A S Dulat's new book explores betrayal, belief and Farooq's Kashmir

An Unlikely Friendship: The Chief Minister and the Spy
Published by Juggernaut
289 pages ₹79
Anyone who knows A S Dulat will know that there cannot be a more unlikely spy: He is amiable, friendly, and operates on trust. His book about his friendship with one of Kashmir's tallest leaders, Farooq Abdullah, is as much a window into some of the most tumultuous and defining decades in the politics of the state as it is a gentle and non-judgemental appraisal of a complex and unpredictable political personality.
Sheikh Abdullah and Farooq Abdullah have been the subject of many fascinating studies, including an outstanding biography of the Sheikh by Chitralekha Zutshi (though Mr Dulat differs with Zutshi on some facts and interpretations of events). The relationship between the father and son is important as it is part of Farooq's political inheritance: A mistrust of Delhi and a perennially thorny relationship with Pakistan which never forgave the father or the son for siding with India. The book explores Farooq's relationship with New Delhi under different dispensations. But on one point it is unequivocal — that he never, ever considered independence of Kashmir as a solution. The book describes his meeting with secessionist leader Yaseen Malik of the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) at which Farooq lambasted him for violence against Kashmiris and about the JLKF's dreams of 'azaadi', telling him he was naive and living in a fool's paradise.
Given this reality, the book argues, Delhi should have trusted Farooq unquestioningly — which it did not. In full knowledge that Farooq's succession had not been smooth and was challenged by his brother-in-law, Gul Mohammad Shah, in 1984, Delhi put its weight behind the Gul Shah faction of the National Conference, deputing Congress leader Mufti Mohammad Sayeed to support a coup against Farooq's government, dislodging him. There was a background to this, as there always is. But Mr Dulat notes regretfully that Kashmir ought to have been kept out of the kind of power politics that was in place elsewhere in India — it was too important to be trifled with. Farooq got the full-throated support of the Opposition. But it was, at the end of the day, the Opposition. He felt he had been betrayed twice over, Mr Dulat writes: Once by his family and then by the Congress led by Indira Gandhi, his extended family.
Other betrayals followed. His right hand man, Saifuddin Soz, was working to undermine him by conducting a dialogue with the Kashmiri underground and the government. Rajiv Gandhi had little time for him, though the two had been good friends. The V P Singh years came and went but Farooq did not get his due. The problem was: No one knew whom to talk to in Kashmir. Dialogues with separatist leaders of the Shabir Shah variety were the flavour du jour. But Mr Dulat says he knew that the only currency that would work, both for Delhi and Srinagar, would be Farooq Abdullah.
In 1993, P V Narasimha Rao's government installed the Department of Kashmir Affairs, headed by Rajesh Pilot. In 1994, the US changed its position, openly calling Kashmir disputed territory. Mr Dulat moved minor mountains to persuade the government to see reason and bring Farooq back in from the cold. This was done by making Farooq part of an all-party delegation to clarify to the world that no human rights violations were taking place in Kashmir as alleged by Pakistan. Farooq was superb. Not only did he speak as an Indian, he also challenged Pakistanis to speak to him in Kashmiri
The 1996 Assembly elections in Kashmir were a turning point for the state and for Farooq himself — not the least because of kindly, understanding and benevolent statesmen in power in Delhi for however short a tenure, such as H D Deve Gowda and I K Gujral. When Atal Bihari Vajpayee came to power the Jammu & Kashmir Assembly passed a resolution seeking autonomy. Mr Dulat emphasised that the demand was for autonomy, not independence.
At around this time, Farooq was made an offer that made his eyes sparkle. What if he were made vice-president of India? Vajpayee was agreeable, and things might have been different if that had happened, Mr Dulat says. It didn't and one more betrayal was added to the layer of mistrust. The National Conference lost the 2002 polls. By now, Omar Abdullah was set to replace Farooq. But as with the Sheikh and Farooq, Omar and Farooq too had their ups and downs.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

