logo
‘Wanted him dead': Bali ambush survivor leaves hospital as manhunt continues

‘Wanted him dead': Bali ambush survivor leaves hospital as manhunt continues

The Age16-06-2025

Crime scene officers recovered 17 bullet casings from the villa, Ariasandy said, but no guns or drugs.
Radmanovic's wife, Jazmyn Gourdeas, who was also in the three-bedroom villa during the attack, told police she 'did not recognise the men'.
Gourdeas said she had fallen asleep about midnight in the locked villa before being woken by gunfire and her husband's screams.
Local media reported that Gourdeas covered her eyes with a blanket before peeking, and described the two attackers as wearing bright orange jackets and dark black helmets. Another woman staying at the villa with Ghanim reportedly heard loud bangs and saw the masked men fleeing.
Radmanovic and Ghanim had been staying at the villa in Bali for a couple of months with their partners and one other person. But police said the group had so far been uncooperative with detectives as Ghanim recovered. He was released from hospital on Sunday, seen being pushed out in a wheelchair with his leg heavily bandaged.
Ariasandy said police suspected the gunmen were Australians and that Radmanovic, rather than Ghanim, was likely to have been the main target considering the injuries inflicted.
'Based on the wounds of the dead victim, two shots to the left chest, they wanted him dead,' he said.
'Until we can ask [Ghamin] questions, we cannot verify the situation yet. It's an ongoing investigation.'
Ariasandy said Indonesian police could not seek assistance from the Australian Federal Police until they confirmed the identities of the perpetrators.
When that request is made, it will trigger a tightly controlled process in Australia, governed by long-standing federal police guidelines on crimes that carry the death penalty.
An AFP spokesperson told this masthead that the case was automatically deemed 'sensitive' because premeditated murder carries the death penalty in Indonesia.
Any co-operation requires oversight from a special 'Sensitive Investigations Oversight Board' and must be personally approved by an AFP deputy commissioner. The decision requires them to weigh the seriousness of the crime against the likelihood of a death sentence being imposed.
Loading
Crucially, if an arrest is made, the AFP would require direct approval from the minister of home affairs before sharing information with Indonesian authorities.
'The AFP has not received a formal request for assistance in this matter,' a spokesman confirmed Monday evening.
Gun crime is rare in Indonesia, and police said they were investigating where the weapons had come from.
'We are still investigating. Is it an assembled gun, organic, or hybrid? We don't know yet,' Ariasandy said. 'Investigators are still investigating the projectiles, and there will be ballistics tests as well.'
'Assembled' means crudely made local guns, 'organic' refers to guns assigned to police and army officers, and 'hybrid' means a modified gun.
More than a decade ago in Melbourne, Ghanim pleaded guilty to reckless conduct endangering life when he encouraged a friend to fire a sawn-off shotgun at a man on a street following a dispute between the pair regarding a woman.
The man shot that day in 2014 suffered 22 separate puncture wounds to his head, face, neck and abdomen, and some shotgun pellets were unable to be removed. Ghanim also pleaded guilty to growing 10 cannabis plants police found at his house in Lalor.
While on bail for that incident, Ghanim also scuffled with a Melbourne mechanic in October 2015 and fired a bullet that grazed the mechanic's head. Ghanim pleaded guilty to reckless conduct endangering life, firearms charges and aggravated burglary over the incident.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman kicked off Perth Virgin flight over bum bag
Woman kicked off Perth Virgin flight over bum bag

Daily Telegraph

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Woman kicked off Perth Virgin flight over bum bag

Don't miss out on the headlines from News. Followed categories will be added to My News. A 28-year-old Perth woman has been removed from a Virgin flight bound for Melbourne after starting a verbal altercation with airline staff. Australian Federal Police were called to a flight waiting to leave Perth Airport at around 2:50pm on Friday after a woman began to act erratically on the outbound plane, which had yet to depart its gate. Footage shows the woman verbally accosting a flight attendant, apparently over a disagreement revolving around her possession of a 'bum bag'. 'You're telling me to take my clothes off on a plane, f*** off,' says the woman in the footage, directing her vitriolic barrage towards a flight attendant standing in the aisle. An unruly passenger was escorted off a Perth flight after abusing flight attendants and causing a scene over being asked to remove a bum bag. Picture: 7News 'No I didn't say that … you had a bum bag on, in the event of an evacuation we need to make sure you're safe and everyone else is safe,' the attendant replies calmly. Another member of the crew then ushers the attendant away, before staff tell the woman the AFP will 'deal with' her. It is understood the woman was removed from the plane before it departed. An AFP spokesperson said officers escorted the passenger off the plane after she was 'allegedly disruptive and abusive towards cabin crew'. 'The Perth woman was spoken to and removed from the plane without incident,' the spokesperson said. The woman will be issued with a summons to appear in court at a later date. Originally published as Woman arrested after wild pre-flight Virgin freakout in Perth

Jennifer Cook: Woman jailed for bestiality, child abuse material offences wins appeal
Jennifer Cook: Woman jailed for bestiality, child abuse material offences wins appeal

News.com.au

time9 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Jennifer Cook: Woman jailed for bestiality, child abuse material offences wins appeal

