Ahead of iPhone 17 launch, Apple puts iPhone XS on the vintage list and makes iPad 5 obsolete
Another iPhone generation has officially entered Apple's digital retirement home. The iPhone XS, once hailed as Apple's flagship device, has now been added to the company's vintage list, signalling that time moves quickly, even for iconic gadgets. Under Apple's classification system, a product is labelled "vintage" once five years have passed since the company stopped selling it through official channels.While repairs may still be possible at Apple Stores and through Apple Authorised Service Providers, service depends entirely on whether replacement parts remain available.advertisementThe iPhone XS originally hit the shelves in September 2018 and was discontinued the following year when the iPhone 11 arrived. However, the device continued to linger in circulation through various resellers, delaying its official move to vintage status until recently. Now, having finally reached the five-year milestone, it has earned its place on Apple's vintage list.
Looking ahead, the iPhone XS faces full obsolescence in just two years' time. Once that happens, Apple will cease providing service entirely, and official repairs will no longer be offered — even if parts happen to be available.Interestingly, the iPhone XS Max, its larger sibling with the spacious 6.5-inch display, was moved to the vintage list earlier, back in November 2024. Both devices, at the time of their release, were seen as modest upgrades over the groundbreaking iPhone X, offering users a speedier A12 Bionic chip, improved cameras, and the added flexibility of dual SIM support. While the XS Max capitalised on its larger screen size, both models were evolutionary rather than revolutionary for Apple.advertisementApple's vintage list wasn't only updated with iPhones this time. The company also shifted the fifth-generation iPad, known as the iPad 5, from vintage to obsolete status. This change means that Apple has now fully ended all hardware services for the 2017 tablet, regardless of part availability.Adding to the round of updates, Apple made a subtle change to the support status of certain Mac devices. The 2018 Mac mini, which had already been listed as vintage a few months ago, now comes with a small caveat. According to fine print recently added to Apple's support page, owners of this particular Mac model are advised to check with an Apple Authorised Service Provider for confirmation of service eligibility. The early vintage classification of the 2018 Mac mini has left some observers puzzled, as many expected the device to enjoy a slightly longer service window.For Apple users, these updates serve as a regular reminder of the company's strict product lifecycle, one that steadily nudges ageing devices towards obsolescence. While many iPhone XS owners may still be happily using their devices, the clock is ticking, and future repair options are becoming increasingly limited.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Apple may bring a new colour variant with iPhone 17: Report
iPhone 17 series is likely to make its debut in September later this year. The new iPhone lineup is rumoured to come with multiple upgrades in terms of camera, performance and battery life. According to details shared by leaker Majin Bu, the Cupertino-based company is testing new Purple and Green color options for the upcoming iPhone 17. However, the leakster says that only one of the two colors is likely to make the final cut. 'While both are under consideration, only one color might make the final cut, with expectations leaning toward Purple being the likely choice for release,' the tipster writes in a blog post. To compare, the base iPhone 16 model is currently offered in Ultramarine, Teal, Pink, White, and Black. The iPhone 17, if the leak proves true, could add a fresh color to the mix when it launches later this year. Apple iPhone 17 features (expected) Beyond colors, recent analyst reports suggest that the iPhone 17 base model will see limited hardware changes. According to Jeff Pu of GF Securities, the device is expected to use the A18 chip, the same processor as the iPhone 16. The processor will reportedly continue to be built on TSMC's 3nm N3E process. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The iPhone 17 is also likely to have 8GB of RAM, matching the iPhone 16. Other upgrades may include a slightly larger 6.3-inch display (up from the current 6.1-inch) with a 120Hz refresh rate. The smartphone is tipped to come with a 24MP camera at the front, compared to 12MP on the iPhone 16. The handset will likely run on iOS 26 that was unveiled earlier this month at the company's annual developer conference – WWDC 2025. The iPhone 17 series is rumoured to consist of iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max . Apple is said to add a new iPhone model, likely to be called iPhone 17 Air. World Music Day 2025: Tech That Changed How We Listen to Music AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Tired Of Overedited iPhone Photos? Adobe Launches Free Camera App For iPhone—Built By Pixel Camera Creators
New Delhi: Have you ever felt like your iPhone Photos look a bit too bright or overly edited? Adobe has launched a new iPhone-only camera app called Project Indigo. The app has been built by the same team behind Google's Pixel camera. Unlike typical smartphone apps, it offers more manual control and aims to deliver a DSLR-style photo experience. It's free to download on the App Store for now. More Natural, True-to-Life Photos Adobe says its new app, Indigo, aims to deliver more natural, true-to-life images—closer to what you'd get from a DSLR. There's less smoothing, less over-sharpening, and the colour adjustments are subtle, avoiding that overly edited 'HDR' look common in regular phone cameras. Full Manual Camera Controls Indigo gives you full manual control over your camera settings like focus, shutter speed, ISO, and white balance. You can choose to shoot in JPEG or RAW (DNG), and even decide how many frames the app captures for each shot. Why does that matter? Because Indigo uses advanced tech to blend up to 32 images into one, helping reduce noise and keep all the details sharp. Night Mode & Long Exposure for Creative Shots Indigo also includes a Night mode that suggests longer exposures in low light, helping you get clearer shots in the dark. There's even a Long Exposure setting to create smooth, motion-blur effects—perfect for capturing waterfalls, flowing traffic, or glowing city lights. Clearer Zoomed-In Shots Adobe says with Indigo, zoomed-in photos will look much clearer and less blurry. Instead of guessing what the image should look like using AI, the app uses a clever trick called multi-frame super-resolution—it quickly snaps several shots when you zoom and blends them together to give you a sharper, more detailed photo. Adobe is also working on a live preview feature, which will let you see how your edited photo will look right in the viewfinder—before you even press the shutter. That could totally change the way people frame and shoot photos on their phones.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
