&w=3840&q=100)
Fed pause leaves Wall Street guessing when rate cuts might finally come
With Federal Reserve officials signaling an extended hold on interest rates, investors and economists will look to Chair Jerome Powell this week for clues on what might eventually prompt the central bank to make a move, and when.
A fourth straight meeting without a cut could provoke another tirade from President Donald Trump. But policymakers have been clear: Before they can make a move they need the White House to resolve the big question marks around tariffs, immigration and taxes. Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear sites have also introduced another element of uncertainty for the global economy.
At the same time, the generally healthy, if slowly cooling, US economy has few expecting a rate move any time soon. Investors are betting the central bank won't lower borrowing costs until September at the earliest, according to pricing in futures contracts.
'The safest path to take in that situation, when there is no urgency to cut rates right now, is to just sit on your hands,' said Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management.
Policymakers gather June 17-18. They'll release a statement at 2:00 PM Washington time, and Powell is scheduled to take questions from reporters 30 minutes later.
Difficult choices
The president's tariffs are widely expected to raise prices and slow growth, risks that officials flagged in their last post-meeting statement. That could eventually force the Fed to make a difficult choice as the economy pulls them in opposite directions.
'I don't think at this point there's anything to be alarmed about,' said David Hoag, fixed income portfolio manager at Capital Group. 'But the longer we have uncertainty — for the consumer, for companies in terms of planning — the more concerned I'll get about the fundamentals of the economy deteriorating.'
So far, however, the economy isn't flashing warning signs that would prompt the Fed to intervene.
The unemployment rate has held steady for three months even as job growth has slowed, in part because a sharp decline in immigration is also lowering the supply of workers. The longer the jobless rate remains stable, the longer the Fed can hold rates as a defense against potentially higher inflation.
Yet price data has also provided little to worry about. Underlying inflation rose by less than expected in May for the fourth straight month. Treasuries rose last week on the news, bolstered by wagers on more than one rate cut this year. The yield on two-year notes, most sensitive to the Fed's policy, declined by more than seven basis points on the week to 3.96 per cent.
Still, officials are likely to wait for additional months of data to understand how much of the tariffs are being passed on to consumers. Israel's airstrikes on Iran will raise additional questions. Fed officials traditionally look through energy price moves, but an oil price shock could affect inflation expectations.
Fresh projections
Fresh economic forecasts and rate projections this week could provide helpful guidance to how officials are thinking. They'll be the first since Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement of sweeping tariffs on April 2.
As analysts ponder the results, the range of possibilities is unusually large.
If officials predict that unemployment will rise this year meaningfully above the 4.4 per cent they forecast in March, that would suggest policymakers may cut rates before the fourth quarter, said Shah.
Some Fed officials, including Governor Christopher Waller, have already signaled an openness to cutting because they believe policymakers can view the expected impact of tariffs on consumer prices as temporary — as long as inflation expectations remain anchored. That aligns with market-based measures suggesting traders also believe the tariff price bump will be short-lived.
But should officials raise their expectations for inflation, that could reduce the number of cuts they project this year to one, from the two seen in March, said Matthew Luzzetti, chief US economist for Deutsche Bank. Strategists at Barclays warned of just such a 'hawkish' surprise in a note to clients.
Officials might also consider the substantial uncertainty over the final state of Trump's policies and simply leave their projections unchanged.
'I'd be surprised if the dots move much,' said Zachary Griffiths head of investment-grade and macroeconomic strategy at CreditSights. 'It's been a roller-coaster ride' since the Fed last released projections in March. 'On net, I think we're probably in a somewhat similar situation,' he said.
