US Security Cooperation in Mideast Must Account for Human Security: Col. Dahouk
During his speech at the annual National Council on US-Arab Relations conference in Washington DC, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State and Member of the Board of Directors of the National Council on US-Arab Relations, Colonel (Ret.) Abbas Dahouk, spoke about the US security cooperation in the Middle East.
Based on his long experience as a recipient of security cooperation in Lebanon during the late 1970s and 1980s, and then as an operator at the US military and US State Department for almost 30 years, Col. Dahouk explained what is security cooperation and how the US policy in the Middle East has changed over time.
Security Cooperation
'Security cooperation has long been a vital tool of US foreign policy and it's important for the US, especially in the Middle East region. Historically, this has been a source of strength for the US building a network of partners and allies, and addressing common problems beyond which the US may be able to accomplish its mission alone,' Col. Dahouk said.
Therefore, security cooperation is 'a way to ensure US superiority in this era of strategic competition,' he added. Col. Dahouk noted that the US traditional approach to today's security cooperation in the Middle East, which is a state-centric approach, 'is no longer sufficient to meet its stated objectives.'
Col. Dahouk thinks that the US security cooperation 'must account for a human security,' not just security assistance or government security, and 'local ownership,' which gives people some ownership of this security cooperation. This security cooperation must also account for 'a good defense government, in terms of effectiveness and accountability on both sides,' the US and the other side.
US Policy in the Middle East
Col. Dahouk pointed to the changes in the US policy in the Middle East over the last three decades. 'Over the last three decades, the US policy towards the Middle East has changed from dual containment of Iraq and Iran, under President Clinton, to 'regime change and democratization' under President Bush,' he said.
'And from pivoting or rebalancing to Asia under President Obama to burden sharing and somewhat pay for security under President Trump. With this administration, the main focus on security is what is called integrated deterrence strategy under Biden, where both the US and partners and allies have to work together to project deterrence against common enemies,' he added.
Defense Posture
Despite these changes in the US policy in the Middle East, certain constants remained unchanged, according to Col. Dahouk. 'One of them is the defense posture in the Middle East remains constant. We still have thousands of US forces present across the region, we still have forces right now in Syria, may be about 900, in Kuwait 13,000, the UAE about 3,500, Qatar about 8,000. You got Saudi Arabia about 1,000, Bahrain about 5,000, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan 3,000 and Libya and so on,' he said.
Col. Dahouk added that this posture 'accounts for about, in terms of statistics, about 50% of all global US force posture. That's before the Ukraine-Russia war. Recently, you have increase in posture for US forces in Eastern Europe and also in Germany.' The Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State noted that with this military presence in the Middle East, 'the US defense strategy is not pivoting or rebalancing to Asia in anytime soon.'
Furthermore, Col. Dahouk said 'we have witnessed 20 years and trillions of US dollars spent in Afghanistan and Iraq in 'nation building,' but ended up in unfavorable outcome for the US and also for the local populations in both countries, Iraq and Afghanistan. And it seems there are more bad outcome coming from Iraq and Afghanistan as well. So, that story has not ended there.'
Defense Transfers
During his speech, Col. Dahouk said that the other constant in the US policy in the Middle East is 'the high volume of defense transfers, in terms of articles and services, to the region.'
He explained that such high volume of defense transfers to the Middle East 'supports the US defense industrial base. So, the US has benefited from the defense transfer, companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and the likes.' Moreover, 'some of the defense advisory firms are also benefiting from defense posture and defense operation,' he added.
'According to the US State Department, the US defense industry directly employs almost two million people across the US. So, there is a job creation. These individuals and the companies they work for represent a key part of American entrepreneurship and innovation, also helping to maintain the US status as a world leader in the defense and aerospace sectors and ensuring our armed forces maintain their military edge,' Col. Dahouk noted.
Changes in the Middle East
On the other hand, the Middle East has seen notable changes over the last years. According to Col. Dahouk, 'Russia is back in the Middle East and re-established a naval base in northern Syria. They deployed over 3,000 of their proxy forces in Libya, through Wagner Group. They also increased their troop presence on the borders of Egypt and Libya. And they also secured a strong voice through membership of the OPEC+, thus influencing all markets perhaps production and prices,' he said.
Furthermore, the former US Senior Military Adviser mentioned the increased presence of China in the region. 'China also moved in the region in the last decade or so. China built their first overseas naval base, about $600 million naval base, on the Red Sea in Djibouti. And Djibouti is a member of the Arab League,' he said.
Col. Dahouk added that China is also 'selling armed drones and long-range ballistic missiles in the region. Armed drones and long-range ballistic missiles, we don't sell them to our friends in the region, so China has moved in and is doing that.'
China has also introduced 'its version of a 5G and 6G telecommunication technologies, which will cause a problem in interoperability between forces,' Col. Dahouk warned. 'If a partner country in the Middle East uses 6G technology, we, US military, cannot talk to them directly, so we cannot link a US system to a Chinese system. This basically narrow down our engagement in the Middle East as well because of the telecommunication aspect,' he explained.
Iran's Increased Presence
Col. Dahouk mentioned Iran as one of the countries that has increased its presence in the region. 'Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, is present and is also operating directly in 4 Arab countries. It is operating in Yemen, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. It is also indirectly operating or trying to hedge their politics in Bahrain, Kuwait and Gaza. Iran has targeted US troops numerous times to cause harm in Iraq and Syria,' he noted.
Moreover, Iran 'damaged oil refineries in northern and southern Saudi Arabia, and indiscriminately shelled population centers, including the city of Riyadh and the Holy City of Makkah. They also used drones against civilian airports, Riyadh and King Khalid international airport and also airports in the UAE and Kurdistan and Baghdad and also used it against flagships around the region,' Col. Dahouk said.
