Waitangi Tribunal asked to halt Taranaki seabed mine fast-track
South Taranaki hapū want the Waitangi Tribunal to halt a fast-track bid to mine the seabed off Pātea.
Trans-Tasman Resources has applied under the new Fast-track Approvals Act to mine in the South Taranaki Bight for 20 years.
The mining and processing ship would churn through 50 million tonnes of the seabed annually, discharging most of it back into the ocean in shallow water just outside the 12-nautical-mile territorial limit.
Hapū and iwi are seeking a tribunal injunction to block processing of Trans-Tasman Resources' fast track application.
The claimants want an urgent hearing into alleged Crown breaches and are seeking to summon Crown officials they say are responsible.
ADVERTISEMENT
They say the Crown failed to consult tangata whenua, breaching Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and ignored a Supreme Court ruling against the seabed mine.
Rachel Arnott - seen here with kaumatua Ngāpari Nui at the NPDC committee now accused of bias - says unlike the miners Ngāti Ruanui will never leave South Taranaki, and will never give up. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting)
To get an urgent Waitangi Tribunal hearing, applicants must be suffering, or likely to suffer, significant and irreversible prejudice as a result of current or pending Crown actions.
Lead claimant Puawai Hudson of Ngāruahine hapū Ngāti Tū said their moana was rich in taonga species.
'If seabed mining goes ahead, we lose more than biodiversity, we lose the mauri that binds us as Taranaki Mā Tongatonga (people of south Taranaki),' Hudson said.
The area was also subject to applications under the Marine and Coastal Area Act – the law that replaced the Foreshore and Seabed Act.
'This is not consultation – this is colonisation through fast-track.'
ADVERTISEMENT
The applicants' legal team, who were also of Ngāruahine, said the Wai 3475 claim broke new ground.
Legal tautoko Alison Anitawaru Cole and Te Wehi Wright said the Court of Appeal proved the Tribunal's powers to require Crown action, in urgent and prejudicial cases, when it summonsed Oranga Tamariki's minister Karen Chour.
They argued the tribunal ought also be able to halt other urgent and prejudicial Crown actions – such as processing Trans-Tasman Resources' application under the Fast-track Approval Act.
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including a push to lift our superannuation age, rising Middle East tensions, and Auckland's amateur footballers face off against global giants. (Source: 1News)
Taranaki claimants
• All hapū of Ngāruahine iwi
• Their school Te Kura o Ngā Ruahine Rangi
ADVERTISEMENT
• Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Ruanui
• Ruanui hapū including Ngāti Tupaea
• Parihaka Papakainga Trust.
Groups outside Taranaki facing Fast-track Approval Act applications have also joined, including Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou ki Hauraki.
As opponents pressed their claim, Trans-Tasman Resources was due to argue its case this week at New Plymouth District Council.
Trans-Tasman has said opposition to seabed mining lacked scientific credibility and the waste sediment it discharged would be insignificant given the load already carried by the turbid Tasman Sea.
Trans-Tasman Resources managing director Alan Eggers was expected to lay out his wares to councillors at a public workshop on Wednesday morning.
ADVERTISEMENT
The company promised an economic boost in Taranaki and Whanganui, creating more than 1350 New Zealand jobs and becoming one of the country's top exporters.
The only known local shareholder, millionaire Phillip Brown, last week was reported to be lodging a complaint to New Plymouth District Council, alleging bias by its iwi committee Te Huinga Taumatua.
The Taranaki Daily News reported that Brown thought tribal representatives and councillors on the committee talked for too long during a deputation opposed to Trans-Tasman Resources' mining bid.
Te Huinga Taumatua co-chair Gordon Brown noted after the hour-and-a-quarter discussion that it was was a record extension of the officially-allotted 15 minutes.
The committee, including Mayor Neil Holdom, voted that the full council should consider declaring opposition to Trans-Tasman Resources' mine when it was due to meet on Tuesday, June 24.
Phillip Brown was reported to believe the meeting was procedurally flawed and predetermined.
Iwi liaison committees in north and south Taranaki typically relaxed debate rules to allow fuller kōrero.
ADVERTISEMENT
Taranaki Regional Council's policy and planning committee recently reached a rare accord on dealing with freshwater pollution when its new chair – Māori constituency councillor Bonita Bigham – suspended standing orders in favour of flowing discussion.
Ngāti Ruanui has stood against Trans-Tasman for over a decade, including defeating its application in the Supreme Court.
Rūnanga kaiwhakahaere Rachel Arnott said the Crown should know mana whenua would never give up.
'We are still here because our ancestors never gave up fighting for what is right.
"Tangaroa is not yours to sell: we will never leave, we will be here way beyond Trans-Tasman Resources, they have no future here.'