The risk is not AI. It is our overreliance on imperfect technology
Nowhere is the AI debate more polarised than between the evangelists who see technology as humanity's next great leap and the sceptics who warn of its profound limitations. Two recent pieces — Sam Altman's characteristically bullish blog and Apple's quietly devastating research paper, 'The Illusion of Thinking' — offer a fascinating window into this divide. As we stand at the threshold of a new technological era, it's worth asking: What should we truly fear, and what is mere hype? And for a country like India, what path does wisdom suggest? Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI and a central figure in the AI revolution, writes with the conviction of a true believer that AI will soon rival, if not surpass, human reasoning. Altman's vision will attract people. After all, he says that AI can be a true partner in solving the world's hardest problems, from disease to climate change. His argument is not just about technological possibility, but about inevitability. In Altman's world, the march toward artificial general intelligence (AGI) is not just desirable — it's unstoppable. But then comes Apple's 'The Illusion of Thinking', a paper that lands like a bucket of cold water on AI enthusiasm. Apple's researchers conducted a series of controlled experiments, pitting state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) against classic logic puzzles. The results drove down the enthusiasm around Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). While these models impressed at low and medium complexity, their performance collapsed as the puzzles grew harder. AI is not truly 'thinking' but merely extending patterns. When faced with problems that require genuine reasoning, there are still gaps to be filled. Apple's work is a much-needed correction to the narrative that we are on the verge of achieving AGI. So, who is right? The answer, as is often the case, lies somewhere in between. Altman's optimism is not entirely misplaced. AI has already transformed industries and will continue to do so, especially in domains where pattern recognition and data synthesis are of utmost use. But Apple's critique exposes a fundamental flaw in the current trajectory: The flaw of conflating statistical abilities with genuine understanding or reasoning. There is a world of difference between a machine that can predict the next word in a sentence and one that can reason its way through the Tower of Hanoi or make sense of a complex, real-world dilemma. What, then, should the world be afraid of? The real danger is not that AI will suddenly become superintelligent and take over, but that we will place too much trust in systems whose limitations are poorly understood. Imagine deploying these models in healthcare, infrastructure, or governance, only to discover that their intelligence isn't truly that. The risk is not Skynet, but systemic failure born of misplaced faith. Billions could be wasted chasing the chimera of AGI, while urgent, solvable problems are neglected. There is often waste in innovation processes. But the scale of resources deployed for AI dwarfs other examples, and hence, demands a different sort of caution. Yet, there are also fears we can safely discard. The existential risk posed by current AI models is, for now, more science fiction than science. These systems are powerful, but they are not autonomous agents plotting humanity's downfall. They are tools — impressive, but fundamentally limited. The real threat, as yet, is not malicious machines, but human hubris. Are there any lessons for India to draw from this? The country stands to gain enormously from AI, particularly in areas like language translation, agriculture, public service delivery, and others. Here, based on the strengths of today's AI — pattern recognition, automation, and data analysis — it can be used to address real-world, local challenges, which is what India has been majorly trying to do. But India must resist the temptation to tag along with the AGI hype. Instead, it should invest in human-in-the-loop systems, where AI aids rather than replaces human judgement, especially in domains where discretion levels are high at the point of contact with people, and where the stakes are high. Human judgement is still ahead of AI, as of now, so, stick to using it. There is also a deeper lesson here, that is imparted by control theory. True control — over machines, systems, or societies — requires the ability to adapt, to reason, to respond dynamically to feedback. Current AI models, for all their power, lack this flexibility. They cannot adjust their approach when complexity exceeds their training. More data and more computing do not solve this problem. In this sense, the illusion of AI control is as dangerous as the illusion of AI thinking. The future will be shaped neither by those who are blind in their faith towards AI, nor by those who see only limits, but by those who can navigate the space between. For India, and for the world, the challenge is to harness the real strengths of AI while remaining clear-eyed about its weaknesses. The true danger is not that machines will outthink us, but that we will stop thinking for ourselves. Related to this was an interesting brain scan study by MIT Media Lab of ChatGPT users, which suggested that AI isn't making us more productive. It could instead be harming us cognitively. This is what we need to worry about, at least for now. The writer is research analyst at The Takshashila Institution in their High-Technology Geopolitics Programme
