Assam govt to invoke a forgotten law to identify and expel illegal migrants

The government of Assam is all set to revive a 75-year-old law that enables the state authorities to push back illegal immigrants upon identification without the need to approach the judiciary every time read more
The Assam government is working on reviving the use of a 75-year-old previously overlooked law in a bid to push back illegal immigrants from the state. As per the law, the state will be able to remove illegal migrants without any form of judicial intervention and immediately after their identification.
On Saturday, Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma noted that a constitutional bench of the Supreme Court, while hearing a case on Section 6A of the Citizenship Act (October 2024), had maintained that there is no legal requirement for the Assam government to always approach the judiciary in regards to illegal immigrants, The Times of India reported.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'There is an old law called the Immigrants Expulsion Order (1950), and during a hearing on Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court said this Act is still valid. Under its provisions, even a district commissioner can issue an order for immediate pushback of illegal immigrants,' the Assam CM said on Saturday.
'For whatever reason, our lawyers had not informed us about this, and we weren't aware of it either,' Sarma added. He revealed that in the past few days, the entire matter has come to light, and the state government will now discuss it seriously.
The process of identifying foreigners will be sped up: Assam CM
The Assam CM noted that the process of identifying illegal immigrants and pushing them back from the state will be sped up now that the government is aware of the law. 'The process of identifying foreigners, which had paused due to NRC-related matters , will now be sped up a bit,' he said.
'This time, if someone is identified as a foreigner, we don't send them to a tribunal. We will straightaway push them back. Preparations for this have been ongoing over the last few days,' he added. Sarma also maintained that those who have moved courts will not be pushed back for now.
In his statement, Sarma was referring to the five-member Constitution Bench headed by then Chief Justice DY Chandrachud . On October 17, 2024, the bench upheld the validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act in a 4:1 majority, with Justice JB Pardiwala giving the sole dissenting opinion.
In their joint order, Justices Surya Kant, MM Sundresh and Manoj Misra said that the provisions of the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950, 'shall be effectively employed for identification of illegal immigrants.'
About the 1950 law
The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950 (IEAA) empowers the central government to order the expulsion of any person or class of persons who came into Assam from outside India, either before or after the commencement of the Act. The act can be implemented to deal with someone who stays in Assam and is detrimental to the interests of the general public of India or any Scheduled Tribe in Assam.
The constitutional bench also noted that the IEAA granted 'the Central Government the power to direct the removal of immigrants who are detrimental to the interests of India.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'If there is any other piece of legislation, such as the IEAA, under which the status of an immigrant can be determined, we see no reason why such statutory detection shall not also be given effect to, for deportation. We thus hold that the provisions of IEAA shall also be read into Section 6A and be applied along with the Foreigners Act, 1946, for detection and deportation of foreigners,' the judges stated in their order.
It is pertinent to note that the law was enacted even before the immigrants from West and East Pakistan were considered foreigners under the Foreigners Act . According to the Statement of Objects and Reasons, the Act was enacted to deal with the large-scale immigration of migrants from East Bengal to Assam.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Organised crime knows no boundaries, fosters terrorism & wrecks economy: Bombay HC

Nagpur: Organised crime is not limited by borders and has a devastating impact on the country's economy and internal security by enabling , Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court observed while overturning a lower court order that denied police custody of a member of a crime syndicate. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, while granting seven-day police custody to , 33, under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), said, "organised crime is a serious threat to society and is fuelled by illegal wealth generated by contract killing, extortion, narcotics trade, ransom kidnappings, money laundering, and protection rackets." The court rejected the special MCOCA court's May 3 ruling, which denied police custody on the limited ground that the probe was focused on tracing bank accounts and property. Justice Joshi-Phalke said the special court failed to consider crucial aspects of the investigation, including the accused's ongoing role in a larger organised crime syndicate. "MCOCA can be invoked even if direct crime involvement is absent, but syndicate nexus is established," the judge said. "Black money generated by organised crime has had a serious adverse effect on our economy. These syndicates have made a common cause with terrorist gangs," the court said, while affirming that MCOCA empowers agencies to intercept communications and pursue complex networks that threaten national security. The court was hearing a revision plea filed by the state against the lower court's refusal to grant police custody. Yadav was arrested in a March 14 assault case registered in Yerla, Kalmeshwar, where he and a co-accused allegedly attacked a man with a sickle. Though the case was initially registered under Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), further investigation revealed a pattern of serious, repeat offences allegedly committed for pecuniary gain — prompting the application of MCOCA. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The prosecution submitted that Yadav had at least nine criminal cases against him, with seven still pending. "He is a repeat offender operating for economic gain. His actions fit the definition of continuing unlawful activity under MCOCA," the state counsel contended, while urging custodial interrogation to investigate deeper links within the crime syndicate. The high court agreed, stressing that even if an individual may not have committed a particular act of organised crime directly, their nexus with a syndicate or with repeated unlawful acts could still justify invoking MCOCA. "A nexus with the crime syndicate is enough to attract the Act," Justice Joshi-Phalke said, citing Supreme Court's precedent in the Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma case. She ruled that police must be given a fair opportunity to probe syndicate structures, pecuniary trails, and unlawful activities under the wider framework of MCOCA. "In light of the legislative intent, denial of custody would amount to frustrating the purpose of the law," the court said while quashing the lower court's orders. Key Takeaways from Bombay High Court Ruling MCOCA can be invoked even if direct crime involvement is absent, but syndicate nexus is established. Illegal wealth and black money generated by organised crime has had a serious adverse effect on our economy. Crime syndicates have made a common cause with terrorist gangs Lower court erred by focusing on financial investigation grounds for police custody. Continuing unlawful activity with pecuniary motives qualifies under MCOCA. Seven prior pending cases against the accused supported the State's plea Police must be allowed custodial access to probe deeper syndicate links.

