
'Two weeks of paternity leave is just too little for the 21st Century'
As a new report describes the UK's paternity leave policy as "one of the worst in the developed world", we speak to a new father, a campaigner and a business group to see just what the problem is.
"When my son was born there's a lot of happiness and joy, you have a newborn but this a huge change in your life," says Luis Palacio."You find yourself being tired, sleep deprivation and I also like taking care of the newborn, but you're still expected to do eight hours at work," the technical manager, who lives in Leeds, explains.Introduced in 2003, statutory paternity leave, allows most new fathers and second parents in the UK to take up to two weeks off work.Luis says although welcome, a fortnight is not enough time "to adapt" to the huge changes fatherhood imposes."Not only tangible changes in your daily life and routines, but the changes in your mental health."Two weeks seems too little for the 21st Century," he adds.
Fathers who are eligible receive £187.18 a week or 90% of their average earnings, whichever is lower.If a father is self-employed or earns less than £123 a week then he is not entitled to paternity leave.Some businesses may offer more generous policies as part of their benefits for employees.The statutory offer is the "worst in Europe," according to Alex Lloyd Hunter, the co-founder of campaign group The Dad Shift.Hundreds of fathers are expected to picket outside the Department for Business and Trade in London later calling for an overhaul of the UK's parental leave policies.Mr Lloyd Hunter says the average paternity leave across Europe is eight weeks on full pay.The most generous offer is Spain, which gives dads 16 weeks on full pay, while further north Sweden offers parents 90 days each and an extra 300 days they can share between them."There are loads of examples of how to do this well," he says.
Luke Charters, Labour MP for York Outer, agrees the system needs changing and has been advocating for a more generous policy."Those few weeks at the start of a child's life are just so important and form that bond and connections," he ssays.That is something Mr Palacio is also aware of."There are studies showing that if fathers don't get this bonding with their children from the beginning it can create a long term disengagement," he says.
A report published on Tuesday by the Women and Equalities Committee says paternity leave rules "entrench outdated gender stereotypes" and that "bold" action is needed - albeit at a steep financial cost.The Sheffield Chamber of Commerce, which represents businesses across the area, says the "growing national conversation around parental leave" is welcome.Chief executive Louisa Harrison-Walker believes proposals to support working parents could "offer long-term benefits" to both individuals and businesses."However, any changes to statutory entitlements must also carefully consider the financial and operational realities that employers – particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – are currently facing," she adds.Mr Lloyd Hunter says 90% of fathers want to be involved more in their children's lives and the system needs to "catch up"."Fathers recognise how important it is to be more involved in their chidren's lives."As a society we are blocking that by not updating a system that was built for an era that no longer exists," he addsA Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said the government was carrying out a review to see how it best can support working families."This government is committed to making sure parents receive the best possible support to balance their work and home lives," they said.A spokesperson added it was already in the process of ensuring dads no longer need to be employed for 26 weeks to be entitled to paternity leave.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU and Canada to deepen ties with new security pact
BRUSSELS, June 23 (Reuters) - The European Union hosts Canada for a summit on Monday designed to deepen their already close ties as both face increased geopolitical threats, including a more hostile U.S. president, Russia and Middle East instability. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa, who chairs EU summits, will greet Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney for a two-hour meeting in Brussels, a day before a NATO summit in the Hague. EU officials said the EU-Canada summit was not a "business as usual" meeting and marked a new era in bilateral ties. The two allies, who already have a free trade agreement, are due to agree to a security and defence partnership, the first the bloc has struck with a country from the Americas. The partnership will involve joint work on crisis management, cyber, maritime and space security, arms control, as well as support for Ukraine, which Russia invaded more than three years ago. It will also pave the way for Canadian companies to access the 150 billion euro ($172 billion) EU joint procurement programme SAFE. The two partners are also expected to launch negotiations on a digital agreement designed to shape global rules for data, such as on e-signatures and consumer protection or limits on spam. A draft of the joint statement refers to alignment of standards in digital regulation to make online platforms safer and more inclusive and AI systems more trustworthy, areas of regulation on which the United States has criticised the EU. ($1 = 0.8721 euros)


Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bank of England's Bailey defends bond programme after Reform UK criticism
