Cybersecurity budgets surge as AI-fuelled threats reshape business priorities
Connected Magazine
Cybersecurity budgets surge as AI-fuelled threats reshape business priorities
With security spending set to soar this year due to rising cyber threats, it's worth revising how much your organisation is investing in protecting the business
Charlie Taylor
05:00
A new study from IDC, the tech-focused research firm, forecasts a 12.2 per cent hike in global spending in 2025 alone, culminating in a $377 billion annual spend by 2028
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Spotify founder bets big on Europe's war economy as defence stocks surge
Daniel Ek isn't known for military manoeuvres. However, the Spotify founder's bet on Helsing, an AI defence start-up, has made him an unlikely figurehead in Europe's arms race. His investment vehicle is leading a €600 million round that values the German group at €12 billion, more than double last year's mark. It's not the only thing surging. European defence stocks have soared this year, fuelled by war in Ukraine, threats from Russia and a new UK-EU security pact. Germany's Rheinmetall is up 190 per cent; German tank maker Renk 270 per cent; France's Thales 80 per cent; British multinationals BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce some 70 and 50 per cent, respectively. The Stoxx Europe Aerospace and Defence index has jumped 45 per cent. The bullish case? A decades-long rearmament, led by NATO states eyeing up to 5 per cent of GDP for defence. The bear case? Patchy procurement, political bottlenecks, and increasingly elevated valuations in a defence bull market now over three years old. READ MORE Still, investor appetite is ravenous. Morningstar notes a new defence ETF has gathered €2.5 billion in just three months. Even peace in Ukraine, analysts agree, wouldn't end the boom – just shift it to replenishment and deterrence. As Helsing's soaring valuation suggests, the war economy may be just getting started.
Irish Independent
9 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Quarter of businesses that use AI are unclear of regulatory obligations, according to new report
Almost four out of 10 businesses here have not appointed a named individual for an AI seat, as required under the law. A new Governing AI report from Irish law firm Arthur Cox shows that almost all businesses in Ireland, 97pc, are using AI, though just 10pc say it is 'fundamental' to their operations. However, while Irish companies are racing to adopt artificial intelligence, they are unclear about the regulatory responsibilities that come with it. The EU AI Act came into force in August 2024, although its provisions are being applied on a phased basis out to August 2027. It establishes a regulatory framework for AI systems developed or deployed in the EU and aims to provide a high level of protection for health, safety and fundamental rights such as privacy, while promoting adoption of trustworthy AI tools. 'Deployers' of AI technology are businesses that are using the new technology to perform functions within their business and they have specific obligations under the EU AI Act which is now in place – including to have suitably qualified named staff with personal responsibility to oversee the processes. They are also required to maintain records. 'Providers' are businesses or entities that develop and supply AI tools; which have distinct responsibilities under the act. The Arthur Cox report's authors say it captures uneven levels of preparedness when it comes to oversight, compliance and long-term planning for the roll-out of high risk AI systems in Ireland. It is based on a survey of professionals in IT, data, risk, compliance, legal and C-suite roles. It found many businesses have yet to implement oversight and compliance mechanisms concerning AI use, particularly around governance, documentation and accountability. At the same time, organisations are already identifying areas where the cost of compliance is likely to rise – including data governance, risk management and reporting requirements. Colin Rooney, partner and head of technology and innovation at Arthur Cox, said many organisations remain unclear on what steps they need to take under the EU AI Act. 'Given the complexity of these new obligations – particularly around documentation, accountability, and data management – businesses must prioritise legal clarity and strategic planning. Proactive compliance will determine whether AI remains a growth driver or becomes a source of risk and disruption,' he said.
The Journal
13 hours ago
- The Journal
Political parties scramble to introduce policies around AI use after Swedish House Mafia-gate
IRISH POLITICAL PARTIES are beginning to develop policies around the use of artificial intelligence (AI) after MEP Ciaran Mullooly revealed he used it to write a letter to the President of the European Commission. In the letter, which urged the EU to deliver more aid to Gaza, the Independent Ireland MEP inadvertently quoted the house music group Swedish House Mafia and recounted a fictional story of a girl in Rafah without indicating that she was not real. Following this, The Journal contacted all political parties represented in Dáil Éireann to see if they have policies or guidelines in place around the use of AI for public representatives. No party currently does. While the Labour Party said it has been working on guidelines since earlier this year, other parties were left scrambling after Mullooly's AI-assisted letter made headlines. The Social Democrats, Fine Gael and Independent Ireland all said they are currently working on developing policies, while the Green Party is also examining the idea as part of a strategic plan. A Sinn Féin source admitted that the Mullooly story was sent around to TDs as a 'cautionary tale' but said the party does not currently have any guidelines around the use of AI. Despite the slow uptake from political HQs on the issue, many TDs were more vocal about their feelings on the use of the technology in public life. When asked if they use AI to assist their work as a TD, just four current members of the Dáil admitted that they do. Independent TD Barry Heneghan used AI to create a song as part of his election campaign and said he uses a mix of programmes now as a TD, such as ChatGPT and Microsoft 365 Co-pilot, depending on the work he wants to streamline. Fianna Fáil's Paul McAuliffe, Fine Gael's John Paul O'Shea and Labour's Conor Sheehan all said they use programmes like ChatGPT and Co-pilot on occasion to help with admin tasks, but all were of the view that it shouldn't be used for drafting speeches or public statements. Advertisement 'I think transparency is important in this job. It's still up to TDs to stand over what they say and do, and AI can make mistakes and add things in that you would never say,' Heneghan said. He added: 'If you trusted it for your whole speech, it doesn't sound human in my opinion.' Independent Ireland TD Ken O'Flynn compared AI to the printing press and said his party supports the 'responsible use' of the emerging technology. 'Whether to improve communication or streamline workflows, like the printing press or the personal computer, artificial intelligence may face scepticism in its early stages but if history has shown us anything, it is that new tools often begin with controversy and end with positive transformation.' Most other TDs we contacted said they do not use AI to assist with their work, although many parties said staff sometimes use it for research purposes or admin. When asked if politicians should have to disclose when they have used AI to draft a speech or statement, most TDs we contacted said yes. A spokesperson for Independent Ireland said it 'would not be a bad idea in the interests of transparency', while Green Party leader Roderic O'Gorman went further and said it should also be disclosed when politicians use it to alter images of themselves. A number of TDs said it came down to being honest with constituents, while others, like People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, said he was against its use on environmental grounds. Labour TD Duncan Smith argued that it is lazy for TDs to use AI. The Dublin Fingal East TD said he doesn't use it because he has 'no interest in selling my constituents short'. 'When people elect you to represent them, it should actually be you and the team you put together to work with you, representing your constituents. 'I think TDs using AI are displaying laziness at best and I think it shows a lack of respect to the people who have elected you to the Dáil, who rightfully expect you to be putting in the work,' he said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
