Nike, Starbucks And Co Exit NFTs But Crypto-Natives Remain Put
Nike is facing a $5 million lawsuit from a group of people who bought its Nike-themed non-fungible tokens. The report follows the global footwear and apparel giant's closure of its RTFKT (pronounced artifact) unit in December 2024. It comes at a time when NFT transaction volumes have fallen to record lows despite the recent resurgence in the crypto market.
A handful of other mainstream brands and crypto companies have also closed their NFT projects including Starbucks and DraftKings, while X2Y2, at some point was one of the biggest NFT marketplaces said it is pivoting to crypto AI.
However, not all believe that the current state of the NFT market spells curtains for the industry, with Solana-based decentralized exchange platform Jupiter consolidating its strategy for the crypto industry with the acquisition of digital collectibles platform DRiP Haus.
The NFT market fell 24% in the first quarter of 2025 to $1.5 billion compared to the preceding quarter, according to a DappRadar report. However, the number of sales was down 10%, implying a substantial decline in the average price for NFTs sold versus the quantity.
The $1.5 billion trading volume recorded between January and March 2025 is just a fraction of the $5.7 billion recorded for the final week of January 2022, when the industry was at its peak, as per Token Terminal data.
The Token Terminal also shows that whilst NFT trading volume fell by 24% in the most recent quarter compared to Q4 2024, there was a significant improvement over the past two quarters when compared to the preceding two.
That surge was linked to the general positivity surrounding the crypto market in the wake of President Trump's election. But even such optimism could not prevent Nike from implementing its previously rumored course of action of shutting down RTFKT.
In December, RTFKT announced via Musk's X platform that it was winding down its NFT business. In January, the company concluded its creative journey with the launch of the MNLTH X Blade Drop, released in collaboration with the 3D-printing footwear manufacturer Zellerfeld.
Last week, images of CloneX NFTs on the NFT marketplace OpenSea temporarily disappeared after Cloudflare downgraded the account responsible for serving the files. The CloneX NFT collection is one of the biggest by sales volume on RTFKT's portfolio with 470,434.88 ETH, according to CoinMarketCap data.
At the peak of the NFT boom, Nike was reported to be the best-performing mainstream brand in the industry, generating $185 million from NFT sales as of June 2022.
Just over two and a half years down the line, and nearly four months after news that RTFKT was shutting down, the company is now facing a $5 million lawsuit from a group of people who purchased its NFTs.
In the class action filed in Brooklyn, New York federal court on Friday, the purchasers claim the closure of Nike's RTFKT platform caused the demand for their NFTs to dry up, Reuters reported.
Nike is not the only mainstream brand that is moving away from NFTs. In March 2024, Starbucks officially closed its NFT royalty program. In the preceding month, Gamestop also closed its NFT marketplace, just months after removing support for its NFT wallet. In both cases, Gamestop pointed to continuing regulatory uncertainty in the crypto industry.
Last month, NFT marketplace X2Y2, which once was among the biggest platforms by transaction volume also said it is closing its NFT business to focus on decentralized artificial intelligence. The company pointed to the declining NFT transaction activity as the main reason for its decision. The company said NFT trading volume had fallen 90% from its all-time highs.
While some of the biggest brands seem to be retreating from NFTs, some crypto-native companies have chosen to stay, and are now, consolidating their positions in the space.
Earlier this month, Solana DEX platform Jupiter said it is acquiring digital collectibles platform DRiP Haus, as part of a broader strategy of upgrading the platform into a 'super app'.
Web3 super apps are decentralized applications that offer different services within a single platform, including token trading, NFTs, payments and cryptocurrency swaps.
'We don't believe it,' Jupiter's Kash Dhanda told CoinDesk about claims that NFTs are dead. 'We think NFTs are here for the long term.'
Other NFT projects like Pudgy Penguins and Doodles have shown what could be the next evolution of NFTs, by expanding their their strategy into gaming and launching tokens. While PFP NFTs still dominate sales with about 56% of volume, as per DappRadar, sales have been falling more drastically compared to gaming NFTs, which are second in transaction activity.
Last October, Pudgy Penguins announced it is developing a AAA blockchain game 'Pudgy Party' set to debut on iOS and Android in 2025.
