Nato summit shambles? US and Spain 'opt out' of new 3.5% spending target with fears of Trump no-show - and questions over how UK will find an extra $40bn a year
Fears are mounting over the Nato summit with both the US and Spain opting out of a new spending target - and speculation Donald Trump might not turn up.
The military alliance is due to gather in The Hague tomorrow evening amid chaos in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.
The US has been demanding member states ramp up defence expenditure to 3.5 per cent of GDP, with an extra 1.5 per cent on measures such as cyber security.
However, a draft communique appears to have pushed back the timetable for hitting the level from 2032 to 2035.
The language on the pledge has also reportedly been watered down from 'we commit' to 'allies commit', with Spain flatly dismissing the idea of meeting the goal.
Mr Trump himself has said America is not bound by it. 'We've been supporting NATO so long… So I don't think we should, but I think that the NATO countries should, absolutely,' he said on Friday.
The slippage raises doubts about whether other states will feel they have to stand by the spending target.
Countries such as Germany face finding upwards of $60billion a year more for the military if a mooted increase in the target goes ahead.
The increase in Italy would be equivalent to around $46billion, Canada $45billion, France £44billion and the UK roughly $40billion.
Spain allocated just 1.24 per cent of GDP on defence in 2024. That could have left it facing funding a $36billion boost despite having a relatively small economy.
But left-wing PM Pedro Sanchez said yesterday that it was only looking to hit 2.1 per cent of GDP.
'We fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defence investment, but we are not going to do so,' he said in a TV address.
The cash cost of the goal for each country have been estimated by comparing the Nato figures for spending levels in 2024 to World Bank figures for the size of GDP.
The current target is 2 per cent, which has not been met by all states. Only Poland currently tops the 3.5 per cent level.
The US itself spent 3.38 per cent on defence in 2024, although the sheer size of its economy meant that dwarfed contributions from the rest of the alliance.
Britain allocated 2.33 per cent of GDP to defence last year, and Keir Starmer has committed to reaching 2.5 per cent by April 2027.
There is an 'ambition' of increasing that to 3 per cent at some stage in the next parliament - likely to run to 2034.
Former UK national security adviser Lord Ricketts said any escalation in the standoff with Iran could change the president's plans
Nato sources told MailOnline there had been concerns in the lead-up to the gathering that Mr Trump might not attend.
The president exited the G7 summit in Canada early last week, snubbing a meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky - who is in London for talks with Sir Keir today.
Former UK national security adviser Lord Ricketts said any escalation in the standoff with Iran could change the president's plans.
The peer posted on X last night: 'Must be highly likely that Trump pulls out of the much-anticipated NATO Summit starting on Tuesday. And a racing certainty he won't go if Iran retaliates.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
NATO chief says Ukraine remains vital at summit despite Zelenskyy's absence from leaders' meeting
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte insisted Monday Ukraine would remain a vital topic at an alliance summit this week despite President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's absence from a leaders' meeting aiming to seal an agreement to boost military spending. 'You will see important language about Ukraine, including connecting the defense spending up to 2035 to Ukraine, and the need for Ukraine to stay in the fight,' Rutte told reporters on the eve of the two-day summit. 'This is a clear commitment by allies.' But the Ukrainian leader hasn't yet publicly confirmed he'll attend a dinner laid on for leaders attending the NATO summit, where his country has had a diplomatic downgrade from previous alliance meetings, even as leaders stress that their militaries need to muscle up to counter the threat of Russia. It's a big change since the summit in Washington last year, when the military alliance's weighty communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to NATO membership. But with Zelenskyy's relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump still strained since a testy Oval Office meeting earlier this year, finding a place for the Ukrainian leader at NATO's top table has proved a bridge too far. There are other meetings scheduled for Zelenskyy at the summit, but the doors remain shut to the leaders' working meeting Wednesday, even as Rutte acknowledged how heavily the war weighs on the leaders. 'Of course, the most significant and direct threat facing this alliance remains the Russian Federation," he said. "Moscow continues to wage war against Ukraine with the support of North Korea, Iran and China, as well as Belarus.' Rutte stressed that the alliance is underwriting Ukraine's defense to the tune of billions of euros. European allies and Canada, 'will provide over €35 billion of additional security assistance to Ukraine for the year ahead,' he said. 'So in a couple of months, we went from €20 billion to €35 billion. And I think that is great news.' Meanwhile, Moscow bombarded Ukraine with 352 drones and decoys, as well as 11 ballistic missiles and five cruise missiles overnight Monday, Ukraine's air force said, killing at least 14 people and injuring several dozen others.
Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Miscalculated Iran revenge move on US could spark all-out war in Middle East'
As the world braces for an escalation in the Middle East war and hopes US strikes on Iran will not spark a bigger conflict nobody can predict the outcome. An escalation is likely before diplomacy prevails but it is certain that the US attacks will affect the region for years. And that escalation is when world leaders become nervous, desperately trying to hold back the tit-fot-tat march towards all out war and trying to stop other countries joining. Here we examine the possible outcomes of this latest outbreak between the US and Iran, as Israel continues to hammer Israel and threatens revenge against the US. The worst possible outcome is least likely and that involves Iran declaring all-out war on America and Israel. This would happen if the Iranian regime miscalculated and goes too far when it makes a revenge gesture of reply to the United States. The problem is that US President Donald Trump has warned Tehran will be hit by far worse if it does hit US interests so that starts a cycle of escalating violence. I believe if Iran does something below the threshold for war then America may be forced to let it pass and give Iran that off-ramp, saving face and avoiding all-out war. That would involve a much wider conflict, sucking in US allies such as the UK and Europe, leaving Iran to persuade China, North Korea and Russia to come to its aid. The best possible outcome is Iran backing off and starting negotiations again, relative peace even though it means Iran would continue its occasional campaign of terror against America. Extremely careful diplomatic handling could mean Iran makes a gesture of defiance against the US, perhaps hitting a building or a site and not killing anyone. This would play to the nationalists screaming for revenge back home and if no American is killed then Iran may get away with it. But it is unthinkable that Iran will let the US strikes pass without a gesture of violence in return - and precisely what that will be will determine the next few years for the Middle East. There is a tsunami of back-channel negotiations buzzing away in the background between the US, Israel and Iran and the wider region. This may include Iran learning what it can and cannot get away with. Iran could opt to let this costly conflict rumble on for months even though each side is rapidly running out of missiles. I believe this is a possible outcome and will mean escalating Mossad assassinations and other covert operations against Iran, with Tehran hitting back with terror. Despite a huge security clampdown Israel could be badly-hit with terror attacks such as suicide bombs, other terror attacks and even kidnappings. This could involve mass casualty incidents and very easily could spread towards Israel's allikes such as the US and UK. This is perhaps a grey zone war fought in the shadows and would be terrifying for civilians in the west. Iran is very experienced at exporting terror on the orders of the shadowy Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. And it is equally good at persuading third parties to act on their behalf.
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Explained: How much can Putin really aid Iran's war effort?
Iran 's nuclear programme has come under direct attack by the US - and Tehran may be looking towards Moscow, one of its closest allies, for help. American forces directly struck three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Naftanz and Isfahan on Sunday morning. While the extent of damage is still being assessed, Tehran has warned that the strikes will be met with a strong response. US military bases in Iran's neighbouring countries are now on alert following threats by the Iranian leadership. On Monday, the Qatari embassy in the US warned its citizens to seek shelter, without stating whether there was any immediate threat. Iran has provided significant military assistance to Moscow during its three-year war in Ukraine, but how much would Russia actually be able to provide in return? Below The Independent looks at the decision facing Putin and why he may decide not to help Iran. Russia and Iran: a changing relationship The relationship between Moscow and Tehran has changed significantly over the past decade, most notably since the outbreak of war in Ukraine in February 2022. Traditionally, their relationship has been characterised by a mix of 'cooperation, competition, and suspicion', according to the Washington-based CNA national security think tank. This relationship notably improved from the early 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union and after the US-backed Pahlavi dynasty was deposed in the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Military cooperation notably grew during the 2010s, the CNA says. How Iran has supported Russia's war in Ukraine Since the war in Ukraine, Iran has become one of Russia's most crucial allies and provided Moscow with missiles and drones. In January this year, Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian and Russian president Vladimir Putin signed a 20-year strategic partnership, which was approved in May by the Iranian parliament. The partnership is designed to deepen their cooperation in defence, explaining that both countries will work together against common military threats, develop their military-technical cooperation, and take part in joint exercises. However, the pact does not include a mutual defence clause, meaning they are not obliged to come to each other's defence in case of war. Putin himself did not initially lead Russia's condemnation of the recent Israeli attack on Iran. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi travelled to Moscow to visit Putin on Sunday - just hours after US strikes rocked the nation. The pair held an official meeting on Monday. "The absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran has no basis and no justification," Putin told Araqchi at the meeting, adding that he wanted to speak about ways to calm the crisis. "For our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people." Kremlin refuses to commit to direct support Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov evaded a question on whether Moscow would offer direct support to Tehran. 'It depends on what Iran needs. We have offered our mediation efforts,' he said according to The Washington Post. Iranian sources told Reuters that Tehran was not impressed with Russia's support so far, without elaborating on what specific assistance they wanted. How much help can Russia actually offer? Russia has channelled huge amounts of resources, including funds, personnel and equipment, to its war in Ukraine. As Moscow continues an expensive and grinding war of attrition, it may not want to divert significant resources towards the Middle East. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) says Russia is not producing enough military equipment in order to train its vast numbers of new troops given its high fatality rate. High interest rates and bureaucratic issues are hindering Russia's ability to scale up its weapons production. The ISW also said Russia was losing vehicles at an unsustainable rate in the past two years, without the industrial capacity to make up for the scale of losses. But assisting Iran would most likely come in the form of air support. It is unlikely the conflict between Iran and Israel will become a ground conflict, given the distance between the countries. Tehran began supplying Russian forces with Shahed drones in 2022, but experts believe Tehran's importance as a supplier has declined as Russia has localised production. "The conflict will likely negatively impact the future provision of Iranian military equipment to Russia," the UK Ministry of Defence said on Thursday. However, Russia is now seeking to reduce its reliance on Iran-made drones, the ISW reported. Citing Ukrainian electronic and radio warfare expert Serhiy Beskrestnov, the ISW said Russia is preparing to build a new Shahed production facility, and warned that Russia strikes could soon incorporate up to 800 drones - more than double the amount which they typically fire each night. This means it may be possible in theory for Russia to supply Iran with some extra Shaheds - but given the Kremlin's maximalist goals for its war in Ukraine, it may decide to keep its added capacity for itself.
