Ted Davis Empowers Leaders by Enhancing Their Communication and Trust Skills
Halford E. Luccock, a Methodist Minister, once said, "No one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it." The same notion applies to teams. Although each member has distinctive skills and produces outstanding results individually, it doesn't guarantee the team's success. Teams must, therefore, work cohesively, in other words, they must have mutual respect.
American author Patrick Lencioni presents the Five Behaviors® model, a roadmap for creating highly cohesive teams. Inspired by The Five Dysfunctions of a Team , it emphasizes five behaviors of a cohesive team—Trust, Conflict, Commitment, Accountability, and Results—enabling the team to operate with maximum efficiency and effectiveness.
Team members must feel safe enough to reveal their weaknesses and express their opinions without fear of ridicule. This trust is the foundation for constructive conflict, which is an open and honest dialogue about differing perspectives. Team members can fully commit even if it wasn't their preference when there's trust and ideas are voiced through healthy conflict. Having committed to a shared action plan, they can then hold each other responsible for delivering on their commitments, allowing them to focus on results.
Ted Davis, DSL, the founder of Grace Strategic Services, Inc. (GSSI), a consultancy firm that enhances leadership performance and organizational success, draws from Lencioni's insights. He champions a leadership philosophy that revolves around the idea that communicating effectively and instilling trust are one and the same skill set.
Davis believes that trust forms the foundation of effective communication. In turn, effective communication is essential to building trust. "When team members trust each other, they make themselves vulnerable to the other's intentions. Such vulnerability reduces defensiveness and welcomes collaboration. The problem of not having trust is that communication becomes clouded by doubt. The messages are usually misinterpreted," he supplies.
He states that effective communication is the process of encoding, exchanging, and decoding information to create shared meaning, even when opinions differ. The level of trust influences how messages are received. Leaders must, therefore, demonstrate trustworthiness. After all, their words carry weight. When they communicate effectively, they effortlessly strengthen trust.
Davis argues that leaders must create an environment where trust is implicit, even in times of disagreement. Team members are more likely to understand and accept each other's perspectives if they believe others have good intentions. This would then lead to more productive dialogue and communication. "Trust and communication are two sides of the same coin," Davis states, highlighting their interconnectedness in pursuing leadership excellence.
Another major influence on Davis' unique approach to leadership is Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It, Why People Demand It by James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner. The book tackles how credibility is the foundation of effective leadership. The authors state that leaders earn credibility by demonstrating competence, consistency, and integrity.
Davis emphasizes that those in positions of power must consistently demonstrate their values and principles through their actions. If they remain consistent in their team-focused behavior and combine it with open communication, leaders can gain the trust of their team—a crucial aspect for long-term success. "Credibility isn't just a matter of perception. Think of it as a leader's currency, which is acquired over time through intentional behavior," Davis remarks.
Davis also draws inspiration from Stephen M. R. Covey's The SPEED of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything . In this book, Covey highlights how trust accelerates business processes and reduces costs. This notion stems from the fact that organizations that operate with high levels of trust are more efficient.
The author identifies four credibility attributes that Davis incorporates into his leadership philosophy: Integrity, Intention, Capability, and Results. Essentially, leaders must be honest, demonstrate strong moral principles, and act with clear, positive intent while showing care and concern for others. They must also have the skills and knowledge to perform tasks and deliver outcomes that meet expectations.
Davis stresses that character, knowledge, and competence are three critical elements in leading the team toward success. As someone with a military background, Davis simplifies leadership as "be, know, and do." "A leader's character drives their motives. Those motives are reflected in their words and actions. This cycle of 1. Motives shape words and actions, 2. Words and actions Create trusting relationships, 3. Trusting relationships drive team success," he expounds.
Ted Davis stresses that trust and communication are the foundation of effective leadership. Through GSSI, he intends to continue helping leaders create environments where teams thrive and achieve results. Davis developed programs like the Define leadership, Assess competencies, Design challenging experiences and education, Support the development process (DADS) Leadership Development Process to fulfill this goal, equipping senior and mid-level leaders with the right mindset to overcome challenges and capitalize on opportunities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
15 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Jamie Gull's Perspective on Why Deep Tech Is Where the Next Wave of Innovation Lies
The world of venture capital is undergoing a structural realignment, one that rewards depth over speed, hardware over code, and defensible engineering over flashy repetition. At the center of this shift stands Jamie Gull, founder of Wave Function Ventures, a fund dedicated to pre-seed and seed investments in deep tech sectors like aerospace, energy, and robotics. With an experience that spans building reentry hardware at a renowned aerospace manufacturer, designing aircraft for an American aerospace company, and founding deep tech startups himself, Gull brings an insider's clarity to a rapidly evolving investment landscape. "Deep tech was long seen as too risky, too expensive, and too slow," Gull explains. "But the data and outcomes over the past decade tell a different story." Indeed, many early-stage investors have historically favored software startups for their low upfront capital needs and quick time to market. But Gull argues that the advantage is evaporating. "Back in the early 2000s, you could spend a few million, build a team of engineers, and get to market quickly," he says. "Now, IPO timelines for software have stretched to seven to 10 years. Software companies are spending huge amounts on customer acquisition and defending turf from competitors who can replicate products overnight, especially in the AI era." The old assumption that software scales cheaply and defensibly is proving false. "Your moat in software today is often just capital," he says. "In deep tech, it's the opposite. The upfront costs are higher, sure, but once you have built it, it is extremely hard to replicate." Gull's own investment track record underscores this conviction. His fund, Wave Function Ventures, has deployed capital into companies building humanoid robots for heavy industry, airships for transoceanic cargo, and advanced nuclear reactors. Many of these deals were oversubscribed, and Gull attributes his access to his founder-engineer background. "Founders want someone on the cap table who understands what it takes to build and scale real technology," he says. "That's where I come in." But Wave Function is not investing indiscriminately. Gull is openly cautious about sectors like space. He looks for niche, underexplored opportunities in space, not pie-in-the-sky ideas, and not overhyped data plays. His skepticism is not negativity; it's strategy. "You have to thread the needle between too speculative and too saturated," he explains. This nuanced view is shaped not just by sector analysis but also by career experience. After five years at a renowned aerospace manufacturer, where he worked on the aft thermal shield for the Falcon 9, a key part of the rocket's reusability, Gull co-founded a satellite antenna company and later, a startup focused on electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft. He says, "I learned how to raise capital, win defense contracts, and build complex hardware at speed." It also gave him empathy for the founders. "Early-stage deep tech founders often face challenges that software peers don't understand, technical risk, regulatory hurdles, and long timelines. But they are also building something truly defensible. Something that matters," Gull shares. Part of what makes now the ideal moment to lean into deep tech is a confluence of positive forces. First, the talent pipeline. "Industry giants created a flywheel. They inspired a generation of engineers to build ambitious hardware," Gull says. "There are now enough experienced founders, and they are pulling in younger talent who want to do more than push pixels." Second, support from governing bodies has meaningfully improved. "Traditional programs used to be inefficient. Now, early-stage companies can get millions in non-dilutive funding early and scale to tens of millions in contracts without becoming a program of record. That's game-changing," Gull states. All of this means the traditional arguments against deep tech, capital intensity, long timelines, and uncertain exits are no longer persuasive. In fact, they're outdated. "Some of the most successful deep tech companies are taking lower capital at higher valuations in later rounds. It flips the old narrative on its head," Gull says. The opportunity is clear. "If you want to be a part of generational companies, not just another SaaS dashboard, deep tech is where you need to be looking," he says. "There's still pricing arbitrage in the early days because not enough people believe in this yet." Wave Function Ventures is already proving the thesis. With six investments completed that are showing strong momentum, Wave Function is off to a strong start. "But it's not just about the returns," Gull says. "It's about backing people who are building the future, real things with real impact." In a world flooded with momentary apps and algorithmic churn, backing deep tech means investing in the infrastructure of tomorrow. "Find the founders who treat it like a life mission," Gull says.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Extends Deadline For TikTok Sale By 90 Days
