First female chief to take reins of secret service MI6

Blaise Metreweli, a career intelligence officer who currently serves as director of technology at the organisation, will become the 18th chief in the organisation's 116-year history.
She will take over from Sir Richard Moore, a senior civil servant who will step down in the autumn after five years in the role.
Commonly referred to as C, the chief has operational responsibility for MI6, and is the only publicly named member of the organisation.
Despite Dame Judi Dench playing M, the fictional head of the secret service in the James Bond films, there has never been a woman in charge of the organisation in real life.
Earlier this year, Sir Richard, who was the first member of MI6 to openly use X, formerly Twitter, suggested a female candidate could replace him.
'We have yet to have a woman as chief so there's still a glass ceiling to shatter. #AccelerateAction,' he wrote in a post on the social media site.
Ms Metreweli first joined the service as a case officer in 1999 and has carried out operational roles in the Middle East and Europe.
In her new post, she will be accountable to the Foreign Secretary.
The Prime Minister said: 'The historic appointment of Blaise Metreweli comes at a time when the work of our intelligence services has never been more vital.
'The United Kingdom is facing threats on an unprecedented scale, be it aggressors who send their spy ships to our waters or hackers whose sophisticated cyber plots seek to disrupt our public services.
'I'd like to thank Sir Richard Moore for his dedicated service, and I know Blaise will continue to provide the excellent leadership needed to defend our county and keep our people safe – the foundation of my Plan for Change.'
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'I am delighted to appoint Blaise Metreweli as the next chief of MI6.
'With a wealth of experience from across our national security community, Blaise is the ideal candidate to lead MI6 into the future.
'At a time of global instability and emerging security threats, where technology is power and our adversaries are working ever closer together, Blaise will ensure the UK can tackle these challenges head on to keep Britain safe and secure at home and abroad.
'Every day, our intelligence services work behind the scenes to protect our national security and compete with our adversaries.
'That's why I am proud that we are investing an extra £600 million in our intelligence community so they can continue to defend our way of life.
'I would also like to pay tribute to Sir Richard Moore for his service and leadership.
'I have worked closely with him over the past year and thank him for his valuable contribution enhancing our national security and protecting the British public.'
Ms Metreweli said: 'I am proud and honoured to be asked to lead my service.
'MI6 plays a vital role, with MI5 and GCHQ, in keeping the British people safe and promoting UK interests overseas.
'I look forward to continuing that work alongside the brave officers and agents of MI6 and our many international partners.'
Outgoing chief Sir Richard said: 'I am absolutely delighted by this historic appointment of my colleague, Blaise Metreweli to succeed me as 'C'.
'Blaise is a highly accomplished intelligence officer and leader, and one of our foremost thinkers on technology.
'I am excited to welcome her as the first female head of MI6.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Record

2 hours ago

• Daily Record

Keir Starmer responds to US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites as he sends warning

Overnight bunker-busting missiles were dropped from American B-2 stealth bombers on number of targets in Iran included their Fordow nuclear site. Keir Starmer has warned Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon - as the US bombed three key nuclear sites in a massive escalation of the Middle East conflict. Overnight bunker-busting missiles were dropped from American B-2 stealth bombers on a number of targets in Iran including their Fordow nuclear site. The attack came despite calls for a diplomatic solution, The Mirror reports. ‌ It is understood the UK was involved in the strikes which came after the Prime Minister repeatedly pushed for de-escalation in the Middle East. ‌ In a statement on Sunday morning, Mr Starmer said: "Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. 'The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.' Just days ago Mr Starmer suggested at the G7 summit in Canada the US would not become involved militarily in the conflict between Iran and Israel. "There is nothing the President said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict, on the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation," he told reporters on Tuesday. ‌ Buisness Secretary also Jonathan Reynolds reiterated the PM's call for a diplomatic solution on Sunday. He told Sky News: "I know people will be waking up this morning, and they'll be worried. They'll want to know what this means. "And I do want to give them reassurance that whilst the British government, the UK has not been involved in these attacks, we have been making extensive preparations for all eventualities, including how we look after British nationals in the region and how we get them out, and the assets we have in the region to protect British infrastructure, British bases, British personnel if we need to do that." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ Overnight, Mr Trump posted on Truth Social, saying: "We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. "All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow." ‌ Mr Trump also warned the regime in Tehran from retaliating against the US, saying it would be met "with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight". But Iran said the attack would have "everlasting consequences". Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said the country "reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest and people". He added: "The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations. "The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour."

