Is this Gentle Jim's JFK moment? If it is, he's overlooked one thing
The request for reporters' self-restraint? He asked that the media abandon a standard form of questioning which he called the 'rule-in-rule-out game'. This happens when a minister is thought to be considering a particular policy and before the minister has had a chance to develop the policy or test it with the cabinet colleagues.
An interviewer will ask the health minister, for instance: 'Are you going to put a tax on the sugar content of processed foods?' The minister, who has a background in metallurgy and a weekend interest in ferret racing, hasn't decided yet so she says she has no such plan in mind. 'So will you rule it out?' The minister feels pressure to give a premature commitment or a panicked rejection.
The journalist is merely trying to get a story. A clear yes or no. But, as Chalmers said, 'limiting ourselves to ruling things in or out forever has a cancerous effect on policy debates'.
And the plea to the privileged and powerful to put self-interest aside? 'Too often, the loudest calls for economic reform in the abstract come from the noisiest opponents of actual reform in the specific.'
For example, everyone agrees that tax reform is important. But if a government devises a tax reform plan that would be good for the nation overall yet require some contribution from the powerful, woe betide it. It will be furiously opposed by every premier whose state might receive a dollar less, by any industry whose companies might pay a dollar more, and any section of the wealth-management class whose tax advantages might retreat by one cent in the dollar.
A case in point. The Australian newspaper and The Australian Financial Review for years have issued stentorian demands that Labor do more to balance the budget. Yet when Chalmers proposed a reduction in the tax concession for earnings on superannuation balances over $3 million, the papers led a hysterical campaign against the change. Even though it would raise $2.3 billion a year. And the only people contributing would still be hanging onto a substantial tax concession plus their $3 million or more.
Loading
Through sheer hyperventilation, these supposedly serious newspapers managed to mobilise much of the country's media in a witless defence of the exorbitant tax privileges of just 80,000 of the richest people in the world. Of these, incidentally, 30 have super balances of $100 million or more. This is no longer a retirement savings vehicle; for the rich, it's a tax shelter. The screams of entitled rage against this proposed change, a minimalist piece of housekeeping, are nauseating. The median Australian worker has a super balance under $100,000.
Asking the powerful and the privileged to set self-interest aside will be the hardest part of Chalmers' experiment, and probably impossible. The opposition says it will work constructively with the government, but ultimately will oppose.
Is it any surprise that Chalmers wants to test the waters before he takes the plunge? 'Let's see what we can do together if we reset and renew the national reform conversation,' he said at the Press Club.
'I am personally willing to grasp the nettle, to use an old saying. I am prepared to do my bit.' He promised that any proposals would be approached from the political centre, with no ideological tests applied. 'The government is prepared to do its bit. And what we'll find out in the course of the next few months is whether everyone is prepared to do their bit as well.'
Loading
The Albanese government routinely is described as timid. Chalmers dismissed that criticism by reciting dozens of policy actions in progress. He did reinforce Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's emphasis that the government's priority is to deliver on its election promises. But then Chalmers broke new ground:
'Delivering our commitments,' he said 'is the best place to start – but it's not the limit of our ambitions. They're a foundation not a destination.'
And he offered this trade-off: 'Let's see what we can achieve together if we dial up the ambition a bit and dial down the rancour a bit as well.'
With those two requests for self-restraint, Chalmers also has given himself two easy outs. If the media insists on playing the rule-in-rule-out game, he can shut down an interview or reject a line of questioning. If lobby groups or industry associations simply make self-interested demands, he can shrug and walk away from the entire exercise.
Is this really leadership? Is this actually 'visionary'? Or is this a feeble feeler that will retract into defeat at the first real resistance? Paul Keating jolted the country out of its customary torpor by warning that Australia was going to become a 'banana republic' if it failed to mend its way. The Hawke-Keating reform era began.
Loading
Chalmers, too, issued warnings. 'Our budget is stronger, but not yet sustainable enough. Our economy is growing, but not productive enough. It's resilient, but not resilient enough – in the face of all this global economic volatility.' He's seeking ideas for policies that will contribute to solving this ménage à trois of mediocrity.
