Retailleau ruined relations with Algeria, and the French colonization was brutal.
The French Press Agency (AFP) acted suspiciously in the interview it conducted with the French historian, Benjamin Stora, last Wednesday, focusing on a small aspect of the dialogue related to the role of memory in reviving relations between Algeria and France, while ignoring more important points concerning the heinous crimes of French colonialism in Algeria and the role of the far-right, represented by the Minister of the Interior, Bruno Retailleau, in destroying the bridges of communication between the two countries.
The French Press Agency summarized the interview in a brief dispatch that various French media outlets covered last Wednesday, while the full interview was only disseminated through the agency's YouTube channel on Saturday, May 24. The full interview was rich in details of great importance that the dispatch did not mention.
It was striking in following the 'video dialogue,' which lasted for 35 minutes, the disappearance of many points that the French historian discussed regarding Algerian-French relations from the past and present, especially concerning the description of the occupation crimes during the initial period of colonization that lasted for eighty years, as well as the crisis instigated by the far-right to destroy the relations between Algeria and Paris.
What Benjamin Stora said: 'The French colonization of Algeria cannot be considered a trivial matter, because it was a colonization unlike any other.
There was a colonial invasion that lasted for eighty years. It was truly horrific; there were atrocious massacres that the French only discovered recently. Entire villages and cities were destroyed, and this cannot be ignored. There were burnings (the caves), forced relocations of Algerians from their land, and their confinement in camps.'
He adds: 'These are painful memories in the history of Algerians that cannot be underestimated. Algeria was part of France, not just a protectorate like Morocco and Indochina. France's borders, until the 1960s, extended south to Mali, Niger, Libya, and Mauritania… The French believed it was impossible to abandon Algeria, which is rich in oil, gas, phosphate, and gold, which led some of the French people to consider Algeria's independence a betrayal.' General Charles de Gaulle was accused of committing this betrayal, and he was the target of assassination attempts several times until his death in 1970.
As for the telegram reported by the French Press Agency last Wednesday (France Press), it focused on the role of memory in bridging the gap between the two countries. It quoted Stora: 'We need strong initiatives, especially regarding the issue of French colonization of Algeria in the 19th century.
But today, in my opinion, considering the possibility of launching memory initiatives could serve as an alternative to resuming political relations,' which is 'necessary to resolve issues of immigration or visas.'
The agency also overlooked an important aspect of the dialogue, which is the role of Algeria in driving rapprochement through memory. Benjamin Stora pointed out that the idea of creating a joint committee of Algerian and French historians originated in Algeria, and it was an initiative that should have been capitalized on.
The historian emphasized that the committee cannot write a shared history because each side has its own perspective. The French consider colonialism as bringing civilization to Algeria, while the Algerians view it as the main reason for the killing of millions, the theft of their wealth, and their illiteracy.
In the opinion of the French historian, progress on the memory front could have alleviated tensions through initiatives from the French president, which were embodied in Macron's acknowledgment that the French state is responsible for the assassination of Maurice Audin, Ali Boumendjel, and the martyr Arab Ben Mhidi.
However, the controversial shift in the French stance on the Sahrawi issue led to the stifling of that initiative, which was proposed after its crystallization during the visit of French President Emmanuel Macron to Algeria in the summer of 2022.
He also accused France of making decisions that intensified the crisis, as it 'reduced the number of visas granted to Algerians without announcing it, from 400 to 200 or 250 thousand, and Algerians are aware of this.
Requesting a visa from a holder of a diplomatic passport is considered reaching the brink of a break, which I don't think will happen because there are millions of people from both sides and shared ties of land and lineage.'