The company also launched the PENGU token, with 25.9% distributed to the Pudgy community, which includes Pudgy Penguins, Lil Pudgys, and Pudgy Rods NFT holders.
In February this year, Doodles also announced it is launching a Solana-based token, DOOD, as part of an expanded NFT strategy that positions the brand as an entertainment company focused on immersive storytelling. The token will later launch on Coinbase's Ethereum layer-2 blockchain Base.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
43 minutes ago
- CNBC
NATO allies will pledge to hike defense spend – but will they deliver?
Fireworks could kick off during NATO's annual summit this week, as the U.S. pushes its allies to sharply increase their defense spending to 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP). The 5% figure is made up of 3.5% of GDP that should be spent on "pure" defense, with an extra 1.5% of GDP going to security-related infrastructure, such as cyber warfare capabilities and intelligence. While some member states they're happy to hit that milestone, and some countries are not too far off that mark, others don't even meet the 2% threshold that was agreed over a decade ago. While they might pledge to increase defense spending, whether these promises materializes will be the key question. Talk is cheap and timelines can be vague — but concerted action is what the U.S. and President Donald Trump, who's attending a NATO summit for the first time since 2019, will want to see. "The U.S. is looking for everybody to say, 'Yeah, we mean it. We have a plan. 5% is real. We're going to get there'," Kurt Volker, former U.S. ambassador to NATO and distinguished fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), said Wednesday. "But one thing to watch for is if the messaging is actually on point. Some of the messaging from some of our European allies, at least when they back brief their own media and their own parliaments is, 'Yeah, 5% but it's really 3.5% and 1.5%, and that can be pretty much anything' ... So there's going to be a whittling down [of defense spending pledges] almost immediately," Volker noted at a CEPA briefing ahead of the NATO summit. "And if that is over emphasized, you're going to have a clash with the U.S.," Volker added. The stakes are high as allies meet in The Hague in the Netherlands on June 24-25, given ongoing conflict in Ukraine and war in the Middle East threatening to destabilize the global economy. Defense analysts say this year's meeting could be the most consequential in the alliance's 77-year history, with the U.S.' spend-pushing heavily forewarned before the summit. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was emphatic as he said 5% "will happen" at a separate NATO gathering earlier this month, with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also widely plugging that message to allies too. Defense spending has been a thorny subject for NATO members for years, and a persistent source of annoyance and anger for Trump, who was demanding that allies double their spending goals from 2% to 4% of GDP all the way back in 2018. NATO defense expenditure has nevertheless sharply picked up among NATO members since Trump was last in power. Back then, and arguably at the height of the White House leader's irritation with the bloc, only six member states met the 2% target, including the U.S. Times have changed, however; by 2024, 23 members had reached the 2% threshold, according to NATO data. While some greatly surpassed that target — such as Poland, Estonia, the U.S., Latvia and Greece — major economies including Canada, Spain and Italy have lagged below the contribution threshold. No NATO member has so far reached the 5% spending objective, and some are highly likely to drag their feet when it comes to getting to that milestone now. The U.K., Poland and Germany have already said they intend to increase defense spending to the requisite target, but their timeline is unclear. The UK is also reportedly trying to delay the spending rise among by three years, according to the i newspaper. CNBC has reached out to Downing Street for comment. Spain and Italy are seen as major holdouts against the 5% target, after only committing to reach the 2% threshold in 2025. Canada meanwhile spent 1.3% of GDP on defense in 2024, NATO estimates suggest, even less than Italy, Portugal or Montenegro. Spending 5% on defense is a target, but not a given, Jason Israel, senior fellow for the Defense Technology Initiative at CEPA, said Wednesday. "Every single country ... is trying to figure out how they're going to thread that needle of being able to make the commitment, but also make the accounting work when every single nation has to make trade offs against what is generally unpopular, massive increases in defense spending," he noted, stressing it's a "long way from commitments ... to actual capability," European aerospace and defense companies are following NATO spending commentary and commitments closely, but say they're stuck in limbo between pledges and action by way of concrete government procurement. The leaders of Leonardo, Embraer and Saab told CNBC last week the continent needs to act decisively and collectively to make long-term commitments to defense spending and investment contracts to enable companies like theirs to scale-up their production capacity and manufacturing capabilities. "If we go for 3.5% [of pure defense spending] across the European part of NATO, that will mean a lot, and more will be needed in terms of capacity. But we need to understand the capability targets better," Micael Johansson, the chief executive of Swedish defense company Saab, told CNBC. "We can do more, and I think we need to come together in Europe to create more scale, also in what we do to align demand, align requirements, so we can actually be competitive