Why Aussie shouldn't worry about oil prices
Australian motorists are being urged not to panic after the price of crude oil rose in recent days on the back of the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.
Motorists in Australia could be spared from the worst of the fallout from the Middle-East, even as the price of the commodity surges.
Futures markets for Brent oil have spiked in recent days and are now buying $US75 a barrel, when it was just over $US65 this time last week.
It comes as tensions out of the Middle East flare up, after Israel undertook pre‑emptive attacks on Iran.
It said the strikes were aimed at eliminating Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missile capabilities, but the fears in the market are based on what Iran will do in response. The price of crude oil has spiked in recent days. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
If it hits neighbouring oilfields or blocks the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 per cent of the world's oil supplies are shipped, the price of the commodity could skyrocket.
But NRMA spokesman Peter Khoury said every time there were geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, there was an initial knee jerk reaction from the market before it stabilised.
He said Australian motorists should remain calm.
'What we are seeing here is an initial reaction to what has happened in the last few hours in Iran, but this is not uncommon,' he told NewsWire.
'Until you see those increases rise and they start occurring in the Asian markets then Australian motorists shouldn't be panicking.'
Mr Khoury said currently there were no issues that there will be supply issues.
'It is important that it is put into context – we get our oil from Asia, we get our refined fuel from Asia, so there's no need to panic,' he said.
AMP chief economist Shane Oliver wrote in his latest note fuel prices could be on the rise, but it would need the price of oil to remain elevated.
'Oil prices were already rising this month on signs of increasing risks and have spiked further – with the rise so far this month threatening a flow of around 12 cents a litre for Australian petrol prices if sustained at these levels,' he said. Australian motorists could be spared the worst of the fallout. NewsWire / Flavio Brancaleone Credit: News Corp Australia
Swissoquote Bank senior analyst Ipek Ozkardeskaya said the price of oil would either rise or fall depending on Iran's response.
'One scenario is de-escalation, which could bring oil back below $US70 per barrel, around the 200-day moving average, shifting the market's attention back to supply-demand dynamics, trade disruptions, and renewed pressure on Russian oil,' she wrote in an economic note.
'The other scenario is broader escalation, potentially pushing oil prices toward $US90 –$100 per barrel – hopefully only temporarily.'
Dr Oliver said the flow on impacts from this could see inflation spike over the short term.
'While petrol prices could spike on the latest Israel/Iran conflict, the RBA is likely to look through any boost to inflation as temporary and focus more on any drag to growth.'
Despite the rise in costs, Dr Oliver reminded motorists the price of crude oil had just gone back to levels it was this time last year.
He also believes subdued consumer confidence, weak business conditions and easing inflation would all add to a case for a rate cut.
'Following the weak March quarter GDP data our base case is for 0.25 per cent rate cuts in July, August, November and February taking the cash rate to 2.85 per cent.
The money market sees about an 88 per cent chance of a 0.25 per cent cut in July and just over three cuts by year end.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Scott Morrison: Donald Trump's strikes on Iran a necessary measure to achieve peace, not war in Middle East
The recent strike by the United States on Iran's nuclear facilities marks a critical turning point in global security. It is not just a matter for the Middle East or for U.S. foreign policy. It is a test for all nations that rely on the strength and credibility of the international rules-based order and the western alliance for their security, Australia included. Let me be clear, this strike was not an act of provocation. It was a necessary measure, undertaken as a last resort by a President who wants peace, not war. The purpose was clear, to disrupt the capabilities of a brutal authoritarian regime that has openly defied international norms, supported terrorist proxies, and pursued nuclear weapons with increasing brazenness. In times of geopolitical crisis, clarity of purpose and principle is essential. That is why I was compelled to speak out following the U.S. operation. What we have seen instead from the Australian government is a concerning lack of clarity and a reluctance to define where Australia stands when it matters most. It is in times like this when allies look around to see who is with them. For a country like ours, deeply integrated into global economic and security networks, reliant on open trade routes and US led allied deterrence, strategic ambiguity is not a strength. It is a vulnerability. Throughout my time as Prime Minister, I took the view that Australia's interests are best served when we speak plainly and act decisively in defence of our values. That is why we stood firmly with our allies against China's economic coercion. It is why we invested in AUKUS, strengthening our sovereign defence capabilities and deepening our technological integration with the U.S. and UK. it is why we worked so closely with our Indo-Pacific partners through the Quad to uphold regional stability. It is why we stood with Israel against those who sought their annihilation. In this context, the U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear facilities must be understood for what it is: an act of strategic deterrence, grounded in the reality that Iran has long been operating outside the bounds of good faith diplomacy. It is what President Trump meant when he spoke of peace through strength. For years, Iran has methodically violated its obligations under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), enriching uranium well beyond civilian thresholds, restricting IAEA inspections, and hardening its facilities in preparation for exactly this kind of confrontation. Attempts to revive the nuclear deal have failed, not because the West abandoned diplomacy, but because Tehran refused to comply with the very terms it had previously accepted. The question facing policymakers in Washington and, indeed, in Canberra is not whether we prefer diplomacy over conflict. Of course we do. It is whether diplomacy alone can halt a regime that has no intention of negotiating in good faith. At a certain point, the cost of inaction outweighs the risk of confrontation. That is precisely where the United States found itself. Given Iran's refusal to cooperate with international monitors and its aggressive posture across the region, including arming Hezbollah, enabling Hamas to commit atrocities on innocent Israelis, supporting Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping, the Trump administration concluded that a targeted