Could Bitcoin Actually Hit $200,000 Before 2026?
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) trades for about $105,000 (as of June 19), yet credible analysts are mapping a route to its price surpassing $200,000 by the end of 2025. For reference, a 90% price gain to $200,000 would raise Bitcoin's market cap to about $3.9 trillion.
That target looks unduly aggressive only if you ignore two simple forces: a sharply lower trickle of new coins, and a sharply higher amount of institutional demand. Both are already affecting the coin's price right now.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Let's see what the numbers actually say and take a moment to understand why the forecast for $200,000 isn't unreasonable at all.
The supply squeeze is real, and intensifying
As always, understanding the supply and demand dynamics of Bitcoin is the first step to appreciating how responsive its price is likely to be relative to what buyers are bidding for it.
Every four years, the Bitcoin network halves the block reward, cutting the flow of fresh coins. The most recent halving on April 20, 2024, reduced the reward such that the total annual new issuance declined from roughly 328,500 coins to about 164,000.
With 19.9 million coins already mined out of a maximum of 21 million possible, new supply now grows less than 0.8% per year. In April 2028, the next halving will constrain supply even further, and that fact is something that most market participants are aware of already, implying that potential buyers have a significant incentive to procure their allocation sooner rather than later.
The tiny drip of new supply today is already meeting a hungry horde of demand.
Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have hauled in more than $46 billion cumulatively, including a six-day streak of $1.8 billion in mid-June. Those funds, institutional investors, and publicly traded companies together now command about 6% of the coin's total circulating supply.
At today's price, that capital removes roughly 360,000 coins from the public float, which is equivalent to more than two years of issuance at the current block reward. If the inflows simply persist at half their recent pace, the available supply could tighten by another 2% to 3% before 2026. And a shrinking float usually forces prices significantly higher because the number of willing sellers dries up faster than the number of willing buyers.
In other words, crypto market euphoria is not a precondition to Bitcoin soaring. The only needed ingredient is buyers who are willing to convert fiat currencies into ETF shares just a bit faster than miners are capable of creating fresh coins. And right now, that speed differential is widening, so the conditions are ripe for the price to squeeze upward.
Understanding the path forward
While supply dynamics explain why the crypto's price can rise, macro tailwinds explain why demand might keep accelerating.
On that front, U.S. core inflation cooled in May to its lowest reading since 2023. The Federal Reserve has held its benchmark interest rate steady since March; many investors are expecting that the Fed will cut rates a bit before next year. It's possible that lower real yields will make a scarce, non-yielding asset like Bitcoin more attractive.
Separately, regulatory clarity is also improving abroad, which will create more institutional buyers. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework began licensing major exchanges in mid-June, opening a harmonized 27-nation market. Clear guidelines for competition reduce regulatory risk and invite European pension funds and other institutional investors to buy in, many of which had waited on the sidelines.
Nonetheless, the path to $200,000 is not necessarily a straight shot, given the current geopolitical and economic instability, as well as major uncertainties in U.S. trade policy.
A surprise liquidity crunch, perhaps sparked by a geopolitical shock or a renewed tariff-driven inflation spike, could dull risk appetite and force some selling, which could temporarily damage sentiment about the coin.
Political risk matters, too. U.S. lawmakers still debate crypto taxation and custody rules. A hostile bill could freeze ETF creation or raise costs, muting demand.
Assuming no severe shock, however, the chances of Bitcoin surpassing $200,000 in 2026 look realistic, if perhaps a bit ambitious. If ETFs absorb another $50 billion of the supply by late 2025, they would remove roughly 475,000 additional coins from circulation at an average cost basis of $105,000.
The good news for investors here is that it doesn't really matter if Bitcoin passes an arbitrary price target before an arbitrary point in time. Since the biggest upside for holders is over the long term, not the near term, the smartest move here is simply to buy the coin and commit to holding it.
Should you invest $1,000 in Bitcoin right now?
Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Cybersecurity Stock: CrowdStrike or SentinelOne?