WARNING: Disturbing content A woman jailed for having sexual intercourse with her mother's dog and accessing child abuse material will have four months shaved off her sentence after winning an appeal. Jennifer Cook pleaded guilty to one count each of using a carriage service to access child exploitation material, using a carriage service to transmit and make available child exploitation material, and committing an act of bestiality with an animal in April last year. A video of Cook engaging in sexual intercourse with her mother's dog was found on her phone as well as the phone of her former partner and co-offender Benjamin Day after their home was raided by the Australian Federal Police in September 2022. Cook had also accessed child abuse material (CAM) between 2020 and 2022, including animations or cartoons, videos, and a real image. Further details of the offending are too disturbing to publish. Cook was ultimately jailed for 3½ years, with a non-parole period of two years. She has since turned to NSW's Court of Criminal Appeal (CCA) to challenge parts of her sentence, arguing the judge made a mistake in determining the seriousness of the charge related to accessing CAM. A recently published judgment on the appeal confirmed that the statement of agreed facts incorrectly stated two images found on Cook's devices depicted real children when there was only one. While this was raised by Cook's counsel at sentencing and conceded by the prosecution, the facts were not formally corrected. Justice Stephen Rothman found this meant the sentencing judge determined the seriousness of the offence 'based on a mistake of fact'. 'It is unfortunate that the sentencing judge was misled in the agreed facts and the correction was not formalised,' Justice Rothman said in the judgment. 'A mistake of fact is an identifiable error and permits the court on appeal to intervene in the sentence imposed.' It was not suggested Cook or her co-offender had themselves filmed a real person being abused. Cook also argued in her appeal that her sentence was 'manifestly excessive' and the judge had erred in determining the threshold for a custodial sentence was met. Justice Rothman found the threshold was passed in each offence 'given the seriousness and depravity of the offending', even when it did not involve an image of a real child. The Crown ultimately argued that Cook's entire appeal should be dismissed, and if it was allowed, a lesser sentence was not warranted. Justice Rothman decided that Cook's original sentence should be quashed and a fresh one of three years and two months' jail, with a non-parole period of two years and 10 months, dated to March 25, 2023, be imposed. This sentence will be four months shorter than Cook's initial sentence. She will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2025. Justice Rothman noted in his judgment that Cook suffered emotional abuse and struggled with substance abuse and mental health disorders. Cook's co-accused has also lodged an intention to appeal his sentence; however, no dates have been set at the time of publication. He was charged with several bestiality and CAM offences and sentenced to an aggregate term of three years and nine months' jail, with a non-parole period of two years and six months.

Big win for woman after depraved act
Big win for woman after depraved act

Perth Now

time9 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Big win for woman after depraved act

WARNING: Disturbing content A woman jailed for having sexual intercourse with her mother's dog and accessing child abuse material will have four months shaved off her sentence after winning an appeal. Jennifer Cook pleaded guilty to one count each of using a carriage service to access child exploitation material, using a carriage service to transmit and make available child exploitation material, and committing an act of bestiality with an animal in April last year. A video of Cook engaging in sexual intercourse with her mother's dog was found on her phone as well as the phone of her former partner and co-offender Benjamin Day after their home was raided by the Australian Federal Police in September 2022. Cook had also accessed child abuse material (CAM) between 2020 and 2022, including animations or cartoons, videos, and a real image. Further details of the offending are too disturbing to publish. Cook was ultimately jailed for 3½ years, with a non-parole period of two years. She has since turned to NSW's Court of Criminal Appeal (CCA) to challenge parts of her sentence, arguing the judge made a mistake in determining the seriousness of the charge related to accessing CAM. A recently published judgment on the appeal confirmed that the statement of agreed facts incorrectly stated two images found on Cook's devices depicted real children when there was only one. While this was raised by Cook's counsel at sentencing and conceded by the prosecution, the facts were not formally corrected. Justice Stephen Rothman found this meant the sentencing judge determined the seriousness of the offence 'based on a mistake of fact'. 'It is unfortunate that the sentencing judge was misled in the agreed facts and the correction was not formalised,' Justice Rothman said in the judgment. 'A mistake of fact is an identifiable error and permits the court on appeal to intervene in the sentence imposed.' Cook challenged her sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal. NewsWire/Bianca De Marchi Credit: News Corp Australia It was not suggested Cook or her co-offender had themselves filmed a real person being abused. Cook also argued in her appeal that her sentence was 'manifestly excessive' and the judge had erred in determining the threshold for a custodial sentence was met. Justice Rothman found the threshold was passed in each offence 'given the seriousness and depravity of the offending', even when it did not involve an image of a real child. The Crown ultimately argued that Cook's entire appeal should be dismissed, and if it was allowed, a lesser sentence was not warranted. Justice Rothman decided that Cook's original sentence should be quashed and a fresh one of three years and two months' jail, with a non-parole period of two years and 10 months, dated to March 25, 2023, be imposed. This sentence will be four months shorter than Cook's initial sentence. She will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2025. Justice Rothman noted in his judgment that Cook suffered emotional abuse and struggled with substance abuse and mental health disorders. Cook's co-accused has also lodged an intention to appeal his sentence; however, no dates have been set at the time of publication. He was charged with several bestiality and CAM offences and sentenced to an aggregate term of three years and nine months' jail, with a non-parole period of two years and six months. Among his offending was exchanging bestiality and CAM material with Cook, according to Cook's CCA judgment. mental health helplines

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store