Storms plague disaster response agency
Hurricane season starts June 1 and runs until Nov. 30 every year. This is expected to be an active season, and follows at least two dozen landfalling hurricanes in the mainland U.S. since 2016.
News of Richardson's remark prompted outrage from former FEMA officials, Democrats in Congress and others concerned about the agency's ability to respond to disasters this year after more than a third of its staff was decimated by Trump administration and its Department of Government Efficiency cuts.
Asked if Richardson would like to respond, FEMA sent USA TODAY a statement attributed to an unnamed DHS official.
Under the leadership of Kristi Noem, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, and the efforts of Richardson, FEMA is "fully activated in preparation for Hurricane Season," the statement read. "Despite meanspirited attempts to falsely frame a joke as policy, there is no uncertainty about what FEMA will be doing this Hurricane Season. FEMA is laser focused on disaster response, and protecting the American people."
FEMA in the crosshairs
In a statement to Reuters, Representative Bennie Thompson, the ranking Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, said "disaster response is no joke."
"If you don't know what or when hurricane season is, you're not qualified to run FEMA," he stated. "Get someone knowledgeable in there."
FEMA's future has been uncertain for months and the apparent joke in Monday's meeting is just the latest incident. President Donald Trump criticized the agency on the campaign trail last year and has called for it to "go away." The president told victims of the Hurricane Helene-related disaster in North Carolina after his January inauguration that residents needed "a good state government" rather than FEMA.
Former acting administrator Cameron Hamilton was fired by Noem in early May after telling a House committee that it would not be his recommendation to abolish FEMA. After being appointed to replace Hamilton, Richardson told staff in his first meeting that he would "run right over" anyone who resisted change.
In its response to criticism of Richardson, the adminstration again complained about FEMA: "It's not a secret that under Secretary Noem and Acting Administrator Richardson, FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens," the statement read. "The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades."
Joking or not, cuts are real
One former FEMA official told USA TODAY on June 3 that even if Richardson was joking in the meeting, it's worrisome the staff couldn't tell.
"People were immediately confused," said Jeremy Edwards, a former FEMA deputy director of public affairs and now a communications advisor at the Century Foundation.
The staff has voiced concerns about whether the agency is prepared for what may come this year and "we've seen internal memos that indicated the same," he said. "They've fired or laid off 2,000 of 6,000 employees, and they've created a culture of fear and toxicity where they've administered lie detector tests to employees."
The current environment has prompted other senior employees to leave, he said. "How could they be prepared when they have top-level people leaving en masse? You're losing tons of expertise and knowledge based on the direction they're taking."
Also on June 2, Richardson told staff they were going to scrap a draft strategic plan that had been expected to be released in May and revert back to the strategic plan used last year, Edwards said.
The budget request put forward by the White House during the last week of May proposed cutting FEMA's budget by almost half from a year earlier.
Carrie Speranza, a disaster executive who serves as president of the USA Council of the International Association of Emergency Managers, said she's hopeful state and local officials can successfully make their case to Congress about the need to restore FEMA's funding.
"As the shock of grant reductions takes hold, remember this is a budget request. It is NOT the FY 2026 budget," Speranza said in a June 2 post on LinkedIn. "Think of it as the President's initial negotiation with Congress."
The cuts pose a "tremendous risk, degrading public safety and national resilience," she said. "My key takeaway? We're still in the fight, and it's Congress's turn to up the ante."
The administration's take on the agency's future
Trump's 2025 budget does include $26.5 billion in disaster relief, the largest request ever, Speranza noted.
During a June 3 briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said FEMA is taking hurricane season seriously.
"Contrary to some of the reporting we have seen based on jokes that were made and leaks from meetings, Secretary Kristi Noem and the FEMA leadership are all over this," Leavitt said. "They are committed to ensuring that federal resources and tax dollars are there for Americans in need."
However, she added: "The president has made it clear we're not going to enable states to make bad decisions with federal tax dollars and then have the federal government later have to bail these states out."
Dinah Voyles Pulver, a national correspondent for USA TODAY, writes about hurricanes, violent weather and other environmental issues. Reach her at dpulver@usatoday.com or @dinahvp on Bluesky or X or dinahvp.77 on Signal.
Reuters contributed to this report.