Artificial intelligence (AI) may have many benefits, but it's also making it easier for hackers, online criminals, and other digital malefactors to threaten businesses, and those threats are getting more potent. Keeping them at bay requires a lot of funds to be devoted to cybersecurity, making companies like CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) and SentinelOne (NYSE: S) excellent investment opportunities. But is there an advantage to buying one over the other now? How do these two approach cybersecurity? Both companies' base products are AI-powered protection platforms that analyze digital activity and learn to spot the threats among the normal activity. They deploy their software to network endpoints -- in other words, laptops, smartphones, and other devices that can access a client's internal network. By protecting these devices, companies make it harder for cyberattackers to gain access to their internal networks, where they might steal sensitive information, delete files, interfere with systems, or even lock them down with ransomware to extort payments from their victims. While endpoint protection is how both companies land clients, each bolsters its offerings with an array of other cybersecurity products that clients can use to create a protection suite tailored to their unique situations. Since these two direct competitors offer highly similar product types, it's hard to declare either a winner on this front from an investor perspective. Winner: Tie. CrowdStrike is much larger than SentinelOne From a sheer size perspective, CrowdStrike is the clear winner. During its fiscal 2026 first quarter, which ended April 30, CrowdStrike's annual recurring revenue (ARR) rose to $4.4 billion. SentinelOne's ARR of $948 million in its fiscal Q1 was less than a quarter of that. While size doesn't always matter, in this case, it does. Because so many more companies use CrowdStrike's platform, it's more likely that any given IT professional will have at least one contact already on its client list. If CrowdStrike is doing a great job with those clients, word will spread, and it will likely receive more serious consideration in future cybersecurity bidding processes. This advantage cannot be understated. Indeed, it's one of the reasons why CrowdStrike's growth has remained strong despite its size. Winner: CrowdStrike SentinelOne is growing more quickly than CrowdStrike, but just barely In terms of growth rates, SentinelOne is slightly outperforming CrowdStrike in this category. However, this should be no surprise because SentinelOne is a much smaller company. In fiscal Q1, SentinelOne's ARR rose 24% year over year, while CrowdStrike's increased 22% year over year. While I will give the point to SentinelOne, it's important to understand that CrowdStrike is growing from a much larger base than SentinelOne, making this close call all the more impressive for CrowdStrike. Winner: SentinelOne Neither company is massively profitable Due to its smaller size and focus on top-line growth, SentinelOne is far from profitable, while CrowdStrike has achieved intermittent profitability (although it reverted to a negative operating margin and a loss in its most recent quarter). S Operating Margin (Quarterly) data by YCharts. SentinelOne is far from breaking even, but CrowdStrike was in this same position about five years ago. There's no reason not to expect SentinelOne to follow a similar path to profitability, but it will take some time. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike should eventually turn a profit again, as it has proven that it can do that. Winner: CrowdStrike SentinelOne looks like a bargain CrowdStrike is leading this battle of the stocks so far, but SentinelOne is about to change the narrative with one jaw-dropping metric. CrowdStrike is the most popular cybersecurity stock in the market, and as a result, it has been bid up to expensive levels. From a price-to-sales (P/S) standpoint (the best metric to use to compare these companies since CrowdStrike flips between profitable and unprofitable, while SentinelOne is years away from profits), CrowdStrike has gotten far more expensive than SentinelOne over the past few years. S PS Ratio data by YCharts. CrowdStrike stock is now five times more expensive than SentinelOne, which is hard to believe, considering they compete in the same industry and are growing at nearly identical rates. This leads me to believe that CrowdStrike's stock has been overly hyped up while SentinelOne has been forgotten. While I'm OK with valuing CrowdStrike at a premium due to its market leadership position, this is far too great a premium to pay. SentinelOne is a dirt-cheap stock, and CrowdStrike is almost too expensive to consider. While I have been a long-term CrowdStrike bull, I'd be a bit cautious about buying the stock at its current lofty valuation. As a result, I think SentinelOne is the better cybersecurity investment right now. Should you invest $1,000 in CrowdStrike right now? Before you buy stock in CrowdStrike, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CrowdStrike wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Is Cathie Wood Actually Right About Tesla Stock?