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters) - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey defended the central bank's programme of government bond purchases and sales which has come under fire from some politicians for its cost. In a letter to Richard Tice, deputy leader of the Reform UK party which is led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage, Bailey said claims that the programme was more expensive than those run by other central banks did not tell the full story. Britain's government issued more long-term debt than other countries at a time when the BoE's bond-buying - or quantitative easing - was keeping borrowing costs low, giving the country a longer-lasting benefit, Bailey said. "Put simply, the cash flow cost of QE/QT is not therefore what it seems, and the outcome in these terms will be better," he said in the letter published on Monday. Reform - which is leading Britain's more established political parties in opinion polls - has said the government could save as much as 40 billion pounds ($53.6 billion) a year by stopping payment of interest to banks on reserves held at the BoE. Most of those reserves were created as a byproduct of the central bank's bond purchases which began in 2009 and reached a peak of almost 900 billion pounds in holdings in 2021. Since then, the BoE has sold much of its bond portfolio - known as quantitative tightening - and the programme is due to incur losses for the public finances because of a rise in interest rates and a subsequent fall in the value of the bonds. In his letter, Bailey said the bond purchases shielded Britain's economy from a string of economic shocks over the past 16 years. "It is easy to forget the severe problems we faced with these shocks," he said. "Although the counterfactual is unknowable with any precision, most estimates indicate that QE provided very significant support to the UK economy, protecting both jobs and tax revenues." Bailey said that ceasing paying interest on reserves was tantamount to increasing taxes on banks and would lead to lower interest payments for savers or higher interest rates for borrowers. He also disputed Reform's view that British banks were making excess profits. "Interest paid on reserves is not free money for the banks, not least as most of it is paid on to customers in the form of interest on their deposits," Bailey said.


BreakingNews.ie
43 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
PSNI disclosing information to inquiry ‘as quickly as it can'
The PSNI is disclosing information to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry 'as quickly as it can', its legal team has said. The pledge came after the overall pace of disclosure to the proceedings was deemed not to be fast enough by the inquiry's counsel. Advertisement The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous UK government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. Philip Henry KC, for the PSNI, said the police service had implemented a new team for the Omagh Bombing Inquiry review, adding that the organisation offers its sincere condolences to those who lost loved ones and its deepest sympathy to all those affected. However, he said there were significant challenges and limitations associated with old, outdated and non-interconnected information technology systems as well as paper records. Advertisement As an example, he said an electronic system that stores criminal investigation papers on the Omagh Bombing holds 26,000 documents of varying length and 2,000 exhibits. In addition, he said the 'magnitude of the request' by the inquiry to provide material in connection with 31 previous attacks and attempted attacks from 25 years ago is 'a huge undertaking'. 'It is important to emphasise that the PSNI is not offering this as an excuse. Rather, it is a candid explanation of what is involved, so that expectations are realistic as to how quickly it is possible to reliably meet the inquiry's requirements. 'The PSNI recognises that any periods of delay can cause frustration. However, the PSNI must also do the work properly – and it is being done as quickly as it can, and in good faith.' Advertisement Mr Henry outlined how it took over three months for three highly trained sensitive researchers to investigate the first three of 31 previous incidents identified by the inquiry. It was believed it would have delayed inquiry proceedings by several years if the PSNI did not allocate additional resources to the process. While the PSNI is also dealing with more than 1,100 other pieces of legacy-related litigation, it decided to reassign all its sensitive researchers who were working on other cases to join the work on the 31 previous incidents for a period of six months. He said this 'exceptional step' was done in the knowledge that it may impact on work on other legacy-related cases. Advertisement 'However, if it did not adopt this course then there would be a delay of several years in progressing the inquiry, which was unacceptable to the PSNI, unacceptable to the inquiry, and would have been unacceptable to the other core participants.' Mr Henry said it will not be possible for the PSNI to disclose all information in an open, public format but said the service would apply for restriction orders only to protect the public interest or national security and to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights. On the subject of making concessions, he said the PSNI will do so if it becomes appropriate but added that it was not possible at this point in time as it is still in the process of reviewing thousands of documents. Ireland UK government's approach to Omagh bomb hearing 'ri... Read More He also said the PSNI believed that the examination of the preventability of the bombing needed to be calibrated with reference to what was reasonably practicable in the circumstances. Advertisement He added that a fair and balanced examination would also have to look at other demands and threats faced by the police at the time. Finally, he noted that it is 'much easier to join the dots after the event, when one already knows the outcome' as he said the inquiry must be aware of 'hindsight bias'.