Late support
Some economists say the timing of the Fed's next moves will eventually come down to how long it takes for Trump's policies to show up in the economic data — and how strongly that raises concerns about a downturn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Hague NATO summit aims to focus on Trump's spending goal but Iran looms large
* Hague NATO summit aims to focus on Trump's spending goal but Iran looms large Leaders set to agree to spend 5% of GDP on defence * US strikes on Iran could overshadow gathering * Spain insists it can spend less than new target * NATO aims to keep Trump on board despite previous criticism By Andrew Gray and Sabine Siebold THE HAGUE, - The NATO alliance has crafted a summit in The Hague this week to shore itself up by satisfying U.S. President Donald Trump with a big new defence spending goal - but it now risks being dominated by the repercussions of his military strikes on Iran. The two-day gathering is also intended to signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that NATO is united, despite Trump's previous criticism of the alliance, and determined to expand and upgrade its defences to deter any attack from Moscow. The summit and its final statement are meant to be short and focused on heeding Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defence - a big jump from the current 2% goal. It is to be achieved by investing more in both militaries and other security-related spending. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, however, upset NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's preparations on Sunday as he declared Madrid did not need to meet the new spending target even as Spain approved the summit statement. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening - rather than a formal session with the leaders when they meet on Wednesday - due to his volatile relationship with Trump. The U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend makes the summit much less predictable than Rutte - a former prime minister of the Netherlands hosting the gathering in his home city - and other NATO member countries would like. IRAN INTRODUCES UNCERTAINTY INTO SUMMIT Much will depend on the precise situation in the Middle East when the summit takes place - such as whether Iran has retaliated against the U.S. - and whether other NATO leaders address the strikes with Trump or in comments to reporters. If the meeting does not go to plan, NATO risks appearing weak and divided, just as European members confront what they see as their biggest threat since the end of the Cold War - Russia - while bracing for possible U.S. troop cuts on the continent. Under the new defence spending plan, countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on "core defence" - essentially, weapons and troops - and a further 1.5% on security-related investments such as adapting roads, ports and bridges for use by military vehicles, protecting pipelines and deterring cyber-attacks. Such an increase - to be phased in over 10 years - would mean hundreds of billions of dollars more spending on defence. Last year, alliance members collectively spent about 2.6% of NATO GDP on core defence, amounting to about $1.3 trillion, according to NATO estimates. The lion's share came from the United States, which spent almost $818 billion. US DEMANDS EUROPE SPEND MORE ON ITS OWN DEFENCE Washington has insisted it is time for Europeans to take on more of the financial and military burden of defending their continent. European leaders say they have got that message but want an orderly and gradual transition, fearful that any gaps in their defences could be exploited by Putin. They are particularly keen to stress their spending commitment as Trump has previously threatened not to protect allies that do not spend enough on defence. A prepared text summit statement agreed by NATO governments and seen by Reuters says: "We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty - that an attack on one is an attack on all." As part of their efforts to keep Trump onside, NATO officials have shunted difficult topics to the sidelines of the summit or kept them off the agenda altogether. While many European nations see Russia as an ever-growing threat, Trump has expressed a desire for better economic relations with Moscow - a prospect that Europeans think would help Russia to strengthen its military and threaten them more. Similarly, many Europeans are deeply wary of Trump's moves to lessen Russia's diplomatic isolation as part of his efforts to secure a deal to end the war in Ukraine. The brief summit statement will include just one reference to Russia as a threat to Euro-Atlantic security and another to allies' commitment to supporting Ukraine, diplomats say. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran stands alone against Trump and Israel, stripped of allies
