Labour council forces residents to pay its workers' parking fines
A Labour council has forced its residents to pay for its own workers' parking fines, The Telegraph can reveal.
Homeowners have been forced to pay for parking charges and other costs incurred by council workers after the local authority was unable to recover the funds from their own staff members.
The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham put the unpaid penalties on the service charge bills for residents of an affordable social housing development in the area.
The fines included the costs of council staff using the Dartford Crossing, which is 12 miles away from the borough and the development.
The Labour-run council acts as the freeholder for homes in the Weavers Quarter development in Barking, and contracts itself for caretaking, cleaning and gardening services.
The disclosures have put further pressure on Labour to follow through on its manifesto promise to abolish the leasehold system.
Matt Lismore, 30, a resident, said that he felt as though the council sees 'leaseholders in social housing as cash machines to be looted'.
The borough provided a partial breakdown of the service charges for the financial year 2022-23 following a freedom of information (FOI) request.
The documents, seen by The Telegraph, reveal that residents paid for two penalty charge notices (PCNs) for parking violations in October 2022, amounting to £65 each.
A lawyer working on behalf of the council in January of this year defended the charges being included in service charges.
In a letter seen by this newspaper, they wrote: 'Much like any private provider, the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham incurs various operating costs. These costs form the basis of the calculation of the service charge.
'Regarding parking charges, any driver who incurs a parking charge is expected to pay the PCN accordingly.
'There will be occasions where the driver does not co-operate, and an HR process will be engaged.
'Exceptionally, the service may pay the PCN to avoid further escalation and additional charges or vehicle seizures, and then seek to recover the cost from the employee. On some rare occasions, recovery may be impossible.
'These therefore form a part of the operating costs of the service. The total impact on leaseholders is negligible and de minimis.'
The FOI documents also show that on four occasions residents footed the bill for council workers using the Dartford Crossing in Kent, despite the bridge being located in a different county to the council area.
The council appears to have a Dart Charge account, which means that small vans pay £2.63 and cars pay £2 to use the crossing. Residents in the block paid almost £17 in charges for the year.
The council said that it would investigate how Dartford Crossing charges had ended up being added to leaseholders' bills.
When approached by The Telegraph, the council said that the costs relating to parking fines only equated to 62p per leaseholder, and would be 'offset' in the next service charge when the authority recoups the costs.
The Weavers Quarter was a new housing development that was completed in 2019.
Since residents moved in, service charges have gone up by over 100 per cent from £1,400 per year to £3,000, mostly as a result of insurance increases.
Other items listed in a breakdown of service costs includes £1,750 for bottled spring water, the use of which is not specified.
Mr Lismore, who is a Labour Party supporter, said: 'Barking and Dagenham council exploit the feudal leasehold system in a sinister fashion, using their position as the freeholder of affordable housing developments to plug the gaps in their finances, either by inflating costs or in many cases inventing them entirely.
'They see leaseholders in social housing as cash machines to be looted, an income stream to be tapped and maximised, a mentality that is simply incompatible with providing ' affordable housing '.
'At the national level, I am so proud of the Labour Party, who are getting on with the business of bringing the leasehold system to an end, but locally, too many councils are extorting leaseholders – an inconvenient truth we must confront and rectify.'
In the Labour Party general election manifesto, Sir Keir Starmer promised to 'act where the Conservatives have failed and finally bring the feudal leasehold system to an end'.
The party also pledged to 'bring the injustice of 'fleecehold' private housing estates and unfair maintenance costs to an end'.
Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, said earlier this month that the Government would ban the sale of new leasehold homes at the end of this Parliament.
The system would instead be replaced with 'commonhold' schemes, where owners will have more control over the buildings in which they live.
However, concerns remain among those who have already purchased leasehold properties, and what protections will be in place to guard against freeholder malpractice.
'Parasitical freeholders'
Harry Scoffin, the founder of the campaign group Free Leaseholders, said: 'Parasitical freeholders are the enemies of growth. It doesn't matter if they're an offshore shell company or a Labour local authority, vested interests are holding this country back. Densification is key to making our cities more dynamic and liveable. But service charge abuse is killing the flats market and our pockets.
