
Will the US hand space leadership to China by pulling Nasa out of Mars race?
White House moves to cancel Nasa's flagship Mars sample return programme amid sweeping budget cuts would leave
China's Tianwen-3 mission – set to deliver around 600 grams (21 ounces) of Martian material to Earth by 2031 – alone in the race.
Advertisement
The White House recommended ending funding for the mission, already subject to major cost overruns and delays, in its 2026 budget proposal which is expected to be finalised by Congress and the White House in coming months.
'While the United States and China are battling on Earth for leadership in
the global economy, the US is giving their leadership role in space to China,' said Yuqi Qian, a planetary geologist at the University of Hong Kong.
Qian, who works with international collaborators to study the volcanological history of the moon and other rocky bodies in space, said the White House was introducing substantial uncertainties for the US and its allies.
'The reversal of the joint Mars sample return mission between Nasa and the European Space Agency is a prime example. The team has already made significant progress collecting samples via the Perseverance rover since 2021,' he said.
Advertisement
Nasa's international partners might be prompted by such a move to rethink their cooperation with the US, according to Qian.
'It would certainly weaken US leadership in space, especially as China is rolling out well-planned, ambitious programmes to return Martian samples and send humans to the moon.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
11 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US attacks on Iran stoke debate over Trump's presidential power: ‘this is not our fight'
US President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. Advertisement 'Well done, President Trump,' Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on social media. Alabama Senator Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical'. The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate – and correct – decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime'. The instant divisions in the US Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorisation from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first US president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Advertisement Democrats and a few Republicans said the strikes were unconstitutional and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson.


RTHK
2 days ago
- RTHK
No nuclear talks unless Israel stops attack, says Iran
No nuclear talks unless Israel stops attack, says Iran Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghch says Tehran would not resume negotiations with the United States until Israel stopped its attacks. Photo: Reuters Iran said on Friday it would not discuss the future of its nuclear programme while under attack by Israel, as Europe tried to coax Tehran back into negotiations and the United States considers whether to get involved in the conflict. A week into its campaign, Israel said it had struck dozens of military targets, including missile production sites, a research body it said was involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran and military facilities in western and central Iran. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said there was no room for negotiations with the US "until Israeli aggression stops". But he later arrived in Geneva for talks with European foreign ministers at which Europe hopes to establish a path back to diplomacy. US President Donald Trump said on Friday he was unlikely to press Israel to scale back its airstrikes to allow negotiations to continue. "I think it's very hard to make that request right now. If somebody is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing, but we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens," he said. Speaking to reporters after his plane landed in Morristown, New Jersey, Trump said he doubted European negotiators would be able to secure a ceasefire. "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one," Trump said. Trump also said that Iran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible US air strikes, indicating he could take a decision before the fortnight deadline he set a day earlier. "I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum," Trump told reporters when asked if he could decide to strike Iran before that. Trump had said in a statement on Thursday that he would "make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks" because there was a "substantial chance of negotiations" with Iran. Those comments had been widely seen as opening a two-week window for negotiations to end the war between Israel and Iran. But his latest remarks indicated Trump could still make his decision before that if he feels that there has been no progress towards dismantling Iran's nuclear program. On Friday, Trump again disagreed with his own national intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, by insisting that Iran does have the capability to build a nuclear weapon. "She's wrong," Trump said. Gabbard testified to Congress in March that the US intelligence community continued to judge that Tehran was not working on a nuclear warhead. (Agencies)


South China Morning Post
3 days ago
- South China Morning Post
SpaceX Starship explodes in setback to Elon Musk's Mars mission
A SpaceX Starship rocket exploded on a test stand in Texas, adding to a series of setbacks to Elon Musk's space ambitions that include trips to Mars. The huge blast enveloped the craft as it stood upright on a test stand, before massive plumes of flames and smoke mushroomed into the night sky, video footage of the incident late Wednesday showed. The incident shook windows and rattled dishes, according to local media reports. The rocket appeared to be undergoing a routine 'static fire test' of its engines. A static fire test is a pre-launch procedure in which a rocket's engines are fired while the rocket remains securely held down on the ground – essentially a rehearsal for the real launch, allowing engineers to test the rocket's systems without actually sending it into space. Musk said on social media that a specialised bottle that holds nitrogen is likely to have failed. 'If further investigation confirms that this is what happened, it is the first time ever for this design,' he said.