HC acts against Thane Dy Collector for hurried compensation disbursal
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court has directed disciplinary proceedings against the Thane Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) for hurriedly disbursing around ₹12 crore in compensation in a case where six agriculturalists had allegedly falsely claimed to be owners of the land.
The direction was given by a division bench comprising Justice MS Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain, which was hearing a land dispute case.
'We note that instances are on the rise where SLAOs (special land acquisition officers) and competent authorities, ignoring legal provisions and decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Court, and even Government Resolutions (GR), rush to disburse the compensation amounts,' the court noted on May 6.
The court was perusing a GR which stated that compensation in apportionment proceedings should not be disbursed for a minimum four weeks. The deputy collector had earlier been told to file an affidavit detailing the circumstances under which he had delivered his April 21 order, and his hurried disbursal of ₹12,74,00,000 by April 29.
Apportionment refers to dividing compensation received for acquired land among several individuals or parties with different interests in the land.
In his affidavit, the deputy collector stated that since there was no stay by an appellate authority or any court, he assumed he was at liberty to decide the apportionment dispute himself, without referring it to the appropriate authority or the court. The court, however, observed that there was a dispute regarding ownership of the acquired land, which the deputy collector was not competent to decide.
The court was further told that the money received by the agriculturalists had been transferred to various relatives and invested in gold and real estate within days after the compensation was disbursed. The court has now directed the agriculturalists to deposit the investments and money within their control with the court. It also referred huge cash withdrawals made to the Income Tax authorities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Organised crime knows no boundaries, fosters terrorism & wrecks economy: Bombay HC
Nagpur: Organised crime is not limited by borders and has a devastating impact on the country's economy and internal security by enabling , Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court observed while overturning a lower court order that denied police custody of a member of a crime syndicate. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, while granting seven-day police custody to , 33, under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), said, "organised crime is a serious threat to society and is fuelled by illegal wealth generated by contract killing, extortion, narcotics trade, ransom kidnappings, money laundering, and protection rackets." The court rejected the special MCOCA court's May 3 ruling, which denied police custody on the limited ground that the probe was focused on tracing bank accounts and property. Justice Joshi-Phalke said the special court failed to consider crucial aspects of the investigation, including the accused's ongoing role in a larger organised crime syndicate. "MCOCA can be invoked even if direct crime involvement is absent, but syndicate nexus is established," the judge said. "Black money generated by organised crime has had a serious adverse effect on our economy. These syndicates have made a common cause with terrorist gangs," the court said, while affirming that MCOCA empowers agencies to intercept communications and pursue complex networks that threaten national security. The court was hearing a revision plea filed by the state against the lower court's refusal to grant police custody. Yadav was arrested in a March 14 assault case registered in Yerla, Kalmeshwar, where he and a co-accused allegedly attacked a man with a sickle. Though the case was initially registered under Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), further investigation revealed a pattern of serious, repeat offences allegedly committed for pecuniary gain — prompting the application of MCOCA. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The prosecution submitted that Yadav had at least nine criminal cases against him, with seven still pending. "He is a repeat offender operating for economic gain. His actions fit the definition of continuing unlawful activity under MCOCA," the state counsel contended, while urging custodial interrogation to investigate deeper links within the crime syndicate. The high court agreed, stressing that even if an individual may not have committed a particular act of organised crime directly, their nexus with a syndicate or with repeated unlawful acts could still justify invoking MCOCA. "A nexus with the crime syndicate is enough to attract the Act," Justice Joshi-Phalke said, citing Supreme Court's precedent in the Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma case. She ruled that police must be given a fair opportunity to probe syndicate structures, pecuniary trails, and unlawful activities under the wider framework of MCOCA. "In light of the legislative intent, denial of custody would amount to frustrating the purpose of the law," the court said while quashing the lower court's orders. Key Takeaways from Bombay High Court Ruling MCOCA can be invoked even if direct crime involvement is absent, but syndicate nexus is established. Illegal wealth and black money generated by organised crime has had a serious adverse effect on our economy. Crime syndicates have made a common cause with terrorist gangs Lower court erred by focusing on financial investigation grounds for police custody. Continuing unlawful activity with pecuniary motives qualifies under MCOCA. Seven prior pending cases against the accused supported the State's plea Police must be allowed custodial access to probe deeper syndicate links.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Invoking anti-gangster law to counter one communal violence incident triggered by a social media post is misuse: SC