Gentle Jim's earnest anxiety doesn't compare with Old Testament Prophet Paul's 1986 apocalyptic vision. What makes Chalmers think that Australians are prepared to shake off our traditional national enemy – complacency – long enough to take risks and make sacrifices?
Trump, in a word. As the election demonstrated, the country is uneasy with the US descent into angry chaos. So are many Americans. Barack Obama made a rare public intervention this week to warn that America was approaching autocracy.
Public officeholders need to honour their vows to protect the constitution, said the former president: 'And when that isn't happening we start drifting into something that is not consistent with American democracy. It is consistent with autocracies. It is consistent with Hungary under Orban. We're not there yet completely, but I think that we are dangerously close to normalising behaviour like that. And we need people both outside government and inside government saying, 'Let's not go over that cliff, because it's hard to recover'.'
This is the 'banana republic' shock of our time. As Chalmers said: 'So much of the democratic world is vulnerable because governments are not always meeting the aspirations of working people. We have a responsibility here and an obligation. A responsibility to rebuild confidence in liberal democratic politics and economic institutions – by lifting living standards for working people in particular.'
In essence, the treasurer is asking us to be more than ourselves. He's testing our patriotism. 'And if we fail it won't be because of a shortage of ideas, options or choices. It won't be a shortage of courage – but a shortage of consensus. We have everything we need but that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Social media ban for children is ‘destined to fail' unless parents address their own smart phone addiction, pyschologist warns
Australia is just six months away from bringing in a world-leading law to ban children under 16 from social media but experts say more needs to be done before it comes into effect. Psychologist Danielle Einstein, who briefed the draft legislation for the ban, was on Weekend Sunrise on Saturday to address how it could work. Previously Einstein warned the ban would 'fail miserably' unless the federal government tackles screen addiction first. 'We need a few different things. First of all, we need doctors and psychologists asking patients when they come in with mental health issues about their tech use,' she told Weekend Sunrise. 'It should just be part of normal conversation — 'let's have a look, how many hours were you on here?' 'It's a part of the way we are trying to handle ourselves, and if someone has anxiety and depression, and you miss it because it's not seen as alright to ask about it and the doctors are embarrassed or if the patient makes it seem as if it's not OK (for asking).' Einstein said she didn't mean doctors had to go into extreme detail of how a person uses social media and technology but said conversations around tech use needed to be a part of a 'digital health check' in the same way doctors use a suicide screening. She also said a big public health campaign would be needed to 'expose the addictive' nature of social media and the corresponding health effects it may have on Australians. 'Both students and parents may realise that this isn't actually healthy for them,' Einstein said. For parents wondering what to do now, before the ban is imposed, Einstein encouraged adults to lead by example and cut back on their own technology use. 'The most important thing a parent can do is model,' she said. 'Parents need to be aware of what we do when we walk into the house (or when) at the dinner table: 'Do I have a phone that's near me?'' Einstein said using phones during arguments between parents to show the other person they were wrong had also become common practice but this could be easily stopped if phones are put out of sight. Despite the potential difficulties with executing the ban, Einstein said the federal government's decision to prevent harm to young Australian's should be looked at as a 'tremendous success' as other countries look to follow our example. 'We are leading the world, and we should be very proud of that,' Einstein said. 'Around the world, we've seen people wake up and start to question tech use. 'In Spain, there are paediatric guidelines coming out to show children from zero to six shouldn't have technology, aside for supervised use.' The social media ban for children under 16 years old is expected to come into effect in December 2025. The ban was first announced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last year, who said he was 'calling time on it' due to a number of tragic deaths relating to bullying on social media. But there is yet no guarantee technologies aimed at blocking young kids from social media will always work, according to early trial results. While the early findings of a federal government-commissioned trial found age assurance technologies are available, there's no silver bullet. 'Age assurance can be done in Australia and can be private, robust and effective,' the report found. 'We found a plethora of approaches that fit use cases in different ways. 'But we did not find a single ubiquitous solution that would suit all use cases, nor did we find solutions that were guaranteed to be effective in all deployments.' Under the social media ban, platforms will have to take reasonable steps to prevent under-16s from creating new accounts and could face millions in fines for systemic breaches of the new rules. Cabinet minister Murray Watt maintained the need for restrictions around social media. 'The Australian people believe that we do need to see some restrictions around social media use when it comes to young people,' he told ABC News on Friday. 'Unfortunately, it has become an insidious force, both for young people and more widely.' Australia's ban is world-leading and, in the aftermath of the November passage of federal laws, other nations indicated a desire to emulate the measure. However, the legislation does not indicate how exactly the ban will be executed. The report found parental control and consent systems could be effective when first introduced. But there is 'limited evidence' that they would be effective as children grow up or allow kids the right to participate in the breadth of digital experiences. Even after the coalition helped secure an amendment to ensure Australians wouldn't have to provide any form of government identification to verify their age, the trial found there was a risk of privacy breaches. Some age assurance service providers had over-anticipated the needs of regulators and built tools that led to an 'unnecessary and disproportionate collection and retention of data'. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh has urged Labor to confirm what technology or verification tools will be used to protect kids online. 'No more young lives can be lost or families destroyed because of the toxicity of social media,' she said in a statement. The Age Assurance Technology Trial's final report is expected to be published later in 2025.
Mercury
2 hours ago
- Mercury
Labor's plan for night-time economy zones
Don't miss out on the headlines from Tasmania. Followed categories will be added to My News. A Salamanca bar manager has thrown his support behind Labor's plan for night-time economy zones saying they will create jobs and attract young people. Daniel Conway of The Pavilion said restrictions were costing the hospitality sector and venues' takings were down between 20 and 50 per cent on 12 months ago. 'We need to draw people back out, bring them back down to Salamanca and just create a massive culture and just an environment with something for them to do in a fun and safe environment,' he said. 'It is all about growth. Growth equals more jobs, more opportunities. 'It's everything from creating more businesses, pop-ups, entrepreneurship, everything that can make hospitality fun again. 'We should be leaders in tourism and hospitality.' Mr Conway said by having a night-time economy zone in Salamanca it would create activities for young people to enjoy and encourage talented musicians. Labor candidate for Franklin, Amelia Meyers, 19, said with the closure of the Uni Bar many young people were looking at other places to visit at night. 'A lot of us do end up drinking with our friends in the uni accommodation just because it's a bit cheaper and a bit easier, but also there hasn't been as much going on in town and especially in Salamanca,' Ms Meyers said. 'A lot of other states and territories have had a better nightlife than what Hobart has seen.' Labor leader Dean Winter is basing his night-time economy zones on NSW and said concerns of Hobart Lord Mayor Anna Reynolds 'can be overcome'. 'This is a business that had to battle to put TVs outside. This is an area where you still can't have a full band play outdoors despite it being Tasmania's biggest nightlife precinct,' he said. 'We need to have a state government that is going to drive change within local government so we can have a vibrant hospitality sector and a night time economy that's fun and safe. 'This strategy will help revitalise Tasmania's nightlife and contribute to my vision of making our state the easiest place in Australia to do business.' Mr Winter said his bold plan for a night life revival would start in Salamanca and be expanded to Launceston and Devonport. 'Salamanca's markets are iconic in the day time. I see an opportunity to make the precinct iconic in the night time too,' he said. 'What we've seen in our cities over the course of the last few years is businesses that have been curtailed by a red tape from local councils. 'We need to help young people see a future here, and make them want to stay. Our plan is for more housing, well-paid jobs and a night life that is thriving.' Labor also wants to modernise the 35-year-old Liquor Licensing Act and introduce a simplified, low-cost liquor licence for small businesses, pop-up events, and food trucks. Premier Jeremy Rockliff said he had been working with the Tasmanian Hospitality Association on a range of measures to free up red tape to support the hospitality industry.
