EU could cancel visa-free travel for Israelis
Israel could face a suspension of its visa-free access to the EU's Schengen area under new rules approved by European lawmakers, Euronews reported on Wednesday. This comes shortly after the Jewish state launched a bombing campaign against Iran, prompting retaliatory attacks.
The new rules amend the visa suspension mechanisms to include violations of the UN Charter, human rights, breaches of international humanitarian law, and defiance of international court rulings. Israel is among the countries most at risk following allegations of war crimes in Gaza raised by the UN, Euronews wrote, citing sources in the European Parliament.
'This tool helps us deliver the values that have built our community,' Slovenian MEP Matjaz Nemec, the bill's rapporteur, told the news outlet. He insisted that 'no specific country is being targeted,' although European Parliament sources said Israel was a focus for several political groups pushing for the reform.
Currently, citizens from 61 countries – including Israel, the UK, Japan, and Australia – may enter the Schengen area for up to 90 days without a visa. So far, the EU has suspended visa-free access only once, in the case of the Republic of Vanuatu for its alleged citizenship-by-investment scheme.
Under the new rules, the European Commission can impose a one-year suspension through an implementing act, which only needs the approval of member states and can be blocked by a qualified majority. Extensions require a delegated act, which can be blocked by either the European Council or Parliament. The process can be initiated by the Commission or prompted by an EU member state.
The deal still awaits formal approval by the full European Parliament and Council before becoming EU law.
The reform follows widespread international condemnation of Israel's conduct in Gaza and its recent military operation against Iran. Russia has denounced Israel's actions against Iran as 'illegal' and warned they could trigger a 'nuclear catastrophe.'
Israel began bombing Iran on Friday, claiming Tehran was close to building a nuclear weapon. Iran denied the accusations and responded with drone and missile strikes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Iran has the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes
Iran has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said in an interview. After the plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) on Friday, he spoke with Nadim Koteich, the moderator of the session and general manager of Sky News Arabia. 'We believe that Iran has the right to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes. And we are prepared, as we have been in previous years, to provide the necessary support in this field,' the Russian president said. Putin added that Russia opposes the spread of nuclear weapons in any country. 'The International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] confirms that there is no evidence of Iranian efforts to acquire nuclear weapons.' Last week, Israel began a series of strikes against Iran and issued serious warnings regarding the country's nuclear program. It claimed that Tehran is rapidly nearing a critical point in its alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons, saying the strikes were essential to prevent this. Iran, which maintains that its nuclear program is intended solely for peaceful purposes, responded with missile and drone strikes against Israel. In his interview on Friday, Putin urged both sides to resolve the conflict through negotiations. He added that Moscow has repeatedly informed Israel of the lack of evidence regarding Tehran's intentions to create nuclear weapons. In a report earlier this month, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi stated that 'Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state in the world that is producing and accumulating uranium enriched to 60%.' Meanwhile, US intelligence agencies have found no evidence that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. However, President Donald Trump insisted that Iran was 'very close' to acquiring them at the time of Israel's attack. He has demanded Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and warned that the US might intervene. According to the Kremlin, Putin has a 'complete picture' of the situation, as one of the few leaders to speak directly with the heads of Israel, Iran, and the US. In a late-night Q&A session on Wednesday, Putin told journalists that resolving the conflict should include mutual security guarantees – protecting both Iran's right to peaceful nuclear technology and Israel's right to security.
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
Where China stands on the Israel–Iran conflict
Israel is once again redefining the rules of engagement. Under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Tel Aviv has carried out attacks on Iran with little regard for international law or global opinion. Framing these strikes as preemptive measures against Iran's alleged nuclear ambitions, the Israeli government is echoing the same kind of narrative Washington used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq – claims of weapons of mass destruction that turned out to be unfounded. Beijing sees this ongoing vilification of Iran – driven by both the US and Israel – as dangerous narrative warfare that could lay the groundwork for a broader military conflict. In response, China has taken a clear and firm stance. The Foreign Ministry condemned repeated violations of Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as actions that risk inflaming tensions across the region. Chinese officials have voiced deep concern about the fallout from the Israeli military operations, calling instead for diplomatic and political solutions. Escalation, they warn, serves no one. Beijing has also expressed a willingness to help de-escalate the situation. China reinforced this position at an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council. Ambassador Fu Cong denounced what he called Israel's 'military adventurism,' linking it to the ongoing occupation of Gaza – a crisis he described as a 'humanitarian disaster.' While not directly naming the US, Fu's comments implicitly urged Washington to rein in Israeli aggression before the situation spirals further out of control. Over the weekend, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke by phone with his counterparts in both Iran and Israel. The tone of these two conversations could not have been more different. Speaking with Iran's Seyed Abbas Araghchi, Wang condemned what he called Israel's 'reckless attacks,' warning that strikes on nuclear facilities set a dangerous and unacceptable precedent. He emphasized that such actions violate both the UN Charter and basic principles of international law. In a call with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, Wang took a more restrained but still critical tone, urging Israel to abandon military solutions and return to diplomacy. In this unfolding crisis, China has made its position unmistakably clear: it backs Iran's stance and rejects any military path to resolving the nuclear issue. This aligns with Beijing's long-held diplomatic posture – recognizing Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), while firmly opposing any move toward nuclear weapons, which would violate international norms and run counter to China's vision of a nuclear-free Middle East. Nevertheless, Iran has repeatedly asserted that it does not seek nuclear weapons. It supported the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which collapsed after the United States unilaterally withdrew under President Donald Trump. With Trump's return to the White House, fears were growing that he would once again elevate the Iranian nuclear issue, threatening military action unless Tehran complies with US demands. China and Russia both oppose such unilateral dictate. In March, Beijing hosted a trilateral meeting of Chinese, Iranian, and Russian deputy foreign ministers to reaffirm support for a multilateral, JCPOA-based resolution and denounce illegal sanctions on Iran. In March, Beijing hosted a trilateral meeting with deputy foreign ministers from China, Iran, and Russia, reaffirming their commitment to a multilateral solution rooted in the JCPOA and denouncing illegal sanctions imposed on Iran. China's diplomatic support is part of a broader strategic alignment with Iran. In 2021, the two countries signed a 25-year cooperation agreement covering trade, infrastructure, energy, technology, defense, education, and more – effectively exchanging long-term economic collaboration for a stable oil supply. Despite ongoing US sanctions, China remains Iran's top trading partner and largest buyer of crude oil, purchasing as much as 90% of Iran's exports. The two nations also conduct joint military exercises, such as the Marine Security Belt drills with Russia, launched in 2019. This partnership reflects Iran's 'Look East' strategy, first introduced by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Focused on deepening ties with China and Russia, the strategy has yielded tangible results, including joint initiatives and Iran's accession to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) in 2023. Yet the relationship isn't without friction. Unfulfilled investment promises, sanctions-related challenges, and mismatched expectations have at times strained the partnership. China seeks stable access to resources and expanded regional influence, while Iran looks for meaningful economic support and advanced technology. Still, China's backing of Iran is not without limits. If Tehran were to block the Strait of Hormuz – a chokepoint for over 25% of global oil and one-third of LNG shipments – China's economic interests would be directly threatened. Likewise, a withdrawal from the NPT would challenge China's commitment to multilateralism and the international legal order. A closer economic and military alignment between Tehran and Beijing could also strain already fraught relations with Washington, especially if it involved significant arms deals. Beijing has no appetite for open confrontation. China prefers to cast itself as a responsible global actor, committed to diplomacy and de-escalation. That image is central to its expanding footprint in the Middle East. Its role in brokering the 2023 rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia was a milestone, but its influence over Tehran remains limited. As a relatively new player in regional diplomacy, China's interests are vulnerable not only to Israeli aggression but also to potential missteps by Iran. So far, Iran's response has been relatively restrained – perhaps deliberately so. But that caution could be misread as weakness. Following the death of President Ebrahim Raisi in May 2024, Iran's leadership has moved slightly closer to engaging with the West. That shift was followed by a wave of Israeli operations: damaging strikes against Hezbollah and Hamas, expanded Israeli presence in Syria, and in October, a direct hit to Iran's missile and air defense systems, potentially paving the way for future attacks. Tehran's muted reaction to these provocations may have been an effort to avoid war – but it risks emboldening its adversaries. For both Beijing and Moscow – each navigating its own rivalry with Washington – the lesson is clear: in today's geopolitical landscape, hesitation can be more dangerous than defiance.
Russia Today
14 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU ministers name Russians they want banned from bloc
Top officials from several Baltic and Nordic countries have called for banning all Russians with past or current ties to the military from entering the Schengen Zone, claiming they could pose a 'criminal threat' to the EU, even after the Ukraine conflict ends. The ban was proposed in a joint statement by the interior ministers of Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Sweden, and Finland after a meeting in Tallinn on Thursday. All of the represented countries, except Sweden, have already effectively shut down their borders to Russian citizens. In their statement, which was shared by the Estonian Interior Ministry, the officials claimed that 'even after the end of the military operation against Ukraine, threats emanating from Russia to the internal security of the European Union will remain.' They claimed that hundreds of thousands of Russian nationals who have taken part in military operations against Ukraine now have combat experience and could supposedly join organized crime groups in Europe. The statement urges EU member states to take all necessary steps to prevent individuals with military backgrounds from Russia from moving freely within the Schengen area and undermining the bloc's security. It calls for a complete ban on residence permits and visas for these individuals. The officials also highlighted the need for drone detection and disruption capabilities along the eastern borders to counter threats from organized crime networks and hostile states. Last month, Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braze urged all EU member states to stop issuing Schengen visas to Russian citizens, citing risks to the bloc's internal security. Latvian Interior Minister Rihards Kozlovskis also insisted the EU must acknowledge it is 'in a hybrid war' with Russia and claimed that Russian tourists are a danger to the bloc. In recent months, a number of Eastern European governments have argued that Russia could pose a military threat to the EU even after the Ukraine conflict concludes and have enacted draconian policies specifically targeting Russian nationals and Russian speakers. Moscow has vehemently accused Western officials, particularly those in the Baltics, of fearmongering to justify a military buildup and 'blatant discrimination against Russians.' The country's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova previously also stated that the EU's Russophobia has turned out to be an 'expensive obsession' for the bloc, noting that it has dealt a significant blow to its economy and citizens.