The Supreme Court has concluded that the use of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act — a law meant to counter organised crime — in a solitary case of communal disturbance caused by an 'incendiary' social media post, amounts to a misuse of the stringent penal law. The recent judgment, authored by Justice Sandeep Mehta, came after the court heard an appeal filed by people accused under the State law for mobbing and vandalising the business establishment of a man who posted content derogatory to a particular religion on social media. 'When juxtaposed with the object and intent of the U.P. Gangsters Act, which was enacted to combat organised gang-based crime and dismantle criminal syndicates that pose a persistent threat to public order, the application of the Act to the appellants based on a single incident of communal violence flaring up from an incendiary post made against a particular religion represents a significant departure from its legislative purpose,' Justice Mehta wrote. 'Colourable exercise of power' The judgment said the application of the Gangsters Act in the current case bore the 'hallmark of colourable exercise of power for purposes extraneous to the Act's legitimate objectives'. The court reminded the State government of Article 21 of the Constitution that 'no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law'. Justice Mehta observed that the procedure prescribed by law must be fair, just, reasonable, and not arbitrary, presumptive, or oppressive. The constitutional guarantee of personal liberty acquired even greater significance when an 'extraordinary legislation with stringent provisions' like the U.P. Gangsters Act was invoked by the State, he said. 'The power conferred upon the State cannot be wielded as an instrument of harassment or intimidation, particularly where political motivations may be at play,' Justice Mehta emphasised. 'Need solid evidence' Extraordinary penal provisions, particularly those that substantially abridge regular procedural safeguards like the U.P. Gangsters Act, must be invoked only if the evidence met a threshold of credibility and substantiality. 'The materials relied upon must establish a reasonable nexus between the accused and the alleged criminal activity… When a statute creates serious fetters on personal liberty, the evidentiary foundation for its invocation must be commensurately strong, supported by concrete, verifiable facts rather than vague assertions,' the top court held. Quashing the FIR and allowing the appeal, the court said the case failed to meet the 'essential threshold' required to invoke the Gangsters Act. It had rested 'largely on presumptive theories rather than presenting tangible material to establish the probability that the appellants were engaged in organised criminal activity,' the court said.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Illegal sand mining along Yamuna banks continues unchecked, says Congress leader
Former Haryana Minister and senior Congress leader Karan Dalal has written to the National Green Tribunal (NGT), flagging what he described as 'ongoing illegal and unrestrained sand mining operations along the banks of the Yamuna', particularly in the districts of Palwal, Faridabad, Sonipat, and Yamuna Nagar. He urged the Tribunal to initiate 'urgent, firm, and exemplary action against all individuals and entities involved'. In a detailed nine-page letter, Mr. Dalal alleged that 'a systematic and large-scale plunder of the Yamuna riverbed' was under way, allegedly 'orchestrated by a powerful, well-organised and influential sand mining mafia operating with blatant impunity'. He contended that these illegal activities constituted a direct violation of environmental and legal provisions, as well as the binding orders, rules, and guidelines of the Supreme Court and the NGT. These, he said, 'strictly prohibit such unregulated and ecologically destructive mining practices'. The letter further alleged that unauthorised excavation was being carried out well beyond approved zones. 'River boundary pillars have been deliberately removed to erase demarcations, and heavy earth-moving machinery is being deployed midstream, leading to unregulated deep excavation,' it said. This, Mr. Dalal added, had resulted in the creation of hazardous deep pits in the riverbed, which were continually exploited for illegal sand extraction. Citing several instances, Mr. Dalal claimed that multiple departments, the Supreme Court-appointed Central Empowered Committee, and the NGT had already noted violations across the affected districts. 'Despite repeated protests by local residents and environmental activists, only cosmetic actions are taken — such as the registration of a few FIRs, seizure of vehicles, imposition of token fines, or isolated 'special raids' — while the core structure of corruption and the mining mafia remains untouched and fully operational,' he said. Referring to specific data, Mr. Dalal pointed out that between January 2024 and March 2025, 117 FIRs were registered in Palwal alone, resulting in the seizure of approximately 188 vehicles. 'However, instead of initiating robust legal proceedings or dismantling the network, a mere fine of ₹7.48 lakh was imposed to cover up the issue, resulting in the illegal sand mining continuing unabated,' he noted.