15 minutes ago

• Time of India

Congress MP Randhawa slams J&K CM Omar Abdullah over remarks on Indus waters

Congress MP Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa strongly rebuked Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah for his opposition to a proposed 113-km canal to divert surplus water from the Indus river system to Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan, emphasising Punjab's historical and agricultural significance. He recalled the challenges Punjab faced during Operation Sindoor , asserting that there wasn't as much "Pakistattack in J&K as there was in Punjab." Speaking in to ANI, Randhawa said, "One should not make statements that cast doubt on patriotism. Punjabis have never done that. And even during Operation Sindoor, there wasn't as much Pakistani attack in J&K as there was in Punjab. Punjab was turned into a battlefield. The patriotism of Punjab, the strength of Punjab, and the strength of its agriculture -- as long as Punjab remains strong, India remains strong." Randhawa said he was "sad" and "hurt" by the Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister's recent comments. "I don't know in what context Mr. Abdullah made his statement, but I'm sad. Considering the relationships his grandfather, father, and himself have had with Punjabis and with Punjab, and the faith his father and grandfather had in Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple), I am hurt by his statement." Live Events He directly replied to CM Abdullah's remarks: "Punjab should be given water because when India gained Independence, we used to beg to the world for (food) grain." The Congress MP underscored the historic significance of Punjab's irrigation system, recalling the legacy of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. "It is because of this water, and the three dams built there, and if they have even a little knowledge of history, they would know that the best canal system existed during Maharaja Ranjit Singh's time. From Khyber Pass, where the Mughals used to enter and loot India, Maharaja Ranjit Singh blocked that route and stopped the Mughals from entering, turning the country into a capable and independent state. He ruled over Jammu & Kashmir for over 40 years." He stated that Punjab's border regions, including areas right up to the no-man's-land where farming continues today, are not only symbols of the state's resilience but crucial contributors to national food supplies. "That water is Punjab's lifeline," he said. Randhawa's remarks come in response to CM Abdullah's June 20 statement in Jammu, where he rejected the canal, citing Jammu's drought-like conditions and questioning Punjab's past support asking "Did they give us water when we needed it?" Economic Times WhatsApp channel )

Time of India

15 minutes ago

• Time of India

Tulsi Gabbard makes U-turn, backtracks on Iran nukes, now claims regime could build bomb in a matter of weeks

