Musk aiming to send uncrewed Starship to Mars by end of 2026
Musk presented a detailed Starship development timeline in a video posted online by his Los Angeles area-based rocket company, SpaceX, a day after saying he was departing the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump as head of a tumultuous campaign to slash government bureaucracy.
The billionaire entrepreneur had said earlier that he was planning to scale back his role in government to focus greater attention on his various businesses, including SpaceX and electric car and battery maker Tesla Inc TSLA.O.
Musk acknowledged that his latest timeline for reaching Mars hinged on whether Starship can accomplish a number of challenging technical feats during its flight-test development, particularly a post-launch refueling maneuver in Earth orbit.
The end of 2026 would coincide with a slim window that occurs once every two years when Mars and Earth align around the sun for the closest trip between the two planets, which would take seven to nine months to transit by spacecraft.
Musk gave his company a 50-50 chance of meeting that deadline. If Starship were not ready by that time, SpaceX would wait another two years before trying again, Musk suggested in the video.
The first flight to Mars would carry a simulated crew consisting of one or more robots of the Tesla-built humanoid Optimus design, with the first human crews following in the second or third landings. Musk said he envisioned eventually launching 1,000 to 2,000 ships to Mars every two years to quickly establish a self-sustaining permanent human settlement.
NASA is currently aiming to return humans to the surface of the moon aboard Starship as early as 2027 – more than 50 years after its last manned lunar landings of the Apollo era – as a stepping stone toward ultimately launching astronauts to Mars sometime in the 2030s.
Musk, who has advocated for a more Mars-focused human spaceflight program, has previously said he was aiming to send an unmanned SpaceX vehicle to the red planet as early as 2018 and was targeting 2024 to launch a first crewed mission there.
The SpaceX founder was scheduled to deliver a livestream presentation billed as 'The Road to Making Life Multiplanetary' from the company's Starbase, Texas, launch site on Tuesday night, following a ninth test flight of Starship that evening.
But the webcast was canceled without notice after Starship spun out of control and disintegrated in a fireball about 30 minutes after launch and roughly halfway through its flight path without achieving some of its most important test goals.
Two preceding test flights in January and March failed in more spectacular fashion, with the spacecraft blowing to pieces on ascent moments after liftoff, raining debris over parts of the Caribbean and forcing scores of commercial jetliners to change course as a precaution.
Musk shrugged off the latest mishap on Tuesday with a brief post on X, saying it produced a lot of 'good data to review' and promising a faster launch 'cadence' for the next several test flights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
12 hours ago
- eNCA
Tesla to build first grid-scale power plant in China
NEW YORK - Tesla announced that it signed an agreement to build its first grid-scale energy storage power station project in mainland China. The project will help with the flexible adjustment of grid resources, and "effectively solve pressures relating to urban power supply," Tesla said in a post to the Chinese social media platform Weibo. "After completion, this project is expected to become the largest grid-side energy storage project in China," Tesla added. Such energy storage systems help to enhance stability in the electricity grid at a time when there are greater supplies of solar and wind power. Chinese media outlet Yicai reported that Tesla Shanghai, Shanghai authorities and China Kangfu International Leasing Co. held a signing ceremony Friday for the project. It added that the deal involved investments of 4 billion yuan ($560 million). The contract comes at a moment of tension between Washington and Beijing, with the two sides yet to hash out a long-term trade agreement following tariffs announced by President Donald Trump.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Weekly economic wrap: Bad news for oil prices, rand soldiers on
While the week was uneventful on the local economic front, the same cannot be said for the international picture for oil prices. As expected, the week brought bad news for oil, but thankfully not such bad news for the rand as Israel and Iran entered a full-blown war after Israel struck Iran's nuclear facilities last week. Closer to home, inflation remained the same in May, while retail sales showed a solid performance in April. Lisette IJssel de Schepper, chief economist at the Bureau for Economic Research (BER), points out that so far none of the global superpowers has directly become involved in the Israel-Iran war, with US president Donald Trump saying that he will decide in the next two weeks what to do, although he already approved attack plans. 'In commodity markets, there is good news with a higher platinum price and bad news with a higher oil price for South Africa's trade dynamics. The platinum price jumped to a more than 10-year high this week, supported by demand from China, sustained investor interest and concerns about a deficit in the market, with demand outstripping supply. 'On a negative note, the oil price surged higher this week and is currently almost 20% above the price at the start of the month. Iran directly supplies about 3 million barrels of oil to the market per day, and this could technically easily be made up by a country like Saudi Arabia, which is still voluntarily cutting back production. 'However, the real concern is that freight in the Strait of Hormuz, which channels about 15% of the world's oil and 20% of liquid natural gas, is disrupted. Oil continues to flow, but prices to charter large oil tankers sailing through the strait have already more than doubled from last week.' ALSO READ: What Israel–Iran conflict means for South African economy Oil prices surge as Israel-Iran war heats up Bianca Botes, director at Citadel Global, agrees that the recent outbreak of war between Israel and Iran has significantly unsettled global energy markets, with profound implications for oil prices, the global economy, and Middle Eastern power dynamics. 'This escalation triggered immediate volatility in oil markets, with Brent Crude and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) prices surging by over 4% from the start of the conflict, seeing Brent reaching around $76/barrel and WTI surpassing $75/barrel. Since the start of the conflict, oil futures have risen approximately 10%, reflecting market anxiety over potential supply disruptions. 'Iran is OPECʼs third-largest oil producer, extracting about three million barrels per day. Despite sanctions limiting its exports, Iran remains a significant player, especially in supplying China and India. The conflict threatens Iranian oil production and shipping routes, notably the Strait of Hormuz.' Botes points out that analysts warn that oil prices could spike to $100 per barrel or even $120 per barrel if supply through the Strait of Hormuz is disrupted. 'Such a price shock would reverberate through global markets, impacting inflation, consumer costs, and economic growth worldwide. 'Brent Crude Oil futures fell below $73/barrel, but are still set for a third consecutive weekly gain. Fears of supply disruptions due to the ongoing conflict supported prices, even as Iran continues to export crude at high levels. A sharp drop in US crude inventories earlier in the week also helped keep oil prices elevated.' She says gold prices dropped below $3 360/ounce, nearing a one-week low and heading for their first weekly decline in three weeks. 'Investors have been selling gold to cover losses in other markets, and the prospect of no or gradual interest rate cuts limited gold's appeal.' ALSO READ: Israel vs Iran: Why you may soon have to pay more for petrol in South Africa The rand soldiers on De Schepper says the rand exchange rate held up well during the week, but depreciated slightly against a stronger dollar on Thursday and closed the week weaker against the dollar, euro, and pound. Botes notes that the rand is bouncing between R17.90/$ and R18.10/$, showing a slight weakening trend since its recent rally. 'The rand's performance was largely influenced by global risk sentiment and fluctuations in commodity prices. 'Compared to other emerging market currencies, the rand has held up well in recent sessions, despite ongoing uncertainty in global markets and the impact of international developments on investor appetite for risk assets.' Busisiwe Nkonki and Isaac Matshego, economists at the Nedbank Group Economic Unit, point out that the rand broke through R18/$, dropping to its lowest level since the second week of May as global risk aversion spiked and investors dumped emerging market assets. 'The local currency touched R18.15/$ on Thursday evening before recovering to around R18.01 this morning, down 1.2% from R17.80 on Monday.' The rand was trading at R17.99/$ this afternoon. ALSO READ: Inflation unchanged in May at 2.8% as economists expected Inflation remains at 2.8% in May According to the latest release from Statistics SA, inflation stayed below 3% in May at 2.8%, the same as in April. The largest contributions came from food and non-alcoholic beverages, which increased by 4.8%, primarily driven by higher meat prices. Katrien Smuts, economist at the BER, says while the recent foot and mouth disease outbreak put pressure on red meat prices, it was not the sole driver. 'Prices were already trending upward for several months and some analysts suggest the impact may be short-lived. Outbreaks often lead to export bans, which can increase local supply and place downward pressure on domestic prices. 'The ban on poultry imports from Brazil, due to an avian influenza outbreak, is expected to be temporary and limited to affected areas. While Brazil is a key poultry supplier to SA, the impact is also only expected to be short-lived.' Nkonki and Matshego say inflation remaining steady at 2.8% in May was in line with market expectations but higher than their 2.3% forecast. 'The primary contributor was food prices, although increases in housing, utilities and alcoholic beverages also played significant roles. Despite ongoing downward pressure from fuel prices, persistent price increases in other sectors shaped the overall inflation landscape.' Mamello Matikinca-Ngwenya, Siphamandla Mkhwanazi, Thanda Sithole and Koketso Mano, economists at FNB, note that fuel prices dropped sharply, but warn that risks from a weaker rand and rising global oil prices could reverse this trend. 'Despite current disinflation, geopolitical tensions and trade uncertainty ahead of the July Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting suggest that the South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) will likely maintain a cautious stance and hold rates.' ALSO READ: China's clever trade deal with Africa – removal of tariffs on most goods Increase in retail sales in April, but motor trade decreases Statistics SA's latest retail trade sales data showed another solid performance in April, with sales increasing by 0.9% compared to March and 5.1% compared to a year ago. The main driver of growth was the general dealers' category, which increased by 5.3%. Despite another steep annual decline of 6.5%, wholesale trade sales perked up by 0.9% compared to March. However, motor trade sales decreased by 1% compared to March and by 0.9% compared to a year ago. Smuts says while the muted inflation print provides some welcome relief and April retail sales showed the consumer has some strength, the question is how long this can be sustained. 'Real incomes are squeezed amid unchanged personal income tax brackets, a pending electricity tariff hike in July and an increase in the fuel levy.' Nkonki and Matshego expect the upward momentum in retail sales to continue, supported by rising real incomes, subdued inflation, continued withdrawals of contractual savings and lower debt servicing costs compared to a year ago. Matikinca-Ngwenya, Mkhwanazi, Sithole and Mano point out that despite April's strong performance, retail activity over the past three months remains 0.5% lower compared to the preceding three-month period, suggesting that household spending may be losing momentum. 'The spike in annual sales likely reflects holiday-related spending and two-pot pension withdrawals coinciding with the new tax season.'
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
How Tesla plans to remotely operate its robotaxis — and where the limits lie
Tesla is expected to tiptoe into its long-awaited robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, as soon as Sunday with about 10 of its Model Y SUVs that will operate within strict limits. CEO Elon Musk has said the company is being 'super paranoid' about safety and that humans will remotely monitor the fleet. Remote access and control — known in the industry as 'teleoperation' — is used in varying degrees by the handful of robotaxi start-ups operating around the globe. The technology has clear advantages and important limitations. Here are some details of how it works: What is teleoperation? Teleoperation is the control of machines by humans in a different location, usually over a wireless network. It is used to train robots to operate autonomously, monitor their autonomous activity and take over when required. How do robotaxi operators use teleoperation? The global robotaxi industry is still in test mode, as companies deploy the vehicles in limited geographic areas and continually adjust the artificial intelligence software that controls them. Teleoperation is often used to intervene when a vehicle is unsure of what to do. Alphabet's Waymo, for example, has a team of human 'fleet response' agents who respond to questions from the Waymo Driver — its bot. 'Much like phone-a-friend, when the Waymo vehicle encounters a particular situation on the road, the autonomous driver can reach out to a human fleet response agent for additional information,' Waymo said in a blog post last year. Former Waymo CEO John Krafcik told Reuters, 'the cars aren't being actively monitored,' adding that the software is 'the ultimate decisionmaker'. A Waymo video shows a car asking a remote operator whether a street with emergency response vehicles is open to traffic. When the human says yes, the vehicle proceeds. In contrast, other companies, such as Baidu's Apollo Go in China, have used fully remote backup drivers who can step in to virtually drive the vehicles. Baidu declined to comment. What are the limitations? Driving vehicles remotely on public roads has a major potential problem: it relies on cellular data connections that can drop or operate with a lag, disconnecting the vehicle from the remote driver in dangerous situations. Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, said that approach could work for a small test deployment of 10 vehicles, such as Tesla's initial effort in Austin, but he called teleoperation 'inherently unreliable technology'. 'Eventually you will lose connection at exactly the worst time,' he said. 'If they've done their homework, this won't ever happen for 10 cars. With a million cars, it's going to happen every day.' Former Waymo CEO Krafcik agreed, adding that the time delay in cell signal makes remote driving 'very risky'. On the other hand, relying on the vehicle to reach out for help and allowing the vehicle to be the decisionmaker are risky as well, Koopman said, as it does not guarantee the vehicle will make the right decision. Waymo declined to comment on the limitations of its approach. Koopman also noted there are limits to how many vehicles one person can safely monitor. A group of Democratic Texas legislators asked Tesla on Wednesday to delay its robotaxi launch until September, when a new autonomous-driving law is scheduled to take effect. The Austin-area legislators said in a letter that delaying the launch 'is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations'. What is Tesla's approach? Musk for years has promised, without delivering, that its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) advanced driver assistance software would graduate to completely self-driving and control robotaxis. This year, he said Tesla would roll out a paid service in Austin underpinned by an 'unsupervised' version of the software. 'Teslas will be in the wild, with no one in them, in June, in Austin,' Musk told analysts and investors in January. In May, he told CNBC the robotaxi would only operate in parts of Austin that are safe for it, would avoid difficult intersections, and would use humans to monitor the vehicles. What those teleoperators will do is not clear. For years inside Tesla, company executives have expected to use teleoperators who could take over in case of trouble, said one person familiar with the matter. For instance, if a robotaxi were stuck in a crowded pedestrian area and confused about what to do next, a human teleoperator could take over and guide it, the source said. Tesla advertised for teleoperation positions, saying the company needs the ability to 'access and control' autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots remotely. Such employees can 'remotely perform complex and intricate tasks', it said in the advertisements. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.
