City staff to explore giving tax break to Stoney Creek residents living within 3 km of stinky landfill

Hamilton city staff will look into measures that could provide relief to neighbours of a smelly GFL dump in Stoney Creek, including tax breaks and a temporary closure of the landfill, after councillors discussed the actions last week.
At a general issues committee (GIC) meeting on Feb. 26, councillors voted unanimously in favour of two motions put forward by councillor Brad Clark's (Ward 9). One of those motions will look at "providing area rating relief or any other tax relief" to Upper Stoney Creek residents living within a three kilometre radius of the dump at 65 Green Mountain Rd. W., where neighbours say a stink continues to impact their lives.
Since April 2023, the area surrounding the GFL Stoney Creek Regional Facility has been dealing with a consistent, at times overwhelming stench coming from the dump, neighbours say.
Tenysha Graham, a neighbour of the area, delegated at GIC and said the "sulphuric, rotten fish-like and chemical [smells] are causing unmistakable harm to our community."
"We are unable to use our backyards and children are unable to use community playgrounds," Graham said at the committee meeting.
"I'm extremely concerned for my health and so I no longer go for a walk or jog in our own neighbourhood."
She said the community wants answers from the province, which approved an expansion of the landfill in 2019, and from GFL, the company that runs the landfill.
"These odour events are frequent, unpredictable and have tangible impact on our daily lives," she said.
Ward 1 councillor Cameron Kroetsch asked if residents impacted by other environmental effects in the city's industrial zones could be considered in the report requested to city staff.
"The impact of a decision like this could be very far ranging," he said.
Mike Zegarac, general manager of finance and corporate services in the city, said the report could include findings that could apply to other areas.
Ministry 'dropping the ball,' says councillor
In the second motion put forward Clark, city staff were directed to look into "legal options available to the city" in relation to residents' concerns, including a possible temporary closure of the site.
In it, he said a community group for the area "has had discussions with their lawyers," in light of what they perceive to be inaction from the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) to help resolve the issue.
He said the MECP and GFL are "well aware of the issue," and the ministry is "dropping the ball."
"What frustrates me more than anything is that [GFL] have been gaslighting residents when they call in for an odour complaint," he said.
In November of 2023, the province strengthened penalties to landfills that contravene environmental laws, which could face fines from $1,000 a day to $100,000 a day, which Clark said was a response to around 6,000 petitioners to the province.
Clark said since then, GFL has responded to odour complaints by saying they're not at fault.
MPP-elect Donna Skelly said, during a Cable 14 provincial candidates debate on Feb. 20 for the Flamborough-Glanbrook riding, that the ministry has an "ongoing investigation," and the company hasn't gotten any fines because the investigation is not complete.
The MECP has said previously the smell is due to leachate, a chemical stew of potentially toxic liquid, that came up while building a new landfill cell.
In the second motion, Clark also mentions a section of the Municipal Act which states a court could order the premises to be closed temporarily if a municipality proves it causes a public nuisance that's not being addressed.
Ward 10 councillor Jeff Beattie, who said he regularly sits in community meetings between GFL and neighbours of the area, said he doesn't see "any alternative to closure of this facility if we keep going down this road."
"Ultimately, the residents of this community have a right to be outdoors," he said.
'We cannot continue to live like this'
Graham said residents organized to do their own air testing after hearing the MECP and city often can't conduct air measurements while the odour events are active.
Results showed levels of hydrogen sulfide close to double Ontario standards, according to Graham.
Beattie said the city's Public Health department has said while the hydrogen sulfide odours have not been "a threat to public health, they are public nuisance."
"They can cause people to be nauseous, they can cause sore throats, they can cause asthma, bronchitis and they can certainly cause migraine headaches," he said.
Graham said while some equipment for the testing was donated, residents also donated to cost it, adding to the financial burden some have been feeling as a result of the odours.
She said many, including herself, have bought air purifiers out of fear for their health, other neighbours have said in the past their bills have gone up due to not being able to open their windows during warmer months.
"We cannot continue to live like this," said Graham.
City staff were given until the end of the second quarter of 2025 to report back to GIC on both motions "with all costs to be funded through the GFL royalties."
Both motions passed unanimously, with 13 councillors and the mayor voting on the first motion, and councillors only voting on the second. The vote will go to council for final approval on Wednesday.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Globe and Mail

