SA needs structural reform and moral courage, not more fiscal tinkering
At the third time of asking, on Wednesday, 11 June, Parliament considered, debated and voted for the 2025 Fiscal Framework, the basis for the Government of National Unity's (GNU) very first budget.
To paraphrase former US congressman and economist Phil Gramm, passing a pro-growth budget is like going to heaven – everybody wants to do it, but nobody wants to do what you have to do to get there.
Unfortunately, the GNU was not willing to do what it takes, and instead pushed through a budget that will not produce the rapid investment and growth required to begin our journey out of the economic doldrums.
Growth flat, investment dried up, and taxes on the rise. We will be back here next year, facing another round of tax increases, because there will have been little to no investment. A budget ought to be a blueprint for progress. A reflection of our values, our priorities and our path forward as a country.
The 2025 Fiscal Framework was preceded by the GNU's 31 priorities in its Medium-Term Development Plan, a bold promise of reform and delivery. Yet the Fiscal Framework tabled in Parliament offers no clear roadmap for achieving those priorities. There is no strategic alignment between what the government says it wants to do and what it is willing to fund.
Without that alignment, these priorities are reduced to political rhetoric.
We've seen this playbook before. The National Development Plan (NDP), hailed over a decade ago as the blueprint for South Africa's long-term development, now serves more as a reminder of broken promises than a source of policy coherence. Most of its targets on jobs, education, crime reduction and infrastructure remain unmet.
Over the past 10 years, our economy has grown at an anaemic average of less than 1% per year. In the most recent quarter, growth was a paltry 0.1%. The only sector showing sustained growth is financial services.
Meanwhile, real economy, labour-absorbing sectors such as agriculture, mining, manufacturing, construction, trade and transport have all declined in their contribution to GDP. These are precisely the sectors that should be powering inclusive growth and job creation.
Gross fixed-capital formation, which is the clearest indicator of future growth and productivity, remains stagnant at 4.2%. These numbers are warnings. And they are being ignored.
The diplomatic disaster last month at the White House only confirmed what many investors already suspect: South Africa is becoming uninvestable. And we are seeing the consequences.
I recently visited Accra, the capital of Ghana, and you can feel the difference in the air. Cranes fill the skyline, a clear signal of construction, investment and progress. How many cranes are visible in Johannesburg, Cape Town or Durban today?
We cannot tax our way out of this crisis. We must invest our way out. And that means fundamentally rethinking how we use the public purse.
We must prioritise investments that unlock growth – in infrastructure, digital connectivity and efficient public transport systems. We need to fast-track the rollout of modern special economic zones, backed by genuine incentives.
Instead of bold reforms or pro-growth investments, the Budget leans on familiar and increasingly regressive tactics: raising taxes on the already-overburdened middle class and borrowing more from international lenders without a clear plan for debt repayment or structural reform.
This year's tax increase comes disguised as 'bracket creep' in personal income taxes, effectively taxing South Africans more without explicitly changing the rates. Next year, there are already whispers of additional taxes on the horizon. The government is milking a shrinking base instead of expanding the economic pie.
Years ago, when VAT was raised, we were promised serious spending reforms and a leaner, more effective state. That promise, too, has faded. The state remains bloated, with an oversized Cabinet and a civil service often rewarded more for loyalty than for performance.
There are still no performance scorecards linked to Cabinet roles. There has been no movement on taxing high-turnover, high-risk sectors such as online gambling. And crucial functions such as policing and justice remain underfunded and underperforming. The human cost of this drift is staggering.
Education budgets in key provinces such as Free State, KwaZulu-Natal and North West are taking a hit, on track to run out of funds to support teachers. Our doctor-to-patient ratio now stands at 1 to 3,000, a clear sign of a healthcare system under collapse.
The National Prosecuting Authority continues to buckle under the weight of its mandate, unable to bring criminals to justice in a country overrun by corruption and violent crime.
There are small signs of momentum. Minister Barbara Creecy's commitment to rail and transport reform is welcome. Fixing our logistics network is essential for reigniting growth in key sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing. But isolated reforms are not enough. We need a coherent, national strategy backed by real budgetary commitments.
I reject the idea that this is the best we can do. South Africa does not need more fiscal tinkering. We need structural reform and moral courage.
I am proposing three immediate steps to be pursued in round two and three of the budget process , asParliament considers the Appropriations Bill and the Division of Revenue Bill.
