Treasury yields ease with US stocks flat to up; investors assess US tax bill

NEW YORK : Thirty-year U.S. bond yields reached their highest level in 19 months before easing on Thursday, with worries lingering over the U.S. fiscal outlook and demand for government debt, while stocks on Wall Street ended flat to slightly higher.
The U.S. dollar strengthened after recent losses.
Yields rose earlier after the U.S. House of Representatives passed President Donald Trump's tax bill by a single vote, adding to worries about the country's debt load.
Moody's late last week became the last of the major credit rating agencies to strip the U.S. of its coveted triple-A status.
The recent selloff sent bond prices lower, which attracted some buyers. Yields, which move inversely to prices, dipped.
The 30-year bond yield was down 3.7 basis points at 5.0521 per cent late Thursday. The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes was down to 4.551 per cent. During the session it had reached 4.629 per cent, the highest since February 12.
The Nasdaq ended higher, while the S&P 500 and Dow finished flat, following sharp declines in the previous session. Shares of Nvidia were up 0.8 per cent, while Alphabet climbed 1.4 per cent.
"Tech is the market's security blanket at this point," said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. "It's seen as the leader."
The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.35 points to 41,859.09, the S&P 500 fell 2.60 points, or 0.04 per cent, to 5,842.01 and the Nasdaq Composite rose 53.09 points, or 0.28 per cent, to 18,925.74.
Shares of solar energy companies fell as Trump's tax bill is expected to end a number of green-energy subsidies. First Solar shares ended down 4.3 per cent.
The bill would deliver new tax breaks on tips and car loans and boost spending on the military and border enforcement. The Congressional Budget Office estimates Trump's tax-cut bill will add $3.8 trillion to the $36.2 trillion in U.S. debt over the next decade.
Soft demand for a $16 billion sale of 20-year bonds on Wednesday increased concerns about reduced interest in U.S. debt.
Benchmark 10-year yields and 30-year yields have both risen by around 50 basis points this month.
"The Treasury market is looking for a circuit breaker," said Ed Al-Hussainy, senior rates analyst at Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Among other things, "this can come in the form of poor labor market data to bring forward (Federal Reserve) cuts and trigger a reassessment of the strength of the economy."
Also on Thursday, German long-term bond yields hit a two-month high.
MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe fell 2.94 points, or 0.34 per cent, to 871.01. The pan-European STOXX 600 index fell 0.64 per cent.
Data showed Britain's government borrowed more than expected in April, euro zone business activity unexpectedly slipped back into contraction territory.
The euro stumbled after the data, while the U.S. dollar rose after three days of losses. The euro was last down 0.41 per cent at $1.1283. Against the Japanese yen, the dollar strengthened 0.29 per cent to 144.08.
Bitcoin, meanwhile, rose again to an all-time high, partly as investors sought out alternatives to U.S. assets. Bitcoin was last up 3.25 per cent at $111,795.31.
A report that OPEC+ is discussing a production increase for July weighed on oil prices.
Brent futures fell 47 cents, or 0.72 per cent, to settle at $64.44 a barrel. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude eased 37 cents, or 0.6 per cent, to settle at $61.20.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNA

6 hours ago

• CNA

I started using corporate lingo ironically – and now I can't stop

I nodded as a coworker listed out a few suggestions on ways her team and mine could collaborate in the next few months. 'Yeah, that sounds like a good way to synergise,' I said. And then we both made a face. Almost a decade ago, when I started my first official 'office job', I made a silent vow to myself that I would never become One of Those. A corporate drone on autopilot, mindlessly regurgitating buzzwords and key phrases day in and day out to no real end until I would one day reach my final form: a glorified LinkedIn bot. I didn't really 'use' corporate lingo so much as make fun of it – in a good-natured, tongue-in-cheek sort of way. It was a quick fix for lightening the mood for everybody, myself included: 'Well, since that project fell through, guess that's one less loop to close, huh?' But these days, I find myself starting to slip into corporate lingo unironically, the same way I started doing years ago with skinny jeans, emojis, and the acronym 'LOL'. LINGO LIMBO More people are expressing annoyance or frustration with it these days, especially on social media, but make no mistake – corporate lingo is nothing new. From the 'value chains' of the 1980s and 1990s to the 'key performance indicators' you hear your own manager wax on about today, such jargon has long been a mainstay of working life. Like with most things that eventually trigger widespread discussions and accusations online of being 'annoying' or 'cringe', there's a legitimately useful element to corporate lingo's villain origin story. Business and work have grown more complex over the last few decades. Thanks to globalisation, the systems we operate in have become more interconnected and as a result, more expansive and intricate. So have the individual roles we play in those systems. We started needing quicker, simpler ways to sum up big or complicated ideas – or ideas that weren't that big or complicated, but were just a mouthful to say. After all, it's definitely easier to say 'outsourcing' than 'farming this out to a peripheral individual, group or organisation so I have more time and energy to focus on more important things'. But over time, something happened to corporate lingo: People started creating buzzwords and phrases for things and situations that didn't seem to require it at all. We stopped postponing or revisiting discussions of an issue and started 'circling back' instead. We eschewed talking to each other and started 'touching base' instead. And then people started 'checking in', but not just any checks, mind you. Temperature checks. Sense checks. Vibe checks. Instead of coining new terms to neatly condense big, complicated ideas, we now seem to be finding overly complex ways to phrase very simple things. WHEN YOU SAY NOTHING AT ALL Again, it's not a bad thing to develop lingo over the course of engaging with other fellow humans in labour. Well before we became office dwellers, plenty of colloquialisms from agricultural work had been leaving the farm to become part of everyday English. For example, "No reason to have a cow about that" or "beat a dead horse". Such jargon of yore does the work it's meant to do, which is to replace a wordy sentiment or thought process with a bite-sized turn of phrase. In comparison, what exactly does the phrase 'moving the needle' accomplish, particularly when in most cases, you immediately have to go on to explain exactly what needle you're hoping to move and in which direction? (Yes, we've done it, we've made shop-talk more efficient – all we had to do was transform our seven-word statement into a 15-word run-on behemoth.) The danger is when we're more concerned about communication for communication's sake, rather than the purposes and objectives for which we're communicating. Are we trying to be in the know, or simply appear so to others? Are we really achieving or improving productivity, or just performing it? MAKE WORK JARGON WORK AGAIN Either way, corporate lingo is here to stay. The exact words and phrases in rotation may come and go, but humans will always want to find a way to jazz up interpersonal communication simply because we're creative, social beings. So is there a way to salvage this? (Or, for the corporate jargon-heads out there: What are the actionable insights and key takeaways to be derived from this?) For my part, I still find myself resisting what I feel are inorganic attempts to shoehorn unnecessary lingo into conversations about work, but I'm trying not to be pedantic about it. If someone says 'Can we align or bridge the gap on this?', I respond, 'Sure, what's unclear right now?' If someone says 'Can I get a sense check on when this might be completed?', I give them a date. (But maybe I'll also have a little rant to a fellow coworker later on about why the question can't simply be 'When will this be done?') Instead of the snark I used to deploy perhaps a little too freely in response to cringey corporate jargon, I try to reach for the same attitude I employ whenever I'm speaking with someone who may not be entirely fluent in English – if I understand what they're saying, maybe how they're saying it doesn't have to matter as much. Still, at the end of the day, there's never any harm in asking, plain and simple: 'What do you mean?'