2 days ago

• Globe and Mail

GICs are simple and safe – and a lousy way to build wealth

This may be a naive question, but if I have $7,000 in cash to contribute to my tax-free savings account, why would I invest it in a dividend exchange-traded fund rather than a guaranteed investment certificate yielding 4 per cent to 4.5 per cent? GICs have their place in a well-balanced portfolio. Because their principal value doesn't fluctuate and their returns are guaranteed, they provide stability and peace of mind during periods of market volatility. That's why, for the fixed-income portion of one's portfolio, GICs are a good solution. However, that stability comes at a cost – several costs, actually. First, GICs don't offer any growth potential. If you invest in a five-year GIC that yields 4 per cent (a rate you'd be hard-pressed to find right now, by the way), you'll make 4 per cent annually – no more, no less. You'll feel like a genius if the stock market treads water or falls over that period, but if the market rises substantially, that GIC won't look nearly so appealing. History has clearly favoured stocks over GICs. Over the past decade, the S&P/TSX Composite Index has posted an annualized total return of about 9 per cent, including dividends. No GIC can keep up with that. True, the stock market had plenty of ups and downs over that period, but volatility is the price investors pay for the superior returns that stocks deliver. Your dividend and DRIP questions answered The financial – and emotional – benefits of dividend ETFs A second drawback is that GICs lock up your money for a fixed period. If you need the cash to buy a new car or replace your furnace, you won't be able to access your funds (exceptions are sometimes made in unusual circumstances, depending on the financial institution). For that reason, you should only purchase a GIC if you're certain you won't need the funds before the maturity date. A third downside of GICs is that the interest is taxed at your full marginal rate. This isn't a factor in a TFSA, registered retirement savings plan or other registered account in which investment earnings are not subject to tax. But in a non-registered account, the tax hit on interest tops out at more than 50 per cent in most provinces for the highest income bracket. On an after-tax basis, GICs may not even keep up with inflation. Dividend stocks and dividend ETFs don't have the same drawbacks. In addition to providing the potential for capital appreciation, dividend stocks and ETFs also typically increase their income over time. Many companies – such as banks, utilities and power producers – have been raising their dividends for years, driven by their growing earnings, out of which dividends are paid. The yield of a GIC, on the other hand, is fixed. Stocks and ETFs are also more liquid than GICs. If you need the money for an unexpected expense, you can always sell a portion of your holdings. Finally, dividend stocks and ETFs also win in the tax department. Thanks to the dividend tax credit, the income from dividends is generally taxed at much lower rates than interest from a GIC. In Ontario, for example, someone with $100,000 of income would pay combined federal and provincial tax of 31.48 per cent on interest but just 8.92 per cent on eligible dividends. In the lowest income brackets, the tax rate on dividends is actually negative in many provinces. According to an Ontario resident with taxable income of $52,886 or less would have an effective tax rate on eligible dividends of negative 7.55 per cent for 2025. Because the dividend tax credit is a non-refundable credit, the government won't send you a cheque for the negative amount, but you can use the credit to offset your other taxes owing. Let me be clear: I am not trying to steer you away from GICs. I own them myself. They are especially useful if you are saving for a large future expense, such as a home purchase or a child's postsecondary education, and don't want to put your principal at risk. Many investors also use GICs for the fixed-income portion of a balanced portfolio. Building a GIC 'ladder' – with maturities ranging from one to five years – can be a useful way to diversify your GIC holdings and control your interest rate risk. When the one-year GIC matures, you would roll the proceeds into a new five-year GIC, and so on. But for long-term growth of both capital and income, stocks and ETFs are the clear winner. So don't let your desire for safety prevent you from enjoying the historically higher returns that stocks offer. E-mail your questions to jheinzl@ I'm not able to respond personally to e-mails but I choose certain questions to answer in my column.

Global News

7 days ago

• Global News

Ontario quietly signs new affordable housing deal with feds

The provincial and federal governments quietly signed a fresh Ontario affordable housing deal worth hundreds of millions of dollars after months of tense back-and-forth and threats to scrap the funding altogether. Shortly after Doug Ford's new cabinet was sworn in March and with Mark Carney installed in the Prime Minister's Office, Ottawa and Queen's Park signed off on a deal to work together on new housing. Details of the need to sign the new agreement were contained in a handover binder prepared for Ontario's new housing minister in March and recently obtained by Global News using freedom of information laws. The same agreement had caused months of grief the previous year as two housing ministers traded barbs, accusations and threats. Last year, the federal and provincial housing ministers clashed repeatedly over the National Housing Strategy – a bilateral, long-term agreement to build affordable housing. Story continues below advertisement The fund provides money to provinces for their affordable housing strategies. It is designed to run for 10 years, with milestones to renew the funds. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Then-Canadian Housing Minister Sean Fraser wrote to his Ontario counterpart, Paul Calandra, in March 2024 to demand 'urgent' action on his affordable housing plan, accusing Ontario of failing to deliver thousands of new units. The letter kicked off back-and-forth jabs, where Ottawa rejected Ontario's various affordable housing plans, claiming it was refurbishing old units and not building new ones. The federal government said it would withhold $357 million in fresh funding until it was satisfied. The federal government eventually said it would sidestep Ontario and give the money straight to local service managers in the province instead. At the time, Calandra said that was exactly what he wanted. 'For weeks, we've been saying, 'It is distributed through our service managers,'' he said in May 2024. 'Now, the big, bad federal Minister of Housing is going to punish Ontario. Do you know how? By distributing the money the same way we have done it for the last 35 years: through our service managers.' After the snap winter election, Calandra was shuffled from housing to education, while Fraser is now the justice minister. A briefing binder prepared for incoming Ontario Housing Minister Rob Flack in March 2025 said one of the first decisions he would have to make would be to sign off on a new federal-provincial agreement to ensure affordable housing dollars continue to flow. Story continues below advertisement 'Ministry staff are reviewing federal input and will bring forward options for the Action Plan for Minister's decision following the election,' the briefing binder, accessed via freedom of information laws, said. Sometime in March, the two governments came to an agreement. 'The National Housing Strategy (NHS) bilateral agreement signed with Ontario runs from 2019/20 to 2027/28,' a federal spokesperson said. 'The targets and outcomes for funding available under the agreement were mutually agreed upon in March 2025 through a three-year Action Plan for 2025/26 to 2027/28. This ensures the continued availability of federal funding for Ontario.' Flack's office indicated he wanted to reset the relationship with his federal counterpart after a tense year. The latest agreement will prioritize rent-assisted units, according to the Ontario government.

Calgary Herald

13-06-2025

• Calgary Herald

Alberta entrepreneurs thrilled for products to be included in G7 goody bags

Article content 'For me, that was like, holy crap,' he said, adding the city ultimately ordered 45 units. 'It's an amazing opportunity and we were (happy) to be able to help fill their needs.' Article content MTNPK Glassware donates part of the proceeds from every Three Sisters glass it sells to the Rocky Mountain Adaptive program, Walker added. To date, the company has been able to donate over $64,000 to the organization. Article content 'Hopefully, this brings more awareness to our products so that we can raise even more funds for the program,' he said. Article content Scott Sanger, Rosso's head of marketing, said it's 'super exciting' to know the Calgary-based roaster's Homebody coffee beans will be in the possession of some prominent world leaders next week. He added the inclusion of coffee beans in the tote bag is a testament to the fact coffee is a global ritual. Article content 'It's a part of our daily lives, no matter where you're coming from and no matter what your title may be,' he said. Article content Article content 'To know we'll be involved in those daily moments of some pretty impressive and senior people is a great accomplishment.' Article content The tote bags themselves are illustrated with artwork from Crystal Lee Clark, a Nehiway/Dene/Métis artist and educator. Clark's piece on the tote bag depicts a soaring black-capped chickadee, which is recognized as Calgary's official bird. Article content In an email, she said that as an Indigenous artist, she approached the opportunity to have her artwork displayed on the tote bags with 'thoughtful consideration,' considering some of the political leaders in attendance represent governments that have not upheld Indigenous rights. Article content 'That said, I see this as a chance for the presence of Indigenous stories, voices, worldview and resilience to quietly accompany these conversations through the story of the art,' Clark wrote. 'The black-capped chickadee is a symbol of survival, song, beauty and strength — qualities that resonate deeply with Indigenous Peoples and our histories and relationships.