Cathie Wood's Ark Invest has been one of the most vocal supporters of and investors in Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), and it's no secret in the investing world that Ark has a $2,600 price target on the stock for 2029. Still, what does that target mean, and does Ark's reasoning make sense? Here's the lowdown. Ark Invest's $2,600 price target The investment company's price target won't be "right," but then again, it's not supposed to be. It's an expected case scenario produced by a Monte Carlo simulation. In other words, Ark plugged numerous variables into an algorithm and ran a vast number of computer simulations to model a range of randomized outcomes. It's not necessary to get into the weeds about how these simulations are done; suffice it to say that on the bearish side, Ark's model shows a 25% chance that Tesla's stock price will be $2,000 or less in 2029, and on the bullish side, it finds a 25% chance that it will be $3,100 or more. Roughly in the middle lies Ark's expected value of $2,600 for the shares. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » The modeling itself is almost certainly wrong, simply because it relies on variables that are incredibly hard to predict. To illustrate just how challenging it can be to make accurate stock forecasts using this kind of simulation, let's revisit the predictions Ark made in 2021 and 2023 for Tesla's share prices in 2025 and 2026, respectively. Tesla's current stock price in 2025 is about $320. Data source: Ark Invest presentations. Tesla's stock price is currently far below even the bearish scenario Ark simulated in 2021, and it would have to increase by 806% to hit the bear case scenario for 2026 that was projected in 2022. All of which is not to criticize Ark, because modeling the long-term value of a speculative growth stock like Tesla is incredibly difficult. The point is not to take the targets too literally. But if investors can't take such price targets as gospel, is there anything to be gleaned from Ark's analysis? As a matter of fact, there is. Where Ark's model makes sense The key points from the model that investors can take away are the following: Tesla's share price is highly sensitive to the timing and scaling of its robotaxi and Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities. The $2,600 price target for 2029 assumes that at that point, 88% of Tesla's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) will be attributable to its robotaxi business, and just 9% to its electric vehicle (EV) sales. The message is clear: Don't buy Tesla stock unless you believe there's a good chance its robotaxi service (which may already be operating in its first market by the time you read this) won't be successful. Everything is riding on the company's robotaxi bet. Tesla's robotaxis Tesla's unsupervised Full Self-Driving (FSD) system is unproven, as is its robotaxi concept. Notably, it has yet to begin volume production of its dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Moreover, there are myriad regulatory hurdles and safety concerns to overcome. Simply put, Tesla's robotaxi business is risky. And if it fails, it will likely set Tesla back significantly. Buyer beware. That said, while Tesla is a speculative growth stock -- remember, buyers at this point are investing primarily for its robotaxi business, not its electric vehicle business -- it's a growth stock with a difference. Tesla continues to dominate the EV market, and rivals such as Ford Motor Company and General Motors, have withdrawn from the robotaxi race. The auto industry as a whole has invested billions into the various efforts to develop a fully autonomous vehicle, and Tesla has not been alone in overpromising and underdelivering on it. Yet Tesla is launching its robotaxi service, and it has the vehicles, the data hoard, and the cash reserves to make it work. It's also ideally placed to start producing lower-cost EVs (which can be used as robotaxis controlled by unsupervised FSD systems), and the company says it's set to begin volume production of the Cybercab in 2026. Where Wood might be right Ark Invest is correct that the robotaxi business will be the key to Tesla's longer-term valuation and also the future of the auto industry. If -- and it's a big if -- Tesla can get the technology right, then there's significant upside for the stock, because all the other operational ingredients are in place for the company to make it work. That's where Wood and Ark might be right after all. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $373,066!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,158!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $664,089!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
CTV QP: ‘We need to fight for every job in the steel sector': Minister Joly
Watch Industry Minister Melanie Joly on the comments about the recently announced countermeasures falling short against U.S. steel tariffs.
