New pension rules for PSU employees: Key things to know

The central government has amended pension regulations that could have major implications for employees who move from government departments to public sector undertakings (PSUs). Under the newly notified Central Civil Services (Pension) Amendment Rules, 2025, any PSU employee dismissed or removed after absorption due to misconduct could forfeit their PSU-related benefits and pension entitlements earned during their earlier government service.advertisementThe change, incorporated under Rule 37(29C) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021, marks a toughening of the disciplinary framework.
Previously, employees absorbed into PSUs retained pension benefits from their time in government service, even if they were later dismissed from the PSU. That protection is now gone.The revised rule states that if an absorbed PSU employee is terminated for misconduct, their entire pension, both from PSU service and previous government service, can be forfeited.However, such decisions will not be absolute. They must undergo review by the administrative ministry responsible for the concerned PSU, adding a layer of checks and balances to the process.The rules also align PSU dismissals with the standards applied to government employees under Rules 7, 8, 41, and 44 of the CCS Pension Rules, ensuring consistency in how disciplinary actions impact retirement benefits.advertisementThis amendment applies to employees who were initially appointed to government service on or before December 31, 2003. It is being seen as an attempt to reinforce accountability among PSU staff, signalling that misconduct at any point in an employee's career can have long-lasting financial consequences.Legal experts suggest the move could lead to a more disciplined approach within PSUs, but it also raises the stakes for employees who may face disciplinary action long after leaving government service.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

6 hours ago

• News18

As PM Modi Raises Deep Fake Menace, Govt Steps Up Fight Against AI Misinformation

Last Updated: The government has launched a multi-pronged strategy combining legal enforcement, regulatory measures, and technological innovation to ensure a secure digital environment Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during his recent three-nation trip, said the world cannot ignore the threats of technology, including the misuse of deep fake, even as he lauded the advancement of technology. Back home, a full-scale effort is underway to mitigate the challenge of AI misinformation. The Union government has launched a multi-pronged strategy combining legal enforcement, regulatory measures, and technological innovation to ensure a secure and trustworthy digital environment. At the heart of this initiative lies the Information Technology Act, 2000, which, along with the IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, forms the legal foundation to tackle cybercrimes, including deep fakes. The IT Act penalises a range of offences such as identity theft, impersonation, privacy violations, transmission of obscene material, and cyberterrorism—irrespective of whether the content is human-generated or AI-created. Under the 2021 IT Rules, digital platforms and intermediaries, including social media companies, are legally required to act swiftly against unlawful content. This includes misinformation, impersonation, obscene visuals, gender-based harassment, and content that can mislead or deceive users. These platforms are also obligated to incorporate explicit content restrictions in their terms of service and ensure rapid redressal of user grievances. The government has also directed platforms to exercise caution when deploying AI models, LLMs (Large Language Models), and generative AI tools. Platforms must ensure such technologies are not used to spread unlawful, biased, or politically disruptive content. Furthermore, content generated through unverified AI tools must be appropriately labelled to indicate its potential unreliability. To bolster user protection, the Grievance Appellate Committees (GACs) have been established under the IT Rules, 2021. These committees offer users the option to file appeals at if dissatisfied with how digital platforms handle complaints, including those related to deep fakes. Meanwhile, with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, set to come into force from July 1, 2024, legal backing for tackling deep fakes will be further reinforced. Sections like 111 (organised cybercrime), 318 (cheating), 319 (impersonation), and 336 (forgery) are directly applicable to deep fake-related offences. At the enforcement level, the Ministry of Home Affairs' Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C) provides a comprehensive support system for law enforcement agencies (LEAs) across states. Citizens can report cybercrimes through the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal ( or by calling the dedicated helpline 1930. In terms of innovation, the government has funded two key projects: Fake Speech Detection Using Deep Learning Design and Development of Software for Detecting Deepfake Videos and Images. The latter has led to the creation of 'FakeCheck", a prototype tool capable of detecting deep fakes without needing internet connectivity. The tool is currently being tested by select LEAs. Further, under the IndiaAI Mission, the government has invited expressions of interest from academia, start-ups, and industry players to develop responsible AI frameworks, watermarking tools, and deep fake detection technologies. So far, 38 proposals on watermarking and 100 on deep fake detection tools have been submitted. 'As the digital landscape evolves rapidly, the government maintains that enforcement remains a state subject. Citizens are encouraged to report violations either through or the national helpline 1093, ensuring swift legal action wherever necessary," the Ministry of Information and Technology has been saying. To ensure an inclusive and informed approach, a high-level committee comprising stakeholders from government, academia, and industry has been constituted to address the broader implications and solutions related to deep fakes. First Published: June 21, 2025, 15:14 IST

New Indian Express

6 hours ago

• New Indian Express

‘Senior IAS officer should set high example', says Orissa HC, bins Bishnupada's plea against CBI probe

CUTTACK: The Orissa High Court on Friday dismissed IAS officer Bishnupada Sethi's petition seeking quashing of the ongoing CBI probe over his alleged link with a senior officer of a central PSU who was arrested in a Rs 10 lakh bribery case. On December 8 last year, the CBI officials arrested the group general manager of the PSU, on charges of taking Rs 10 lakh bribe from a real estate company promising them work orders. Sethi's name came up during the PSU official's interrogation. A CBI team conducted a search operation at his official residence in Bhubaneswar on February 18. Sethi along with his wife and daughter filed a petition on February 24. Taking up the petition for hearing the next day, Justice SK Panigrahi had passed an interim order stating, 'No coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners till the next date.' However, in the judgment on Friday, Justice Panigrahi dismissed Sethi's petition saying it was devoid of merit. 'The petition is dismissed as premature and not maintainable, the investigation being at an ongoing stage. The CBI is at liberty to continue its investigation in accordance with law, without any interference from this court. The reliefs sought by the petitioners to interdict or quash the FIR/investigation are refused.' The HC also expressed its disapproval over Sethi's conduct. 'As a senior IAS officer, petitioner 1 (Bishnupada Sethi) is expected to set a high example in upholding the law. The court is constrained to note its disapproval of the petitioner's attempt to invoke the extraordinary writ jurisdiction in the midst of an investigation, without exhausting the ordinary processes provided under law. Such attempts smack of forum-shopping and an impatience with the ordinary course of justice,' Justice Panigrahi remarked. 'There is no showing that the CBI's investigation is transgressing any legal provision; hence this court must not micro-manage or prematurely halt it. Investigative agencies must be allowed the operational freedom to pursue leads and uncover facts, especially in matters involving serious economic offences and corruption,' Justice Panigrahi further observed.

Business Standard

9 hours ago

• Business Standard

Pakistan nominates Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize after Munir's US visit

Pakistan has backed US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, crediting him with helping to de-escalate the recent crisis between India and Pakistan. The nomination was shared through an official post on X (formerly Twitter), where Pakistani officials praised Trump's 'decisive diplomatic intervention' and 'pivotal leadership' in preventing the conflict from spiralling further. The news came shortly after Trump told reporters on Friday that he deserved the Nobel for a range of peace efforts — from calming tensions in South Asia to brokering a reported treaty between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, which he claims will be signed on 23 June. India dismisses Trump's mediation claim India has rejected Trump's repeated claims of mediation between the two nations. Officials in New Delhi have firmly rejected suggestions that any external power played a mediating role. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a 35-minute call with US President Donald Trump on 18 June, reaffirmed India's firm stand against third-party mediation on Pakistan-related issues. PM Modi also dismissed Trump's claims of brokering peace, clarifying that the 10 May ceasefire followed direct military talks initiated by Islamabad, with no US involvement. Pak's strategy of 'flattery' after Munir meets Trump Trump's recent meeting with Pakistan's Army Chief, General Asim Munir, at the White House seems to have been more than a diplomatic courtesy. The idea of a Nobel Prize nomination could have floated during the visit — part of what some analysts are calling a shrewd move by Islamabad. While the prospect of a Nobel Prize may seem far-fetched, it aligns neatly with Trump's long-running narrative of being a global dealmaker. What happens now? There's a procedural hurdle: General Asim Munir, as Pakistan's Army Chief, does not meet the eligibility criteria to formally nominate a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize. According to the Nobel Committee's rules, nominations can only be submitted by select individuals — including national lawmakers, heads of state, university professors in certain fields, and past laureates. Still, the gesture appears to be more symbolic than procedural. By publicly endorsing US President Donald Trump, Pakistan is signalling diplomatic goodwill while appealing to Trump's self-image as a global dealmaker — a narrative central to his ongoing election campaign. As for the Nobel Committee, it maintains strict confidentiality and does not comment on nominations, with records sealed for 50 years.