‘Helpless and trapped': political prisoners stuck in Tehran jail with no way to flee bombings
When Mehraveh Khandan heard about Israel's evacuation order in Tehran last week, the first thing she thought of was her father. Reza Khandan, imprisoned for his human rights activism in 2024, was sitting in a cell in Tehran's Evin prison on the edge of the evacuation zone.
She fielded calls from her friends, who were breathless from the shock of the Israeli bombs as tens of thousands fled the Iranian capital. Her father, by contrast, had no way to flee. He was stuck.
'It was the most helpless and trapped moments in my entire life. That was the clearest image for me of our situation as Iranians: one captures us, so the other can strike us,' the 25-year-old said from Amsterdam.
On Monday, Mehraveh's worst fear was realised when Israel struck Evin prison.
Grainy CCTV footage showed the entrance exploding and the gate crumbling, with Iran's judiciary confirming damage to parts of the prison. Relatives of prisoners told the Guardian there were injuries reported in wards four, seven and eight – where Reza was being held, though he was unharmed.
'Their heads are slightly injured from the force of the explosion, the blast wave caused their heads to hit the wall and swell,' said Hussein*, an Iran-based relative of the human rights lawyer Mohammed Najafi, who is imprisoned in ward four. 'The prisoners are worried.'
The Guardian could not independently verify claims of injuries within the prison.
Mehraveh is just one of many whose family members were detained for political reasons by the Iranian government. They now fear for the safety of their loved ones stuck in prisons, unable to flee the bombs.
The Israeli defence minister's office said the prison attack was part of a larger assault on 'regime targets and government repression bodies in the heart of Tehran'.
Detainees and human rights activists have called for the temporary release of prisoners until fighting has stopped.
A group of detainees, including Reza, sent a letter to the head of Iran's judiciary on Wednesday calling on him to temporarily release prisoners, citing an Iranian law that allows for conditional releases during war time.
'Prisons are not equipped with air raid warning systems, shelters or safe evacuation routes … especially ward eight of Evin prison, which is in an even more vulnerable state and does not even have a single fire extinguisher,' the letter read.
Mehraveh and other family members of detainees were not optimistic that the Iranian government would approve the releases, noting a pattern of increasing repression during times of crisis.
For Reza Younesi, whose 25-year-old brother Ali Younesi has been held in Evin prison since 2020, conditions have already gotten worse. On Wednesday, his family received news that Ali had been moved from Evin to an unknown location and that attempts by lawyers to locate him had proved fruitless.
'His cellmates called my mum from prison to let us know. We were hoping that maybe he's moved to another ward or even another prison, but there is no information,' said 43-year-old Younesi, speaking from Sweden.
He added that he feared his brother was transferred to ward 209, where interrogations are conducted. According to a 2020 Amnesty report, security forces have been documented torturing detainees in ward 209, including through beatings and electric shocks.
Ali, a student activist, was accused of possessing 'explosive devices' by Iranian authorities and of being associated with the People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran, which Iran considers a terrorist group. He was initially sentenced to 16 years in prison, which was reduced to six years and eight months on a recent appeal.
'This is a pattern for the regime. What they do when they are in crisis to show that they can control society is to become more aggressive, they suppress regular people in society, especially prisoners,' Younesi said.
Human rights groups shared Younesi's concern. The New York-based Center for Human Rights in Iran warned on Thursday that 54 political prisoners on death row were at grave risk.
'There is growing fear that Iranian authorities may use the cover of war to carry out these executions, using them as tools of reprisal and intimidation to further silence dissent and instil fear across the population,' the rights group said in a statement.
Last Saturday, security forces arrested at least 16 people for 'spreading rumours' and residents in Iran told the Guardian they had noticed an uptick of arrests of people critical of the regime. Iran's interior ministry has also published a video of someone confessing to working on behalf of the Mossad (Israel's intelligence service) in Iran.
Families of political prisoners say Israeli airstrikes on prisons are not the answer to state repression. They say bombing prisons could put political prisoners at risk.
