EXCLUSIVE I've spent years studying natural disasters... here's how likely an apocalyptic-level event really is

A man who has spent years studying natural disasters has revealed how likely an apocalyptic-level event really is.
With doomsday shows and movies like The Last Of Us, Don't Look Up, and 28 Years Later taking over screens, many people are often left wondering: can something like that really happen?
Thankfully, expert Anthony Finchum, 31, from Omaha, Nebraska, broke down the chances of an incident occurring in our lifetime that will wipe out the human race.
And he explained that while it may make for good cinema, the chances of an event like that really happening are actually pretty slim.
'So this is a difficult question to answer. In practice, there are very few ways that an actual apocalyptic level event could happen,' he explained.
Anthony, who runs the Disastrous History podcast, said a 'giant hurricane or wildfire' destroying the entire planet is not possible.
And while he explained that things like a 'pandemic, asteroid impact, large volcanic eruption, or unregulated climate change' could potentially end our existence, he added that a lot of 'factors would have to align' for it to reach an apocalyptic level.
'Something like a giant hurricane or a giant wildfire or something along those lines is impossible,' he said.
With doomsday shows and movies like The Last Of Us and 28 Years Later taking over screens, many people are often left wondering: can something like that really happen?
'There are upper limits on the strength of just about every disaster based on what the earth's atmosphere can handle weather wise and things of that nature.
'The primary [ways the world could end] are pandemic, asteroid impact, a large volcanic eruption, and unregulated climate change.
'But [to reach] the level of apocalyptic, there's a vanishingly small chance because so many precise factors have to align in order for one to occur.'
Originally from Indiana, Anthony has lived through several natural disasters, including several tornadoes and blizzards as well as one 'derecho,' which is an intense wind storm.
In addition, throughout his career as a first responder and fire investigator, he has assisted in numerous rescues during hurricanes, tornadoes and fires.
He explained to the Daily Mail that he has 'always had an interest' in understanding how and why they occur.
He would lay in bed at night researching and reading obsessively on past disastrous events, wracking up unrivaled knowledge on the topic.
All of that led to him launching his Disastrous History podcast in 2020, where he uses his knowledge to instruct others on what to do if they find themselves facing a natural disaster.
'I really wanted to educate people that yes, these are bad but they are survivable and recovery is always possible,' he explained.
'I have found that breaking these things down into small and manageable pieces makes them seem less scary as they are happening and give people a way to react properly in a stressful situation.
'I feel that understanding the disasters of the past helps us to grow and prevent disasters of all types from happening in the future.'
He also shared vital tips to surviving tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes and fires exclusively with the Daily Mail.
For tornadoes, he said the 'best option' is to head down to the basement, and if you don't have one, then he suggested bunkering down in the 'most center section of your home.'
'A tornado has unlimited energy but only a finite time to use it,' he explained. 'The more you barriers you can put between yourself and a tornado the better.
'When you are in a tornado watch, its time to get things together, hard soled shoes, flashlights, first aid kit, charge your phones, things like that so you're ready in case you have to take shelter quickly.'
As for hurricanes, Anthony said the way you react depends on where you are located. And if you live near a beach, he explained that 'evacuation is your best option.'
In practice, there are very few ways that an actual apocalyptic level event could happen,' he explained. He's seen with his family
'Storm surge and flooding is the main cause of death in hurricanes,' he shared.
'Because warning time for hurricanes is so long, the best option will always be to simply not be there anymore.
'If that is not an option, sheltering from high winds is similar to a tornado. Get to an interior room without windows.
'If flooding becomes a concern go to the highest available floor without going into the attic. Going into the attic could cause you to become trapped with no escape.'
If an earthquake hits, the expert said you should 'place yourself under the sturdiest furniture you can find and protect your head and neck.'
He also stated that despite contrary belief, it is not recommended to 'stand in a doorway.'
Lastly, if your house has caught fire or if there's a wildfire nearby, Anthony suggested you get as far away as possible.
'Get out. Whether it is a building fire or wildfire, your best option for survival is simply to not be there anymore,' he said.
'If it is a building fire, make sure to stay low and move quickly. Smoke will build along the ceiling first with relatively clean air down low which will allow for quick and safe escape.
'As far as wildfires, as soon as you have an evacuation order, it is time to go.'
Anthony and his wife, Kaitlin, 35, recently launched a new charity called Stuffie Strong, which brings toys to children who have endured a natural disaster.
'Our goal is to provide kids that have been through various disasters a new stuffed animal to help them get through it,' he explained.
'Often in the aftermath, parents and adults are focused on the necessities, ie. food, clothing, shelter, toiletries, those kinds of things.
'Kids are shunted around without anything to comfort them after having lost everything they've ever known.'
In the end, he said he hopes that he can help as many people as he can through both his charity and by sharing his knowledge.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