strike was the only viable option left. Only the US could have taken this step and President Trump should be commended for his courage and leadership, especially by allies. This was not a broad campaign. It was a calibrated operation aimed at degrading the most advanced elements of Iran's nuclear infrastructure specifically, targeting Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow. The objective was not regime change. It was to halt Iran's progression toward nuclear weapons capability and to send a clear message that the West's red lines still mean something. Yet here in Australia, the official response from the government has been muted. No strong statement of support for the United States. That silence is telling. It suggests a reluctance to confront difficult choices and to support our most important ally in the righteousness of the actions that have taken. I believe that such an approach is short-sighted and fundamentally misjudges the nature of the challenge we face. Australia cannot afford to be passive in moments like this. Our voice matters, not just because we are a U.S. ally, but because we are a middle power with global responsibilities. We sit at the intersection of East and West, of advanced democracies and rising developing powers. Our stance sends signals across the region, from Beijing to Moscow, Jakarta to Seoul. We must make the case for resistance against authoritarian arrogance. That doesn't mean we should follow Washington blindly. It means we must be clear, consistent and credible in how we support a global order that has protected our prosperity and security for generations. This is a time for strategic clarity, not importantly, we must ensure our own defences are fit for purpose. AUKUS is not a theoretical construct. It is a practical framework for dealing with the kinds of threats we are now seeing unfold. That means accelerating delivery timelines, investing in sovereign capabilities, and ensuring that deterrence in our own region is not eroded by distraction or delay. The world is entering a more dangerous phase. The era of risk aversion is over. Strategic competitors are testing our resolve, our alliances, and our willingness to act in defence of shared values. The choices we make now will define the kind of world our children inherit. We must choose clarity over confusion. Strength over silence. And principle over passivity. We must know who we stand with. That is the standard Australia has upheld in the past. And it is the standard we must uphold again now
Man of Many
3 hours ago
- Man of Many
Toyota Unveils ‘First-Ever' Performance Hybrid LandCruiser 300 Series
By Somnath Chatterjee - News Published: 22 June 2025 |Last Updated: 21 June 2025 Share Copy Link Readtime: 3 min Every product is carefully selected by our editors and experts. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more. For more information on how we test products, click here. Toyota has announced a new LandCruiser 300 Series with a powerful one-motor hybrid powertrain . . The automaker claims this will be the ' most powerful LandCruiser to date '. '. The first-ever performance hybrid LandCruiser 300 Series will arrive in Australia in H1, 2026 . . Further details on the new LandCruiser will be made available closer to its Australian introduction. The most powerful LandCruiser ever is headed Down Under. Toyota has announced that the much-loved LandCruiser 300 series is getting a major upgrade, confirming that for the first time, it will be available with a one-motor hybrid powertrain instead of the traditional diesel engine. That's right, come early next year, you can expect to see a LandCruiser hybrid hit the road with a 3.5-litre twin-turbo petrol V6 engine paired alongside a large electric motor. The big off-roader's watershed moment marks a significant step in Toyota's continued electrification strategy, with the brand outlining plans to offer customers a 'mix of powertrain technologies to support their varied lifestyles'. Hybrids are not new to the Toyota brand, having first appeared in October 2001 with the introduction of the Prius to Australia. This time around, however, the brand is introducing the technology on its flagship off-road model. 2026 Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series GXL Model Interior | Image: Toyota Australia Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series Hybrid According to Toyota, the parallel hybrid configuration means that both the engine and the motor can power the wheels either together or separately. In terms of the numbers, the petrol hybrid LandCruiser comfortably sails past its diesel sibling with figures of 341kW/790Nm vs 227kW/700Nm on the diesel model. Harnessing all that power is a standard 10-speed automatic, paired with a four-wheel drive system with a low-range transfer case. As Toyota Australia vice president sales, marketing and franchise operations Sean Hanley revealed, the new hybrid configuration not only continues the brand's electrification journey, it also makes this LandCruiser the fastest iteration ever released. 'For decades, Australians have trusted the LandCruiser to get them to the furthest reaches of the country and back again – it is synonymous with Australian outback touring thanks to its incredible capability and dependability,' Hanley said. 'We have always said that Toyota aims to offer the right powertrains to suit our customers, and we are excited to introduce the first performance hybrid LandCruiser next year, which will offer a level of capability never before seen on our flagship four-wheel drive.' Also, the hybrid powertrain will add more refinement and greater touring range, with an efficiency of about 10.9 km based on the specs of the model available in the UAE market. Details will be revealed for the Australian market close to the launch. 2026 Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series Hybrid Revealed | Image: Toyota Australia Hybrid LandCruiser Release Information Set to arrive by the first half of 2026, the LandCruiser's performance hybrid powertrain has been extensively tested across the world's harshest environments to match the capability and rugged nature of the LandCruiser moniker. The performance hybrid LandCruiser 300 Series is clearly aimed at the Nissan Patrol, which in turn will come later next year with a twin-turbo V6 petrol engine. It seems that the new battleground for these SUVs is combining petrol power with electrification of some sort as carmakers look to maintain the rugged appeal of these beasts while expanding their appeal to cater to a wider market.
AU Financial Review
4 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Patent ‘trolls' come for Canva as it prepares for share sales
Canva is being targeted by a Canadian serial litigant alleging the Australian design software giant has stolen its patents for an artificial intelligence voice generator that is now integrated into its platform. Cedar Lane Technologies has made similar claims against hundreds of companies over the last five years including Amazon, Zoom and Huawei. Its lawyer, Isaac Rabicoff, has lodged separate patent claims against Canva in Texas on behalf of other companies over the last two months.