President Donald Trump announced Thursday he had given social media platform TikTok another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. "I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration. The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app. "I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision. "We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," said a statement issued by the platform. Trump said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations. Trump has repeatedly downplayed risks that TikTok is in danger, saying he remains confident of finding a buyer for the app's US business. The White House had announced Monday that Trump would throw the wildly popular video-sharing app, which has almost two billion global users, another lifeline. During this new grace period the administration will work "to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure," the administration said in a statement. The president is "just not motivated to do anything about TikTok," said independent analyst Rob Enderle. "Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape." Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. Motivated by national security fears and a belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having made no attempt to find a suitor. TikTok "has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control," said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain. The president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19. Now the deadline is September 17. Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over his tariffs on Beijing. ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law." Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company. Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok. Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman, Larry Ellison, is a longtime Trump ally. Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm. "TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand -- it's simply not as powerful," said Forrester Principal Analyst Kelsey Chickering. Despite the turmoil, TikTok has been continuing with business as usual. The platform on Monday introduced a new "Symphony" suite of generative artificial intelligence tools for advertisers to turn words or photos into video snippets for the platform.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
How Trumponomics Has Shaken Global Markets
US President Donald Trump has taken just a few months since his election to upend global financial markets with his economic policies. Many investors are pulling money out of the United States, the mighty dollar has lost its lustre and Wall Street is being outpaced by European stock markets. Here is a look at the financial roller-coaster ride. After years of global dominance, US stocks are feeling the heat -- and Europe is the main beneficiary. Wall Street's S&P 500 index has gained just two percent since the start of the year, compared with 16 percent for Frankfurt's main index. Growth at the exchanges in London (eight percent) and Paris (three percent) is also outstripping Wall Street. Kevin Thozet from the investment firm Carmignac pinned the blame firmly on Trump. The president's flip-flopping on tariffs had created a "high level of uncertainty" about their potential impact on growth, Thozet told AFP. The dollar has lost 10 percent of its value against the euro in the past six months, "its worst performance in 30 years", according to Robert Farago, an analyst at the British investment firm Hargreaves Lansdown. Trump's tariffs are the main culprit but the global reserve currency is also suffering from concerns about the size of the US debt -- exacerbated by a budget proposal from the president that many analysts say will be hugely expensive. While some have suggested the Chinese yuan could become a dollar alternative, ECB chief Christine Lagarde has touted the euro, discussing in May its potentially greater "international role". But any currency attempting to topple the dollar faces plenty of challenges. "The yuan is not convertible, and the euro is too fragmented," said Jean Lemierre, chairman of the board of directors of BNP Paribas. American debt is a cornerstone of the financial system, as the rest of the world lends to the United States in search of a safe investment. But Jamie Dimon, head of JPMorgan Chase, said in early June that the level of US debt was a "real problem" and that bond markets were facing a "tough time". In a sign of the loss of confidence, interest rates on 30-year US Treasury bonds surpassed the symbolic five percent mark at the end of May. "I've always told clients they need US debt if they want an asset that remains intact even in a disaster, but I think that's no longer the case," said Alexandre Hezez, a strategist at Banque Richelieu. Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at US-based Interactive Brokers, told AFP the fact the dollar was falling while rates were rising was "a sign there's money moving out of the US". Investors have long regarded gold as the ultimate safe harbour in a crisis, and the clamour for the metal has seen its value jump by almost 30 percent since the start of the year. Major central banks have also had a hand in pushing up the price, as they look to gold as a more sure bet than dollars to hold in their reserves. Meanwhile, Trump has leant heavily into cryptocurrencies with investments of his own and official measures to bring the assets into the mainstream. Bitcoin passed $100,000 for the first time just after the US election, increasing almost 60 percent in a year. Trump made it a priority to bring down oil prices so that US inflation would come down. Crude oil fell below $60 per barrel in April, its lowest price since 2021. But that was because investors spooked by Trump's tariffs were anticipating weaker demand worldwide if economies slowed. The military escalation between Israel and Iran has seen prices climb again to around $75 a barrel.