5 hours ago

• The Guardian

‘We were all pretty privileged': Allison Williams on Girls, nepo babies and toxic momfluencers

If you had wandered the set of the film M3gan 2.0 last year, chances are you would have stumbled into M3gan, the terrifying humanoid doll, staring lifelessly while she waited to be called for her next scene. Sometimes she would stand in the corner of the soundstage, says Allison Williams with a nervy laugh. 'The dilemma is: do you turn her around so she's facing the wall, or do you let her face the room? Both answers are wrong.' In the sequel to the sci-fi horror M3gan, Williams resumes her role as Gemma, a roboticist who has become a crusader against rampant and reckless AI development after her creation – developed for her orphaned niece – became murderous. (She is also a producer on the second film.) Acting opposite M3gan was unsettling, says Williams, speaking over a video call from a hotel room in New York. Sometimes she was played by the 15-year-old dancer Amie Donald, but often she was a robotic doll, animated by a small team. 'When she's been working for a while, her eyelids can get sticky,' says Williams. M3gan's handlers would paint lubricant on to her eyeballs with a brush and Williams would have to catch herself: 'She's not flinching and for a second you're like: 'Ugh.' Then you remember: this is not a live thing.' Still best known for her first role as Marnie in Lena Dunham's landmark TV series Girls, Williams has gravitated towards comedy-tinged horror in recent years. Her first post-Girls film role was in the Oscar-winning dark comedy horror Get Out. It and M3gan were relatively low-budget projects that became cultural phenomena – Get Out for its commentary on racial politics, M3gan for what it says about the dangers of AI (as well as the uncanniness of M3gan herself). Williams has long been interested in AI – she knows Sam Altman, the co-founder and CEO of OpenAI, which created ChatGPT, who put her in touch with robotics experts when she was researching the role of Gemma. The film raises questions not only about the danger of rogue AI, but about the ethical concerns –including how we should feel about the 'rights' of devices. 'It's easy to imbue anything that has AI in it with humanity. Like our little robot vacuum we have at our house; I often feel it's doing all this labour and being overlooked.' Does she worry that her job will be taken by AI in the not-too-distant future? She laughs. 'If you ask me any question that starts with: 'Are you worried?' the answer is always yes, because I have an endless capacity to be worried about things.' But it's possible, she says, that humans in acting, or any other job, are not special or unique and that 'we will all be seamlessly replaced. But so far, especially in the arts, I haven't yet had an experience that's supposed to mimic a human output that has felt seamlessly human to me – and who knows if that's going to be true for ever. For now, it's towards the bottom of the list of things I worry about.' She smiles. 'But it's not not on the list of things I worry about.' M3gan raises questions about the tech to which we expose our children. 'You wouldn't give your child cocaine,' says Gemma in M3gan 2.0. 'Why would you give them a smartphone?' Williams' son is three and she is wary of it. 'He has so many questions and they're incredible; I often don't know the answers.' The other day, she says, she used ChatGPT to answer one about rocket launches. 'Watching what happened to his face was like when Gemma sees her niece interacting with M3gan. Like, I have connected my kid to a drug, this is so immediately addictive and intoxicating.' She quickly put her phone away and made a mental note to go to the library next time to get out a book. 'I can't justify it, logically,' she says. 'It just felt like an innate instinct.' Parenting is the central theme of the new podcast Williams launched this month with two friends, Hope Kremer, an early childhood educator, and Jaymie Oppenheim, a therapist. It came out of a group chat in which just about everything to do with motherhood, ageing and life in general was discussed. A future episode is about the guilt many mothers feel, which is also a theme in M3gan 2.0. Will our expectations of mothers ever change? 'Oh God, I hope so,' says Williams. 'The guilt, I think, is most potent in the absence of a community where you can voice the things that you feel guilt about. I think the guilt around what kind of parent we all are is something that only survives as long as we hold each other to insane standards and expectations.' She is, she says, 'filled with rage about the majority of Instagram and TikTok 'mom content' – the aspirational version of it, anyway. I think it's poisonous [and] it really only exists to make people feel bad about themselves, maybe under the guise of wanting to motivate people, but the impact is so painful.' She laughs as she describes the dishonesty of an influencer making a perfect packed lunch, filled with nutritious food – because it's actually 4pm, perhaps, or because they have nannies – that makes other parents, primarily mothers, feel as if they are failing. 'I would be in a puddle on the ground if we didn't have the nanny that we have, who is the reason my husband is shooting in London right now and I'm here,' says Williams. 'None of this is possible without her, and we're so grateful. I'm just like, show your work. Show me a clock. Like, what day was this filmed?' She is laughing, but she is on a roll. 'I cannot stand artifice about creating an expectation of what someone should be able to achieve that is totally unreasonable. Who is that helping?' On another episode, she says, they discuss ageing and unrealistic beauty standards: 'I talk about my love for Botox when I'm not filming, because, you know, you need to make facial expressions when you're shooting.' She laughs. 