First, cut wasteful spending. Initiate independent, sector-wide spending reviews to reduce inefficiencies, and reallocate funds to frontline services.
Second, legislate for investment. Pass laws that make South Africa the easiest place in Africa to do business. Prioritise local businesses with the same urgency we show global ones such as Starlink.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
19 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Editorial: The GNU survives a year
There has been nothing remarkable about the government of national unity's first year in office, but the steadying of the ship has been invaluable. Photo: GCIS It was with great curiosity that we read ActionSA's GNU One Year Assessment this week. The project, a not-so-subtle rip-off of the Mail & Guardian's cabinet report cards, rated the government of national unity's key performance metrics on a scale of A to F. (As you might expect, most leaned towards the latter). These are not objective scores, of course — as you well know. Still, the marketing effort gets a passing mark for its creativity and contribution to democratic discourse. The GNU's actual performance over the past year is not neatly measurable. The uninspired leadership is easy to scrutinise. With the exception of some flickers of business optimism, the government of the last year has largely carried on the legacy of President Cyril Ramaphosa's first term. That is to say, a dispensation that strangled hopes of Ramaphoria early on. There is little immediate effect on people's lives — South Africa remains deeply divided and faces economic uncertainty. There is an argument, however, that the steadying of the ship has been invaluable. Democratic Alliance leader John Steenhuisen is always quick to point out that his party slipped under the sheets of leadership with the ANC to prevent a doomsday scenario. Although we have been critical of such party-first rhetoric, the rivals he has warned about have done well to prove his point. It has not been a good year for the Economic Freedom Fighters. A poor electoral performance has led to discord and a subsequent hollowing-out of key members (some might say that a purge of rivals is a more appropriate framing). Their once-upon-a-time role as disruptors of a stale political system is now buried. One of those leaders, Floyd Shivambu, has occupied the headlines this week as his falling-out with the uMkhonto weSizwe party continues to play out publicly. The episode is consistent with a turbulent organisation that has failed to distinguish itself from a cult of personality. By contrast, the GNU has miraculously remained intact. The budget debacle has threatened, differing ideologies have simmered, but clear heads have always prevailed. That was desperately needed at the infamous White House meeting last month — a notable success in retrospect. The uncomfortable obsequiousness of our leaders notwithstanding, the co-ordinated message on key issues such as crime allowed South Africa to ride out its fevered moment under the international spotlight. As uncertainty grips the world, it is imperative that we continue to walk with a unified purpose. But stability will only take us so far. The GNU must now begin to think more creatively on how it will solve the country's social ills. Failure to do so will earn it an F on anybody's report card next year.
Mail & Guardian
19 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
One-year-old GNU brings stability, but fails on other metrics
No goal: ActionSA, which chose to remain outside the government of national unity, gave a damning evaluation of the GNU. Photo: @Presidency/ZA/X Observers say the government of national unity has kept parties such as the EFF and MK in check, but jobs, growth and reform remain elusive This content is restricted to subscribers only . Join the M&G Community Our commitment at the Mail & Guardian is to ensure every reader enjoys the finest experience. Join the M&G community and support us in delivering in-depth news to you consistently. Subscription enables: - M&G community membership - independent journalism - access to all premium articles & features - a digital version of the weekly newspaper - invites to subscriber-only events - the opportunity to test new online features first Already a subscriber?