Stora was asked if he would play the role of mediator to resolve the crisis between the two countries, to which he replied: 'The mediator must be accepted by both parties of the crisis. There is no search for a mediator. The crisis has reduced communication channels. I was indeed received by the two presidents in 2020 and 2021, but many things have changed today; we are in 2025.' He hinted that the French Minister of the Interior is responsible for the deterioration of these bilateral relations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
El Chorouk
14 hours ago
- El Chorouk
French Interior Minister Tries to Bargain With Algerian Authorities
After an undeclared truce by French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, he once again dug into the ashes of the escalating political and diplomatic crisis between the two countries. The occasion was the release of social media influencer and activist Boualem Nouamane, following the end of his three-month administrative detention. Following this release, the French Interior Minister found himself facing a defeat in his confrontation with the state he considers his archenemy. Bruno Retailleau has been unable to deport Boualem Nouamane to his native Algeria by any means possible, despite more than six months of administrative and judicial attempts against him. Therefore, the minister in François Bayrou's government issued press statements confirming that he had not given up despite his failed efforts to deport Boualem Nouamane. However, the provocative tone he usually employs in the media when discussing Algeria disappeared this time, in what appeared to be an attempt to project a deceptive sense of calm that no longer fooled the Algerian authorities. Commenting on Boualem Nouamane's release from administrative detention, Bruno Retailleau told the French private television channel BFM TV: 'We will present him (Boualem Nouamane) to the Algerian authorities, as they are responsible,' he claimed, to obtain consular authorisation to deport him to Algeria. The man appeared desperate to get a response from the Algerian authorities in this regard, stating, 'There is an agreement signed between Algeria and France, and based on this agreement, we will see if someone's identity is known. The country of his origin must receive him.' On January 9, the French Interior Minister deported Boualem Nouamane to Algeria without obtaining a deportation permit issued by the Algerian consulate in France. This prompted Algerian authorities to return him on the same day's flight. This drastic decision drove Retailleau to the brink of madness, accusing the Algerian authorities of 'insulting' France, as he claimed. Although Bruno Retailleau initially refused to comment on the decision to release influencer Boualem Nouamane, his provocative and hostile stances toward the Algerian authorities prevented him from exerting self-control. For several weeks, he has refrained from mentioning Algeria, despite having spoken about it frequently morning and night. This has drawn sharp criticism from many French politicians, who have accused him of 'Algeria obsession.' Two days ago, Bruno Retailleau was asked about the Boualem Nouamane case on CNews, a channel known for its far-right stance. He responded by saying he preferred to 'stay silent.' However, he quickly corrected himself, confirming that he 'will regain his freedom to discuss this issue (the case of the influencer Boualem)' after the trial of Franco-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, who is serving a five-year prison sentence in Algeria for his involvement in harming Algeria's territorial integrity. The trial of Boualem Sansal is expected to begin in an appeal session less than a week from now (June 24) before the Algiers Judicial Council. This means that the French Interior Minister is counting on an Algerian judicial decision that satisfies the French authorities; otherwise, he will reconsider the case of 'influencer Boualem,' in what appears to be a cheap bargain by the French minister. It is clear from Retailleau's statement that he is linking the case of Boualem Nouamane, who spent more than half a century of his life on French soil, 15 of which were legal, to another legally unrelated case: the case of Boualem Sansal, who was implicated in criminal offences that could have been punished more severely, namely, harming Algeria's territorial integrity.
El Chorouk
3 days ago
- El Chorouk
Paris seeks forgiveness from Polynesian residents for nuclear explosions
A report prepared by a French parliamentary committee, which has been unveiled, concluded that France must apologize to the residents of 'Polynesia' for the nuclear tests conducted by Paris in its atolls. This development increases pressure on the French authorities, who still refuse to respond to Algerian demands regarding the memory file. The report, circulated on Tuesday, June 17, spoke of the 'necessity' for France to apologize to the residents of Polynesia, a group of islands located in the far southeast Pacific Ocean, still under French control, because the French nuclear tests, which spanned three decades from 1966 to 1996, caused serious health and environmental problems for the region's residents. The report's authors stated that 'seeking forgiveness is not merely symbolic, nor is it a request for repentance,' emphasizing that 'this must be a sincere approach, and an essential step in the reconciliation process between French Polynesia and the state,' as written by the committee chairman, MP Didier Le Gac, and the rapporteur, MP Moerana Redon-Arbellot. The report also noted that dealing with this part of French history in a 'calm' manner is a 'sober act,' and Parliament must 'make this gesture on behalf of the nation.' The report also recommended establishing a committee of historians and researchers 'to conduct in-depth work focused on studying all archives related to France's nuclear testing policy in French Polynesia,' which aims to form 'the historical basis for shared memory,' noting that Paris had conducted at least 193 nuclear tests in Polynesia under the auspices of the Pacific Testing Center. Algeria and Polynesia share a history of French crimes. Algeria, in turn, was subjected to no less than 17 nuclear explosions in the south of the country (Reggane and Wadi Namous) between 1960 and 1966. These tests enabled France to acquire nuclear weapons, but in return, they left the lands contaminated with nuclear radiation and chemical waste, causing many incurable diseases that affected residents and animals due to radioactive pollution. The local social security agency in Polynesia estimated the cost of radiation-induced diseases at more than 1 billion euros and intends to pass a bill in this regard. Meanwhile, the issue of compensation for victims of the 30-year nuclear tests remains thorny, according to the French news agency, 'France Presse,' which indicated that local residents (Polynesians) are still awaiting official recognition of the diseases caused by the nuclear explosions. While the French parliamentary report acknowledges the serious health and environmental consequences for Polynesia and proposes a series of recommendations regarding victim care and compensation, and the recognition and remediation of environmental damage, Paris insists on not recognizing its responsibility for the tests it conducted in southern Algeria and even refuses to compensate victims based on what it called the 'Morin Law,' enacted in 2010, which has not been activated until now due to the bureaucratic and scientific obstacles set by this law, preventing Algerian victims from receiving compensation, so that not a single Algerian victim has been compensated to date, 15 full years after the issuance of this law. The issue of French nuclear explosions in southern Algeria is among the files that have contributed to the exacerbation of relations between Algeria and Paris, because French President Emmanuel Macron has not made any progress in this regard, despite its obvious dangers, while he has spoken of symbolic initiatives such as seeking forgiveness from the family of the activist who supported the Algerian revolution, Maurice Audin, and recognizing the French state's responsibility in the heinous assassination of Larbi Ben M'hidi and Ali Boumendjel. The French parliamentary initiative regarding nuclear explosions in the far southeast Pacific Ocean could bring the file of nuclear tests in southern Algeria back to the forefront, because Paris insists on a policy of moving forward. It still refuses to clean the areas where the explosions were carried out of radiation and nuclear waste, and also refuses to compensate Algerian victims of these explosions, despite the existence of a law that stipulates this.