Tulsi Gabbard warns Iran could build nuclear weapon 'within weeks' after earlier denying threat- Tulsi Gabbard has issued a sharp warning that Iran could potentially produce a nuclear weapon 'within weeks.' This comes just months after she testified before Congress claiming Iran was not building such weapons—though she now says her earlier comments were taken out of context. The sudden shift in Gabbard's public position has added fuel to an already heated debate in Washington, as tensions with Iran rise following Israeli airstrikes and threats of further US involvement. With top US intelligence agencies, Israeli officials, and Iran's own statements clashing, questions are growing about how close Tehran really is to developing a nuclear weapon. Why did Tulsi Gabbard change her position on Iran's nuclear threat? In March, Tulsi Gabbard testified before Congress that Iran was not actively building nuclear weapons, citing US intelligence that the country's stockpile of enriched uranium was growing, but not yet weaponized. She pointed out that Iran's stockpile was 'unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons' but insisted there was no clear evidence of weapon development. Now, she says the situation has drastically changed. In a social media post this week, Gabbard stated, 'US intelligence shows Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months.' She added that President Trump 'has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' Live Events Gabbard also claimed her March testimony was misrepresented by what she called the 'dishonest media,' and posted the full video of her remarks to offer context. What is the US intelligence community saying about Iran's nuclear capability? The Intelligence community has supported Gabbard's clarification, stating that her earlier remarks were 'selectively edited' and misunderstood. Intelligence agencies have now reportedly concluded that Iran's enriched uranium levels—and related capabilities—have reached a point where a weapon could be built in 'a matter of weeks.' This assessment aligns with President Trump's own warning. On Thursday, Trump said Iran had 'a tremendous amount of material' and was potentially just 'months, if not weeks' away from a nuclear weapon. He also issued a sharp deadline, stating that Iran had a 'maximum of two weeks' to come to the negotiating table before the US considered joining Israeli strikes. What triggered the sudden urgency over Iran's nuclear program? Rising violence in the Middle East has escalated global concerns. On June 13, Israel launched a major airstrike campaign on Iranian military and nuclear facilities. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the attacks 'targeted the heart of Iran's nuclear program.' The strikes reportedly killed senior Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists. Iran's Health Ministry confirmed at least 430 deaths, while the Human Rights Activists News Agency reported an unofficial death toll of 657. Iran responded with missile and drone attacks that killed 25 people in Israel, including one man who died from a heart attack during the strikes. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had already flagged concerns earlier this month, warning that Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium is at its highest level ever. Though enriched uranium can be used for civilian nuclear energy, it's also the main ingredient for building a nuclear bomb when highly refined. Is Iran willing to negotiate a new nuclear deal with the US? Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Saturday that Tehran remains open to talks. 'We are absolutely ready for a negotiated solution,' he stated. However, he stressed that diplomacy is impossible while Iran is under military attack. 'We cannot go through negotiations with the US when our people are under bombardment,' he said. Iran has always claimed its nuclear program is peaceful. Since the 2015 nuclear deal—also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)—Tehran has said it does not seek to develop nuclear weapons. However, that agreement fell apart after the US, under Trump's first term in office, withdrew in 2018. Talks had resumed earlier this year, but were disrupted by the Israeli strikes. Could the US be preparing for military action alongside Israel? Within Trump's 'America First' movement, internal disagreements are rising over whether the US should escalate militarily. Some of his closest allies argue for direct involvement, while others warn against deeper entanglement in Middle Eastern conflicts. Despite the division, Trump has remained firm. 'Iran will not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon under any circumstances,' he told reporters on Friday. He did not rule out a joint strike with Israel if no deal is reached soon. For now, the world waits. With a rapidly narrowing window for diplomacy, and with deaths mounting on both sides, all eyes are on Tehran and Washington as the next critical weeks unfold. FAQs: Q1: Can Iran build a nuclear weapon soon according to Tulsi Gabbard? Tulsi Gabbard says Iran could produce one within weeks. Q2: What is Trump's deadline for Iran's nuclear talks? President Trump gave Iran two weeks to reach a deal.

Time of India

15 minutes ago

• Time of India

No need to learn moral lessons from MLA Sunil Kumar: Min

Udupi: Women and child development minister and Udupi district minister Laxmi Hebbalkar said, "There is no need to learn moral lessons from MLA . What does moral authority even mean? Let him first understand morality before lecturing others." Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The minister was responding to Sunil Kumar's allegation that Hebbalkar lacked moral right to speak on activist Chakravarthy Sulibele. She questioned, "What does he mean by saying the district minister lacks moral right? Sunil Kumar speaks well but seems to believe he alone holds all the wisdom and others are fools," she said. On a question by Sunil Kumar about the number of anganwadi centres under her department, the minister responded, "There are around 69,000 anganwadi buildings in the state, of which about 12,000 are rented. Do I need to speak everything about Sunil Kumar? You are asking about my department? Come, I will give you all the details." Further, she said, "I know exactly how many anganwadis there are in the state, how many anganwadi workers are there, how many are functioning from rented buildings, how many are govt-owned, how many are in rural areas, how many in towns, and how many are in poor condition. I even know how many are in your (Sunil Kumar's) constituency." "Protest is a constitutional right. If the opposition has nothing else to do, let them protest. The central govt is being unfair when it comes to development. Let them protest against the injustice by the central govt. NREGA funds were not released. Can they protest about that? The BJP is trying to mislead the public and are protesting to cover up internal party conflicts. This is all BJP's drama. Even BJP workers are tired. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Wherever you go, they express dissatisfaction with their leaders. These protests are just a distraction tactic to blame the Congress," she alleged. Responding to allegations that Hindutva activists were being targeted and externed, and in particular, targeting Hindutva activist Srikanth Shetty, the minister said, "We are not targeting any intellectual or orator. It is important to protect communal harmony in society. No attempt should be made to divide the society. One must review Srikant Shetty's past speeches and the truth will be out," she said.