LDR is local body reporting co-funded by RNZ and NZ on Air
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
3 days ago
- 1News
Iwi files court action against minister, DOC over Ruapehu ski fields
A central North Island iwi has filed court action against Minister of Conservation Tama Potaka and the Department of Conservation (DOC) over concession made to the commercial operators of Tūroa and Whakapapa ski fields on Ruapehu. The iwi, Te Patutokotoko, alleges the Crown failed their legal obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi by failing to engage with them and actively protect their interests in their ancestral maunga by continuing to deal with private owners over them. Lead claimant Te Kurataiaha Te Wanikau Tūroa told RNZ the the iwi has been looking for a solution to the issue for years, but was "shrugged off no matter what plan we put forward". Tūroa said the iwi had spoken directly to the minister about their concerns. "We actually put in an interest for Whakapapa 18 months back, we got right to the end of it... the Crown just shut us off at the 12th hour. ADVERTISEMENT "It was a let down. But we didn't cry. We just carried on. That's what we're doing," Tūroa said. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka. (Source: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone) Earlier this year, Whakapapa Holdings Limited and Pure Tūroa were granted 10-year concessions by DOC to operate the north and south sides of the maunga respectively. The previous owner went into receivership in 2022 and the successful bid by the private companies came as a relief to Ruapehu mayor Weston Kirton who said the ski fields were vital to the district's economy. Te Kurataiaha Te Wanikau Tūroa said he did not want the companies to be kicked off the mountain, but wanted the iwi to have more say on how the maunga was operated. "It's an activity that our people, and New Zealanders, and foreigners come to do. It just needs to be run better. "We still have no coexistence with iwi our people in this, and that's where the breakdown is," Tūroa said. In a statement, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka said it would not be appropriate to comment as the matter was before the courts.
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
Northland iwi leader rules out settlement under this Government after Minister's comments
Ngāti Hine leader Pita Tipene is ruling out a settlement under this Government after remarks made by Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith. Goldsmith said on Tuesday the Government would not agree to Treaty settlements that disputed whether the Crown is now sovereign. Under the previous Labour Government, an
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Moriori Challenge Crown Over 'Tino Rangatiratanga'
Wellington, 12 June 2025 – The Moriori Imi Settlement Trust (MIST), supported by the Hokotehi Moriori Trust (HMT), has filed proceedings in the High Court at Wellington challenging the Crown's proposal to recognise Ngāti Mutunga o Wharekauri's (NMOW) tino rangatiratanga over Rēkohu (the Chatham Islands). In 1870, the Native Land Court and colonial government gave 97.3% of all land on the Chatham Islands to NMOW (who arrived on an English sailing ship in only 1835), completely disregarding Moriori custom and the ancient, peaceful occupation of the islands. Instead, they applied the New Zealand Māori custom of take raupatu (claim by conquest). The Waitangi Tribunal found in 2001 that Moriori should have received 'at least 50% of the land' on Rēkohu and that 'redress by far was due to Moriori' (Tribunal recommends compensation for Moriori). Despite this, NMOW have continued to claim exclusive mana whenua and tino rangatiratanga over Rēkohu. Now, the Crown appears ready to repeat these past injustices. When Moriori settled their historic Treaty claims with the Crown in 2020, the Crown gave clear and repeated assurances that it would remain strictly neutral between imi and iwi on matters of mana whenua and tino rangatiratanga over Rēkohu. For this reason, those terms do not appear in the Moriori Deed of Settlement. Moriori Claims Settlement Act 2021: However, in 2022, MIST was formally advised that the Crown intended to include in the NMOW Deed of Settlement an explicit acknowledgement of NMOW's tino rangatiratanga over Rēkohu. This contradicts prior commitments made to Moriori and represents a serious breach of trust and the terms of our own Deed. The Crown maintains this does not amount to recognition of mana whenua —a position strongly rejected by MIST and supported by respected Māori legal and tikanga experts. In their view, tino rangatiratanga clearly implies exclusive chiefly authority over land. Moriori (MIST & HMT) consider the Crown's position not only disingenuous—but outrageous. Tino rangatiratanga is not a term the Crown has the right to define, limit, or politically reinterpret to suit its convenience. The implications of this recognition are profound. It would undermine the integrity and intent of the Moriori Treaty settlement—an outcome Moriori worked toward for generations. It would also risk legitimising the 1835 invasion, where two mainland tribes used violence to kill, enslave, and displace the peaceful Moriori. Under tikane Moriori, land was never taken through warfare. Even under tikanga Māori, NMOW's claims to take raupatu were not found valid by the Waitangi Tribunal. This situation raises an unsettling question: Why is this happening at all? Why would the Crown give such clear assurances to Moriori, only to reverse course and grant the very recognition it swore it would withhold? This contradiction cuts to the core of the Crown's integrity and the trust that should underpin the Treaty settlement process. This legal challenge is not intended to delay or block NMOW's redress. Moriori supports their right to a settlement— provided it does not impinge upon or undermine Moriori rights. We offered a solution: remove the offending phrase from NMOW's Deed. The Crown refused. Moriori are now calling on the Crown to honour its promise of neutrality and refrain from taking any steps that would undermine the Treaty settlement signed with us just five years ago. Anything less risks eroding trust in the Crown's commitments. With all other avenues exhausted, Moriori will now seek to be heard in the court of law. We do so reluctantly, but with a firm commitment to uphold the dignity of our karapuna (ancestors) and protect the legacy we leave for future generations of our imi (people). Me rongo (In peace)