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
A stagnant economy: The driving force behind South Africa's unemployment crisis
The writer says that we cannot keep placing our economic hopes in the hands of a state that has repeatedly failed to deliver. Image: File THERE'S no denying that a misalignment between our education system and the demands of the economy is a driver of our unemployment crisis; it's been said often, and it holds up. We produce far too many graduates with qualifications that don't match what the market is looking for. Humanities graduates, in particular, tend to be cited as an example – and there's truth to this. However, to suggest that merely closing the skills gap will resolve unemployment is to oversimplify a much deeper crisis. This line of thinking implies that jobs are readily available, and that the only thing standing in the way is a lack of relevant skills. As appealing – and partly valid – as it may be, it doesn't capture the full picture. To be clear, aligning the education system more closely with the economy is undoubtedly important. It will improve the prospects of many graduates and create pockets of new employment. Nevertheless, the positive outcomes of such reform (in the broader picture) will likely be modest, and they won't come close to addressing the massive scale of unemployment that we're facing. Reframing the underlying issue The bigger problem – which we skirt around sometimes – is that our country just doesn't have enough jobs. Regardless of the skills they bring to the table, we have an economy that isn't creating nearly enough employment to absorb millions of people. As it stands, the most affected are those with little or no education, and those with qualifications that are oversupplied and out of sync with demand. But we would be making a mistake to assume that this crisis is limited to them. We're beginning to see signs that even those with in-demand skills are not as secure as many might think. The growing number of unemployed medical doctors, for instance, is not just an anomaly, but a warning. While this trend hasn't reached crisis proportions, it clearly indicates that no one is fully insulated from an economy that isn't growing at the level it should. All this points us to key questions that we should keep are: why is our economy failing to produce the jobs we so desperately need? What are the structural issues holding us back? And more importantly, how do we build an economy that can create employment for millions of South Africans and not just those with the 'right' skills? The answer to the first question is widely understood and requires no overstating. The ANC-led Government of National Unity (GNU) remains committed to an archaic and globally discredited economic orthodoxy that simply does not confront the structural roots of our unemployment crisis. To begin addressing this, we need to look at a few key areas that aren't silver bullets, but necessary foundations for any serious structural reform. Educational policy Political analyst Prince Mashele has consistently and correctly argued that fixing our education system must be a top priority. The dysfunction in basic education is well documented, but the deeper issue is that our entire system, from primary school through to college or university, is still poorly aligned with the practical and technical demands of our modern economy. We need to move away from an overly abstract approach to learning and focus more on what equips people to participate meaningfully in the economy. This shift needs to begin at the foundational level and not when learners are preparing to exit the system. Rethinking our growth formula The idea that the state must be central to any meaningful development or job creation strategy is taken as gospel in many circles. But ironically, it is this very gospel that has failed and lies at the heart of many of our economic problems. As Senior Associate of the Free Market Foundation (FMF) Nicholas Woode-Smith has often argued, it is the market, and not the state, that has the capacity to drive growth, innovation, and employment, provided the environment allows it. This environment must obviously be created by the state, but it must understand that its role is to facilitate growth and not dominate the economy. A bloated and inefficient public sector cannot absorb labour at scale through unsustainable programs or endless grants. It also cannot micromanage growth into existence. What we need is a more open market that isn't shackled by red tape and labour laws that protect incumbency at the cost of flexibility. The notion of "exploitation" that is often used to undermine this credible argument isn't only a subjective judgment, but also a distraction from the fact that real job creation demands dynamism. Even the People's Republic of China (PRC), which is often misrepresented as a successful model of state-led growth, actually built its economic miracle on the back of aggressive liberalisation and global market integration. We would do well to take note of this. Attracting foreign investment If investment is the oxygen of a growing economy, then ours has been gasping for breath for years. As political economist Phumlani Majozi has long warned, our country is not an attractive destination for substantial investment. Some of the reasons for this are not obscure. They include rampant crime, a financially repressive policy framework in Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE), infrastructure deficits, and ongoing energy insecurity. Taken together, these factors largely explain why foreign investment has not been flowing in. Naturally, the aforementioned challenges are only part of a much larger picture. There are other vital pillars of structural reform that receive far less attention than they should. Through its Liberty First policy initiative, the FMF, in line with core research findings of the annual Economic Freedom of the World (EFW) report, has identified five of them. Three of them – sound money, free trade, and secure private property rights – are especially worth highlighting here. Liberty first A stable currency is crucial for long-term investment and planning. Without it, both individuals and businesses struggle to make meaningful decisions about saving and investing. Free trade creates access to new markets, lowers costs, and increases consumer choice. Yet unfortunately, our country continues to lean more towards projectionist measures that do more harm than good. The third pillar, and arguably the most urgent, is the protection of private property rights. The recent signing of the Expropriation Act into law is deeply concerning and constitutes a direct attack on the very property rights of all South Africans. As FMF Head of Policy Martin Van Staden has recently posited, "nil compensation" is nothing but a formal and euphemistic way of saying zero. Worse still, the Act opens the door to abuse by allowing expropriation under the vague and sweeping label of "public interest". This creates legal ambiguity and deters much-needed investment. Without secure private property rights, our economy will remain stagnant and start to regress as productive activity slows and whatever little capital we have left flees. Ayanda Sakhile Zulu holds a BSocSci in Political Studies from the University of Pretoria and is an intern at the Free Market Foundation. Image: Free Market Foundation