El Chorouk
5 days ago
- El Chorouk
French Newspaper Refuses to Publish Article on Algeria by 'Impartial' Historian
Malika Rahal, a French historian and writer of Algerian origin, exposed the lie of freedom of expression in France, revealing a secret she had kept for about three months. However, she was forced to disclose it after realizing that the freedom of the press, so lauded in France, is merely a lie. Malika Rahal revealed that she was commissioned to write an article for the French newspaper 'Libération' at the same time the newspaper intended to prepare a file on Algerian-French relations, which are experiencing one of their worst periods in over six decades. However, this left-leaning newspaper, known for its centrism and criticism of right-wing ideas, withheld publication of the article for reasons that remain unclear. The writer and historian Malika Rahal stated: 'I was commissioned to write an article in mid-March 2025, as part of a file published in 'Libération' on relations between France and Algeria, a file coordinated by researcher Paul Max Morand. After the first version, I was asked to produce a longer version to conclude the series.' She added: 'During discussions with the editorial board, objections were raised, but the explanations provided were deemed satisfactory. Nevertheless, the publication of the article was continuously delayed, without any explanation given to Paul Max Morand, the person in charge of the file, or to me (Malika Rahal). Its publication has now become pointless after more than a month since the last article in the series was published in April 2025.' The writer was forced to publish her article in another platform known for its anti-colonial and anti-colonialist stances, after realizing that the French newspaper was not serious about honoring its commitment to a distinguished historian and writer of Malika Rahal's caliber. This raises more than one question about the remaining credibility of values that France and other Western system countries have long defended, namely freedom of expression and the press. 'Relations in the Time of Retailleau and Gaza' The French newspaper did not clarify the reason for its reluctance to publish the article, which was titled 'Algerian-French Relations in the Time of Retailleau and Gaza.' However, its content indicates that those in charge of 'Libération,' which is considered one of the strongholds of French media not hostile to Algeria and immigrants in general, are no longer as they once were. Instead, it has become like other French newspapers, controlled by considerations that have nothing to do with freedom of expression. Among what was stated in Malika Rahal's article: 'French-Algerian relations have been in crisis since 2024 when France, like the United States, joined in affirming Morocco's (alleged) sovereignty over Western Sahara. One of the elements explaining this recognition is the role played by Morocco in normalizing relations with Israel (the Zionist entity) at the African Union level and at the Arab world level, where Morocco joined the Abraham Accords in 2020. Undoubtedly, other factors in French policy contribute to this recognition, but since that date, the previous model of bilateral relations no longer seems to work, with more violent tensions and unexpected reactions from both sides. On the French side, the intensity of statements and belligerent stances is inconsistent with the recent development of French society, but conversely, their impact on the people of this country can be devastating.' It seems that the newspaper's management could not tolerate some of the 'stings' contained in the article, such as the role played by the French Minister of Interior in undermining the multi-ethnic and multi-religious French society due to his racist statements and stances, as well as the struggle led by Algerians against French occupation, which ended long decades of colonial darkness and became an inspiration for many peoples in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, as Malika Rahal wrote. The article also touched upon the nature of French settler colonialism in Algeria, and its transfer of the equivalent of one million Europeans (Pieds-Noirs), which was one-tenth of the Algerian population, and what accompanied it of 'the genocidal ambition to eliminate the indigenous population, which is a constant feature in cases of settler colonialism, as colonizers seek to seize their lands and impose their status in the country,' in addition to the forced displacement and massacres suffered by Algerians at the hands of the French occupation army, which was ultimately defeated with Algeria gaining its independence and ending the illegal situation that gave the European group what it did not deserve at the expense of the legitimate rights of Algerians.