Business Times

14 hours ago

• Business Times

Taiwan central bank says US debt rising too fast may impact trust in Treasuries

[TAIPEI] Taiwan's central bank governor warned on Saturday (Jun 21) that rapidly rising US debt could be 'unfavourable' to the outlook for US Treasuries and that US President Donald Trump's trade policies have made investors cautious. Taiwan's US$593 billion in foreign exchange reserves are more than 80 per cent made up of US Treasury bonds, according to the central bank, which said earlier this month that Treasuries were 'sound' and still favoured by investors. It added that there were no worries about the US dollar's position as the leading international reserve currency. Governor Yang Chin-long, in a speech posted on the central bank's website, said Trump's repeated criticisms of the US Federal Reserve's monetary policy have caused concerns about its independence. 'In addition, Trump 2.0's trade policy has made investors hesitant about holding US Treasury bonds; Trump's budget, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' may cause US debt to expand too quickly, which is unfavourable to the outlook for US sovereign debt,' he said. 'All of these have had a significant impact on the international monetary system centred on the US dollar and based on US creditworthiness.' Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill is the centrepiece of his domestic agenda. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The bill would lead to a larger-than-expected US$2.8 trillion increase in the federal deficit over the decade, despite a boost to US economic output, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected on Tuesday. Trump, in his first few weeks in office, also announced sweeping tariffs on a broad swathe of countries and trading partners, including Taiwan, only to pause them for 90 days in April to allow for talks to take place. Yang said Trump had been hoping the tariffs could resolve the US trade deficit. 'However, the tariff policy not only fails to solve the structural problems, it will also impact the US economy, and threaten to further affect the outlook for global trade and the economy.' REUTERS

CNA

14 hours ago

• CNA

South Korea's trade chief heads to US from Jun 22 as Trump tariffs cast long shadow

SEOUL: South Korea's Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo will visit the United States from Jun 22 to Jun 27, the trade ministry said on Saturday (Jun 21), amid intensifying concerns over the impact of US tariffs. The visit will include discussions with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and the third round of bilateral technical discussions, a ministry official told Reuters. Further details about the meetings were not disclosed. The two countries began trade talks in April, with Seoul seeking a path to slash the stiff tariffs US President Donald Trump is angling to impose. South Korea is currently facing a 10 per cent blanket tariff and a 25 per cent country-specific duty temporarily paused for 90 days. It agreed with the US during initial trade negotiations in April to craft a trade deal reducing tariffs by Jul 8. However, political uncertainty triggered by leadership upheavals had stalled progress. "Since a South Korea-US summit has yet to take place and key ministers have not been appointed under the new administration, negotiations are likely to focus on areas that the trade ministry can manage - excluding major issues such as defence cost-sharing and exchange rates," Heo Yoon, an economics professor at Sogang University, said. "Given these circumstances, reaching a comprehensive agreement on key negotiation frameworks and agendas is expected to be challenging." The announcement of Yeo's trip to Washington comes days after South Korea launched a task force on negotiations with the US. It comprises industry ministry officials overseeing trade, manufacturing, energy and investment. According to the Industry Ministry, it will deal with tariff and non-tariff matters across industry and the energy sector, while also coordinating with the private sector. Yeo, who heads the task force, said the team has a major responsibility as "businesses and the public have experienced great difficulties due to US tariff measures".