The Advertiser
9 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Why Ford thinks its Ranger PHEV doesn't need a bigger battery than Shark 6, Cannon Alpha
Ford says its new Ranger PHEV ute is the 'best tool for the job', despite it failing to match key rivals on battery capacity, power, and electric driving range. Launched in the Australian market last month ahead of imminent customer deliveries, plug-in hybrid versions of the Ranger are propelled by the combination of a 2.3-litre turbo-petrol four cylinder engine and a rear-mounted electric motor, producing a combined 207kW of power and 697Nm of torque. The electric motor sources power from an 11.8kWh lithium-ion battery, which caps the ute's electric driving range at a claimed 49km on the NEDC cycle. The Ranger PHEV is one of three plug-in hybrid utes now available Down Under, alongside the BYD Shark 6 and GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV. Both Chinese rivals outgun the Ranger on power, EV range and fuel-efficiency, calling into question the competitiveness of Ford's newest model. However, Ford is hanging its hat on the Ranger PHEV's superior payload and towing capacity. All variants can tow up to 3500kg, and payloads range between 808-973kg. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. The Cannon Alpha equals Ford's Ranger in the towing stakes, but neither the GWM (790kg) nor the BYD (685kg) promise an equivalent payload. It's those attributes that local ute buyers value most, according to senior Ford product executive, Jim Baumbick. "We've always tried to develop the best tool for the job," Mr Baumbick told Australian media at the international launch of the Ranger PHEV. "When you talk to truck customers they want payload and towing. EV range matters, but in context when you're adding more battery you're working counter to the payload and towing. "You can increase the battery size, but then you have to increase the size of other parts to carry that weight. It's about system optimisation. We think it's the right balance for a first application." Ford is also spruiking the vehicle-to-load charging capabilities (V2L) of the Ranger PHEV. It features a pair of 15A power outlets, which allow owners to plug electrical applicances into the vehicle to use it as a generator. Ford dubs this 'Pro Power Onboard' and it offers a total capacity of 6900W, which exceeds the capacity of both the Shark 6 and Cannon Alpha PHEV. Ultimately, Ford has attempted to create an electrified version of Australia's best-selling vehicle that outperforms its diesel stablemates while staying true to the roots of the Ranger brand. "The PHEV isn't just an alternative, it can do everything the diesel can do and then some. The truck is more capable because it's a hybrid. It still does truck things but there's a new thing it can do with exportable power," said Mr Baumbick. "For us, it was about optimising the system for performance, towing and capability. Our target was diesel [performance] or better. "It offers hybrid propulsion, [better] fuel economy, and the superpower of Pro Power Onboard. "It's the right time for a PHEV, and unlocking this new superpower for Ranger. This is going to show our customers the benefits of electrification without any tradeoff to what the truck is capable of." Of the three PHEV utes now available in Australia, the Ranger is the most expensive – the base XLT is priced from $71,990 before on-road costs, more than the most expensive Cannon Alpha PHEV and Shark 6. BYD has already reacted to the arrival of the Ranger PHEV, stating it's not worried about the new electrified ute. "I wouldn't say that we're worried," BYD Australia senior product planning manager, Sajid Hasan told CarExpert. "We respect them, direct competitors, but we're more focused on ourselves and working to expand the Shark 6 lineup and see where that takes us." MORE: Explore the Ford Ranger showroom Content originally sourced from: Ford says its new Ranger PHEV ute is the 'best tool for the job', despite it failing to match key rivals on battery capacity, power, and electric driving range. Launched in the Australian market last month ahead of imminent customer deliveries, plug-in hybrid versions of the Ranger are propelled by the combination of a 2.3-litre turbo-petrol four cylinder engine and a rear-mounted electric motor, producing a combined 207kW of power and 697Nm of torque. The electric motor sources power from an 11.8kWh lithium-ion battery, which caps the ute's electric driving range at a claimed 49km on the NEDC cycle. The Ranger PHEV is one of three plug-in hybrid utes now available Down Under, alongside the BYD Shark 6 and GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV. Both Chinese rivals outgun the Ranger on power, EV range and fuel-efficiency, calling into question the competitiveness of Ford's newest model. However, Ford is hanging its hat on the Ranger PHEV's superior payload and towing capacity. All variants can tow up to 3500kg, and payloads range between 808-973kg. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. The Cannon Alpha equals Ford's Ranger in the towing stakes, but neither the GWM (790kg) nor the BYD (685kg) promise an equivalent payload. It's those attributes that local ute buyers value most, according to senior Ford product executive, Jim Baumbick. "We've always tried to develop the best tool for the job," Mr Baumbick told Australian media at the international launch of the Ranger PHEV. "When you talk to truck customers they want payload and towing. EV range matters, but in context when you're adding more battery you're working counter to the payload and towing. "You can increase the battery size, but then you have to increase the size of other parts to carry that weight. It's about system optimisation. We think it's the right balance for a first application." Ford is also spruiking the vehicle-to-load charging capabilities (V2L) of the Ranger PHEV. It features a pair of 15A power outlets, which allow owners to plug electrical applicances into the vehicle to use it as a generator. Ford dubs this 'Pro Power Onboard' and it offers a total capacity of 6900W, which exceeds the capacity of both the Shark 6 and Cannon Alpha PHEV. Ultimately, Ford has attempted to create an electrified version of Australia's best-selling vehicle that outperforms its diesel stablemates while staying true to the roots of the Ranger brand. "The PHEV isn't just an alternative, it can do everything the diesel can do and then some. The truck is more capable because it's a hybrid. It still does truck things but there's a new thing it can do with exportable power," said Mr Baumbick. "For us, it was about optimising the system for performance, towing and capability. Our target was diesel [performance] or better. "It offers hybrid propulsion, [better] fuel economy, and the superpower of Pro Power Onboard. "It's the right time for a PHEV, and unlocking this new superpower for Ranger. This is going to show our customers the benefits of electrification without any tradeoff to what the truck is capable of." Of the three PHEV utes now available in Australia, the Ranger is the most expensive – the base XLT is priced from $71,990 before on-road costs, more than the most expensive Cannon Alpha PHEV and Shark 6. BYD has already reacted to the arrival of the Ranger PHEV, stating it's not worried about the new electrified ute. "I wouldn't say that we're worried," BYD Australia senior product planning manager, Sajid Hasan told CarExpert. "We respect them, direct competitors, but we're more focused on ourselves and working to expand the Shark 6 lineup and see where that takes us." MORE: Explore the Ford Ranger showroom Content originally sourced from: Ford says its new Ranger PHEV ute is the 'best tool for the job', despite it failing to match key rivals on battery capacity, power, and electric driving range. Launched in the Australian market last month ahead of imminent customer deliveries, plug-in hybrid versions of the Ranger are propelled by the combination of a 2.3-litre turbo-petrol four cylinder engine and a rear-mounted electric motor, producing a combined 207kW of power and 697Nm of torque. The electric motor sources power from an 11.8kWh lithium-ion battery, which caps the ute's electric driving range at a claimed 49km on the NEDC cycle. The Ranger PHEV is one of three plug-in hybrid utes now available Down Under, alongside the BYD Shark 6 and GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV. Both Chinese rivals outgun the Ranger on power, EV range and fuel-efficiency, calling into question the competitiveness of Ford's newest model. However, Ford is hanging its hat on the Ranger PHEV's superior payload and towing capacity. All variants can tow up to 3500kg, and payloads range between 808-973kg. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. The Cannon Alpha equals Ford's Ranger in the towing stakes, but neither the GWM (790kg) nor the BYD (685kg) promise an equivalent payload. It's those attributes that local ute buyers value most, according to senior Ford product executive, Jim Baumbick. "We've always tried to develop the best tool for the job," Mr Baumbick told Australian media at the international launch of the Ranger PHEV. "When you talk to truck customers they want payload and towing. EV range matters, but in context when you're adding more battery you're working counter to the payload and towing. "You can increase the battery size, but then you have to increase the size of other parts to carry that weight. It's about system optimisation. We think it's the right balance for a first application." Ford is also spruiking the vehicle-to-load charging capabilities (V2L) of the Ranger PHEV. It features a pair of 15A power outlets, which allow owners to plug electrical applicances into the vehicle to use it as a generator. Ford dubs this 'Pro Power Onboard' and it offers a total capacity of 6900W, which exceeds the capacity of both the Shark 6 and Cannon Alpha PHEV. Ultimately, Ford has attempted to create an electrified version of Australia's best-selling vehicle that outperforms its diesel stablemates while staying true to the roots of the Ranger brand. "The