Senate 'killed' wage hike bill, says House spokesperson

'Let's not sugarcoat it—the Senate killed the P200 wage hike bill. Last night was the final session of the 19th Congress. No bicam, no compromise, no wage hike,' Abante said.
A spokesperson for the House of Representatives on Thursday blamed the Senate for the failure of the 19th Congress to pass a legislated wage hike despite passage of the measure in both houses.
In a video message, House spokesperson Atty. Princess Abante claimed that the Senate 'killed' the House bill that would grant a P200 wage hike, which was approved by the lower chamber on third and final reading last Wednesday, June 4.
The Senate passed a P100 wage hike law more than a year earlier in February 2024.
'Let's not sugarcoat it—the Senate killed the P200 wage hike bill. Last night was the final session of the 19th Congress. No bicam, no compromise, no wage hike,' Abante said.
'And the reason is simple—ayaw ng Senado makipag-usap. Ang gusto nila, tanggapin na lang ng tao ang P100 nila. Bakit? Bakit binabarya ng Senado ang mga manggagawa?'
(And the reason is simple—the Senate does not want to talk about it. What they want is for the people to accept their P100 wage hike version. Why is the Senate being stingy to the workers?)
The 19th Congress adjourned sine die on Wednesday night.
The legislated increase in the minimum wage needs to be refiled and again go through the legislative process in the 20th Congress.
Sen. Joel Villanueva, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Labor, Employment and Human Resources Development, wrote the House a letter and asked that it adopt Senate Bill No. 2534, or the "P100 Daily Minimum Wage Increase Act of 2024," as approved by the Senate on third reading in February 2024, in substitution of House Bill No. 11376, as approved by the House on third reading on June 4.
Rizal Rep. Fidel Nograles, the chairman of the House Committee on Labor on Employment, in a letter addressed to Villanueva, asked for the immediate convening of the bicameral conference committee on June 11 to reconcile both versions of the wage hike bill before the 19th Congress adjourns sine die.
'The House strongly prefers a transparent and deliberative bicameral process, rather than being bamboozled into accepting the Senate version wholesale, without discussion or compromise,' Nograles said.
Abante said the bicam conferees from the House were 'ready to sit down, they were ready to defend the P200 proposal, and fight for labor, only to find out that the Senate had no intention of meeting at all.'
'We were ready to deliberate. We came in good faith. But what the Senate gave us was a take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum. Wala silang balak makipag-usap. Ang gusto nila, susunod lang kami sa gusto nila. [The Senate had no intention to talk with us, what they wanted was for us to follow what they wanted]. That's not how democracy works,' the House spokesperson said.
She also maintained that the House bill was not a reckless proposal, but a 'responsible, well-considered measure.'
'But instead of a dialogue, ang binalik sa amin ay tahimik na pagtanggi at pagmamadali. The people deserve accountability. Hindi ito pagkukulang ng Kamara. Ginawa namin ang aming trabaho namin, pero ang Senado, iniwan sa ere ang manggagawa,' Abante continued.
(But instead of a dialogue, the Senate gave us silence and haste. The people deserve accountability. This is not a shortcoming of the House. We did our job, but the Senate left the workers hanging.)
GMA News Online sought a comment from Villanueva and Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero regarding the matter, and will update this story once they respond.
In an earlier interview, Escudero compared the House's wage hike bill to its transmittal of the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte.
"'Yong impeachment pinadala niyo huling araw na lang ng sesyon namin, ito gan'on din huling mga araw ng mga sesyon naming tapos ayan na naman kayo, mamadaliin niyo na naman kami na parang kami ang may kasalanan," Escudero said.
"Pinasa naming itong wage hike na one hundred pesos January o February 2024, mahigit isang taon nilang inupuan ito. Tapos bigla ngayon sila 'yong gigil na gigil at nagmamadali. May proseso kung gusto Talaga nilang i-adopt 'yong bersyon ng Senado. Simpleng mosyon 'yan sa Plenaryo ng Kamara," he added.
(You sent the impeachment on the last day of the session. In this case, you sent the wage hike bill in the last few days of the session and again want us to hurry, making it appear that it is our fault. We passed the P100 wage hike in January or February 2024, and they sat on the measure for more than. a year. And now they are pressing us to move in a hurry. If they want to adopt the Senate version, all it takes is a motion in the House plenary.)
Villanueva had expressed concern regarding the House's version of the bill as it might get vetoed by President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. if adopted by the Senate.
Malacañang said President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. will look into the economic implications of the proposed increase in the minimum wage.
Escudero said on Monday that the measures seeking an increase in the daily minimum wage of workers is not a priority of the Legislative-Executive Development Advisory Council (LEDAC). –NB, GMA Integrated News