Short link :
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
State Department starts assisted departure flights for US citizens in Israel: Ambassador
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said on Saturday that the State Department has started assisted departure flights from Israel amid its conflict with Iran. He encouraged US citizens and lawful permanent residents in Israel and the West Bank, who want government assistance to department, to complete a form on the department's website. Developing
Saudi Gazette
4 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
US embassies must vet students for ‘hostile attitudes' but can resume visa appointments, State Department says
WASHINGTON — The US State Department told embassies and consulates they must vet student visa applicants for 'hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles' but said they should resume appointments that were paused in late May. The new guidance was sent to US diplomatic posts worldwide in a cable seen by CNN Wednesday. It says the vetting will look at student and exchange visa applicants' 'entire online presence.' Applicants will be asked to set their social media profiles to public as part of the new vetting, and the cable notes that 'limited access to, or visibility of, online presence could be construed as an effort to evade or hide certain activity.' It comes as the Trump administration has taken significant actions that are likely to deter international students from coming to the US. It has aggressively revoked student visas and specifically targeted Harvard University. The latest guidance 'requires consular officers to conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting of all FMJ applicants, including online presence, to identify applicants who bear hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles; who advocate for, aid, or support designated terrorists and other threats to U.S. national security; or who perpetrate unlawful antisemitic harassment or violence,' according to the cable. The guidance, which applies to both new and returning applicants for student and exchange visas, formally known as F, M, and J visas, calls for 'a review of the applicant's entire online presence – not just social media activity – using any appropriate search engines or other online resources,' including 'a check of any databases to which the consular section has access.' The guidance, first reported by the Free Press, does not give details of what constitutes 'hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' The cable says embassies and consulates should implement the new vetting within five business days. They 'should resume scheduling FMJ appointments but should consider the effect of this guidance on workload and schedule accordingly.' It is unclear if embassies and consulates will be able to process as many visas as before given the new vetting standards. They should prioritize expedited visa appointment requests for 'J-1 physicians (and) F-1 students seeking to study at a U.S. university where international students constitute 15 percent or less of the total student population, according to the U.S. Department of Education.' The new vetting, the cable states, is being implemented to ensure 'that aliens seeking admission to the United States are screened and vetted to the maximum extent possible and that they will respect the terms of their admission to the United States.' It notes that such vetting is particularly important for these applicants, noting that 'the FBI has long warned that foreign powers seek access to American higher education institutions to, among other things, steal technical information, exploit U.S. research and development, and spread false information for political or other reasons.' 'During the vetting, you simply are looking for any potentially derogatory information about the applicant,' the cable instructs consular officers, and says they should screenshot relevant online findings. Even if the 'inconsistencies or potentially derogatory information' does not rise to the level of ineligibility for a visa, 'you must consider whether they undermine the applicant's credibility or suggest that the applicant will not respect the terms of his admission to the United States.' 'For applicants who demonstrate a history of political activism, especially when it is associated with violence or with the views and activities described above, you must consider the likelihood they would continue such activity in the United States and, if so, whether such activity is consistent with the nonimmigrant visa classification they seek,' the cable notes. 'As Secretary Rubio has said, we do not seek to import activists who will disrupt and undermine scholarly activity at US universities.' — CNN
Leaders
4 days ago
- Leaders
US Military Preparations at its Peak: Col. Abbas Dahouk
Over the past few days, Trump has made several posts that suggest a direct US military involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict, which erupted on Friday, June 13, 2025. His remarks included that the US has a 'total control of the skies over Iran' and that Tehran should submit to an 'unconditional surrender.' Then, he said about the US striking Iran 'I may do it, I may not do it.' In this context, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State and Member of the Board of Directors of the National Council on US-Arab Relations, Colonel (Ret.) Abbas Dahouk, said that the Trump administration is preparing for a military operation while using coercive diplomacy. Military Operation Coming Speaking to BBC Arabic, Dahouk said: 'It seems that the Trump administration tries to gather all these elements to launch a military operation against the most fortified nuclear facility in Iran, which is Fordo.' 'But at the same time, the US continues to use coercive diplomacy to try to put pressure on the Iranian regime through the above-mentioned remarks, that the US is serious about the unconditional surrender,' he added. The Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State also suggested that the fact that Israel is dropping bombs on Tehran 'disappoints the Iranians and may push them to take a position on this war and take an action.' So, 'Trump's coercive diplomacy continues and at the same time, preparations go on,' he noted. Moving US Assets American officials told Israeli counterparts that the next 48 hours will be decisive, raising questions about what may happen. In the light of this, Col. Dahouk said: 'The military preparations seem to be at its peak. All these strategic assets have been moved.' These assets include refueling aircraft, US Navy destroyers and warships that have moved to the Middle East. Targeting Fordo All these elements come together to 'prepare for what could be a major strike on specific targets inside Iran,' Dahouk said. In case of US involvement, 'this engagement will be very specific and will target certain nuclear facilities, namely the Fordo nuclear compound, which requires US assets to destroy it,' he said. Moreover, US assets are needed to destroy 'the infrastructure related to Iran's nuclear program, an advanced infrastructure that contributes to building a nuclear bomb,' Dahouk added. Geopolitical Dilemma 'This requires a political decision. Trump has not decided yet on this operation, some elements in his administration want to destroy Iran's nuclear program once and for all, and topple the Iranian regime,' Dahouk noted. On the other hand, he said that other elements want Trump to fulfill his 'America First' promises and to not engage in new wars in the Middle East. Thus, it is a 'geopolitical dilemma' that Trump is trying to decide. But militarily, everything seems ready, according to Dahouk. Short link : Post Views: 75