PHEV isn't just an alternative, it can do everything the diesel can do and then some. The truck is more capable because it's a hybrid. It still does truck things but there's a new thing it can do with exportable power," said Mr Baumbick. "For us, it was about optimising the system for performance, towing and capability. Our target was diesel [performance] or better. "It offers hybrid propulsion, [better] fuel economy, and the superpower of Pro Power Onboard. "It's the right time for a PHEV, and unlocking this new superpower for Ranger. This is going to show our customers the benefits of electrification without any tradeoff to what the truck is capable of." Of the three PHEV utes now available in Australia, the Ranger is the most expensive – the base XLT is priced from $71,990 before on-road costs, more than the most expensive Cannon Alpha PHEV and Shark 6. BYD has already reacted to the arrival of the Ranger PHEV, stating it's not worried about the new electrified ute. "I wouldn't say that we're worried," BYD Australia senior product planning manager, Sajid Hasan told CarExpert. "We respect them, direct competitors, but we're more focused on ourselves and working to expand the Shark 6 lineup and see where that takes us." MORE: Explore the Ford Ranger showroom Content originally sourced from: Ford says its new Ranger PHEV ute is the 'best tool for the job', despite it failing to match key rivals on battery capacity, power, and electric driving range. Launched in the Australian market last month ahead of imminent customer deliveries, plug-in hybrid versions of the Ranger are propelled by the combination of a 2.3-litre turbo-petrol four cylinder engine and a rear-mounted electric motor, producing a combined 207kW of power and 697Nm of torque. The electric motor sources power from an 11.8kWh lithium-ion battery, which caps the ute's electric driving range at a claimed 49km on the NEDC cycle. The Ranger PHEV is one of three plug-in hybrid utes now available Down Under, alongside the BYD Shark 6 and GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV. Both Chinese rivals outgun the Ranger on power, EV range and fuel-efficiency, calling into question the competitiveness of Ford's newest model. However, Ford is hanging its hat on the Ranger PHEV's superior payload and towing capacity. All variants can tow up to 3500kg, and payloads range between 808-973kg. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. The Cannon Alpha equals Ford's Ranger in the towing stakes, but neither the GWM (790kg) nor the BYD (685kg) promise an equivalent payload. It's those attributes that local ute buyers value most, according to senior Ford product executive, Jim Baumbick. "We've always tried to develop the best tool for the job," Mr Baumbick told Australian media at the international launch of the Ranger PHEV. "When you talk to truck customers they want payload and towing. EV range matters, but in context when you're adding more battery you're working counter to the payload and towing. "You can increase the battery size, but then you have to increase the size of other parts to carry that weight. It's about system optimisation. We think it's the right balance for a first application." Ford is also spruiking the vehicle-to-load charging capabilities (V2L) of the Ranger PHEV. It features a pair of 15A power outlets, which allow owners to plug electrical applicances into the vehicle to use it as a generator. Ford dubs this 'Pro Power Onboard' and it offers a total capacity of 6900W, which exceeds the capacity of both the Shark 6 and Cannon Alpha PHEV. Ultimately, Ford has attempted to create an electrified version of Australia's best-selling vehicle that outperforms its diesel stablemates while staying true to the roots of the Ranger brand. "The PHEV isn't just an alternative, it can do everything the diesel can do and then some. The truck is more capable because it's a hybrid. It still does truck things but there's a new thing it can do with exportable power," said Mr Baumbick. "For us, it was about optimising the system for performance, towing and capability. Our target was diesel [performance] or better. "It offers hybrid propulsion, [better] fuel economy, and the superpower of Pro Power Onboard. "It's the right time for a PHEV, and unlocking this new superpower for Ranger. This is going to show our customers the benefits of electrification without any tradeoff to what the truck is capable of." Of the three PHEV utes now available in Australia, the Ranger is the most expensive – the base XLT is priced from $71,990 before on-road costs, more than the most expensive Cannon Alpha PHEV and Shark 6. BYD has already reacted to the arrival of the Ranger PHEV, stating it's not worried about the new electrified ute. "I wouldn't say that we're worried," BYD Australia senior product planning manager, Sajid Hasan told CarExpert. "We respect them, direct competitors, but we're more focused on ourselves and working to expand the Shark 6 lineup and see where that takes us." MORE: Explore the Ford Ranger showroom Content originally sourced from:
