Gulf markets lacklustre as global stocks rally loses steam

May 15 (Reuters) - Most Gulf stocks were unchanged early on Thursday, as oil prices slid and broader Asian stocks fell after enthusiasm from easing trade tensions began to fade and investors waited for further cues.
Oil prices slid on expectations of a potential U.S.-Iran nuclear deal, with Brent crude futures and U.S. crude falling more than 2% each.
Global stocks earlier in the week had rejoiced after U.S-China trade war truce but the rally lost steam as investors paused to take stock and weigh its implications on the economy.
Dubai's main share index (.DFMGI), opens new tab was the only market in the region that chose a definite direction, rising up 0.3%.
Saudi Arabia's benchmark stock index (.TASI), opens new tab was flat by 0706 GMT.
Meanwhile, Saudi Aramco (2223.SE), opens new tab said on Wednesday it had signed 34 preliminary deals with major U.S. companies, potentially worth up to $90 billion.
Shares of Aramco were down 0.4% in early trade on Thursday.
U.S. President Donald Trump signed a host of economic and bilateral cooperation agreements with Saudi Arabia earlier this week to kick off a four-day Middle East trip with a focus on dealmaking with a key Mideast ally.
In Abu Dhabi, the benchmark index (.FTFADGI), opens new tab was down 0.02%, while Qatar's benchmark stock index (.QSI), opens new tab was down 0.06%.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Reuters

18 minutes ago

• Reuters

Hague NATO summit aims to focus on Trump's spending goal but Iran looms large

THE HAGUE, June 23 (Reuters) - The NATO alliance has crafted a summit in The Hague this week to shore itself up by satisfying U.S. President Donald Trump with a big new defence spending goal - but it now risks being dominated by the repercussions of his military strikes on Iran. The two-day gathering is also intended to signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that NATO is united, despite Trump's previous criticism of the alliance, and determined to expand and upgrade its defences to deter any attack from Moscow. The summit and its final statement are meant to be short and focused on heeding Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defence - a big jump from the current 2% goal. It is to be achieved by investing more in both militaries and other security-related spending. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, however, upset NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's preparations on Sunday as he declared Madrid did not need to meet the new spending target even as Spain approved the summit statement. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening - rather than a formal session with the leaders when they meet on Wednesday - due to his volatile relationship with Trump. The U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend makes the summit much less predictable than Rutte - a former prime minister of the Netherlands hosting the gathering in his home city - and other NATO member countries would like. Much will depend on the precise situation in the Middle East when the summit takes place - such as whether Iran has retaliated against the U.S. - and whether other NATO leaders address the strikes with Trump or in comments to reporters. If the meeting does not go to plan, NATO risks appearing weak and divided, just as European members confront what they see as their biggest threat since the end of the Cold War - Russia - while bracing for possible U.S. troop cuts on the continent. Under the new defence spending plan, countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on "core defence" - essentially, weapons and troops - and a further 1.5% on security-related investments such as adapting roads, ports and bridges for use by military vehicles, protecting pipelines and deterring cyber-attacks. Such an increase - to be phased in over 10 years - would mean hundreds of billions of dollars more spending on defence. Last year, alliance members collectively spent about 2.6% of NATO GDP on core defence, amounting to about $1.3 trillion, according to NATO estimates. The lion's share came from the United States, which spent almost $818 billion. Washington has insisted it is time for Europeans to take on more of the financial and military burden of defending their continent. European leaders say they have got that message but want an orderly and gradual transition, fearful that any gaps in their defences could be exploited by Putin. They are particularly keen to stress their spending commitment as Trump has previously threatened not to protect allies that do not spend enough on defence. A prepared text summit statement agreed by NATO governments and seen by Reuters says: "We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty - that an attack on one is an attack on all." As part of their efforts to keep Trump onside, NATO officials have shunted difficult topics to the sidelines of the summit or kept them off the agenda altogether. While many European nations see Russia as an ever-growing threat, Trump has expressed a desire for better economic relations with Moscow - a prospect that Europeans think would help Russia to strengthen its military and threaten them more. Similarly, many Europeans are deeply wary of Trump's moves to lessen Russia's diplomatic isolation as part of his efforts to secure a deal to end the war in Ukraine. The brief summit statement will include just one reference to Russia as a threat to Euro-Atlantic security and another to allies' commitment to supporting Ukraine, diplomats say.

Economist

39 minutes ago

• Economist

H.R. McMaster on how to play the inconsistencies in Trump's worldview

MANY OF President Donald Trump's goals are consistent—some might say inflexible. He wants secure borders, less drug-trafficking, deregulation, strong armed forces and missile defence, fair and reciprocal trade, a vibrant manufacturing base, secure supply chains and energy security. Most Americans and citizens of allied countries agree with those objectives, although many worry about how Mr Trump pursues them.

Leader Live

43 minutes ago

• Leader Live

Oil prices jump after US attacks Iran nuclear sites

Brent crude surged to more than 78 US dollars (£58.06) a barrel before paring back a little to stand 77.6 dollars (£57.76) higher in early morning trading on Monday. The cost of oil has risen sharply since the recent Israel strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, with the US launching an aerial bombing on three facilities in Iran over the weekend, with investors worried over counter attack moves by Iran. Iran can block oil being shipped through the all-important Strait of Hormuz, which analysts feared could send crude prices rocketing. But the FTSE 100 Index in London was spared losses on Monday, thanks to gains from oil giants BP and Shell on the back of the crude price rise, with the two stocks up 1.1% and 0.8% respectively. The wider FTSE 100 largely held steady, up 2.9 points at 8777.6. Panmure Liberum experts estimated that Brent crude could peak at 100 dollars (£74.43) a barrel due to severe disruption of the crucial waterway route. Soaring oil prices, if the Strait of Hormuz is closed, could spark a 'major' spike in inflation while seeing growth stall, which could have a severe knock-on effect on global stock markets, according to Joachim Klement at Panmure Liberum. Closing the Strait of Hormuz could disrupt about a fifth of global oil and a fifth of global gas shipments, according to Panmure. Mr Klement said it could be worse than the oil and gas shock seen in 2022 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent sanctions against Russian oil and gas exports. Mr Klement said: 'If the Straits of Hormuz is shut, we expect a major stagflationary shock similar to 2022. 'In this case, a 10% to 20% correction seems likely and we could see a new bear market if the trade war escalates again in early July.' But he said if the Strait of Hormuz is disrupted but not closed, 'the inflation shock will be significant, but not enough to derail markets and the economies of the US, the UK and Eurozone for too long'. 'In this scenario, we expect an initial correction of stock markets of 5% to 10%. 'Whether this correction lasts longer and becomes deeper depends very much on how the trade war unfolds in the next couple of weeks.'