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

GMA Network

2 hours ago

• GMA Network

Marcos on influencing Sara Duterte impeachment: I choose not to

President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. has said it is his decision not to influence the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte, insisting that the matter is in the hands of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Marcos made the remark in an episode of the BBM Podcast on Saturday, when he was asked about views that the President has a say in the decision of the impeachment court even with separation of powers between branches of government. "If a president chooses to do that, I choose not to," Marcos said. Duterte has brushed off Marcos' pronouncements that he was not in favor of her impeachment, as their feud continued to simmer with lawmakers pressing forward with House investigations and endorsing the impeachment complaint to the Senate. Advocacy groups, meanwhile, have called out Marcos for conveying a supposed lack of urgency to make Duterte accountable. Marcos has said the impeachment will take Congress' attention away from passing important pieces of legislation. Speaking on the podcast, Marcos reiterated that he has been preoccupied with lowering retail prices of rice and improving public transportation, among other initiatives of his administration. The Chief Executive stood pat that the impeachment process lies with the legislative branch. "That's not my, I'm busy with the transport, with the rice, all of the different things that we are doing, that, that nauubos ang oras ko doon. Put it bluntly. Wala naman akong papel doon sa impeachment eh," the President said. (That's not my, I'm busy with the transport, with the rice, all of the different things that we are doing. My time is devoted to these things. I have no role in the impeachment.) Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero has denied that Marcos was behind the delay in the presentation of the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. Relations between Marcos and Duterte, running mates in Eleksyon 2022, have turned frosty following House probes into the drug war under the administration of her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, as well as the handling of confidential funds by offices under her leadership. Last Thursday, House Secretary General Reginald Velasco said the Vice President will not be attending Marcos' fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) on July 28. Malacañang has said it is her choice if she prefers not to attend the event. — VDV, GMA Integrated News

GMA Network

16 hours ago

• GMA Network

House prosecution says impeachment court spox should not speak for VP Sara

Senate impeachment court spokesperson Regie Tongol should speak for the court, not for the camp of Vice President Sara Duterte, House prosecution panel spokesperson and lawyer Antonio Bucoy said Friday. Bucoy was reacting to Tongol's comments on Thursday when he said that there is a high chance that the Vice President will make a motion to dismiss the impeachment complaint. Tongol said, 'Ang action na ini-expect natin from the defense by filing an ad cautelam appearance—na magpa-file sila ng either answer with affirmative defense questioning the jurisdiction, or a motion to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.' (We expect the defense to question the jurisdiction of file a motion to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.) 'As spokesperson, he is the mouthpiece of the court. He expresses the mindset of the court. [But] he's telegraphing the defense to file a motion to dismiss,' Bucoy told GMA News Online in a text message. 'Recall that the partiality of some members of the court had already been raised as an issue. I priorly stated that while I am prepared to give the judges the benefit of a doubt, the spokesperson's subject statement convinces me otherwise,' Bucoy added. House spokesperson Princess Abante agreed. 'Do not speak for the defense. Speak for the impeachment court,' Abante said of Tongol. 'That is why we are saying that what we want is a Senate impeachment court that is ready to accept the evidence, listen to the evidence and decide based on the evidence presented,' Abante added. In a "24 Oras" report by Saleema Refran, Tongol said, "Hindi pag-aabogado sa isang panig o paglilito sa publiko ngunit pagsagot lamang sa scenario setting na tanong sa akin nang naayon sa aking karanasan sa litigation." "Ito ay bahagi ng ating tungkulin hindi lamang bilang spokesperson ngunit bilang abogado rin upang ipaliwanang ang legal proceedings sa lahat," he also said. "The Impeachment Court is committed to neutrality, fairness and due process. Respect for the court is fundamental to democracy, so it is vital for the stability of this democracy for all to work together with mutual respect…and for litigants to avoid unnecessary attacks that only serve to hinder our collective efforts to proceed with the impeachment process," Tongol added. In a separate statement, House lead prosecutor and 4Ps party-list Representative Marcelino Libanan commended the senator-judges who uphold decorum and refrain from public commentary, but he did not mention names. 'We commend our senator-judges who have chosen the high road of restraint. Silence, in the context of an ongoing trial, is not passivity—it is professionalism,' Libanan said. 'In this highly charged political moment, those who speak least may actually understand the gravity of their judicial role the most. They recognize that the Senate, sitting as an impeachment court, is a constitutional tribunal—not a venue for political theater," Libanan added. Libanan then cited the Constitution's demand for neutrality from judges in any legal or quasi-legal proceeding. 'Every statement a judge makes outside the courtroom is a potential challenge to fairness inside it. The discipline shown by some senators is therefore not just admirable—it's essential,' Libanan said. 'We urge all senator-judges to uphold the same level of discretion. Let the facts and the Constitution—not noise—shape the outcome of this process,' he added. Over 200 lawmakers endorsed the impeachment complaint against Vice President on February 5, accusing her of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes.—LDF, GMA Integrated News