'But, right now, there's not a ton I can do with my forehead. But the idea that someone would look at me and be, like: 'I should be capable of that forehead.' No, you shouldn't! I'm not better than you because I have no wrinkles there, I just paid to put chemicals in my face. Let's be real about this.' I always think it's quite an achievement for famous people to hang on to pre-fame friends, once acclaim and money start getting in the way. Is it important to have 'normal' friends? 'I don't walk the world and feel like a celebrity,' says Williams. 'I think I did in my 20s, shooting and living in New York. But that isn't how I feel dropping our son off at preschool; I feel like a person among people. My job is public, and that's unique and weird, and our culture thinks it's more important than other jobs, for sure. But, in our friend group, we celebrate what everyone's up to and that has been such a stable, steady source of nourishment in my life.' Williams noticed recently that her son is about the same age she was when she realised acting could be a job and that she might one day do it (his father, Alexander Dreymon, is also an actor; Williams and Dreymon met on the 2020 thriller Horizon Line). She watched bits of The Sound of Music and Mary Poppins and it dawned on her that the woman in both films was the same. 'Julie Andrews was like a goddess to me,' she says. Her parents, the former NBC news anchor Brian Williams and the producer Jane Stoddard Williams, insisted she get an education, which she did (English at Yale), rather than become a child actor. 'I'm grateful that my parents didn't cave and that I didn't make my way into this business any sooner than I did, because already, at 23, when Girls came out, that was a lot to process.' In a way, Williams had the reverse experience – her parent was famous. At a time before media was so fragmented, being an NBC news anchor meant Brian Williams reached millions of people. His reputation took a battering in 2015, when it was revealed he had embellished – mistakenly, he said – a story about being shot down in a helicopter while covering the Iraq war. He was suspended for six months and left NBC shortly after. What was that like to go through as a family? 'Anything that feels loud, like people are talking about you and all of that, is horrible,' says Williams. 'I think it's the underbelly of the media – it happens all the time, they eat their own. Everything just goes back to its fundamental priorities – family, friends, people who matter.' In the recent criticism of nepo babies, Williams has always been admirably upfront and unguarded about her advantages. 'Aside from all the many layers of privilege, high on the list is the fact that I could pursue a career in acting without being worried that I wasn't going to be able to feed myself. I had been surrounded by people who did what I wanted to do.' It didn't seem like an unreachable dream when Tom Hanks and his wife, Rita Wilson, were family friends. When she was still at high school, she got a summer job as a production assistant on Robert Altman's A Prairie Home Companion and got to be around its starry ensemble cast, which included Meryl Streep. 'Having had that experience gives you a leg-up when finally it's your turn and you have to know how to be on a set and how it all works.' Gratitude seems to be a defining theme in Williams' life. She is happy she is not starting out now. There was huge hype around Girls during its six-year run, which ended in 2017, but she can't imagine what that would be like with social media now. (Williams came off Instagram in 2020 – a time, she felt, when the platform was becoming more cynical and toxic.) It was, she says, as if there were 'a gazillion think pieces about every episode that we did – and most thought we all took ourselves too seriously. We were all pretty privileged people who were the leads of this HBO show that was definitely skewering our own, but we weren't given credit for that, or for being in on it.' Some of the criticism was valid – it was set in New York, yet was overwhelmingly white – but much of it was misogynistic and more. 'The shame is that, when it is coupled with misogyny and fatphobia and everything, the valid criticism gets lost.' Some of the coverage was so mean, she says with a laugh, especially on Gawker, which didn't describe the lead characters by their names, but as the daughters of the famous parent each actor had. 'We were easy targets, I get it.' For a while, Williams struggled with people assuming she was inseparable from her character, Marnie, a narcissist verging on sociopathy. 'I really desired to put distance between us, because I thought that was the kind of acting everybody respected – like, I'm wearing a prosthetic nose and I gained 40lbs, or whatever. And here [our characters] were, who looked basically like we looked and sounded like we sounded, but crucially said and did things that we would never do. It always felt weird that, since we didn't transform ourselves in some way, people weren't buying us playing characters.' Mostly though, she says, it was an amazing experience. Will there be a reunion? 'I would love it,' says Williams. 'I know that Zosia [Mamet, who played Shoshanna] has been pushing for a spin-off, which I would voraciously consume and try to elbow my way into. I kind of want us all back together. It was so fun and it was the beginning of my career, so I didn't have the perspective I have now on just how lucky we were, or to know how unusual a creative experience it was.' For those of us who loved Girls, I can think of nothing better – four hilarious, horrendous humans, no scary AI doll in sight. Allison Williams' podcast, Landlines, is available now. M3gan 2.0 is in cinemas on 27 June