'We don't believe he [Najafi] is safe at all – we know both the brutality of the Islamic Republic and the intensity of Israel's strikes. When he calls us, we can hear the sound of missile launches and anti-aircraft through the phone,' Hussein said.
Inside Evin prison, detainees have reportedly started to stock up on goods, fearful that the fighting outside will lead to deterioration of conditions. Ali's cellmates were buying more food from the commissary, Reza said.
Checking on loved ones inside prisons has become more difficult as Iran's government has also imposed a near-complete internet blackout on its population.
Mehraveh, used to speaking to her father from abroad by calling her mother who would put him on speaker on a separate phone, has been unable to hear his voice since the bombing of the prison.
For Reza, whose family has not heard from his brother in six days, the lack of communication was deeply worrying.
Before, Ali would call his mother every day on the prison phone, comforting her with the mundane details of his daily routine. He had recently began learning French from other prisoners, and was teaching them astronomy – his passion – in return.
'I always tell him that he needs to do sports to make sure his body is not degrading,' Reza said. 'He always says, yeah don't worry, I'm doing it … Now we have no information from him, it's a very stressful time.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
22 minutes ago
- The Sun
Explosions heard in Qatar as Iranian missiles shot towards US airbase after Tehran vowed revenge for Trump nuke strikes
IRAN launched a salvo of ballistic missiles at Qatar targeting the biggest US military base in the Middle East. Loud explosions were heard in central Doha as air defence systems worked to intercept the missiles launched at Al Udeid air base - home to some 10,000 US army personnel. 3 3 All the Iranian missiles were shot down, it is understood. Footage shared by OSINT accounts appeared to show interceptions by air defence systems. It comes after the US said it expects that Iran could carry out retaliatory attacks targeting American forces in the next 24 to 48 hours. The Qataris have now closed their airspace. They said they reserve the right to respond directly and in accordance with international law. It has also been said that there are no casualties at the US Al Udeid military base in Doha, following Iran's attack on the facility. Tehran repeatedly threatened to strike US military bases in the Middle East following Donald Trump's bombing of its nuclear sites. Qatar is home to the largest US military base in the Middle East – Al Udeid Air Base. The base in the desert outside of Doha serves as the forward HQ for US Central Command. It houses about 10,000 troops and hosts some 40 military aircraft. In total, the US has about 50,000 troops stationed in the Middle East. British military personnel also serve there on rotation. Earlier today, The Sun reported that US and UK embassies in Qatar warned American and British citizens to 'shelter in place until further notice'. Meanwhile, the Israelis carried out their most intense bombing raids in Iran - pounding the Islamic Republic's intelligence HQ, a prison full of dissidents and the Fordow nuke plant for the second time. The IDF blew the gates off the notorious Evin Prison - a pit of torture and executions - hoping to bust out the regime's fierce critics languishing behind the walls. Also targeted were the Basij Headquarters of the Revolutionary Guard, Iran's "Destruction of Israel" countdown clock and various other security hubs, the IDF said. The Fordow mountain-fortress nuclear site was bombed - barely a day after the Americans pulverised it - with IDF rockets going after the "access routes". Significant damage has likely been caused to the plant and the sensitive machinery it houses by the US's bombing, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said. Stay up to date with the latest on Israel vs Iran with The Sun's live blog below...
Sky News
26 minutes ago
- Sky News
Tulip Siddiq: Innocent bystander or beneficiary of grand corruption?