Iran 's leaders are discovering they're on their own against the US and Israel, without the network of proxies and allies that allowed them to project power in the Middle East and beyond. As the Islamic Republic confronts its most perilous moment in decades following the bombing of its nuclear facilities ordered by US President Donald Trump , Russia and China are sitting on the sidelines and offering only rhetorical support. Militia groups Iran has armed and funded for years are refusing or unable to enter the fight in support of their patron. After decades of being stuck in a game of fragile detente, the entire geopolitical order of the Middle East is being redone. The Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel was only the beginning. It led to multiple conflicts and tested decades-long alliances. It offered Trump, on his return to power this year, a chance to do what no president before him had dared by attacking Iran so aggressively and directly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your IQ Is 140 If You Can Answer 10 Of These Questions Correctly IQ International Undo Since Israel started strikes on Iran on June 13, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has spoken of goals beyond neutering Tehran's nuclear threat, even hinting at regime change. But the risk is that an isolated Iran could become more unpredictable with its once-steadfast allies keeping their distance. 'As Iran faces its most critical military test in decades, further tangible assistance from either Moscow or Beijing remains unlikely,' said Bloomberg Economics analysts including Adam Farrar and Dina Esfandiary. 'While both maintain bilateral strategic partnerships with Tehran, neither Russia nor China is a formal military ally, and neither is likely to provide significant military or economic aid due to their own limitations and broader strategic considerations.' Live Events You Might Also Like: Iran Israel war: Will Tehran be saved by 'Axis of Resistance' against USA? Iran isn't getting any support, either, from the BRICS grouping of emerging markets that purports to want a new global order that's not dominated by Western nations. The organization — set up by Brazil, Russia, India and China and which Iran joined in early 2024 — has been silent over Israel and the US's attacks on the Islamic Republic. Bloomberg Iran signed a strategic cooperation treaty with Russia in January and it was a vital source of combat drones early in President Vladimir Putin 's invasion of Ukraine. However, Russian officials have made clear the pact includes no mutual-defense obligations and that Moscow has no intention of supplying Iran with weapons, even as they say Tehran hasn't asked for any. You Might Also Like: Bombing Iran, Trump gambles on force over diplomacy Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told reporters in Turkey on Sunday he plans to travel to Moscow to discuss the situation with Putin on Monday. He can expect warm words and little practical support. That's a far cry from 2015, when Russia joined Iran in sending forces to Syria to save the regime of President Bashar Al-Assad, which was eventually toppled by rebels last year. Moscow risks losing another key ally in the Middle East if the government in Tehran led by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei falls. Yet while the Kremlin has condemned the Israeli and US attacks, Putin is distracted and stretched — militarily and economically — by his war in Ukraine. China, too, 'strongly' condemned the US strikes as a breach of international law. But it hasn't offered assistance to Iran, which sells some 90% of its oil exports to Beijing. You Might Also Like: Why some key Tehran allies have stayed out of the Israel-Iran conflict Iran's Gulf neighbors urged restraint and warned of potentially devastating implications for the region if Iran retaliates against US assets in the Middle East. Nations such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates spent months trying to use their geopolitical and economic heft to bolster nuclear talks between the Americans and Iran. In the end, the talks have been overtaken by military power. Iran's proxy militant groups are mostly absent too. Hezbollah in Lebanon, hitherto the most potent member of Tehran's 'axis of resistance' was pummeled by Israeli forces last year, much as Hamas was. Israeli strikes on Assad's military in Syria, meanwhile, played a part in his government's collapse. Hezbollah still poses a threat and on Sunday the US ordered family members and non-emergency government personnel to leave Lebanon. Still, the group's not threatened to back Iran by firing on Israel, as it did right after Hamas' attack in 2023. The Houthis in Yemen are an exception and hours after the US strikes on Iran, they issued fresh threats against US commercial and naval ships. Yet they risk another American bombardment like that one Trump ordered before a truce with the group in May. Bloomberg The Europeans, meanwhile, are increasingly irrelevant, in terms of swaying Trump and Israel, and Tehran. The UK, France and Germany have historically held an important role in the Middle East. They represented the dominant economies in Europe. The first two were colonial powers in the region and in the case of Germany, given its Nazi past, there was a strong pro-Israel voice. Both the UK and France have had to handle a vocal voter constituency that was pro Palestinian and complicated their messaging. That was not always an easy needle to thread. The current UK government is led by Labour, whose legacy was damaged by Tony Blair's decision to join US President George W. Bush in his invasion of Iraq in 2003. So for Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has finally wrested control of the country from Conservatives, there is no upside to supporting any US military involvement. Trump didn't seem to need it, and the UK was happy to stay out of it even though it has enough of a presence