Wales Online

3 hours ago

• Wales Online

Keir Starmer reacts to US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites

Keir Starmer reacts to US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites US President Donald Trump ordered the bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites overnight, in a huge escalation of the Middle East crisis British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Image: Getty Images ) American B-2 stealth bombers executed overnight strikes using bunker-busting missiles, targeting Iran's Fordow nuclear site among others, in spite of worldwide calls for diplomatic resolution. The UK is believed not to be involved in the action, following the Prime Minister's ongoing advocacy for conflict de-escalation. On Sunday morning Keir Starmer issued a statement saying: "Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. ‌ "The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis." ‌ In recent remarks at the G7 summit held in Canada, Mr Starmer intimated that military entanglement by the US in the Israel-Iran dispute seemed unlikely. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here "There is nothing the President said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict, on the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation," Mr Starmer reported to journalists last Tuesday. Donald Trump communicated via Truth Social post-midnight: "We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan." Everything we know about the bombings here. Article continues below He added: "All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow." He also issued a warning to the Iranian regime, stating that any retaliation would be met "with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight". President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation (Image: Getty Images ) ‌ However, Iran vowed that the attack would have severe and long-lasting repercussions. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi asserted that the country "reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest and people". Araghchi further stated: "The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations." He continued: "The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour." Article continues below

Daily Mirror

3 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

'Trump's reckless lurch towards war puts UK in the firing line'

For years, Donald Trump told the American people - and the world - that he was different. That he wasn't like the warmongering presidents before him. That under his watch, the mistakes of Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan would never be repeated. 'Wars would never have started if I had been president,' he bragged time and again. Now, with the dust still rising from the bomb craters left by American B-2 bombers over Iran, it's clear: that too was just another Trumpian lie. Last night, the US leader ordered airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, using deep-penetrating 30,000lb bunker-busting munitions to inflict maximum destruction. The move was taken without congressional approval. It came without debate, without explanation, and in direct contradiction to the very campaign promise that helped put him back in the White House: to avoid reckless foreign entanglements. And perhaps most damningly, it flew in the face of public opinion. In recent days, multiple polls showed a clear majority of the American public, including a majority of Trump's own MAGA supporters, opposed military action against Iran. Americans, scarred by the ghosts of past misadventures, did not want another war. Trump knew this. He ignored them anyway. He wasn't just convinced to strike; he was willingly pulled in by Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu. Their personal bond - part political alliance, part mutual admiration society - overrode strategic judgment. Trump didn't just act because he believed in the threat; he acted because his friend Bibi wanted him to. For decades, Netanyahu has insisted Iran was on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon. Since the mid-1990s, 'weeks away' has been his rallying cry. Yet presidents from Clinton to Obama, from Bush to Biden, resisted being drawn into direct conflict. They questioned the intelligence. They prioritised diplomacy. They knew war with Iran could unleash forces they couldn't control. So what makes this moment even more dangerous is the brazen hypocrisy displayed by Trump. The US leader spent the better part of a decade presenting himself as the anti-war candidate. He vilified the architects of Iraq, mocked NATO, and promised to end the 'forever wars.' His 2024 campaign leaned heavily on that promise. His supporters believed him. Now they, like the rest of the world, are left to reckon with the truth: Trump was lying. Again. And once more, Britain is being dragged into the fallout of a war it did not start and may not want. As one of America's closest allies, we are now faced with a grim and familiar choice: do we blindly follow Washington into another potential quagmire, or do we finally draw a line and put British interests, and British lives, first? There is no easy answer. Iran has already vowed to retaliate. Its network of militias and regional proxies extends across the Middle East. British troops served alongside Americans in Iraq, Syria, and the Gulf. Our ships patrol the same waters. Our intelligence services are tightly bound to theirs. But this is no longer a distant threat. It is immediate. And it didn't have to happen. Trump had options. He was urged by advisers inside and outside the White House to hold back. Some argued that the US could support Israel through intelligence sharing and non-lethal means. They warned that striking Iran directly could pull America (and its allies) into an open-ended war with no clear objective and no public mandate. Trump dismissed them. Worse, he acted with his goon squad, circumventing Congress, silencing dissent, and pursuing a path that looks more like personal vengeance than national security. For Britain, the question is urgent: How much longer can we afford to tie ourselves to a man who governs by whim, not wisdom? Who says one thing on the campaign trail and does the exact opposite in office? We've followed America into too many disasters already. Do we really want Iran to be next? What must happen now is this: Parliament must urgently debate our position. There must be no quiet complicity, no unspoken assent. If we are to support this action - or not - it must be done transparently and with full public scrutiny. The American people, those who voted for peace, not war, must hold their president to account. Trump has broken faith with his supporters and with the world. If this war expands, if lives are lost, if allies are drawn in, he must bear the blame. Trump once insisted that he, and he alone, could keep America out of war. With last night's reckless strike, he has proved the opposite. And once again, Britain is left standing at the crossroads of loyalty and self-preservation, wondering how much longer we can afford to follow a leader who cannot be trusted to tell the truth, much less keep a promise.