tech companies are laying off engineers by the thousands. At Microsoft, generative AI already writes a third of the company's code, and some experts predict it could eliminate two-thirds of programming jobs by decade's end. Companies like Shopify and IBM have gone even further, requiring managers to justify hiring humans over AI or freezing new hires for roles they believe GenAI tools will soon replace. In medicine, large language models already outperform physicians at diagnosing complex cases and answering patient questions. But that doesn't mean clinicians are at risk of losing their jobs. Here are three reasons GenAI won't replace doctors — followed by one major caveat. 1. Too Few Doctors, Too Much Work Across hospitals and clinics, American healthcare is already stretched beyond capacity. The American Medical Association projects a shortfall of up to 124,000 physicians by 2036, including 48,000 in primary care alone. Three major forces are driving this shortage: Bottom line: The physician shortage is real and getting worse. GenAI can help fill the gaps, but it won't eliminate the demand for human clinicians. 2. Cutting Doctors Is A Poor Way To Cut Costs In most industries, replacing high-salaried workers with technology is the fastest path to profitability. But in healthcare, that approach misses the point entirely. Take primary care as an example. It's the backbone of the U.S. medical system, yet it accounts for less than 5% of the nation's $4.9 trillion in healthcare spending. Only half of that percentage goes to salaries. So, even if we eliminated half of all primary care physicians (an unthinkable move), total costs would drop by just 1.25%. In healthcare, the greatest opportunity for cost savings is in preventing and better managing chronic diseases like diabetes, hypertension and long-term heart failure. According to the CDC, improving prevention and chronic disease management could prevent 30–50% of their complications (heart attack, stroke, cancer and kidney failure). Avoiding these catastrophic medical events would save an estimated $1.5 trillion annually. Value-based care models have already demonstrated what's possible. Studies from leading health systems show that investing in proactive, team-based primary care reduces hospitalizations, improves outcomes and lowers annual per-patient costs by up to 23%. That's where the right combination of clinicians and generative AI offers the greatest value. Between visits, GenAI can track symptoms, alert patients to necessary medication changes and identify complications before they turn into crises. Paired with 24/7 telemedicine, GenAI can provide patients with real-time expertise and care for routine concerns, flagging serious problems when doctors aren't normally available. Bottom line: Controlling chronic disease offers 20 times the savings of cutting primary care jobs. Ultimately, the greatest cost reductions will come from better health, and the best way to achieve that is pairing generative AI with skilled clinicians and empowered patients. 3. AI Can't Replace Human Connection Generative AI is becoming more skilled with every update. In a recent dual study, ChatGPT provided answers to routine patient questions originally fielded by doctors. When clinicians and patients reviewed the anonymized responses, the AI was rated better than physicians in both quality and empathy. But when the stakes are high — life-altering cancer diagnoses or complex treatment decisions —patients want a trusted human at their side. Abraham Verghese, my colleague at Stanford and a bestselling author, notes: 'Medicine at its heart is a human endeavor … the physician‑patient relationship is key; all else follows from it.' He emphasizes the ritual of the physical exam as transformative, a structured encounter that seals trust, communicates care and calms fear. Studies show that the doctor's touch reduces anxiety, boosts patient satisfaction, and even improves clinical outcomes. Bottom line: Even when data show that generative AI is more accurate, patients still want to talk with a human when facing complex or life-threatening decisions. A Caution Against Complacency No matter how powerful generative AI becomes, physicians will still have jobs. But will those jobs be fulfilling or soul-crushing? That depends on what doctors do next. If private equity firms or for-profit health insurers determine how GenAI is integrated into medicine, the technology will be used primarily to increase productivity: faster diagnoses, shorter visits, less support staff. Yes, technology can streamline tasks. But unless clinicians shape its deployment, GenAI will be used primarily to drive productivity, making today's problems worse for both clinicians and patients. By contrast, if physicians take the lead, they can harness generative AI to improve patient health, reduce burnout and lower costs by preventing complications like heart attacks, strokes, cancer and kidney failure. But that success will require more than technological tools. Doctors must organize into high-performing medical groups, integrate GenAI into all aspects of clinical care and negotiate payment models that reward improved outcomes — not just higher volume. Bottom line: Bottom line: GenAI can cut corners or improve care, but not both. It can boost profits or improve lives, but not both. The path we take will depend on who takes the lead.