The Independent

11 hours ago

• The Independent

Cannabis users more likely to die of heart disease, study reveals

Marijuana users are up to twice as likely to have a stroke, heart attack, or die from heart disease, research has revealed. University of California scientists found there was a 29 per cent higher risk of conditions like heart attack, a 20 per cent higher risk for stroke and double the risk of dying from heart disease among cannabis users. The study, published in Heart, reviewed 24 studies involving 200 million people to investigate the relationship between the drug and the diseases. The researchers warned that the study 'raises serious questions about the assumption that cannabis imposes little cardiovascular risk'. The reviewed studies, which ranged from 2016 to 2023, included people aged between 19 and 59 years old. The research did not specify if the marijuana exposure was from smoking the drug or other forms of consumption. In 2023, the American College of Cardiology revealed that people who smoke marijuana or eat weed-laced edibles daily are a third more likely to develop coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD is the most common form of heart disease – cholesterol narrows the arteries supplying blood to the organ, causing chest pain, shortness of breath and fatigue. The significant link remained regardless of whether users smoked tobacco, drank alcohol, had major cardiovascular risk factors, and no matter their age or sex. Whether users took cannabis by smoking the drug, eating edibles, or other methods also made no difference. The American College of Cardiology researchers said people should let their doctors know if they use the drug, so clinicians can start monitoring heart health. Dr Ishan Paranjpe, resident physician at Stanford University and the study's lead author, said: 'We found that cannabis use is linked to CAD, and there seems to be a dose-response relationship in that more frequent cannabis use is associated with a higher risk of CAD. 'In terms of the public health message, it shows that there are probably certain harms of cannabis use that weren't recognised before, and people should take that into account. 'From a scientific standpoint, these findings are exciting because they suggest there might be new drug targets and mechanisms we can explore to take control of this pathway going forward.'

The Sun

14 hours ago

• The Sun

Mummified creature with human-like hands found next to severed head is linked to legend of blood-sucking beast

A MUMMIFIED creature with human-like hands was found, leaving scientists gobsmacked as they find out what it is. The creature, called the "Capacabra," was found at Michigan State University while Cook-Seevers Hall was being renovated in 2018. 5 5 Since then, it's become a spooky mascot for the school's Campus Archaeology Program, with some of them working to solve the mystery. "It is roughly the size of a small cat, and it's got a very long, skinny tail, which goes hand in hand with cat-like features," Jerielle Cartales, a PHD student, told the Daily Mail. "But it has very, like, almost human hands. There's five fingers, and nails, and everything – it looks almost humanoid." The creature is covered with a thin layer of tissue that Cartales said felt like "old parchment paper." "It has its nose and its ear still, but they're very dried out." Comparisons have been made to the chupacabra, a mythical, bloodsucking beast from American folklore, hence the nickname the "capacabra." Like its namesake, there's so much about the creature that's unknown, including its age, however, it can't predate 1889, which is when the building the constructed. "So the interesting thing is that it could have been there for a month, it could have been there for 50 years, we don't really know," said Cartales. "Theoretically, I guess we could try radiocarbon dating it, but the building itself isn't old enough for it to be worth it." THEORIES RUNNING AMOK Since the creature's discovery, there have been many theories on what it could possibly be, including one expert suggesting it could be an opossum However, Cartales doesn't agree. "And so we were throwing out a bunch of ideas about what it could be," she said. "We were throwing out like 'maybe it's a dog, maybe it's a cat,' but raccoon didn't even make the list. "And now, that's my very strong hunch." The mummy was X-rayed to compare its skeleton with other known species, providing a clearer picture of what it could be. So far, a dog, a cat, and a rat were quickly ruled out as possible theories. At first, a raccoon seemed like a possibility; however, it's hard to be sure without a dental comparison, said Cartales. "A raccoon has the same general cranium shape, and the same with the snout shape," she said. "But the osteology text doesn't have any good images of dentition for the raccoon because their example was edentulous. "So I'm trying to find an example of a raccoon I can use for dentition. That's the next step." How the creature ended up in the building is also a mystery, with Cartales thinking it may have gone inside an air duct and got trapped. Mummification can happen in dry environments, which is likely how the creature met its fate. "If it was found next to an air duct, which seems to me like the most accessible point for an animal to get in from the outside, then that would be a pretty regular supply of warm, dry air, especially in the colder months." She added that it gets very humid in the area, but the building offered the perfect environment for mummification to take place. For now, Cartales believes the creature is a raccoon, "I'm a scientist, I'm never going to say 100% on anything." 5