that it could have been useful. Europeans find themselves sidelined with little power to influence the outcome. At the Group of Seven summit, Trump put France's President Emmanuel Macron in his place for suggesting the US was working toward a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. That did not stop Macron from working the phones, but the harsh reality that has filtered through is that Europe has its own existential crisis much closer to home. It needs Trump to at least make a cameo in The Hague for a NATO summit on Tuesday and Wednesday. The organization's leaders want assurances the US post-World War II commitment to stop Russian expansionism still stands. Europe has provided back channels for Iran in the past. In a climate where Europe and the US aren't working together on Iran, it's possible some valuable diplomatic signaling may be lost. That's one side effect of the US going it alone and of Europe being a bit player, as the crisis in the Middle East deepens.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
After taking $60 billion from China, Pakistan offers critical mineral assets in Balochistan to US during Asim Munir–Trump meet
General Asim Munir's meeting with Donald Trump explored potential US access to Balochistan's mineral wealth, challenging China's dominance in the region. Discussions included trade, AI, and energy, signaling a broader strategic partnership. This move aligns with US efforts to diversify critical resource supply chains, mirroring a similar deal being discussed with Ukraine. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Balochistan: Rich in minerals, light on development Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US signals interest amid push to reduce dependence on rivals The deal with Ukraine Broader Scope of Cooperation Pakistan's Army Chief, General Asim Munir, recently held a closed-door meeting with former US President Donald Trump in Washington, where discussions reportedly included a potential offer of access to critical mineral assets in Balochistan. This comes after China has already invested an estimated $60 billion in Pakistan, much of it focused on infrastructure and mining under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor ( CPEC ).While neither side has officially confirmed the terms, reports in Pakistani media and statements in parliament suggest that Washington may now be exploring commercial entry into Balochistan's mineral-rich zones—long seen as strategically important and previously dominated by Chinese covering nearly 43 per cent of Pakistan's land area, is home to some of the world's most sought-after raw materials. These include copper, lithium, rare-earth elements, gold, coal, and chromite. Despite its natural wealth, the province remains underdeveloped and politically the centre of attention is the Reko Diq project , one of the largest undeveloped copper and gold deposits globally. Canadian mining company Barrick Gold estimates it holds 7.3 million tonnes of copper and 15 million ounces of gold, with an additional 8.4 million tonnes in inferred copper to media reports and parliamentary comments in Pakistan, the Munir–Trump meeting touched on strategic access to Balochistan's minerals. This aligns with the United States' ongoing efforts to diversify its supply chains for critical resources, reducing dependence on countries it considers adversarial.A Pakistani lawmaker also raised the issue in the National Assembly, indicating that General Munir's US visit may have included negotiations involving Balochistan's rare-earth reserves. While the US has not made any official announcements, the development hints at a potential shift in mineral diplomacy in the to its interest in Balochistan, the U.S. is also in discussions with Ukraine for a $500 billion deal focused on critical minerals. The agreement aims to secure vital resources such as lithium and rare earths, essential for U.S. defense systems, emerging technologies, and green energy solutions. Ukraine, with its vast mineral wealth, is seen as a key partner in diversifying the U.S. supply of these crucial materials. This deal is expected to provide significant economic benefits to Ukraine, attracting investment for its mineral extraction industries. Ultimately, the collaboration aligns with U.S. interests in reducing dependence on adversarial nations and enhancing global influence over critical resources essential for technological and national security has been a dominant economic player in Balochistan, investing in ports, roads, and mining projects through CPEC. China has invested nearly $60 billion in CPEC corridor in Pakistan, the majority of which lies in Balochistan. It has been involved in copper and gold mining, including earlier phases of the Reko Diq project. However, Chinese investments have faced setbacks due to rising attacks by Baloch separatist groups, who oppose foreign exploitation of local entry of the United States into the picture could complicate the geopolitical equation in the region and potentially trigger concerns in Beijing, which has committed billions in strategic Inter-Services Public Relations said Munir's discussions with Trump also 'explored collaboration in trade, artificial intelligence, energy and emerging technologies.' The statement added that both sides want broader strategic and economic ties, with Trump 'indicating a willingness' to deepen engagement across sectors.