He added: 'If Labour are serious about turbocharging the economy, they will prioritise tackling service charge abuse, including for leaseholders living under the rule of councils they control.
'To end two-tier homeownership, this Government must legislate for a mass shift to commonhold by no later than the second session of Parliament. If ministers don't put pedal to metal, they will go the same way as the Tories.'
A council spokesman said: 'The council does not make leaseholders pay for parking fines incurred by council staff and there is no direct cost to leaseholders for these two parking fines.
'The costs are not a direct charge but are listed as indirectly forming part of the overall operating cost which leaseholders contribute to. In this case, this amounts to 62p per leaseholder.
'Once the costs of the two PCNs are recovered, the indirect charge of 62p is erased and offset against the next service charge demand. This figure is applied to the caretaking service as the parking contravention was incurred by a council vehicle working for the leasehold estates.
'The council has a policy of recovering all PCNs incurred by its employees directly. In the time made available to respond to this enquiry it is not possible to know where we are in the recovery process for these two PCNs. To avoid confusion and provide greater clarity on leaseholder costs however the council will review its financial cost coding.'
'We are investigating charges relating to the Dartford Tunnel Crossing, this is something that hasn't been brought to our attention before.
'In relation to the service charge increase and in accordance with usual practice, the council is currently assisting the First Tier tribunal with that review.'
A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesman said that while they could not comment on specific cases, 'leaseholders should not be subject to opaque and excessive costs'.
He added: 'All variable service charges must be reasonable by law. We are implementing measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act to increase transparency of these costs and ensure leaseholders can better hold landlords to account.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Online attacks on MSPs cross the line of decent debate as hate almost triples
Even if we disagree fundamentally with some of our MSPs' political positions, they deserve to be safe at work, Record View says. The number of abusive social media posts directed towards MSPs has almost tripled in the past year. According to research, MSPs have been on the receiving end of 23,500 abusive posts – an increase from 8000 the 12 months before. No matter your views on the performance of our politicans, this is unacceptable. While robust debate should always be welcomed – and our MSPs should expect a fair amount of anger from constituents – this onslaught of online hate must end. Even if we disagree fundamentally with some of our MSPs ' political positions, they deserve to be safe at work. But it makes it almost impossible for them to engage with voters when they are on the receiving end of so much online abuse. Some will argue MSPs should just get on with it and these hateful messages are nothing more than keyboard warriors letting off steam. But we all know nasty bile poured out online can seep into the real world. We saw the worst of this in 2016, when Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered just a week before the Brexit referendum. If we want politics to make our lives better and spark real change, then we need to engage with ideas and real debate. We should disagree with our politicians. We should argue with them. We can think outside the box and put forward radical ideas. But the minute we start to abuse, threaten and hate those we disagree with, a line has been crossed. There is no excuse for it and those who engage in such tactics deserve nothing but disdain. Stay sun-sible Scots will be baking in the hottest day of the year so far today – with the temperature in Jedburgh set to top Tenerife. With the mercury soaring as high as 29C, many of us will be heading for beaches and parks to enjoy the great outdoors and a few drinks. With that in mind, many pubs are ordering in extra beer barrels to keep up with demand. But although the sun has been a rare visitor so far this summer, it would be wise to keep everything in moderation. Sunbathing, like alcohol, is best enjoyed with a sensible head on. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Health chiefs in Glasgow have warned sun-worshippers to keep hydrated and make sure to cover up if out in the heat for long spells. The warm and dry weather will also increase the risk of wildfires, so people are being urged to take care with open fires and disposable barbecues. Whatever you get up to this fine weekend, be safe and don't forget the sunscreen.