Time of India

3 hours ago

• Time of India

Delhi govt to implement uniform admission age of six years for class 1 from 2026-27; seeks public suggestions

New Delhi: The Delhi government has announced the implementation of a uniform minimum age of six years for admission to class 1 and a restructuring of the foundational stage of school education in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009, starting from the 2026-27 academic session. According to a circular issued by the Directorate of Education (DoE), the foundational stage will be reorganised to include three years of pre-primary education prior to Class 1. The move aims to align Delhi's school system with the 5+3+3+4 structure recommended under the NEP. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ductless Air Conditioners Are Selling Like Crazy [See Why] Keep Cool Click Here Undo The 5+3+3+4 structure introduced under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 replaces the earlier 10+2 system and reorganizes school education into four developmental stages: five years of the foundational stage, three years of the preparatory stage, three years of the middle stage and four years of the secondary stage. The circular stated that children will be admitted to nursery (also referred to as pre-school or 'Bal Vatika') at the age of three years, to lower KG (pre-school 2) at four years and to upper KG (pre-school 3) at five years. Live Events The admission to class 1, according to the circular, will be allowed only upon completion of six years of age from the academic year 2026-27 onwards. The nomenclature for pre-primary classes is flexible and may be revised as required, it said. The Directorate of Education further stated that all government, government-aided and recognised unaided private schools under its purview are expected to comply with the revised age criteria and foundational structure as per the new directives. In an effort to make the process participatory, the Directorate has invited suggestions and inputs from stakeholders, including parents, teachers, students, the school management, subject experts, professionals, scholars and members of the public, before July 10, the circular added.

Indian Express

3 hours ago

• Indian Express

Former RLP worker arrested for ‘issuing death threats' to MP Upendra Kushwaha

Patna Police Saturday arrested a former party worker for allegedly issuing death threats to Rashtriya Lok Morcha president Upendra Kushwaha. The suspect has been identified as Rakesh Kumar alias Bharat Bhushan Tiwari, a resident of Darouli police station in Siwan district who left the party a few days ago. According to the Patna Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Kartikeya Sharma, Kushwaha received seven threatening calls and a message on his official mobile number on June 19 – all allegedly made in the name of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang. The calls were allegedly made over speculation that Rajya Sabha MP was rethinking alliances ahead of the upcoming Bihar assembly election. Kushwaha's RLP is currently part of the National Democratic Alliance. The leader had attended Prime Minister rally in Siwan Friday. Kushwaha had tweeted about the threats late Thursday, claiming he had received calls from two mobile numbers between 8:52 pm and 9:20 pm. '…at 8:57 PM, I received an MMS/SMS…stating that if I continue to speak politically against a particular party, I will have to face the consequences, and that I would be finished within 10 days,' the Rajya Sabha member's post on X said, urging the Patna Police to take action. SSP Sharna said an FIR had been registered at Secretariat Police Station Friday under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Information Technology (IT) Act based on a written complaint by his (Kushwaha's) personal assistant. The Special Intelligence Unit conducted a technical investigation to trace the origin of the calls, he said. The SSP claimed that the mobile phone used in the incident has been recovered from the accused. 'We have also recovered a diary from him which contains the contact numbers of several prominent individuals and various other people. He had attempted to contact several people and in the course of this, he spoke to the MP on three occasions,' he said. During interrogation police learnt 'the accused thought that Kushwaha might join another party, which is why he issued the threats'. 'He claims to be his (Kushwaha's) supporter but was recently dissatisfied with some of his statements, which led to the threats,' SSP Sharma said, adding that the suspect had no link with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi.