logo
Students remove pillars to stop ‘encroachment' of Government College for Girls ground in Ludhiana.

Students remove pillars to stop ‘encroachment' of Government College for Girls ground in Ludhiana.

Time of India28-05-2025

Ludhiana: Students of Government College for Girls (GCG) on Wednesday protested against the installation of pillars and fence in the college ground. They raised slogans against authorities for allowing such 'encroachment' of making a fence in the college ground.
Controversy erupted as part of the GCG ground being fenced to turn it in into a parking space for Durga Mata Mandir across the road. But the students protested the move and said that the land belonged to the college where they hold their sports activities.
"We need this space for sports and other activities. We practice here and this space cannot be taken away. The college would expand, such encroachment and giving away of the college land should not be done," Jasman Kaur, a student of the college said.
"The college land belongs to the students and it should not given to anyone under any condition," Anita, another protesting student said.
It is pertinent to mention that Rajya Sabha MP Sanjeev Arora had written to Punjab education minister Harjot Singh Bains that the land of Government College for Girls should be allotted for parking for Durga Mata Mandir.
But after the activity for earmarking land started taking place in the sports ground, students got to know about it and started protesting against the move.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
They also held protest at DC office on Monday in this regard, but still fencing of the land started. "This is highly ironic that the the government college land is being allocated for parking. Even though this government has been making big claims about improving education, here prime land of a reputed educational institute is being grabbed.
We have been asking under which rule or authority was such step was being done in the college, but nobody is answering.
The land belongs to the students," said Ranvir Singh, president, Punjab Students' Union.
"The MP or the ministry or the administration should come forward and debate with us why this land is being allocated for parking purpose. Alternatives for parking space for temple should be explored, but land of the college cannot be given at any cost. The is the space for the colleges and students. Action must be taken against the contractors and all involved who started encroaching the college ground," Amandeep Singh Kheowali, national coordinator for Punjab Students' Union.
Educationists have also condemned the move. Brij Bhushan Goyal from SCD Government College Alumni Association said, "The Government College for Girls should be given grant for research and institute and made a deemed university. But instead, even the existing land of the college is being encroached upon," he said. "An educational institute that has given so much to Punjab, so many students from the college are serving as educationists.
This too is a temple of education, and land is being encroached upon to make space for temple parking is highly condemnable. No educated person would tolerate such encroachment," he said.
Former principals express shock
Manjit Kaur Sodhia, former principal, Government College for Girls, said, "I have been really perturbed ever since I got to know about this. Even if I have to lay my life, I will do it, but I will not let even an inch of the land of my college to be encroached upon.
There have been such attempts earlier as well. When I was a principal, we had stopped such attempts," she said. "This land is only and only for education and for students.
When I was the principal, then MP Lala Lajpat Rai about 35 years ago and the govt tried to get this ground land allocated and many other attempts were made, but I put my foot down. No individual has rights to interfere in the college and try to encroach upon or grab the land of the college," she said.
Another former principal Dr Mohinder Kaur Grewal said, "We had never allowed such a situation to escalate. Though the ground is for a short duration like 5-7 days is given on lease for exhibitions etc, but never for a regular parking space.. I have been a student here, then taught and became the principal here. There were such attempts earlier when we used to be told and got letters from authorities, but we never let it happen.
We used to get orders, and even used to get letters, we have been resiting and fighting. Anything and everything is happening for vote bank politics these days," she said. "It is the primary responsibility of the staff to safeguard the institution," she said. "Students, teachers and principal must take a stand and don't let the land be given at any cost whatsoever," she added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Have supplies of several weeks': Puri assures fuel stability amid US-Iran strikes; India leans on Russian Crude
'Have supplies of several weeks': Puri assures fuel stability amid US-Iran strikes; India leans on Russian Crude

Time of India

time10 hours ago

  • Time of India

'Have supplies of several weeks': Puri assures fuel stability amid US-Iran strikes; India leans on Russian Crude

NEW DELHI: As military conflict escalates between Israel and Iran, Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri on Sunday assured citizens that India's fuel supplies remain secure despite growing volatility in the Middle East. 'We have diversified our supplies in the past few years, and a large volume of our energy no longer passes through the Strait of Hormuz,' Puri posted on X, adding that Oil Marketing Companies have 'supplies for several weeks' and continue to receive fuel from multiple routes. His comments come as India dramatically increased Russian oil imports in June, buying more crude from Moscow than from all Middle Eastern suppliers combined. According to preliminary data from Kpler, Indian refiners are set to import 2 to 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) from Russia, up from 1.96 million bpd in May. In comparison, total imports from traditional Gulf partners like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait are projected to be slightly lower at around 2 million bpd. US strikes add to region's instability The latest geopolitical instability stems from a direct US military intervention in Iran. Yesterday, American forces bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, joining Israel's June 13 attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Tehran has responded with strong warnings, including threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global chokepoint through which 40% of India's oil and 50% of its gas transits. Analysts believe a full closure is unlikely. 'Iran would risk hurting allies like China and Gulf neighbours, as well as provoke military retaliation,' said Sumit Ritolia of Kpler. 'At most, isolated disruptions could occur for 24–48 hours.' India's energy strategy pivots India's import strategy has shifted significantly since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Russian oil now makes up about 40-44% of India's crude basket, compared to under 1% before the war. US oil imports have also jumped, from 280,000 bpd in May to 439,000 bpd in June. Ritolia says India is now better prepared for supply shocks. 'Russian barrels come via routes detached from Hormuz. India is also sourcing more from the US, West Africa, and Latin America,' he noted. In the event of disruption, India may dip into its strategic reserves, which can cover around 9–10 days of imports. For now, Puri reiterated the government's commitment: 'We will take all necessary steps to ensure the stability of fuel supplies for our citizens.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Par panel to discuss judges' code of conduct
Par panel to discuss judges' code of conduct

Time of India

time10 hours ago

  • Time of India

Par panel to discuss judges' code of conduct

A Parliamentary panel is set to discuss the code of conduct for judges in the higher judiciary , even as the government is poised to move an impeachment motion against former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma . The judge is under scrutiny over the recovery of unaccounted for cash from his national capital residence. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice, in a meeting on Tuesday, will discuss the issue and will also deliberate on the post-retirement assignments of judges. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "The Committee will hear the Secretary, Department of Justice on the subject 'Judicial processes and their reform' concerning issues of Code of Conduct for the judges of higher judiciary and taking up post-retirement assignments by judges," a notice sent by the committee secretariat informed members of the panel. The Committee of the Rajya Sabha is headed by BJP MP Brij Lal and has former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, who is a nominated MP, former minister of state for law P P Chaudhary, TMC MPs Sukhendu Sekhar Ray and Kalyan Banerjee, Congress's Vivek Tankha, and DMK's P Wilson and A Raja as its key members. Live Events While Justice Varma is likely to be impeached, the Opposition has already given a notice for the same action against Allahabad High Court judge Justice Shekhar Yadav. After the cash recovery, Justice Varma was repatriated to his parent court, the Allahabad High Court. He has denied the charges against him. The Rajya Sabha Secretariat is also verifying the signatures of the MPs who signed the impeachment notice against Justice Yadav for an alleged hate speech he gave. The secretariat has already written to the MPs to confirm their signatures.

Netizens slam Pakistan's 'hypocrisy' and 'servility' over Trump Nobel nomination after Iran strikes: 'What greater betrayal could there be to Muslims'
Netizens slam Pakistan's 'hypocrisy' and 'servility' over Trump Nobel nomination after Iran strikes: 'What greater betrayal could there be to Muslims'

Time of India

time16 hours ago

  • Time of India

Netizens slam Pakistan's 'hypocrisy' and 'servility' over Trump Nobel nomination after Iran strikes: 'What greater betrayal could there be to Muslims'

Pakistan's Shahbaz Sharif The Pakistani government and its powerful military establishment are facing a wave of public backlash after formally recommending US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, a move that drew widespread condemnation following the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan's deputy prime minister and foreign minister Ishaq Dar sent a letter to the Nobel Committee in Norway, crediting Trump's 'decisive diplomatic intervention' during the recent India-Pakistan standoff. But the recommendation triggered a storm on social media after Trump ordered attacks on Iran's Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites, an operation he called a 'historic moment' and one that escalated regional tensions. On X (formerly Twitter), users accused the Pakistani government of appeasing its 'master.' One user mocked, 'Pakistanis, beware! After the attack on Iran, PM Shehbaz might not only award Trump the Nobel Peace Prize, but also Tamgha-e-Jurat, Tamgha-e-Shujaat, Tamgha-e-Basalat, Tamgha-e-Imtiaz, and perhaps even the Nishan-e-Haider!' Veteran journalist Ameer Abbas recalled that PML-N leader Khawaja Saad Rafique had once likened Trump to Genghis Khan and Hitler. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo 'Now, the same government nominates him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Who is orchestrating such shameful and cowardly decisions?' he asked. Raheeq Abbasi, political analyst and columnist, noted the irony, 'Trump, who vetoed the Gaza ceasefire 8 times and is protested across the West for war crimes, is being nominated for a Nobel by the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Is there no sense of honour left?' The backlash cut across ideological lines. Some users accused the military establishment of calling the shots. 'The uncrowned kings are ready to sell out the nation whenever they please,' wrote Major (R) Asim. Another user, Jarjees Ahmad, called out the 'supreme level of hypocrisy', 'We're nominating someone involved in the massacre of Palestinians while claiming to stand with Iran.' Aamir Khan added, 'What greater betrayal could there be to Muslims, our country, and the people of Pakistan?' The Pakistani government has yet to respond officially to the criticism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store