Powys County Times
4 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Creative industries to get £380m boost ahead of industrial strategy launch
Britain's film, music and video game industries are set to receive millions of pounds of investment as the Government seeks to ensure the UK's place as a creative superpower. The investment, announced by Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, will see £380 million spent on a range of projects intended to double private investment in the creative industries. Ms Nandy said the investment would 'boost regional growth, stimulate private investment, and create thousands more high-quality jobs'. The figure includes £25 million for research into cutting-edge technologies such as the virtual avatars used in Abba Voyage, and £75 million to support the film industry. It will also see £30 million put towards backing start-up video games companies – an industry worth billions of pounds to the UK – and another £30 million for the music industry, including an increase in funding for grassroots venues. Another £150 million will be split between the mayors of Manchester, Liverpool, the West Midlands, West Yorkshire, the North East and the West of England to support creative businesses in their regions. The announcement comes as the Government prepares to publish its industrial strategy next week, billed as a 10-year, multibillion-pound plan to back certain sectors and secure growth for the UK economy. The creative industries are set to be one of the winners, with a plan for the sector expected to be published alongside the wider industrial strategy. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'The UK's creative industries are world-leading and have a huge cultural impact globally, which is why we're championing them at home and abroad as a key growth sector in our modern industrial strategy.' But earlier this month, the Government also rejected a planning application for a major new film studio near Holyport, in Berkshire, over its impact on the green belt. The £380 million has been welcomed by the industry, with the Broadcasting, Entertainment, Communications and Theatre Union (Bectu) saying it was a 'show of commitment to the sector'. But Bectu chief Philippa Childs said creative workers would also be looking for 'sustained support' from the Government as the sector 'recovers from a series of external shocks'. Recent years have seen the sector rocked by Covid, the cost-of-living crisis and concerns about the impact of AI and Donald Trump's threat to impose tariffs on films made outside the US. Conservative shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew accused Labour of threatening the 'very survival' of the creative industries. He said: 'From their national insurance jobs tax to their business rates hike, Labour are pushing creative businesses to the brink, and we now know that Rachel Reeves has a secret plan to raise taxes – meaning things will only get worse. 'Labour must recognise that their economic mismanagement is dealing a devasting blow to the sector.'
South Wales Argus
6 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Creative industries to get £380m boost ahead of industrial strategy launch
The investment, announced by Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, will see £380 million spent on a range of projects intended to double private investment in the creative industries. Ms Nandy said the investment would 'boost regional growth, stimulate private investment, and create thousands more high-quality jobs'. The figure includes £25 million for research into cutting-edge technologies such as the virtual avatars used in Abba Voyage, and £75 million to support the film industry. It will also see £30 million put towards backing start-up video games companies – an industry worth billions of pounds to the UK – and another £30 million for the music industry, including an increase in funding for grassroots venues. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the investment would create thousands of jobs in Britain's creative industries. (Andrew Matthews/PA) Another £150 million will be split between the mayors of Manchester, Liverpool, the West Midlands, West Yorkshire, the North East and the West of England to support creative businesses in their regions. The announcement comes as the Government prepares to publish its industrial strategy next week, billed as a 10-year, multibillion-pound plan to back certain sectors and secure growth for the UK economy. The creative industries are set to be one of the winners, with a plan for the sector expected to be published alongside the wider industrial strategy. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'The UK's creative industries are world-leading and have a huge cultural impact globally, which is why we're championing them at home and abroad as a key growth sector in our modern industrial strategy.' But earlier this month, the Government also rejected a planning application for a major new film studio near Holyport, in Berkshire, over its impact on the green belt. The £380 million has been welcomed by the industry, with the Broadcasting, Entertainment, Communications and Theatre Union (Bectu) saying it was a 'show of commitment to the sector'. But Bectu chief Philippa Childs said creative workers would also be looking for 'sustained support' from the Government as the sector 'recovers from a series of external shocks'. Recent years have seen the sector rocked by Covid, the cost-of-living crisis and concerns about the impact of AI and Donald Trump's threat to impose tariffs on films made outside the US. Conservative shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew accused Labour of threatening the 'very survival' of the creative industries. He said: 'From their national insurance jobs tax to their business rates hike, Labour are pushing creative businesses to the brink, and we now know that Rachel Reeves has a secret plan to raise taxes – meaning things will only get worse. 'Labour must recognise that their economic mismanagement is dealing a devasting blow to the sector.'
