Humanity isn't asteroid-proof yet. But we're getting closer.

is an editorial director at Vox overseeing the climate, tech, and world teams, and is the editor of Vox's Future Perfect section. He worked at Time magazine for 15 years as a foreign correspondent in Asia, a climate writer, and an international editor, and he wrote a book on existential risk.
An artist rendering of the NASA Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) space probe approaching the asteroid Didymos and its minor-planet-moon Dimorphos. Illustration by Nicholas Forder/Future Publishing via Getty Images
In 2012, astronaut Ron Garan did an AMA on Reddit. In between questions about aliens (he didn't see any in space) and where his coffee came from (recycled urine), he responded to a question about why we should accept the risks of a future mission to Mars. Garan quoted a colleague: 'If the dinosaurs had a space program, they'd still be here.'
Putting aside the unlikelihood of giant reptiles with brains the size of walnuts developing their version of Apollo 11, the point here is that the dinosaurs were almost certainly wiped out by a nearly 6-mile-wide asteroid that struck the Earth with the destructive power of billions of Hiroshima-scale nuclear bombs, causing an 'impact winter' that cut off sunlight and led to drastic cooling far beyond what most dinosaurs could survive.
The dinosaurs, of course, could do nothing about the killer asteroid, other than presumably waving their tiny arms at the oncoming doom. But if they did have a space program — and yes, now I'm imagining a T. rex in a space suit, swaggering to a rocket like John Glenn in The Right Stuff — they might have been able to detect that incoming asteroid decades in advance, and done something to avert their doom.
Humans, though, are in a better place — as shown by the recent news over an asteroid called 2024 YR4 that briefly appeared to be threatening the Earth.
Killer asteroids, briefly explained
The Chicxulub asteroid that likely wiped out the dinosaurs wasn't the first time a massive asteroid collided with the Earth. An asteroid 12 to 16 miles wide hit the planet more than 2 billion years ago, in what is now Vredefort, South Africa, while another 6 to 10 miles wide hit what is now Sudbury, Ontario 1.85 billion years ago. More recently, a 130-foot-wide space rock exploded 6 miles above Siberia in 1908, creating a blast strong enough to knock over 80 million trees.
Related How to avert an asteroid apocalypse
The Earth exists in a cosmic shooting gallery, and while truly civilization-threatening strikes of the kind seen in movies like Deep Impact are incredibly rare, they do happen. And given enough time, they will happen again.
Until very recently, were a Chicxulub-sized asteroid to find itself on a collision course with Earth, we wouldn't have been able to do much more than the dinosaurs did. The result would be global firestorms, massive earthquakes, and potentially megatsunamis, followed by an impact winter that would wipe out the global food supply. Very bad stuff.
But we're not helpless anymore.
Project Icarus
Like a lot of cool things, the field of asteroid defense began with a bunch of kids at MIT with brainpower to spare. In 1967, MIT professor Paul Sandorff asked his class to imagine that a real-life asteroid called Icarus, which astronomers had already identified, would hit the Earth in the near-future — and it was their job to devise a way to save the world. (In real life, the asteroid came within 4 million miles of the Earth — 15 times the distance between our planet and moon, but a close shave by cosmic standards.)
So was born 'Project Icarus.' The students created a plan to launch six Saturn V rockets, each carrying a 100-megaton nuclear warhead, at the asteroid. The warheads would detonate near the asteroid and create enough force to alter its trajectory and miss the Earth.
For all its careful engineering, 'Project Icarus' was largely science fiction; among other inconveniences, the largest nuclear bomb ever made only had a force of 50 megatons. Our space science was so rudimentary at the time that we had no way to reliably identify potentially dangerous asteroids very far in advance, and no real way to deflect them.
But Project Icarus put the idea of asteroid defense out into the public. The discovery of the actual Chicxulub crater in 1990, confirming the likely cause of dinosaurs' demise, and the sight of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet walloping Jupiter in 1994, convinced Congress to take the threat of killer asteroids seriously. In 1998, Congress directed NASA to detect and catalog within 10 years at least 90 percent of what are called near-Earth objects (NEOs) that were more than a kilometer wide.
NASA and its partners hit that goal with time to spare, and so in 2005, Congress directed the agency to identify at least 90 percent of all NEOs 140 meters or wider — not big enough to end the world, but big enough to destroy a city. Though over 18,000 NEOs have been identified, about 40 every week, there may be a million or more out there. That mission continues.
Do look up
The recent scare over the asteroid known as 2024 YR4 made this search for killer asteroids so we can knock them off course a bit less academic. (When NEOs are discovered, they are initially given a name that reflects the year of identification, followed by letters and numbers that indicate the order it was identified that year, starting with AA. But the discoverer does get to propose a formal name for it, provided it's less than 16 characters and meets the approval of the International Astronomical Union, which is cool.)
2024 YR4 was discovered on December 27 of last year by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) — a NASA-funded asteroid detection program with telescopes around the world — at its station in Chile. With an estimated diameter of 130 to 300 feet, it wouldn't be a world-ender, but it could cause severe local damage if it were to collide with the Earth. Which was worrying, because early calculations suggested it had as much as a 3.1 percent chance of striking our planet on December 22, 2032.
3.1 percent may not seem like much of a risk — it's about the same chance as flipping a coin five times and getting all heads or all tails — but it was three times higher than that of any other large known asteroid. For skywatchers this was a big deal. So they swung into action, pulling in data from observatories run by NASA, the European Space Agency, and the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency.
Asteroids do offer us the opportunity to stave off at least one kind of planetary disaster because, like all objects in space, they follow a clear and largely predictable orbit. An asteroid impact happens when the orbits of the object and the Earth intersect, like two cars trying to merge onto the highway. Get enough data, do some math, and scientists can figure out with astounding precision whether the Earth will suffer a cosmic fender bender decades into the future.
Once the new measurements were taken and the math was done, the probability of YR4 hitting the Earth began to decline, eventually falling to just 0.004 percent. Crisis, such as it was, averted. But while YR4 won't be obliterating any cities, it did provide an invaluable test for planetary defense science — one we passed.
Planetary defense
Now, what would happen if a big asteroid was confirmed to be on a collision course impact path with Earth? While our asteroid detection systems are way ahead of our asteroid defense systems, there are some options, at least theoretically.
Project Icarus had already figured it out back in the 1960s: You don't need to destroy an asteroid to protect the Earth — you just need to give it a slight nudge. Treat it like the eight ball on a pool table, and knock it away. The cue ball in this analogy would be something known as a 'kinetic impactor' — a spacecraft that crashes into the asteroid with enough force to alter its orbit.
We know this can work. On September 26, 2022, NASA's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) collided with the tiny asteroid Dimorphos, more than 7 million miles from Earth. DART was a success, shortening Dimorphos's orbit by 32 minutes.
DART wasn't perfect. The collision also unleashed a swarm of boulders, demonstrating some of the unintended consequences of smashing something into a space rock at roughly 14,760 mph. As the science writer Robin Andrews pointed out on X, DART was proof of principle at best, and not yet something we could use on an asteroid like YR4 if we needed.
Of course, a much bigger asteroid that would actually threaten the whole planet would require far, far more force to deflect, and technology we don't yet have. (No, we cannot yet send up oil drillers with a nuclear bomb, like Bruce Willis in Armageddon.)
But still. Thanks to brilliant space scientists, international collaboration, and yes, even an act of Congress, our species is closer to being able to permanently protect itself from a natural existential risk that has obliterated the dominant species in our planet's past. If that's not good news, I don't know what is.
A version of this story originally appeared in the Good News newsletter. Sign up here!

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

28 minutes ago

• Yahoo

The treasure trove of platinum on the moon

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The moon is likely to become the next mining hot spot, as there may be extensive platinum and other metal deposits in its craters. Guidelines about resource mining on the moon are still not solidified, so this could lead to problems with more countries and private companies trying to stake their claim. But the potential for platinum could also entice private companies to invest more in space exploration. There might be more than $1 trillion worth of platinum deposits on the moon, according to a paper published in the journal Planetary and Space Science. Of the 1.3 million craters on the moon with a diameter greater than one kilometer, "nearly 6,500 were made by asteroids containing commercial quantities of platinum," said New Scientist. This "highlights the potential viability and profitability of lunar mining endeavors compared to mining asteroids in orbit," said the paper. Countries have already been involved in a modern space race to put humans back on the moon, and the profit potential could bring more interested parties. Nobody owns the moon because of the Outer Space Treaty of 1967. But as the potential for resources becomes imminent, the rules are likely to change. The treaty notably "leaves key questions unanswered," Rebecca Connolly, an adjunct senior lecturer at the University of Sydney Law School, said to New Scientist. This includes "clarity on the rules and governance for ownership of extracted resources, commercial licensing rights, equitable benefits sharing, environment protection standards to avoid harm, and regulations for long-term occupation and permanent infrastructure on the moon." To address some of the unknowns, NASA and the U.S. spearheaded the Artemis Accords in 2020. These "provide a common set of principles to enhance the governance of the civil exploration and use of outer space," said NASA. Though the accords are nonbinding, 55 countries have signed on as of last month. Russia and China, two of the most proactive countries trying to reach the moon, have not signed on. A monetary incentive for reaching the moon could change space exploration as we know it. Astronomy is "done to satiate our curiosity," Jayanth Chennamangalam, an astrophysicist and the lead author of the study, said to New Scientist. It has "very few practical applications" and is "mostly paid for by taxpayer money." If we can "monetize space resources, be it on the moon or on asteroids, private enterprises will invest in the exploration of the solar system." While that could lead to wider research being done, it can also lead to the exploitation of the moon. It was recently listed as a threatened historic site for this very reason. "Take one last good look at the moon tonight," Luis Prada said at Vice. "There might be a time when the moon is not so innocent and pretty anymore and you only see cynical corporate greed."

Wall Street Journal

38 minutes ago

• Wall Street Journal

World's Largest Digital Camera Snaps Its First Photos of the Universe

Cerro Pachón, CHILE—The Vera C. Rubin Observatory on Monday released its first dazzling images of deep space in a preview of the cosmic movie the pioneering probe was built to create. The U.S.-funded observatory, perched in an area of the Chilean Andes known for exceptionally dark skies, is equipped with the world's largest digital camera and a 27.5-foot mirror that can capture light too faint for other telescopes to see.

Newsweek

an hour ago

• Newsweek

Satellite Image Captures US Volcano 'Ready to Rumble'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An image of Alaska's Iliamna Volcano "ready to rumble" has been captured from space. The image was taken on June 10 by the OLI (Operational Land Imager) on the Landsat 8 satellite, which is operated by NASA and the United States Geological Survey. The volcano saw an increase in seismicity, marked by frequent small earthquakes, around 4:30 a.m. local time on June 15. "This activity is likely not caused by volcanic unrest," the Alaska Volcano Observatory (AVO) said, but is instead caused by avalanches thundering down the volcano's slopes. While it last erupted in 1867, Iliamna still rumbles once every two years and "its murmurs tend not to be signs of volcanic unrest but rather the signature of avalanches large enough to register on nearby seismic and infrasound instruments," NASA explains. The AVO added: "Initially, the earthquake rate was nearly continuous, with several earthquakes per minute, but this has since slowed to a rate of about one earthquake per minute." A NASA satellite image of Alaska's Iliamna Volcano appearing "ready to rumble" days before seismic activity was reported days later. A NASA satellite image of Alaska's Iliamna Volcano appearing "ready to rumble" days before seismic activity was reported days later. NASA Earth Observatory The snow-covered stratovolcano is found on the western side of the lower Cook Inlet of Lake Clark National Park, about 130 miles southwest of Anchorage and 30 miles southwest of the more eruptive Redoubt Volcano. "Although steam plumes occur on its eastern flanks, there has been no historical volcanic activity at Iliamna," notes the AVO. While the AVO did not have enough information, as of June 16, to ascertain the size and location of any slide that may have occurred that day, the recent seismic activity was similar to that caused by the initial slipping between rock and ice that has preceded large avalanches on the volcano in the past. However, the "outcome of the current activity remains uncertain," the AVO says, noting that large ice and rock avalanches on Iliamna in the past have taken place around this time of year. Mostly covered by perennial snow, ice and numerous glaciers radiating from the summit area, large avalanche deposits are observed on Iliamna's flanks, especially down the Umbrella Glacier on its southwest side. Massive slides on the slopes of the volcano can occur from a combination of glacial ice; hydrothermally altered and weakened rock; and volcanic heat. Researchers says the frequency of the large ice and rock avalanches observed at this volcano is unusual but offers a setting for understanding the mechanics and precursors of this type of event. "Iliamna is remote, but similar conditions in more populated ranges around the planet could pose hazards to communities," NASA warned. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about volcanoes? Let us know via science@