A beneficiary of grand corruption waged by a repressive regime? Or an innocent bystander caught in political crossfire from a country five thousand miles away? Those are the questions at the core of an extraordinary argument that's been raging for months between the Labour MP Tulip Siddiq and the authorities in Bangladesh. Key to understanding this tangled tale is understanding both the recent history of Bangladesh and how Ms Siddiq's family is woven into it. Politics in the country was turned on its head last August after weeks of deadly protests triggered the ousting of longstanding prime minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League regime. From there, a temporary government took charge led by an interim leader - or 'Chief Adviser' - the Nobel Prize-winning economist Professor Muhammad Yunus. He pledged to begin legal proceedings to investigate crimes and human rights abuses allegedly committed under the previous regime and recover wealth that had been reportedly taken out of the country. In March, my colleague Cordelia Lynch and who was clear about where the blame lay. "Everybody was involved in it all," he said. "The whole government was involved in it." He vowed action against Sheikh Hasina and those close to her. Which is where Ms Siddiq enters the story. As well as being the niece of the former prime minister, she is also the granddaughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman - the founding president of modern Bangladesh. Tulip Siddiq's mother Sheikh Rehana has also been intimately involved in Bangladeshi politics and was reportedly by the side of her sister Sheikh Hasina when she fled Dhaka and resigned last August. So these are not tangential or loose links. And they - to an extent - explain why the Bangladeshi authorities are going after the Labour MP so vociferously. In short, they see her as part of an establishment that they believe pilfered and abused Bangladesh for two decades. So is this political guilt by association - in other words, a "vendetta" as Tulip Siddiq puts it - or is there substance to any of the allegations? Some of the claims certainly stretch believability and appear very political in nature. For instance, stories about her benefitting from billions of pounds siphoned off from a Russian nuclear deal appear to have emanated from a dubious-looking American website which also used an AI-generated image of Ms Siddiq to accompany their 'reporting'. The claims spread after a political opponent of Sheikh Hasina in Bangladesh filed a court claim off the back of them - allowing mainstream UK news outlets to safely report on the story. Other accusations around the allocation of land are potentially more plausible, but as yet no hard evidence has emerged to back up the claims. There are some parts of this story that look trickier for Ms Siddiq though. Property documentation does show links between her and associates of the Awami League. The Bangladeshi authorities argue this means the Labour MP may have - even unknowingly - benefitted from wealth corruptly taken out of the country and used to purchase flats and houses in the UK. Ms Siddiq says this has been looked at by the Number 10 ethics adviser and found to be in order. Briefing from sources close to the MP also suggests a defence that these property links were born out of regular family relationships rather than anything more political or financial in nature. But a photo of Ms Siddiq in the Kremlin with her aunt in 2013 as well as the fact that she thanked Awami League supporters after her 2015 election suggests a more political context. That said, disentangling politics and family when you are descended from one-time political royalty and standing as an MP in a city with a large Asian community may be easier said than done. The Number 10 probe did suggest she should have been more mindful of the possible reputational damage done by these connections. So this is a saga shaped more by Bangladeshi politics than British politics. A country getting to grips with its past and preparing for the future, but producing side effects in the process that are reaching these shores.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
header
Fifa is facing new questions over the increasingly fraught World Cup next year, with the issue of how to treat Iran while the country is involved in a conflict with the co-host the US. There are no provisions within Fifa's regulations to prevent Iran from playing their group matches in the US, despite the country being subject to military action by the Trump administration and Iranian citizens being under a travel ban that prevents them from entering the country. The ban contains an exemption that could apply to players, staff or associated families with teams at the 2026 Fifa World Cup. Iran, who faced USA in the group stage of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, qualified in March for their fourth consecutive World Cup. Although 2026 is also being hosted by Canada and Mexico, only by being given a specific slot in group A could Iran avoid playing in the US, with their matches then taking place in Mexico. If Iran won that group they would stay in Mexico for their last-32 game and any last-16 match. Should they go further – and they have never reached a World Cup knockout game – they would then play in the US. Fifa did not respond on Monday to a request for comment from the Guardian and will likely be considering its options before the World Cup draw, which is due to take place in December. The decision will be a difficult one for its president, Gianni Infantino, who has associated himself closely with President Donald Trump, who authorised the use of US bombs on Iranian nuclear sites last weekend. Infantino and the Fifa Council will have the final say on inclusion in the competition and the makeup of the draw, but the organising committee for Fifa competitions will be expected to have input. The committee has members from Canada, Mexico and Iran, and its chair is Uefa's president, Aleksander Ceferin. In 2022, his organisation announced that Ukraine and Belarus would be kept apart in Uefa competition draws, after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and his action may provide an example for Fifa to follow. Before the World Cup draw in Qatar, the agreed draw constraints included limitations on where teams could be selected but this related only to a 'general principle' that no more than one team from each confederation (excluding Europe) should appear in a given group.