player in internationally. So there's a lot to do still," he said. Roberto Cingolani, CEO of Italian defense firm Leonardo, agreed that "there's a lot of work to be done." "Leonardo has a capacity boost program at the moment because we are quite aware of the fact that we have to increase the production of specific platforms, defense systems, electronics and technology solutions. It is not only matter of money, it's matter of priority. It's matter of reducing the fragmentation among countries in Europe," he told CNBC's Charlotte Reed at the Paris Air Show. Defense companies needed to know what will be expected of them ahead of time, Cingolani said, given the complex nature of global supply chains that underpin the defense industry. "We have approximately 5000 companies in the supply chain, and we are in 160 countries in the world. So it's very complicated," he noted. "You have to invest in supply chain. You have to make investments. You have to protect the supply chain. But of course, we also have to face a shortage of raw materials ... There is no no simple solution. If there were a solution, we would have done it already," he said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Those who invested in RCE Capital Berhad (KLSE:RCECAP) five years ago are up 251%
It hasn't been the best quarter for RCE Capital Berhad (KLSE:RCECAP) shareholders, since the share price has fallen 11% in that time. But that scarcely detracts from the really solid long term returns generated by the company over five years. In fact, the share price is 140% higher today. We think it's more important to dwell on the long term returns than the short term returns. The more important question is whether the stock is too cheap or too expensive today. While the long term returns are impressive, we do have some sympathy for those who bought more recently, given the 15% drop, in the last year. With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. RCE Capital Berhad's earnings per share are down 3.0% per year, despite strong share price performance over five years. So it's hard to argue that the earnings per share are the best metric to judge the company, as it may not be optimized for profits at this point. Therefore, it's worth taking a look at other metrics to try to understand the share price movements. In fact, the dividend has increased over time, which is a positive. Maybe dividend investors have helped support the share price. The revenue growth of about 3.5% per year might also encourage buyers. You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). Take a more thorough look at RCE Capital Berhad's financial health with this free report on its balance sheet. When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for RCE Capital Berhad the TSR over the last 5 years was 251%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! We regret to report that RCE Capital Berhad shareholders are down 11% for the year (even including dividends). Unfortunately, that's worse than the broader market decline of 7.2%. However, it could simply be that the share price has been impacted by broader market jitters. It might be worth keeping an eye on the fundamentals, in case there's a good opportunity. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 29% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for RCE Capital Berhad that you should be aware of before investing here. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Malaysian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Those who invested in RCE Capital Berhad (KLSE:RCECAP) five years ago are up 251%
It hasn't been the best quarter for RCE Capital Berhad (KLSE:RCECAP) shareholders, since the share price has fallen 11% in that time. But that scarcely detracts from the really solid long term returns generated by the company over five years. In fact, the share price is 140% higher today. We think it's more important to dwell on the long term returns than the short term returns. The more important question is whether the stock is too cheap or too expensive today. While the long term returns are impressive, we do have some sympathy for those who bought more recently, given the 15% drop, in the last year. With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. RCE Capital Berhad's earnings per share are down 3.0% per year, despite strong share price performance over five years. So it's hard to argue that the earnings per share are the best metric to judge the company, as it may not be optimized for profits at this point. Therefore, it's worth taking a look at other metrics to try to understand the share price movements. In fact, the dividend has increased over time, which is a positive. Maybe dividend investors have helped support the share price. The revenue growth of about 3.5% per year might also encourage buyers. You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). Take a more thorough look at RCE Capital Berhad's financial health with this free report on its balance sheet. When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for RCE Capital Berhad the TSR over the last 5 years was 251%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! We regret to report that RCE Capital Berhad shareholders are down 11% for the year (even including dividends). Unfortunately, that's worse than the broader market decline of 7.2%. However, it could simply be that the share price has been impacted by broader market jitters. It might be worth keeping an eye on the fundamentals, in case there's a good opportunity. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 29% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for RCE Capital Berhad that you should be aware of before investing here. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Malaysian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