GMA Network

19 hours ago

• GMA Network

House to Imee Marcos: Stop pointing fingers, we delivered on San Juanico Bridge

House spokesperson Atty. Princess Abante cited official data showing that the House had secured P27 million in funding for the bridge in 2018, followed by P22 million in 2019, P105 million in 2021, P90 million in 2022, and P150 million in 2023. For 2026, a House-initiated proposal seeks to raise that amount to P400 million. The House of Representatives on Friday fired back at Senator Imee Marcos for deflecting responsibility over the upkeep of the San Juanico Bridge. They said that lawmakers should focus on solutions instead of pointing fingers and reminded Marcos that the House has long initiated funding for the landmark infrastructure. In a press conference, House spokesperson Atty. Princess Abante called out the senator for turning the issue into a personal attack rather than acknowledging her legislative responsibility, particularly in the national budget process. 'Una, bilang senador, kasama din sa tungkulin niya 'yung pagbalangkas ng budget ng bansa. Galing sa House, papunta sa Senate,' Abante said. (First, as a senator, her duties also include drafting the country's budget. From the House, to the Senate.) 'Kaya nung kinuwestiyon niya kung ano ang nangyayari sa pangangalaga ng San Juanico Bridge, eh sinagot lang natin na alam ko, sigurado ako based on records may pondong nailagay for the maintenance ng San Juanico Bridge since 2018, mismo advocated by the congressman of the 1st District of Leyte,' she added, referring to Speaker Ferdinand Martin G. Romualdez. (So when she questioned what was happening with regards to the maintenance of the San Juanico Bridge, we just answered that I know, I am sure based on records there has been funding allocated for the maintenance of the San Juanico Bridge since 2018, itself advocated by the congressman of the 1st District of Leyte.) Earlier, Abante challenged Marcos to account for her own contribution to the upkeep of the bridge, after the senator reportedly downplayed government efforts by saying the budget allocated for the structure was good only for repainting. In Friday's press conference, Abante said that if the senator truly cared about the condition of the bridge, she should show what she has done to support it. 'Ngayon kung tatanungin niya ano 'yung nangyayari, dapat tanungin din bilang senador ano ang nagawa niya para sa San Juanico Bridge. Tutal, hindi pwedeng tanong lang nang tanong. Kailangan nagtatrabaho,' she said. (Now if she asks what is happening, she should also be asked as a senator what she has done for the San Juanico Bridge. After all, we can't just ask questions. We need to work.) Abante cited official data showing that the House had secured P27 million in funding for the bridge in 2018, followed by P22 million in 2019, P105 million in 2021, P90 million in 2022, and P150 million in 2023. For 2026, a House-initiated proposal seeks to raise that amount to P400 million. 'This is a concrete initiative of the House of Representatives. Gusto rin nating malaman ano rin ang initiative ng Senado, tutal gusto nilang malaman kung ano ang nangyayari. Nasa posisyon sila para gumawa ng solusyon, hindi maghanap ng sisi,' Abante said. (This is a concrete initiative of the House of Representatives. We also want to know what the Senate initiative is, because they want to know what is happening. They are in a position to create solutions, not find blame.) Speaker Romualdez, who represents Leyte's 1st District where the bridge is located, has long included San Juanico's rehabilitation in his infrastructure agenda even before becoming Speaker. The 2.16-kilometer San Juanico Bridge connects Samar and Leyte and is one of the longest bridge in the country. It serves as a crucial economic and transport link in Eastern Visayas and has also become a key tourism attraction. President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. recently declared a state of calamity over the bridge after recent typhoons caused structural damage, triggering emergency rehabilitation measures. — BAP, GMA Integrated News