This story has been updated to add new information.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
US does not seek war, says Pentagon after bombing Iran's nuclear sites
The mission, called Operation Midnight Hammer, involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance, Mr Hegseth and US Air Force General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a Pentagon news conference on Sunday. Mr Hegseth said it is important to note the US strikes did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people, a veiled effort to indicate to Tehran they do not want retaliation on American targets in the region. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Mr Hegseth added. Mr Caine said the goal of the operation – destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan – had been achieved. US President Donald Trump earlier claimed the facilities had been 'completely and fully obliterated'. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Mr Caine said. The operation inserted the United States into Israel's war aimed at destroying Iran's nuclear programme, though the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran insisted the programme will not be stopped. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has condemned the US attacks, while foreign minister Abbas Araghchi warned diplomacy is no longer an option. 'This aggression showed that the United States is the primary instigator of the Zionist regime's hostile actions against the Islamic Republic of Iran,' Mr Pezeshkian said on Sunday. 'Although they initially tried to deny their role, after our armed forces' decisive and deterrent response and the Zionist regime's clear incapacity, they were inevitably forced to enter the field themselves.' Mr Araghchi meanwhile declared that while the 'door to diplomacy' should always be open, 'this is not the case right now'. Joint Chiefs chairman Dan Caine addressed the media at the Pentagon (Alex Brandon/AP) He added: 'The warmongering, lawless administration in Washington is solely and fully responsible for the dangerous consequences and far reaching implications of its act of aggression.' Satellite images taken on Sunday show damage to the mountainside at the underground site at Fordo. The images, by Planet Labs PBC, show the once-brown mountain now has parts turned grey and its contours appear slightly different than in previous images, suggesting a blast threw up debris around the site. That suggests the use of specialised American bunker-buster bombs on the facility. Light grey smoke also hung in the air. Iran and the UN nuclear watchdog said there were no immediate signs of radioactive contamination at the three locations following the strikes. It is not clear whether the US will continue attacking Iran alongside its ally Israel, which has been engaged in a nine-day war with Iran. Iran targeted Tel Aviv with missiles in the hours after the US attack (Oded Balilty/AP) Mr Trump acted without congressional authorisation, and he warned there will be additional strikes if Tehran retaliates against US forces. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he said. Iran's foreign ministry said Washington had 'betrayed diplomacy' with the military strikes, and that 'the US has itself launched a dangerous war against Iran'. Its statement added: 'The Islamic Republic of Iran reserves its right to resist with full force against US military aggression and the crimes committed by this rogue regime, and to defend Iran's security and national interests.' Hours after the American attacks, Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard said it launched a barrage of 40 missiles at Israel, including its Khorramshahr-4, which can carry multiple warheads. Israeli authorities reported that more than 80 people suffered mostly minor injuries, though one multi-storey building in Tel Aviv was significantly damaged, with its entire facade torn away to expose the apartments inside. Houses across the street were almost completely destroyed. Following the Iranian barrage, Israel's military said it had 'swiftly neutralised' the Iranian missile launchers that had fired, and that it had begun a series of strikes towards military targets in western Iran. President Donald Trump addressed the nation from the White House following the air strikes (Carlos Barria/pool/AP) Iran has maintained its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Mr Trump and Israeli leaders have argued Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon, making it an imminent threat. The decision to directly involve the US in the war comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel that significantly degraded Iran's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, and damaged its nuclear enrichment facilities. But US and Israeli officials have said American B-2 stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb that only they have been configured to carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground. Mr Trump appears to have made the calculation – at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republicans – that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear programme, perhaps permanently. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordo, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Mr Trump said in a post on social media. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordo. All planes are safely on their way home.' Mr Trump later added: 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!' Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks. US officials said the attack used bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, while submarines launched about 30 Tomahawk missiles. The decision to attack was a risky one for Mr Trump, who won the White House partially on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism. But he has vowed he will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon and he had initially hoped the threat of force would bring the country's leaders to give up its nuclear programme peacefully.
NBC News
28 minutes ago
- NBC News
‘It was our intelligence': VP Vance says attack on Iran wasn't based on Israeli intelligence
Vice President JD Vance tells Meet the Press that the White House relied on American intelligence sources when deciding whether to launch an attack on 22, 2025
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Plaid to PM: 'Don't follow Trump into Middle East conflict'
Rhun ap Iorwerth, MS for Ynys Môn, and Liz Saville Roberts, MP for Dwyfor Meirionnydd, welcomed Prime Minister Keir Starmer's calls for diplomacy and de-escalation, but voiced concerns that he had fallen short of roundly condemning President Trump's authorisation of US strikes against Iran overnight. The Plaid Cymru politicians said that the pursuit of peace should take priority over any UK loyalty to the US and warned against repeating history where the UK entered a regional conflict in the Middle East as 'America's puppet.' In a joint statement, Mr ap Iorwerth and Ms Saville Roberts said: 'President Trump's decision to launch US strikes against Iran is potentially catastrophic for an already destabilised region. 'Whilst Prime Minister Keir Starmer's calls for diplomacy and de-escalation are to be welcomed, it is concerning that he has fallen short of roundly condemning President Trump's actions. 'The pursuit of peace should take priority over any UK loyalty to the US. We all remember the disastrous consequences of being dragged into a regional conflict in the Middle East as America's puppet. 'It is essential therefore that Parliament has the opportunity to veto any UK military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict should Keir Starmer yield to any pressure from President Trump and propose some form of intervention. 'In the same way the US Democrats are divided on the issue, Keir Starmer may well face pressure from Labour hawks to follow President Trump's lead. 'Air strikes were launched against Syria in 2018 without granting Parliament an opportunity to vote on military action. At the time Plaid Cymru accused then-Prime Minister Theresa May of showing complete disregard towards democracy. 'We stand firmly by that view and reiterate our calls for restraint before more innocent civilian lives are lost.' The US strike on Iran has fuelled fears that Israel's war with Tehran could escalate to a wider regional conflict. World leaders have reacted with calls for diplomacy and words of caution. US President Donald Trump had said on Thursday that he would decide within two weeks whether to get involved. In the end, it took just days, and Washington inserted itself into Israel's campaign with its early attack early on Sunday, reports the Press Association (PA).
